Territorial organization of innovative development: Entrepreneurial aspect of sustainability

Autori/Curatori: Pavlo T. Bubenko, Olena V. Dymchenko, Olha O. Rudachenko, Serhii M. Haidenko, Oleg A. Diegtiar
Anno di pubblicazione: 2021 Fascicolo: 2 Lingua: Italiano
Numero pagine: 15 P. 171-185 Dimensione file: 126 KB
DOI: 10.3280/RISS2021-002013
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit.
Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The article is devoted to the research of scientific issues related to acceleration of innovative development of spatial economy, the provision of the theoretical basis for the formation of zones of innovation growth of individual territories (regions). The degree of influence of innovations on the nature of the territorial organization of economic activity determines the level of well-being in society. The purpose of the study was to identify the features and contradictions of the current state of the system of territorial organization of innovation activity. The issue of diffusion of innovation has been studied in terms of representing and positioning a separate territory (region) as a subject of economic relations, a multifunctional and multi-faceted economic system, but not as a place of concentration of means of pro-duction and labor. The further development, the symbiosis of the regionalism the-ory, in particular the spatial organization of production, along with the theory and practice of innovative entrepreneurship, is the substantiation of creation and de-velopment of the territorial poles of innovation growth. It is proved that the effi-cient innovation policy in a certain economic space of activity should be based on the functional properties of the forms of spatial organization of production on the one hand, and the placement of productive forces, on the other hand. The idea of the nature and character of the existing forms of modern territorial organization of innovation activity embedded in a kind of network design, which is the projection of production networks in a certain territory, or so-called "place-connected net-works", is explored and developed.

  1. Beilin I.L., Khomenko V.V. and Kalenskaya N.V. (2019). The stability of the regional economic system based on the innovative development of the petrochemical cluster. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 8(4): 140-145.
  2. Bian F. and Yeh A.G.O. (2020). Spatial-economic impact of missing national highway links on China’s regional economy. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 84: 102377.
  3. Borscheva N.L., Fedorova J.V. and Glukhova M.I. (2019). Human capital: The evaluation methodology and definition of scenarios of innovative development of the organization. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 10(2): 612-622.
  4. Boudeville J. (1970). Economic Spaces. Paris: Puf.
  5. Deelers S., Tantasanowong P. and Aujirapongpan S. (2019). Innovative organization and creative thinking development for undergraduate students of the university with creative identity in Thailand. GMSARN International Journal, 13(3): 119-124.
  6. Ezdina N. and Dotsenko E. (2021). The neo-industrial role of digital and converged technologies in the Russian economy. SHS Web of Conferences, 93: 01003.
  7. Gnatenko K.V., Yaroshenko O.M., Anisimova H.V., Shabanova S.O. and Sliusar A.M. (2020). Prohibition of discrimination as a principle of social security in the context of ensuring sustainable well-being. Rivista di Studi sulla Sostenibilità, (2): 173-187.
  8. Goryainova L., Maksimova T., Zhdanova O. and Ermilova M. (2020). Possible ways to attract private investment in a knowledge-based economy. E3S Web of Conferences, 159: 06013.
  9. Haraschuk V., Zelinska Y., Spasenko V. and Shulga I. (2020). Information component of the environmental policy of Ukraine: Current status and development potential. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 9(2): 69-79.
  10. Hegerstrand T. (1968). Innovation Diffusion as a Spatial Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  11. Hizard W. (1960). Methods of Regional Analysis: An Introduction to Regional Science. Moscow: Progress.
  12. Ilvitskaya S. and Prihodko, V. (2018). Innovative technologies in the field of topography, land management, territorial planning, construction and architecture. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 365(2): 022030.
  13. Klopova O., Komishova L. and Simonov M. (2018). Professional development in the field of human resource management of heads and specialists of the innovative organizations. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(1): 214-223.
  14. Kondratenko D., Savchuk O. and Liubchych A. (2020). Foreign practices in land cadaster systems: An experience for Ukraine. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 9(2): 325-337.
  15. Kookueva V.V. (2021). Assessment of current trends in state financing of innovative development in Russia. International Science and Technology Conference, FarEastСon 2020 “Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies”, 227: 1187-1193.
  16. Kostygova L. (2018). Prospects for implementing a circular economy in industry based on territorial innovative clusters. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, 18(5.3): 631-638.
  17. Krugman P.R. (1999). The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions and International Trade. London: The MIT Press Cambridge.
  18. Lasarte-López J.M., Carbonero-Ruz M., Nekhay O. and Rodero-Cosano M.L. (2021). Why do regional economies behave differently? A modelling approach to analyse region-specific dynamics along the business cycle. Applied Economics Letters, 28(16): 1391-1399.
  19. Lasuen Kh.R. (1969). On growth poles. Urban Studies, 6: 137-152.
  20. Lasuen Kh.R. (2010). Urbanization and Economic Development: Temporary Interaction Between Geographic and Industry Clusters. Spatial Economics, 1: 68-104.
  21. Li D., Yang L., Lin J. and Wu J. (2020). How industrial landscape affects the regional industrial economy: A spatial heterogeneity framework. Habitat International, 100: 102187.
  22. Lyosh A. (2007). Spatial Organization of the Economy. Moscow: Nauka.
  23. Mukhanova G. (2014). The population life quality related to health as the basis from human capital formation in Kazakhstan. Life Science Journal, 11(SPEC. ISSUE 8): 20-28, Article Number 4.
  24. Perroux F. (1954). L’Eroup Sans Rivages. Grenoble: Press Grenoble Universities.
  25. Perroux F. (2007). Economic space: Theory and applications. Spatial Economics, 2: 77-93.
  26. Tarigan H., Matondang A.R., Lubis S. and Sirojuzilam S. (2021). The effect of road transportation infrastructure on freight transport mobility and regional economy in Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(3): 645-654.
  27. Trusova N.V., Kohut I.A., Osypenko S.A., Radchenko N.G. and Rubtsova N.N. (2019). Implementation of the results of fiscal decentralization of Ukraine and the countries of the European Union. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 10(6): 1649-1663.
  28. Tsertseil J.S., Kookueva V.V. and Ordov K.V. (2017). Regional competitiveness within the cluster’s territory: Case of the Volga Federal District’s chemical industry. In: Albert Tavidze (Ed.). Progress in Economics Research (vol. 37, pp. 169-184). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
  29. Valdes R. and Jara-Rojas R. (2020). The impact of commodity price shocks among regional economies of a developing country. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 64(3): 920-939.
  30. Wang C., Zhang Y., Liu C., Hu F., Zhou S. and Zhu J. (2021). Emergy-based assessment and suggestions for sustainable development of regional ecological economy: A case study of Anhui province, China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(51): 2988.
  31. Yaroshenko O.M. and Tomashevski K.L. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on labour and social security relations: Rule-making experience of Belarus and Ukraine. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 28(2): 211-221.
  32. Yaroshenko O.M., Vapnyarchuk N.M., Burnyagina Y.М., Kozachok-Trush N.V. and Mohilevskyi L.V. (2020). Professional development of employees as the way to innovative country integration. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 11(2): 683-695.
  33. Zając P. and Avdiushchenko A. (2020). The impact of converting waste into resources on the regional economy, evidence from Poland. Ecological Modelling, 437: 109299.

Pavlo T. Bubenko, Olena V. Dymchenko, Olha O. Rudachenko, Serhii M. Haidenko, Oleg A. Diegtiar, Territorial organization of innovative development: Entrepreneurial aspect of sustainability in "RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'" 2/2021, pp 171-185, DOI: 10.3280/RISS2021-002013