Perdita e resilienza al tempo di Covid-19: creazione di significato, speranza e trascendenza

Titolo Rivista: TERAPIA FAMILIARE
Autori/Curatori: Froma Walsh
Anno di pubblicazione: 2021 Fascicolo: 127 Lingua: Italiano
Numero pagine: 23 P. 47-69 Dimensione file: 713 KB
DOI: 10.3280/TF2021-127004
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit.
Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

L’articolo affronta le numerose perdite complesse e traumatiche causate dalla pandemia Covid-19. In contrasto con il lavoro su base individuale e focalizzato sui sintomi, un approccio sistemico orientato alla resilienza nelle perdite complesse contestualizza il disagio e mobilita le risorse relazionali per supportare un adattamento positivo. In una cornice di resilienza familiare alle perdite legate alla pandemia, la discussione si concentra sull’importanza dei sistemi di credenze condivise per quanto riguarda (1) i processi di creazione di significato; (2) una prospettiva positiva e piena di speranza orientata all’agire concreto; (3) i valori trascendenti e i fondamenti spirituali per l’ispirazione, la trasformazione e la crescita positiva. Vengono offerte linee guida pratiche per facilitare l’adattamento e la resilienza.

  1. Antonovsky A. & Sourani T. (1988). Family sense of coherence and family adaptation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50: 79-92.
  2. Boss P. (1999). Ambiguous loss. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  3. Bruner J. (1986). Actual minds/possible worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  4. Cacioppo J.T., Cacioppo S., Capitanio J.P. & Cole S.W. (2015). The neuroendocrinology of social isolation. Annual Review of Psychology, 66: 733-767. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015240
  5. Doka K. (2002). Disenfranchised grief. Champaign: Research Press.
  6. Flaskas C. (2007). Holding hope and hopelessness: Therapeutic engagements with the balance of hope. Journal of Family Therapy, 29: 186-202. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6427.2007.00381.x
  7. Frankl V. (2006). Man’s search for meaning. New York: Beacon Press (ed. orig. 1946).
  8. Gunnell D., Appleby L., Arensman E., Hawton K., John A., Kapur N. et al. (2020). Risk and prevention during the Covid-19 pandemic. The Lancet, 7(6): 468-471. DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30171-1
  9. Imber-Black E. (2020). Rituals in the time of Covid-19. Imagination, responsiveness and the human spirit. Family Process, 59(3): 912-921. DOI: 10.1111/famp.12581
  10. Janoff-Bulman R. (1992). Shattered assumptions: Towards a new psychology of trauma. New York: Free Press.
  11. Killgore W.D.S., Cloonan S.A., Taylor E.C. & Dailey N.S. (2020). Loneliness: A signature mental health concern in the era of Covid-19. Psychiatry Research, 290: 113-117. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113117
  12. Koenig H. (2012). Religion, spirituality, and health: The research and clinical implications. International Scholarly Research Network (ISRN) Psychiatry, 33. DOI: 10.5402/2012/278730
  13. Kubler-Ross E. & Kessler D. (2005). On grief and grieving. New York: Scribner.
  14. Landau J. (2007). Enhancing resilience: Families and communities as agents for change. Family Process, 46(3): 351-365. DOI: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2007.00216.x
  15. Masten A. & Motti-Stefanidi F. (2020). Multisystemic resilience for children and youth in disaster: Reflections in the context of Covid-19. Adversity and Resilience Science, 1: 95-106. DOI: 10.1007/s42844-020-00010-w
  16. Nadeau J.W. (2008). Meaning-making in bereaved families: Assessment, intervention, and future research. In: Stroebe M., Hansson R., Schut H. & Stroebe W., a cura di, Handbook of bereavement research: 21st century perspectives (pp. 511-530). Washington: American Psychological Association.
  17. Neimeyer R.A. & Sands D.C. (2011). Meaning reconstruction in bereavement: From principles to practice. In: Neimeyer R.A., Harris D.L., Winokuer H.R. & Thornton G.F., a cura di, Grief and bereavement in contemporary society: Bridging research and practice (pp. 9-22). New York: Routledge.
  18. Norris F.H. (2002). 60,000 disaster victims speak: Part 1. An empirical review of the empirical literature, 1981-2001. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 65: 207-239. DOI: 10.1521/psyc.65.3.207.20173
  19. Oppel R.A. Jr, Gabeloff R., Lai K.K.R., Wright W. & Smith M. (2020). The fullest look yet at the racial inequality of coronavirus. New York Times, July 5.
  20. Rolland J.S. (2018). Helping couples and families navigate illness and disability. New York: Guilford Press.
  21. Rosenblatt P.C. (2013). Family grief in cross-cultural perspective. Family Science, 4(1): 12-19. DOI: 10.1080/19424620.2013.819226
  22. Saul J. (2013). Collective trauma, collective healing: Promoting community healing in the aftermath of disaster. New York: Routledge.
  23. Stroebe M. & Schut H. (2010). The dual process model of coping with bereavement: A decade on. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 61: 273-289. DOI: 10.2190/OM.61.4.b
  24. Stroebe M., Schut H. & Boerner K. (2010). Continuing bonds in adaptation to bereavement: Toward theoretical integration. Clinical Psychology Review, 30: 259-268. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.007
  25. Tedeschi R.G. & Calhoun L.G. (2008). Beyond the concept of recovery: Growth and the experience of loss. Death Studies, 32(1): 27-39. DOI: 10.1080/07481180701741251
  26. Walsh F. (2002). Bouncing forward: Resilience in the aftermath of September 11. Family Process, 41(1): 34-36. DOI: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2002.40102000034.x
  27. Walsh F. (2003). Family resilience: A framework for clinical practice. Family Process, 42(1): 1-18. DOI: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2003.00001.x
  28. Walsh F. (2007). Traumatic loss and major disasters: Strengthening family and community resilience. Family Process, 46: 207-227. DOI: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2007.00205.x
  29. Walsh F. (2009a). Human-animal bonds: I. The relational significance of companion animals. Family Process, 48: 462-480. DOI: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2009.01296.x
  30. Walsh F., a cura di (2009b). Spiritual resources in family therapy. New York: Guilford Press (2nd ed.).
  31. Walsh F. (2016a). Applying a family resilience framework in training, practice, and research: Mastering the art of the possible. Family Process, 55(4): 616-632. DOI: 10.1111/famp.12260
  32. Walsh F. (2016b). Strengthening family resilience. New York: Guilford Press (3rd ed.).
  33. Walsh F. (in press). Complicated loss: Fostering healing & resilience. New York: Guilford Press.
  34. Walsh F. & McGoldrick M. (2004). Loss and the family: A systemic perspective. In
  35. Walsh F. & McGoldrick M., a cura di, Living beyond loss: Death in the family (pp. 3-26). New York: Norton (2nd ed.).
  36. Walsh F. & McGoldrick M. (2013). Bereavement: A family life cycle perspective. Family Science, 4(1): 20-27. DOI: 10.1080/19424620.2013.819228
  37. Weingarten K. (2010). Reasonable hope: Construct, clinical applications, and supports. Family Process, 49: 5-25. DOI: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2010.01305.x.
  38. White M. (1988). Saying hullo again: The incorporation of the lost relationship in the resolution of grief. Dulwich Centre Newsletter, Spring.
  39. Wortman C. & Silver R. (1989). The myths of coping with loss. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 57: 349-357. DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.57.3.349
  40. Wright L.M. & Bell J.M. (2009). Beliefs and illness: A model for healing. Alberta: 4th Floor Press.

Froma Walsh, Perdita e resilienza al tempo di Covid-19: creazione di significato, speranza e trascendenza in "TERAPIA FAMILIARE" 127/2021, pp 47-69, DOI: 10.3280/TF2021-127004