Legal problems of the paternity institution: Child’s rights ensuring issues

Author/s Mikhail A. Gussev, Yessil S. Rakhmetov, Aliya K. Berdibayeva, Ainash Yessekeyeva
Publishing Year 2020 Issue 2020/1 Language English
Pages 20 P. 267-286 File size 131 KB
DOI 10.3280/RISS2020-001016
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The aim of the article is to analyze the paternity as a component of the institution of the family, its modern transformations and the resulting challenges, including modern features of parenthood. The authors show that the modern understanding of paternity is determined by gender identity and social constructs that equalize the rights of all persons who act as guardians of the child. The authors determine that the problem of paternity involves not only civil issues, but also family and in-ternational law. The authors of the article clearly show that paternity can act not only as a voluntary, conscious act, but also as a mandatory legal norm. In particu-lar, the authors note that it is possible to use the method of establishing paternity or delegating part of the authority to raise a child in the context of considering public law and its prevalence over family law. The practical significance of the study is determined by the fact that the importance of establishing the principles, as well as the legal conditions for implementing the functions of paternity, will form not only legal but also social forms and even economic parameters for citi-zens and address issues of ensuring human rights, including the rights of the child.

Keywords: Paternity, marriage, family, child custody.

  1. Adlan A.A., Henk A.M.J., Ten H. (2012). The dilemma of revealing sensitive information on paternity status in Arabian social and cultural contexts. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 9(4): 403-409.
  2. Asano M., Minakata K., Hattori H. (1980). Diagnosis of paternity for cases without mother and without both mother and putative father based on blood group findings from the relatives. Zeitschrift für Rechtsmedizin, 84(2): 135-144. DOI: 10.1007/BF02114582
  3. D’Amico G. (2012). Genetic testing and authentication of paternity after death of the putative father: the bio-history and its “costs”. Springer, Milan.
  4. Elston R.C. (1990). The probability of paternity. In: 13th Congress of the International Society for Forensic Haemogenetics, pp. 327-333.
  5. Freeman M.A., Parker L.S. (2016). Answers to questions that weren’t asked: the ethical complexities of identifying misattributed paternity during the transplant evaluation process. In: Greenberg R.A., Goldberg A.M., Rodríguez-Arias D. (eds.). Ethical Issues in Pediatric Organ Transplantation. Springer International Publishing, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-29185-7_3
  6. Fung W.K, Chung Yu., Wong D. (2002). Power of exclusion revisited: probability of excluding relatives of the true father from paternity. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 116(2): 64-67.
  7. Junge A., Brinkmann B., Fimmers R., Madea B. (2006). Mutations or exclusion: an unusual case in paternity testing. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 120(6): 360-363.
  8. Machado H. (2008). Biologising paternity, moralising maternity: the construction of parenthood in the determination of paternity through the courts in Portugal. Feminist Legal Studies, 16(2): 215-236.
  9. Mayer M., Le Bourdais C. (2019). Sharing parental leave among dual-earner couples in Canada: Does reserved paternity leave make a difference? Population Research and Policy Review, 38: 215-239.
  10. Miller C., Garfinkel I. (1999). The determinants of paternity establishment and child support award rates among unmarried women. Population Research and Policy Review, 18(3): 237-260. DOI: 10.1023/A:1006137601213
  11. Morling N. (2003a). International recommendations for paternity testing standards. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 117(1): 1.
  12. Morling N. (2003b). Paternity testing commission of the international society of forensic genetics. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 117(1): 51-61.
  13. Mossman C. (1998). DNA and the stakes in embodying paternity. In: Spaas L. (ed.). Paternity and Fatherhood: Myths and Realities. Palgrave Macmillan, London. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-13816-6_4
  14. Rédei G.P. (2008). Paternity testing. In: Encyclopedia of Genetics, Genomics, Proteomics and Informatics. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
  15. Report on the situation of children in the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2017). -- Available from:
  16. Sánchez-Castelló I.M. (2017). Maximum number of children per sperm donor based on false paternity rate. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 34(3): 345-348.
  17. Sosiawan A. (2018). Detection of short tandem repeats at 5 loci and amelogenin with cell-free fetal DNA as a specimen in the development of prenatal paternity diagnostic tests. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 8(1): 15.
  18. Sun M. (2016). Mutations of short tandem repeat loci in cases of paternity testing in Chinese. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 130(5): 1203-1204.
  19. Valsecchi Ch. (2016). Fathers by law, fathers by choice. Paternity and illegitimacy between ancien régime and codification in western countries. In: di Renzo Villat M.G. (ed.). Family Law and Society in Europe from the Middle Ages to the Contemporary Era. Springer International Publishing, Cham.
  20. Weichhold G.M., Keil W., Bayer B. (1996). The y-linked locus Y27H39 (DYS19), frequency distribution in South Bavarian and application to paternity testing. In: 16th Congress of the International Society for Forensic Haemogenetics, pp. 641-643.
  21. Zabidi-Hussin Z.A.M.H. (2012). Does nondisclosure of genetic paternity status constitute a breach of ethics? Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 9(4): 413-414.

Mikhail A. Gussev, Yessil S. Rakhmetov, Aliya K. Berdibayeva, Ainash Yessekeyeva, Legal problems of the paternity institution: Child’s rights ensuring issues in "RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'" 1/2020, pp 267-286, DOI: 10.3280/RISS2020-001016