Classroom assessment and teachers’ professional develop¬ment. Experience from a teacher training course in secondary schools be¬fore and during the Covid-19 outbreak

Journal title CADMO
Author/s Valeria Damiani
Publishing Year 2021 Issue 2021/1
Language Italian Pages 17 P. 46-62 File size 211 KB
DOI 10.3280/CAD2021-001004
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This contribution presents a reflection on teachers’ professional development regarding classroom assessment, which emerged from the experience of a training course carried out for a network of secondary schools in Rome in 2019/2020, that was interrupted due to the COVID-19 outbreak, and from a follow up group interview, carried out at the end of the school year to discuss teachers’ perspec¬tives and experience related to assessment during online teaching. In this paper, remote schooling is considered as an occasion in which, due to the inefficacy of traditional teaching methods and tools, teachers were asked to make a change within highly established practices. The reflections on assessment arise from the integration between the face to face teachers’ training and their experience during the pandemic on online teaching, highlighting key aspects and challenges that characterise classroom assessment in secondary education in Italy and suggesting further development for future in-service training activities. Results highlight the need to focus teacher professional development on some key elements related to classroom assessment (in terms of item writing, validity and reliability, for instance), that emerged as critical issues from the training course, and on the intersection between teacher practices and assessment methodologies and tools.

Keywords: Classroom assessment, Covid-19, Italy, remote schooling, online teaching.

  1. Anderson, W.L., Krathwohl, D.R., Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J., Wittrock, M.C. (2001), A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing. A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
  2. Ayala, C.C., Shavelson, R.J., Ruiz-Primo, M.A., Brandon, P.R., Yin, Y., Furtak, E.M., Tomita, M.K. (2008), “From formal embedded assessments to reflective lessons: The development of formative assessment studies” Applied Measurement in Education, 21, pp. 315-334. Becchi, E. (1999), Perché uno strumento per valutare la qualità del nido. In Scala per la valutazione dell’asilo nido, Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  3. Beebe, R, Vonderwell, S., Boboc, M. (2010), “Emerging Patterns in Transferring Assessment Practices from F2f to Online Environments”, Electronic Journal of e-learning, 8 (1), pp. 1-12.
  4. Bloom, B.S., Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., Krathwohl, D.R. (1956), Taxonomy of educational objectives, Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.
  5. Brookhart, S.M. (2009), Assessment and examinations. In L.J. Saha, A.G. Dworkin (Eds), International Handbook of Research on Teachers and Teaching. New York: Springer, pp. 723-738.
  6. Cardarello, R. (2018), Dimensioni metodologiche nella Ricerca-Formazione. In G. Asquini (a cura di), La Ricerca-Formazione. Temi, esperienze, prospettive. Milano: FrancoAngeli, pp. 13-24.
  7. Cataldi, S. (2009), Come si analizzano i focus group. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  8. Corbetta, P. (1999), Metodologia e tecniche della ricerca sociale. Bologna: il Mulino.
  9. DeLuca, C., Klinger, D.A. (2010), “Assessment literacy development: Identifying gaps in teacher candidates’ learning”, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17, pp. 419-438.
  10. Dewey, J. (1929), The Sources of a Science of Education. New York: Livering Publishing Corporation; tr. it. Le fonti di una scienza dell’educazione. Firenze: La Nuova Italia, 1951.
  11. Elliott, J. (1991), Action Research for Educational Change. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
  12. European Commission (2020), Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions on achieving the European Education Area by 2025, -- disponibile alla pagina: (consultata il 13/5/2021).
  13. European Commission, EACEA, Eurydice (2021), Teachers in Europe: Careers, Development and Well-being. Eurydice report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  14. Girelli, C. (2020), “La scuola e la didattica a distanza nell’emergenza Covid-19. Primi esiti della ricerca nazionale condotta dalla SIRD (Società Italiana di Ricerca Didattica) in collaborazione con le associazioni degli insegnanti (AIMC, CICI, FNISM, MCE, SALTAMURI)”, RicercAzione, 12 (1), pp. 209-220.
  15. INDIRE (2020), Indagine tra i docenti italiani pratiche didattiche durante il lockdown. Report integrativo, -- disponibile alla pagina: (consultata il 13/5/2021).
  16. Kearns, L.R. (2012), “Student Assessment in Online Learning: Challenges and Effective Practices”, MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 8 (3), pp. 198-208. Kennedy, K., Nowak, S., Raghuraman, R., Thomas, J., Davis, S.F. (2000), “Academic dishonesty and distance learning: Student and faculty views”, College Student Journal, 34 (2), pp. 309-314.
  17. Kim, N., Smith, M.J., Maeng, K. (2008), “Assessment in online distance education: A comparison of three online programs at a university”, Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 11 (1), -- disponibile alla pagina: (consultata il 13/5/2021).
  18. Lewin, K. (1947), “Frontiers in group dynamics II. Channels of group life; social planning and action research”, Human Relations, 1 (2), pp. 143-153.
  19. Lucisano, P. (2020), “Fare ricerca con gli insegnanti. I primi risultati dell’indagine nazionale SIRD ‘Per un confronto sulle modalità di didattica a distanza adottate nelle scuole italiane nel periodo di emergenza COVID-19’”, Lifelong Lifewide Learning, 17 (36), pp. 3-25.
  20. Nigris, E., Cardarello, R., Losito, B., Vannini, I. (2020), “Ricerca-Formazione e miglioramento della scuola. Il punto di vista del CRESPI”, RicercAzione, 12 (2), pp. 225-237.
  21. OECD (2018), TALIS 2018 Results, vol. I: Teachers and School Leaders as Lifelong Learners. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  22. OECD (2020), The impact of Covid-19 on education insights from education at a glance 2020. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  23. Robles, M., Braathen, S. (2002), “Online assessment techniques”, Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 44 (1), pp. 39-49.
  24. Schaffer, W.D. (1993), “Assessment literacy for teachers”, Theory in Practice, 32, pp. 118-126.
  25. Schön, D.A. (1983), The Reflective Practitioner. How Professionals Think in Action. New York: BasicBooks.
  26. Simonson, M., Smaldino, S.E., Albright, M., Zvacek, S. (2006), Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Merrill/Prentice Hall, 3rd ed.
  27. Stiggins, R.J., Chappuis, J. (2008), “Enhancing student learning”, District Administration, 44, pp. 42-44.
  28. Trinchero, R. (2004), I metodi della ricerca educativa. Roma: Laterza.
  29. Vertecchi, B. (2003), Manuale della valutazione. Analisi degli apprendimenti e dei contesti. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  30. Vertecchi, B. (2021), A distanza: insegnare e apprendere. Roma: Anicia.
  31. Wilson, R.J. (1990), “Classroom processes in evaluating student achievement”, Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 36, pp. 4-17.

Valeria Damiani, Valutazione e sviluppo professionale degli insegnanti. Un percorso di formazione alle superiori tra didattica in presenza e a distanza in "CADMO" 1/2021, pp 46-62, DOI: 10.3280/CAD2021-001004