In the Scheme. Italian Academic Women between Teaching Duties and Research

Author/s Alessandra Minello, Concetta Russo
Publishing Year 2021 Issue 2021/160
Language Italian Pages 22 P. 88-109 File size 262 KB
DOI 10.3280/SL2021-160005
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The academic labor is divided between researching, teaching and fulfilling admin-istrative tasks. After the Gelmini reform, research has gain a relevant weight for career advancement. According to the literature, women are more inclined to take on teaching and administrative tasks, due to a gender scheme which considers them as more suited to these tasks. They are less likely to reach top positions and achieve them at a slower pace. In this paper we explore the role of teaching tasks in the trajectories of a group of Italian female academics, investigating the paths of adaptation/resistance to the new rules of competition. Through fifteen qualita-tive interviews it emerges teaching is an anchoring element: our interviewees per-ceive the direct relationship with students as indispensable to the achievement of professional satisfaction, or they consider the investment in this area as a potential gateway to an academic career. Some have experienced pressing demands for ful-filling both teaching and administrative tasks.

Keywords: Gender, Academia, Research, Teaching

  1. Armano E., Murgia A. (2013). The precariousness of young knowledge workers: a subject-oriented approach. Global Discourse, 3(3-4): 486-501. DOI: 10.1080/23269995.2013.86531
  2. Babcock L., Recalde M.P. and Vesterlund L. (2017). Gender differences in the allocation of low-promotability tasks: The role of backlash. American Economic Review, 107(5): 131-35.
  3. Bellas M.L. (1999). Emotional Labor in academia: The case of professors. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 561(1): 96-110. DOI: 10.1177/00027162995610010
  4. Benschop Y., Brouns M. (2003). Crumbling ivory towers: academic organizing and its gender effects. Gender, Work and Organization, 10(2): 194-212.
  5. Berlant L.G. (2011). Cruel Optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  6. Boffo S., Moscati R. (2008), Evaluation in the Italian Higher Education System: many tribes, many territories... many godfathers. European Journal of Education 33(8): 349-360.
  7. Bozzon R., Murgia A. and Villa P. (2017). Precariousness and gender asymmetries among early career researchers: a focus on stem fields in the Italian academia. Polis, 31(1): 127-158. DOI: 10.1424/8608
  8. Bozzon R., Murgia A. and Poggio B. (2019). Gender and precarious careers in academia and research: Macro, meso and micro perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge.
  9. Clark S. (1986). The academic profession and career: Perspectives and problems. Teaching Sociology, 14: 24-34. -- Stable URL:
  10. Colarusso S., Giancola O. (2020). Università e nuove forme di valutazione. Strategie individuali, produzione scientifica, effetti istituzionali. Roma: Sapienza Università Editrice.
  11. Davis D.E., Astin H.S. (1990). Life cycle, career cycle, and gender stratification in academe: Expelling myths and exposing truths. In: Lie S., O’Leary V., editors, Storming the tower: Women in the academic world. Londra: Kogan Page.
  12. Facchini C., Sacconi L. e Fia M. (2019). La governance delle università italiane dopo la Riforma Gelmini: un'indagine empirica sui processi decisionali. EconomEtica Working Papers, 68.
  13. Ferlie E., Musselin C. e Andresani G. (2008). The steering of higher education systems: a public management perspective. Higher Education, 56: 325-348.
  14. Fox M.F. (1990). Research, teaching, and publication productivity: Mutuality versus competition in academia. Sociology of Education, 65(4): 293-305. DOI: 10.2307/211277
  15. Gaiaschi C., Musumeci R. (2020). Just a Matter of Time? Women’s Career Advancement in Neo-Liberal Academia. An Analysis of Recruitment Trends in Italian Universities. Social sciences, 9(9): 163.
  16. Goastellec G., Pekari N. (2013). Gender Differences and Inequalities in Academia: Findings in Europe. In: Teichler U., Höhle E., editors, The work situation of the academic profession in Europe: Findings of a survey in twelve countries. Dordrecht: Springer.
  17. Goode J., Bagilhole B. (1998). Gendering the management of change in higher education: a case study. Gender, Work & Organization, 5(3): 148-164. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0432.0005
  18. Hochschild A. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85(3): 551-575. DOI: 10.1086/22704
  19. Hochschild A. (2003). The commercialization of intimate life: Notes from home and work. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  20. Kantola J. (2008). ‘Why do all women disappear?’ Gendering processes in a political science department. Gender, Work and Organization, 15(2): 202-225.
  21. Ladd E.C. (1979). The work experiences of American college professors. Current Issues in Higher Education, 22: 135-154.
  22. Light D. (1974). The structure of academic professions. Sociology of Education, 47: 2-28.
  23. Marini G., Meschitti V. (2018). The trench warfare of gender discrimination: evidence from academic promotions to full professor in Italy. Scientometrics, 115: 989-1006.
  24. Miller C., Roksa J. (2020). Balancing research and service in academia: Gender, race, and laboratory tasks. Gender & Society 34(1): 131-152. DOI: 10.1177/089124321986791
  25. Minello A., Martucci S. and Manzo L.K.C. (2021). The pandemic and the academic mothers: present hardships and future perspectives. European Societies, 23: 582-593. DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2020.180969
  26. Miur (2018). Il personale docente e non docente nel sistema universitario italiano – a.a 2016/2017. -- Testo disponibile dal sito:
  27. Moscati R. (2008). La cultura accademica e le nuove funzioni dell’università. In: Moscati R., Vaira M., a cura di, L’università di fronte al cambiamento. Realizzazioni, problemi, prospettive. Bologna: il Mulino.
  28. Moscati R. (2001). Italian University Professors in Transition. Higher Education, 41(1/2): 103-129. DOI: 10.1023/A:102676682975
  29. Myers K.R., Tham W.Y., Yin Y., Cohodes N., Thursby J.G., Thursby M.C., Schiffer P., Walsh J.T., Lakhani K.R. and Wang D. (2020). Unequal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientists. Nature Human Behaviour, 4: 880-883.
  30. Normand R. (2016). The changing epistemic governance of European education. The fabrication of the homo academicus Europeanus?. Dordrecht: Springer.
  31. Palomba R., Menniti, A. (2001). Minerva’s Daughters. Roma: Istituto di Ricerche sulla Popolazione e le Politiche Sociali.
  32. Parker L.D. (2002). It’s been a pleasure doing business with you: a strategic analysis and critique of university change management. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13(5-6): 603-619.
  33. Parsons T., Platt G. (1968). Considerations of the American academic system. Minerva, 6: 497-523. DOI: 10.1007/BF0109654
  34. Picardi I. (2019). La porta di cristallo: un nuovo indice per rilevare l’impatto di genere della riforma Gelmini sull’accesso alla professione accademica. Quaderni di Sociologia, 80: 87-111.
  35. Picardi I. (2020). Labirinti di cristallo. Strutture di genere nella ricerca e nell’accademia. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  36. Poggio B. (2006). Editorial: outline of a theory of gender practices. Gender, Work and Organization, 13(3): 225-233.
  37. Puljak L, Sharif W.D. (2009). Postdocs’ perceptions of work environment and career prospects at a US academic institution. Research Evaluation, 18(5): 411-415. DOI: 10.3152/095820209X48306
  38. Raffaetà R. (2020). Perdite e stato di liminalità: un’autoetnografia tra precarietà riproduttiva e precarietà lavorativa. In: Mattalucci C., Raffaetà R., a cura di, Generare tra la vita e la morte: Aborto e morte perinatale in una prospettiva multidisciplinare. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  39. Rebora G., Turri M. (2011). Critical factors in the use of evaluation in italian universities. Higher Education, 61(5): 531-544.
  40. Santos G.G., Cabral-Cardoso C. (2008). Work–family culture in academia: a gendered view of work–family conflict and coping strategies. Gender in Management, 23(6): 442-457. DOI: 10.1108/1754241081089755
  41. Schiebinger L., Henderson A.D. and Gilmartin S.K. (2008). Dual-career academic couples: What universities need to know. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  42. Taylor S.E. (1981). A Categorization Approach to Stereotyping. In: Hamilton D.L., editor, Cognitive Processes in Stereotyping and Intergroup Behavior. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum.
  43. Vaira M. (2003). Higher education reform in Italy: An institutional analysis and a first appraisal. 1996-2001. Higher Education Policy, 16: 179-203.
  44. Valian V. (2005). Beyond gender schemas: Improving the advancement of women in academia. Hypatia, 20(3): 198-213.
  45. Williams J.C. (2005). The glass ceiling and the maternal wall in academia. New Directions for Higher Education, 130: 91-105.
  46. Wilson F. (1996). Research note: Organizational theory: Blind and deaf to gender? Organization Studies. 17(5): 825-842. DOI: 10.1177/01708406960170050
  47. Winslow S. (2010). Gender inequality and time allocations among academic faculty. Gender & Society, 24(6): 769-793. DOI: 10.1177/089124321038672
  48. Woodward I. (2007). Understanding Material Culture. New York: Sage.

  • Etnografia a distanza o etnografia digitale? Una riflessione metodologica su uno studio etnografico tra le lavoratrici accademiche italiane mediato dalle Ict Concetta Russo, in SOCIOLOGIA E RICERCA SOCIALE 127/2022 pp.43
    DOI: 10.3280/SR2022-127003
  • Gender Inequalities in Academia: Multiple Approaches to Closing the Gap Emanuela Lombardo, Manuela Naldini, Barbara Poggio, in SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO 168/2024 pp.9
    DOI: 10.3280/SL2024-168001
  • You have to work more than men to succeed! Gender differences in workaholism among Italian academics Giulia Tattarini, Renzo Carriero, Cristina Solera, in SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO 168/2024 pp.28
    DOI: 10.3280/SL2024-168002

Alessandra Minello, Concetta Russo, Dentro lo schema. Accademiche italiane tra ricerca e didattica in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO " 160/2021, pp 88-109, DOI: 10.3280/SL2021-160005