Problem aspects of mediation dispute resolution

Author/s Saida Assanova, Serikkali Tynybekov, Arkhat Abikenov, Sarsengaly Aldashev, Gulyiya Mukaldyeva
Publishing Year 2020 Issue 2020/1 Language English
Pages 19 P. 215-233 File size 136 KB
DOI 10.3280/RISS2020-001013
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Legal features of dispute resolution in the order of mediation are of particular in-terest in connection with the relatively new and unexamined, from a scientific point of view, phenomenon of modernity, arising from increasing processes of globalization and internationalization of legal systems, as well as scientific and technical progress. This article is devoted to the scientific study of the international legal regulation of such phenomena as mediation on the example of the analysis of the legislation of foreign countries, and law of the Republic of Kazakhstan. This article presents various points of view of international and Kazakh scientists on the subject of dispute resolution in the mediation procedure. It was concluded that the mediation has a number of advantages, which satisfies the need of a person, society and the state to solve conflicts quickly and efficiently with minimal losses.

Keywords: Mediator, parties, judicial system, amicable settlement, legal mechanisms.

  1. Akhmach G.M. (2013). Terms of the amicable settlement and the practice of their application. Kharkiv: Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University.
  2. Allahverdova O.V. (2007). Mediation as a socio-psychological phenomenon. Bulletin of St. Petersburg University, 6(2): 151-159.
  3. Barkai J., Kent E. (2014). Let’s stop spreading rumors about settlement and litigation: a comparative study of settlement and litigation in Hawaii courts. Rochester: Social Science Research Network.
  4. Bortnik O. (2009). The amicable settlement in the system of alternative dispute resolution. Problems of Jurisprudence and Law Enforcement, 4: 216-222.
  5. Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan (with amendments and additions as of 05/07/2018) (2015). -- Available from:
  6. Crowley D., Graham K. (2010). Mediation for Managers. Moscow: Interregional Center of Management and Political Counseling.
  7. Davydenko D.L. (2005). The amicable settlement out of court and its settlement by the civil law. Moscow: Moscow State Institute of International Relations.
  8. Directive 2008/52/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council dated May 21, 2008 (regarding certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters) (2008). -- Available from:
  9. Federal Law dated 27.07.2010 N 193-F3 (as amended on 07.23.2013). “On the alternative procedure for the settlement of disputes with the participation of a mediator (mediation procedure)” (2010). -- Available from:
  10. Illuyev A.G. (2013). The introduction of mediation as a means of extrajudicial resolution of disputes in the Russian legal reality. Legal Bulletin of the DSU, 3: 67-71.
  11. Isayenkova O.V. (2016). The civil process in Russia ‒ the main trends. Bulletin of the TSU, 1: 5-10.
  12. Ivleva V.N., Nichkova N.E. (2018). The problem of the mediation procedure as an alternative to litigation in civil proceedings. In Youth Scientific Forum: Electronic Collection of Articles on the Materials of II Student International Scientific-Practical Conference, pp. 365-369. Moscow: Publishing House “MCNO”.
  13. Karmaza O.O., Stefanyshyn N.M., Skhab-Buchynska T.Y., Koroied S.O. (2018). Institute of dispute resolution by the participation of a judge in the court of Ukraine: Joint and different characteristics with the institute of mediation in Ukraine. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 9(5): 1653-1659.
  14. Khudoykina T.V. (2012). Use of mediation as a conciliation procedure in the resolution of legal disputes and conflicts in Russia. Social and Political Sciences, 4: 67-70.
  15. Kizdarbekova A.S., Prudnikova M.Y., Nurzhanova A.S. (2018). On the issue of civil liability for inadequate provision of medical services. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 9(7): 2336-2346.
  16. Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated January 28, 2011 No. 401 “On Mediation” (2011). -- Available from:
  17. Lichman L.G. (2013). The procedure of pre-trial settlement in civil proceedings in Ukraine as a judicial method of resolving a dispute. Bulletin of the High Qualifications Commission of Judges of Ukraine, 1: 32-36.
  18. Masyuk V.V. (2013). Problematic issues of the application of the settlement agreement in civil proceedings. Bulletin of Kherson State University, 1(3): 90-95.
  19. McCain J. (1997). Global Settlement of Tobacco Litigation: Hearing Before the Commerce, Science, and Transportation, U.S. Senate. Collingdale: Diane Publishing.
  20. Muratshina G.P. (2011). The reconciliation of the parties is the most important function of the justice of the peace (comparative legal analysis). History of State and Law, 6: 35-37.
  21. Naukenova D. (2017). What is the judicial practice on the implementation of a pilot project on mediation. -- Available from:
  22. Nosyreva E.I. (2005). Alternative dispute resolution in the United States. Moscow: Gorodets.
  23. Pel M. (2009). Invitation to mediation. Moscow: Interregional Center of Management and Political Counseling.
  24. Resource Mediation Center. -- Available from:
  25. Sheremetyeva A.K. (2013). Mediation as a civil-law method of resolving conflicts in the field of intellectual property. PSU Scientific Notes, 4(4): 1161-1169.
  26. Skuratovskyi M.L. (2011). The amicable settlement: problems of law enforcement. Arbitration and Civil Procedure, 3: 21-26.
  27. Smagulovm D.T. (2017). Overview of the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan “On mediation”. -- Available from:
  28. Sokolyanskyi D.V. (2012). The amicable settlement of the parties in civil proceedings in Ukraine: the formulation of the problem. Relevant Problems of State and Law, 66: 348-353.
  29. Sukhova N.V. (2013). Principles of the mediation process. Bulletin of the Tyumen State-Military University, 3: 154-162.
  30. Svobodnyi F.K. (2013). Professional communication of the mediator: stages and techniques. Civil Society and the Rule of Law, 2: 68-73.
  31. Sycheva O.A. (2013). Possibilities of mediation in resolving administrative and legal disputes. Volga Pedagogical Search, 1(3): 131-136.
  32. Tsibulyak-Kustevich A.S. (2010). Prospects for the introduction of the institution of reconciliation in civil proceedings in Ukraine. Bulletin of the Academy of Advocacy of Ukraine, 18(2): 187-190.
  33. Vasilyeva S.V. (2015). Comparative civil process. Moscow: Alerta.
  34. Yurchenko R. (2011). Commentary to the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan “On Mediation”. -- Available from:
  35. Zhumagulov M.I. (2015). Prospects for the use of the institution of judicial mediation in administrative proceedings. In: International Conference “Administrative Justice: Experience and Problems” June 4-5, 2015, Academy of Public Administration under the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Astana. -- Available from:

  • RETRACTED: Conciliation procedures in civil proceedings: Comparative legal aspect Mariya S. Zhumayeva, Aigul Zh. Kassenova, Gabiden A. Zhailin, Fatima A. Tlegenova, Zhassulan M. Akhmetov, in Conflict Resolution Quarterly /2022 pp.61
    DOI: 10.1002/crq.21343

Saida Assanova, Serikkali Tynybekov, Arkhat Abikenov, Sarsengaly Aldashev, Gulyiya Mukaldyeva, Problem aspects of mediation dispute resolution in "RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'" 1/2020, pp 215-233, DOI: 10.3280/RISS2020-001013