Topic relevance as the basic structuration of the field of consciousness

Autori/Curatori Carlos Belvedere
Anno di pubblicazione 2021 Fascicolo 2021/124 Lingua Inglese
Numero pagine 15 P. 37-51 Dimensione file 212 KB
DOI 10.3280/SR2021-124003
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

My aim is to depict Schutz’s theory of topic relevance as his own distinctive phenomenology of consciousness. I will show that his conception of consciousness is elaborated from at least three types of elements. First, I will disclose Husserl’s influence on Schutz in this matter. I will list a few Husserlian terms that Schutz takes into consideration such as noema, horizon, parts and wholes, attentional ray and passive synthesis. Second, I will show that Schutz turns to Gurwitsch’s idea that consciousness is a field of experience where the previously listed elements are held together and find their relational meaning. Third, I will expose how all these elements taken from Husserl and Gurwitsch are reinterpreted by Schutz as being relative to relevance as a basic phenomenon of our mind’s selective activity which puts at work different levels of our personality according to the schizophrenic ego hypothesis.

  1. C. Belvedere, A. Gros (2019), «The Phenomenology of Social Institutions in the Schutzian Tradition», Schutzian Research, 11, pp. 4374.
  2. P.S. Arvidson (2018), «The Field of Consciousness and Extended Cognition», Human Studies, 41, pp. 21-40,
  3. E. Campo (2015), «Relevance as Social Matrix of Attention in Alfred Schutz», Società, Mutamento, Politica, 6, 12, pp. 117-48, DOI: 10.13128/SMP-17852
  4. R. Cox (1978), Schutz’s Theory of Relevance: A Phenomenological Critique, Dordrecht, Springer.
  5. L. Embree (2004), The Three Species of Relevancy in Gurwitsch, in L. Embree (ed.), Gurwitsch Relevancy for Cognitive Science, Dordrectht, Springer.
  6. L. Embree (2015), The Schutzian Theory of the Cultural Sciences, Cham/Heidelberg/New York/Dordrecht/London, Springer.
  7. L. Embree (2009), Some Philosophical Differences within a Friendship: Gurwitsch and Schutz, in H. Nasu, L. Embree, G. Psathas, I. Srubar (eds.), Alfred Schutz and His Intellectual Partners, Konstanz, Uvk Verlagsgesellschaft mbH.
  8. R. Grathoff (ed.) (1989), Philosophers in Exile. The Correspondence of Alfred Schutz and Aron Gurwitsch, 1939-1959, Bloomington and Indianapolis, Indiana University Press; translated by J.C. Evans, with a forword by M. Natanson.
  9. A. Gurwitsch (2009a), The Collected Works of Aron Gurwitsch (1901-1973), vol. I: Constitutive Phenomenology in Historical Perspective, ed. by J. García-Gómez, Dordrehct/Heidelberg/London/New York, Springer.
  10. A. Gurwitsch (2009b), The Collected Works of Aron Gurwitsch (1901-1973), vol. II: Studies in Phenomenology and Psychology, ed. by Fred Kersten, Dordrehct/Heidelberg/London/New York, Springer.
  11. A. Gurwitsch (2010), The Collected Works of Aron Gurwitsch (1901-1973), vol. III: The Field of Consciousnes: Theme, Thematic Field, and Margin, ed. by Richard M. Zaner and Lester
  12. Embree, Dordrect/Heidelberg/London/New York, Springer. E. Husserl (1948), Experience and Judgment. Investigations in a Genealogy of Logic, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul; revised and edited by L. Landgrebe; translated by J. Churchill and K. Ameriks, 1973.
  13. E.S. Kassab (1991), «“Paramount reality” in Schutz and Gurwitsch», Human Studies, 14, pp. 181-98, DOI: 10.1007/BF02205602
  14. L. Muzzetto (2006), Il soggetto e il sociale. Alfred Schutz e il mondo «taken for granted», Milano, FrancoAngeli.
  15. H. Nasu (2008), «A Continuing Dialogue with Alfred Schutz», Human Studies, 31, pp. 87-105,
  16. L. Landgrebe (1991), «Relfections on the Schutz-Gurwitsch correspondence», Human Studies, 14, pp. 107-27, DOI: 10.1007/BF02205598
  17. A. Schutz (1947-51), Reflections on the Problem of Relevance, in Collected Papers V: Phenomenology and the Social Sciences, ed. by L. Embree, Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London, Springer, 2011.
  18. A. Schutz (1955), Symbol, Reality and Society, in Collected Papers I: The Problem of Social Reality, The Hage, Martinus Nijhoff, 1967.
  19. A. Schutz (1958), Fourth Notebook from Minnewaska and New York City. October 26-November 9, in A. Schutz, T. Luckmann (eds.), The Structures of the Life-World. Volume II, Evanston, Northwestern University Press, translated by Richard M. Zaner and David J. Parent, 1989.
  20. J. Strassheim, H. Nasu (2018), Relevance and Irrelevance. Theories, Factors and Challenges, Berlin, De Gruyter.
  21. H.R. Wagner (1983), Alfred Schutz. An Intellectual Biography, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.

Carlos Belvedere, Topic relevance as the basic structuration of the field of consciousness in "SOCIOLOGIA E RICERCA SOCIALE " 124/2021, pp 37-51, DOI: 10.3280/SR2021-124003