Global financial crisis and relevance of GRI disclosure in Italy. Insights from the stakeholder theory and the legitimacy theory

Author/s Luca Fornaciari, Caterina Pesci
Publishing Year 2018 Issue 2018/1 Language English
Pages 36 P. 67-102 File size 410 KB
DOI 10.3280/FR2018-001003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

In this study, we examine the effects of voluntary disclosure on the market value of Italian-listed companies adopting GRI guidelines, interpreting our results in the light of both stakeholder theory and legitimacy theory. From a methodological viewpoint, an index is used to measure the level of disclosure of human resources and environmental information. We consider a sample of firms listed on the Milan Stock Exchange for an eleven-year period (2004-2014). The period chosen gave us the opportunity to assess the value-relevance of environmental and social information before and during the Global Financial Crisis. We supplement the previous literature on the topic of the relationship between social and environmental disclosure and value-relevance by arguing that sustainability tools have to be evaluated, remembering that they express a notion of value in the long term and provide information to a large number of stakeholders. Our findings show that environmental information is only value-relevant during the crisis period, when the shareholder perspective comes more into line with other stakeholder perspectives because they are seeking a middle-to-long run notion of value. Finally, we find that a high level of GRI information disclosure is positively evaluated by investors; this result is important also because it was obtained in the Italian market which is largely considered inefficient, and thus it supports the urgent need to provide high-quality information in each type of market.

Keywords: Social and environmental reports, global financial crisis, global reporting initiative guidelines, stakeholder theory, value relevance.

  1. Acemoglu D., Johnson S., Robinson J. and Thaicharoen Y. (2003), Institutional causes, macroeconomic symptoms: Volatility, crises and growth, Journal of Monetary Economics, 50, pp. 49-123, DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3932(02)00208-8
  2. Adams C.A. (2004), The ethical, social and environmental reporting-performance gap, Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 17(5), pp. 731-757. DOI: 10.1108/09513570410567791
  3. Andreaus M. (ed.) (2007), La rendicontazione sociale nei gruppi aziendali. (Milano: McGraw Hill).
  4. Barone E. (1990), The Italian stock market: Efficiency and calendar anomalies, Journal of Banking & Finance, 14(2-3), pp. 483-510.
  5. Barth M.E. (2006), Research, standard setting, and global financial reporting, Foundations and Trends in Accounting, 1(2), pp. 71-165, DOI: 10.1561/1400000002
  6. Barth M.E. and Clinch G. (2009). Scale effects in capital markets-based accounting research, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 36(3-4), pp. 253-288,
  7. Barth M.E., Beaver W.H. and Landsman W. R. (2001), The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: another view, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1-3), pp. 77-104.
  8. Barth M.E., Landsman W.R. and Lang M.H. (2008), International accounting standards and accounting quality, Journal of Accounting Research, 46(3), pp. 467-498,
  9. Bartov E., Goldberg S.R. and Kim M. (2005), Comparative value relevance among German, U.S., and international accounting standards: A German stock market perspective, Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 20(2), pp. 95-119, DOI: 10.1177/0148558X0502000201
  10. Basu K. and Palazzo G. (2008), Corporate Social Responsibility: A Process Model of Sensemaking, Academy of Management Review, 33, pp. 122-136.
  11. Beattie V., McInnes B. and Fearnley S. (2004), A methodology for analyzing and evaluating narratives in annual reports: A comprehensive descriptive profile and metrics for disclosure quality attributes, Accounting Forum, 28(3), pp. 205-236.
  12. Bebbington J. (1999), Compulsory environmental reporting in Denmark: An evaluation, Social and Environmental Accounting, 19(2), pp. 2-4, DOI: 10.1080/0969160X.1999.9651612
  13. Beets S.D. and Souther C.C. (1999), Corporate environmental reports: The need for standards and an environmental assurance service. Accounting Horizons, 13(2), pp. 129-145,
  14. Belal A.R. and Roberts W.R. (2010), Stakeholders’ perceptions of corporate social reporting in Bangladesh, Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), pp. 311-324,
  15. Bouten L., Everaert P. and Roberts R.W. (2012), How a Two-Step Approach Discloses Different Determinants of Voluntary Social and Environmental Reporting, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 39(5-6), pp. 567-605.
  16. Cardamone P., Carnevale C. and Giunta F. (2012), The value relevance of social reporting: evidence from listed Italian companies, Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 13(3), pp. 255-269, DOI: 10.1108/09675421211281326
  17. Carnevale C., Mazzuca M. and Venturini S. (2012), Corporate social reporting in European banks: The effects on a firm’s market value, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19, pp. 159-177,
  18. Cho C.H. and Patten D.M. (2007), The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: a research note, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7-8), pp. 639-647.
  19. Cho C.H., Laine M., Roberts R.W. and Rodrigue M. (2015), Organized Hypocrisy, Organizational Façades, and Sustainability Reporting, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 40(1), pp. 78-94.
  20. Clarckson P.M., Fang X., Li Y. and Richardson G. (2010). The relevance of environmental disclosures for investors and other stakeholder groups: Are such disclosures incrementally informative? Working paper, Social Science Research Network.
  21. Clarkson P.M., Fang X.H., Li Y. and Richardson G. (2013), The relevance of environmental disclosures: are such disclosures incrementally informative? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(5), pp. 410-431,
  22. Clarkson P.M., Li Y., Richardson G.D. and Vasvari F.P. (2008), Revising the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: an empirical analysis, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4-5), pp. 303-327,
  23. Clarkson P.M., Li Y. and Richardson G.D. (2004), The market valuation of environmental capital expenditures by pulp and paper companies, The Accounting Review, 79(2), pp. 329-353.
  24. Connors E. and Silva-Gao L. (2008), The impact of environmental risk on the cost of equity capital: evidence from the toxic release inventory, Working paper.
  25. Contrafatto M. and Rusconi G. (2005), Social accounting in Italy: Origins and developments, Social & Environmental Accounting Journal, 25(2), pp. 3-8, DOI: 10.1080/0969160X.2005.9651737
  26. Cormier D. and Magnan M. (2007), The revisited contribution of environmental reporting to investors’ valuation of a firm’s earnings: An international perspective, Ecological Economics, 32(3-4), pp. 613-626.
  27. Cormier D., Magnan M. and Van Velthoven B. (2005), Environmental disclosure quality in large German companies: economic incentives, public pressures or institutional conditions?, European Accounting Review, 14(1), pp. 3-39, DOI: 10.1080/0963818042000339617
  28. Davis-Friday P., Eng L. and Liu C. (2006), The effects of the Asian crisis, corporate governance and accounting system on the valuation of book value and earnings, The International Journal of Accounting, 41(1), pp. 22-40,
  29. Bénabou R. and Tirole J. (2010), Individual and Corporate Social Responsibility, Economica, 77, pp. 1-19.
  30. Bouten L., Everaert P., Liedekerke L.V., De Moor L. and Christiaens J. (2011), Corporate social responsibility reporting: A comprehensive picture?, Accounting Forum, 35, pp. 187-204,
  31. De Klerk M. and De Villiers C. (2012), The value relevance of corporate responsibility reporting: South African evidence, Meditari Accountancy Research, 20(1), pp. 22-38, DOI: 10.1108/10222521211234200
  32. Deegan C. and Gordon B. (1996), A study of the environmental disclosure policies of Australian corporations, Accounting and Business Research, 26(3), pp. 187-99.
  33. Deegan C. and Rankin M. (1996), Do Australian companies report environmental news objectively? An analysis of environmental disclosures by firms prosecuted successfully by the environmental protection authority, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9(2), pp. 50-67, DOI: 10.1108/09513579610116358
  34. Deegan C. (2002), The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures – a theoretical foundation, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), pp. 282-311.
  35. Dhaliwal D.S., Li O.Z., Tsang A. and Yang G.Y. (2011), Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting, The Accounting Review, 86(1), pp. 59-100,
  36. Easton P.D. (1999), Security returns and the value relevance of accounting data, Accounting Horizons, 13(4), pp. 399-412.
  37. Entwistle G.M., Feltham G.D. and Mbagwu C. (2010), The value relevance of alternative earnings measures: a comparison of pro-forma, GAAP and I/B/E/S earnings, Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 25(2), pp. 261-288, DOI: 10.1177/0148558X1002500205
  38. Freeman R.E. (1984), Strategic Management: A stakeholder approach. (Boston: Pitman).
  39. Freeman R.E., Harrison J.S., Wicks A.C., Parmar B.L. and De Colle S. (2010), Stakeholder theory: the state of the art. (Cambridge).
  40. Graham R., King R. and Bailes J. (2000), The value relevance of accounting information during a financial crisis: Thailand and the 1997 decline in the value of the Bath, Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 11(2), pp. 84-107, DOI: 10.1111/1467-646X.00057
  41. Gray R.H., Owen D.L. and Adams C. (1996), Accounting and accountability: Changes and challenges in corporate social and environmental reporting (London: Prentice Hall).
  42. Gray R.H. (2001), Thirty years of social accounting, reporting and auditing: what (if anything) have we learnt?, Business Ethics: A European Review, 10(1), pp. 9-15, DOI: 10.1111/1467-8608.00207
  43. Gray R.H. (2006), Does sustainability reporting improve corporate behaviour?: Wrong question? Right time?, Accounting and Business Research, International Accounting Policy Forum, pp. 65-88, DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2006.9730048
  44. Gray R.H. (2010), A re-evaluation of social, environmental and sustainability accounting: An exploration of an emerging trans-disciplinary field?, Sustainability Accounting and Management Policy Journal, 1(1), pp. 11-32, DOI: 10.1108/20408021011059205
  45. Greeves L. and Ladipo D. (2004), Added values? Measuring the ‘Value Relevance’ of sustainability reporting. (London: Lintstock Ltd & Imagination (GIC) Ltd).
  46. Guthrie J. and Farneti F. (2008), GRI sustainability reporting by Australian public sector organizations, Public Money & Management, 28(6), pp. 361-366,
  47. Harris M. and Muller III. K. (1999), The market valuation of IAS versus US Gaap accounting measures using Form 20-F reconciliations, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 26(1), pp. 285-312.
  48. Hassel L., Nilsson H. and Nyquist S. (2005), The value relevance of environmental performance, European Accounting Review, 14(1), pp. 41-61, DOI: 10.1080/0963818042000279722
  49. Ho L., Liu C. and Sik Sohn P. (2001), The value relevance of accounting information around the 1997 Asian financial crisis – the case of South Korea, Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics, 8(2), pp. 83-107, DOI: 10.1080/16081625.2001.10510591
  50. Jensen M.C. (2002), Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function, Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), pp. 235-256.
  51. Kothari S.P. and Zimmerman J.L. (1995), Price and return models, Journal of Accounting & Economics, 20(2), pp. 155-192.
  52. Krippendorf K. (1980), Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications).
  53. Lindblom C.K. (1994), The implications of organizational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure, Paper presented at the Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference, New York.
  54. Mitchell R.K., Agle B.R. and Wood D.J. (1997), Theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts, The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), pp. 853-886.
  55. Mia P. and Al-Mamun A. (2011), Corporate social disclosure during the global financial crisis, International Journal of Economics and Finance, 3(6), pp. 174-187.
  56. Mitra S. and Hossain M. (2009), Value relevance of pension transition adjustments and other comprehensive income components in the adoption year of SFAS No. 158, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 33(3), pp. 121-137,
  57. Moneva J.M., Archel P. and Correa C. (2006), GRI and the camouflaging of corporate unsustainability, Accounting Forum, 30(2), pp. 121-137,
  58. Moneva J. M. and Cuellar B. (2009), The value relevance of financial and non financial environmental reporting, Environmental and Resource Economics, 44(3), pp. 441-456. DOI: 10.1007/S10640-009-9294-4.
  59. Morris R.D., Ho B.U.S., Pham T. and Gray S.J. (2004), Financial reporting practices of Indonesian companies before and after the Asian financial crisis, Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics, 11(2), pp. 1-27.
  60. Morris R.D., Pham T. and Gray S.J. (2011), The value relevance of transparency and corporate governance in Malaysia before and after the Asian financial crisis, ABACUS, 47(2), pp. 205-233,
  61. O’Donovan G. (2002), Environmental disclosures in the annual report: extending the applicability and predictive power of legitimacy theory, Accounting, Auditing &Accountability Journal, 15(3), pp. 34-71.
  62. O’Dwyer B. and Owen D. L. (2005), Assurance statement practice in environmental, social and sustainability reporting: a critical evaluation, The British Accounting Review, 37(2), pp. 205-229,
  63. Ohlson J.A. (1995), Earnings, book values and dividends in security valuation, Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), pp. 661-687,
  64. Parker L.D. (2005), Social and environmental accountability research: A view from the commentary box, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(6), pp. 842-860, DOI: 10.1108/09513570510627739
  65. Patten D.M. (2013), Lessons from the third wave: A reflection on the rediscovery of corporate social responsibility by the mainstream accounting research community, Financial Reporting, 2, pp. 9-26, DOI: 10.3280/FR2013-002002
  66. Plumlee M., Brown D. and Marshall S. (2009), Voluntary environmental disclosure quality and firm value: the role of venue and industry type, Working Paper. University of Utah.
  67. Roberts R.W. (1992), Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: an application of stakeholder theory, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(6), pp. 595-612.
  68. Ruf B.M., Muralidhar K., Brown R.M., Janney J.J. and Paul K. (2001), An empirical investigation of the relationship between change in corporate social performance and financial performance: a stakeholder theory perspective, Journal of Business Ethics, 32(2), pp. 143-156, DOI: 10.1023/A:1010786912118
  69. Schadewitz H. and Niskala M. (2010), Communication via responsibility reporting and its effect on firm value in Finland, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(2), pp. 96-106,
  70. Sharfman M. and Fernando C. (2008), Environmental risk management and the cost of capital, Strategic Management Journal, 29, pp. 569-592.
  71. So S. and Smith M. (2009), Value-relevance of presenting changes in fair value of investment properties in the income statement: evidence from Hong Kong, Accounting and Business Research, 39(2), pp. 103-118. DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2009.9663352
  72. Stock J.H. and Watson M.W. (2009), Introduzione all’econometria. (Milano: Pearson Addison Wesley).
  73. Suchman M.C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches, The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), pp. 571-610.
  74. Unerman J. (2000), Methodological issues, reflection on quantification in corporate social reporting content analysis, Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13(5), pp. 667-680, DOI: 10.1108/09513570010353756.
  75. Van der Lann G., Van Ees H. and Van Witteloostuijn A. (2008), Corporate social and financial performance: an extended stakeholder theory, and empirical test with accounting measures, Journal of Business Ethics, 79, pp. 299-310,
  76. Verbeek M. (2006), Econometria (Bologna: Zanichelli).
  77. White H. (1980), A heteroscedasticity consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroscedasticity, Econometrica, 48(4), pp. 817-838.
  78. Wang K., Sewon O. and Claiborne M.C. (2008), Determinants and consequences of voluntary disclosure in an emerging market: evidence from China, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 17, pp. 14-30.
  79. Willis C.A. (2003), The role of the Global Reporting Initiative’s sustainability reporting guidelines, Journal of Business Ethics, 43, pp. 233-237.

  • The level of compliance with the Italian Legislative Decree No. 254/2016 and its determinants: Insights from Italy Valter Cantino, Alain Devalle, Simona Fiandrino, Donatella Busso, in FINANCIAL REPORTING 1/2019 pp.113
    DOI: 10.3280/FR2019-001004
  • Does the Adoption of Planning and Control Tools Influence Performance? Opinions of Grantors and Grantees About Non-profit Projects Giacomo Boesso, Fabrizio Cerbioni, Andrea Menini, in FINANCIAL REPORTING 2/2022 pp.35
    DOI: 10.3280/FR2022-002002
  • Accounting, Accountability and Society Caterina Pesci, Luca Fornaciari, Alice Medioli, Silvia Triani, Teerooven Soobaroyen, pp.225 (ISBN:978-3-030-41141-1)
  • The assurance of non-financial disclosure: A longitudinal analysis of the academic and professional literature Michele Guidi, Marco Giuliani, Maria Serena Chiucchi, Stefano Marasca, in FINANCIAL REPORTING 2/2021 pp.5
    DOI: 10.3280/FR2021-002001
  • The Factors of Integrated Reporting Quality: A Meta-Analysis Madalina Dumitru, Voicu D. Dragomir, in SSRN Electronic Journal /2021
    DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3940094

Luca Fornaciari, Caterina Pesci, Global financial crisis and relevance of GRI disclosure in Italy. Insights from the stakeholder theory and the legitimacy theory in "FINANCIAL REPORTING" 1/2018, pp 67-102, DOI: 10.3280/FR2018-001003