E-prescribing: the rise of socio-tech-med micronetworks of care during the COVID-19 pandemic

Journal title SALUTE E SOCIETÀ
Author/s Monica Murero
Publishing Year 2021 Issue 2021/suppl. 2 Language English
Pages 15 P. 104-118 File size 689 KB
DOI 10.3280/SES2021-002-S1007
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The present paper critically investigates the rise of e-prescribing socio-tech-med micronetworks of health care in Northern Italy and the role of innovative caregivers. Based on semi-structured one-to-one discursive interviews, this study’s results show that e-prescribing innovative practices modify four domains: 1) introduce techno-care fluctuating dynamics, 2) modify spaces and time barriers to care, c) build socio-tech-med micro-networked connections, and d) create innovative "technological" carers. The interdigital carer may support distinctive forms of techno-based senior care in Italy, diffuse e-prescribing culture, and transmediate health objects and services. Careful planning and human-tailored decisionmaking are necessary to normalize e-prescribing socio-tech-med practices and avoid digital health inequalities in pandemic and post-pandemic scenarios.

Keywords: e-prescribing; digital health; interdigital caregivers; socio-tech-med; micronetworks of care; COVID-19

  1. Seaver N. (2017). Algorithms as Culture: Some Tactics for the Ethnography of Algorithmic Systems. Big Data & Society, 4(2), 1-12. DOI: 10.1177/205395171773810
  2. Bruni A., Gherardi S. (2007). Studiare le pratiche lavorative. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  3. Cardano M. (2019). Defending Qualitative Research. Design, Analysis, Textualization. Abingdon-New York: Routledge.
  4. Cardano M., Giarelli G., Vicarelli G. (2020). Sociologia della salute e della medicina. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  5. Corbin e Strauss (1993) The Articulation of Work through Interaction. The Sociological Quarterly, 34 (1), 71–83.
  6. Baumgart D.C. (2020). Digital advantage in the COVID-19 response: perspective from Canada’s largest integrated digitalized healthcare system. Npj Digital Medicine, 3:1.
  7. Glaser B., Strauss A. (1968). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
  8. Heath H., Cowley S. (2004). Developing a grounded theory approach: a comparison of Glaser and Strauss. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 41(2):141-150. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7489(03)00113-
  9. Koster E., Philbert D., Bouvy M. L. (2020). Impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on the provision of pharmaceutical care in community Pharmacies. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 17(1):2002-2004
  10. Laguarta J., Hueto F., Subirana B. (2020). COVID-19 Artificial Intelligence Diagnosis using only Cough Recordings. Medicine and Biology. – Testo disponibile al sito: https://news.mit.edu/2020/covid-19-cough-cellphonedetection-1029 (12/12/2020). Masiero M. (2020). From Individual To Social Trauma: Sources Of Everyday Trauma In Italy, The US And UK During The Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 21(5): 513-519. DOI: 10.1080/15299732.2020.178729
  11. Maturo A., Moretti V. (2019). La medicalizzazione della vita tra quantificazione e gamification. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, 3. DOI: 10.1423/9550
  12. Mol A. (2002). The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  13. Mol A., Moser I., Pols J. (2015). Care in practice: On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms. Transcript. Mueller A. L., McNamara M. S., Sinclair D. A. (2020). Why does COVID-19 disproportionately affect older people?. Aging, 12(10): 9959–9981.
  14. Murero M. (2010). Digital Literacy: Introduzione ai social media. PD (Italy): Libreriauniversitaria.
  15. Murero M. (2012). Interdigital Communication Theory. PD (Italy): Libreriauniversitaria. Murero M. (2014). Comunicazione Post-Digitale: teoria interdigitale e mobilità interconnessa. PD (Italy): Libreriauniversitaria.
  16. Murero M. (2020). Building Artificial Intelligence for Digital Health: a socio-techmed approach and a few surveillance nightmares. Special Issue Etnografia e Ricerca Qualitativa, 3:374-388. DOI: 10.3240/9955
  17. Naderifar M., Goli H., Ghaljaie F. (2017). Snowball Sampling: A Purposeful Method of Sampling in Qualitative Research. Strides Dev Med Educ., 14(3):e67670.
  18. Nimmon L., Stenfors-Hayes T. (2016). The “Handling” of power in the physicianpatient encounter: perceptions from experienced physicians. BMC medical education, 16(114).
  19. Riemann G., Schütze F. (1991). “Trajectory” as a basic theoretical concept for analyzing suffering and disorderly social processes. In: Maines D.R., editor, Social organization and social process: essays in honor of Anselm Strauss, New York: de Gruyter.
  20. Silverman D. (2013). Doing Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
  21. Urick B, Farley J., Bhosle M. (2020) Exploring Drivers of Community Pharmacy-Level Performance on Adherence Measures. PQA 2020 Annual Meeting.
  22. Vicarelli G., Bronzini M. (2019) Sanità digitale. Riflessioni teoriche ed esperienze applicative, Bologna: Il Mulino.
  23. Vicarelli G., Giarelli G. (2021). Libro bianco. il Servizio Sanitario Nazionale e la pandemia da Covid 19. Milano: FrancoAngeli.

Monica Murero, E-prescribing: the rise of socio-tech-med micronetworks of care during the COVID-19 pandemic in "SALUTE E SOCIETÀ" suppl. 2/2021, pp 104-118, DOI: 10.3280/SES2021-002-S1007