Sketch for a Sociology of Sociological Self-Analyses

Autori/Curatori: Gerardo Ienna, Carmelo Lombardo, Lorenzo Sabetta, Marco Santoro
Anno di pubblicazione: 2021 Fascicolo: 126 Lingua: Italiano
Numero pagine: 19 P. 7-25 Dimensione file: 253 KB
DOI: 10.3280/SR2021-126002
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit.
Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

This essay analyzes one of the major expressions of the sociological critique of sociological reasoning, the objectivation of the subject of objectivation, who should analyze the sociohistorical conditions of possibility of the very act of objectivation. Though Bourdieu’s invitation to a reflexive sociology of sociology has not been widely accepted and put into practice, the authors argue that its actual application actually brings about consistent payoff: this special issue represents but one installment. Reclaiming a place for socio-analysis, this paper highlights how this activity can produce a cognitive difference in the making of sociological research, insofar as its genesis and development are defined by the sharing of a specific thought style, existing within and because of an intersubjective framework.

  1. A. Abbott (2019), «Living One’s Theories: Moral Consistency in the Life of Émile Durkheim», Sociological Theory, 37, 1, pp. 1-34.
  2. L. Boltanski (2008), Rendre la réalité inacceptable. A propos de «La production de l’idéologie dominante», Paris, Éditions Demopolis.
  3. P. Bourdieu (1987), The Biographical Illusion, in R.J. Parmentier, G. Urban (eds.), Working Papers and Proceedings of the Centre for Psychosocial Studies, Chicago, Center for Psychosocial Studies.
  4. P. Bourdieu (1988), Homo Academicus, Stanford (CA), Stanford University Press.
  5. P. Bourdieu (1990), A Lecture on the Lecture, in In Other Words. Essays Towards a Reflexive Sociology, Stanford (CA), Stanford University Press.
  6. P. Bourdieu (1997), «Passport to Duke», Metaphilosophy, XXVIII, 4, pp. 449-455.
  7. P. Bourdieu (ed.) (1999), The Weight of the World: Social Suffering in Contemporary Society, Stanford (CA), Stanford University Press.
  8. P. Bourdieu (2000a), Pascalian Meditations, Cambridge, Polity Press.
  9. P. Bourdieu (2000b), «For a Scholarship with Commitment», Profession, 2000, pp. 40-45.
  10. P. Bourdieu (2003), «Participant Objectivation: The Huxley Medal Lecture», Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, IX, 2, pp. 281-94.
  11. P. Bourdieu (2004), Science of Science and Reflexivity, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  12. P. Bourdieu (2008a), Sketch for a Self-Analysis, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  13. P. Bourdieu (2008b), The Bachelors’ Ball: The Crisis of Peasant Society in Béarn, Cambridge, Polity Press.
  14. P. Bourdieu, L. Wacquant (1992), An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  15. P. Bourdieu, L. Wacquant (1999), «On the Cunning of Imperialist Reason», Theory, Culture & Society, 16, 1, pp. 41-58.
  16. J. Bouveresse, D. Roche (2004), La liberté par la connaissance. Pierre Bourdieu (1930-2002), Paris, Odile Jacob.
  17. C. Calhoun (2002), Remembering Pierre Bourdieu, in G. Sapiro (ed.), Sociology is a Martial Art. Political Writings by Pierre Bourdieu, New York, The New Press, 2010.
  18. N. Chen, X. Zang (2009), «Bourdieu and Chinese Sociology», Sociologica, 3, 1, pp. 1-15.
  19. P. DiMaggio (2007), «Comment on John Goldthorpe/2», Sociologica, 1, 2, pp. 1-7.
  20. N. Elias (1956), «Problems of Involvement and Detachment», British Journal of Sociology, 7, 3, pp. 226-252.
  21. C. Ellis, A.P. Bochner (2000), Autoethnography, Personal Narrative, Reflexivity: Researcher as Subject, in N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, London, Sage.
  22. P. Encrevé, R.-M. Lagrave (2003), Travailler avec Bourdieu, Paris, Flammarion.
  23. A. Frank (2011), «Reviews: Identities in Flux», International Sociology Review of Books, 26, 5, pp. 661-663.
  24. L. Gelernter, I.F. Silber (2009), «Bourdieu’s Reception in Israeli Sociology. The Fragmented Imprint of a Grand Theory», Sociologica, 3, 1, pp. 1-27.
  25. N. Heinich (2007), Pourquoi Bourdieu?, Paris, Gallimard.
  26. G. Ienna, M. Santoro (2016), «Per una scienza delle relazioni internazionali in campo culturale», Studi culturali, 13, 1, pp. 61-69.
  27. M. Kolkenbrock (2017), Life as Trajectory: Pierre Bourdieu’s «The Biographical Illusion» (1986), in W. Hemecker, E. Saunders (eds.), Biography in Theory, Berlin, De Gruyter.
  28. M. Lamont (2010), Looking Back at Bourdieu, in E. Silva, A. Warde (eds.), Cultural Analysis and Bourdieu’s Legacy: Settling Accounts and Developing Alternatives, London and New York, Routledge.
  29. R. Lippi-Green (1997), English with an Accent: Language, Ideology, and the Discrimination in the United States, London and New York, Routledge.
  30. C. Lombardo, L. Sabetta (2018), «Interpreting life sociologically: the cases of Merton and Bourdieu», Sociologia e ricerca sociale, 39, 115, pp. 37-44.
  31. R.K. Merton (1965), On the Shoulders of Giants: A Shandean Postscript, New York, The Free Press.
  32. R.K. Merton (1968), Social Theory and Social Structure, New York, The Free Press.
  33. R.K. Merton, M. White Riley (eds.) (1980), Sociological Traditions from Generation to Generation: Glimpses of the American Experience, Norwood (NJ), Ablex Publishing.
  34. J.-C. Passeron (2003), «Mort d’un ami, disparition d’un penseur», Revue européenne des sciences soociales, 41, 125 pp. 77-124.
  35. B. Paulle, B. van Heerikhuizen, M. Emirbayer (2011), Elias and Bourdieu, in S. Susen, B.S. Turner (eds.), The Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu: Critical Essays, London, Anthem Press.
  36. D. Robbins (2008), «French Production and English Reception. The International Transfer of the Work of Pierre Bourdieu», Sociologica, 2, 2, pp. 1-32.
  37. D. Robbins (2022), Self-Presentation and Representative Politics. Essays in Context, 1960-2020, London, Anthem Press.
  38. M. Santoro (2008), «Putting Bourdieu in the Global Field», Sociologica, 2, 2, pp. 1-32.
  39. M. Santoro (2009), «How “Not” to Become a Dominant French Sociologist: Bourdieu in Italy, 1966-2009», Sociologica, 3, 2-3, pp. 1-80.
  40. M. Santoro, A. Gallelli, B. Grüning (2018), Bourdieu’s International Circulation: An Exercise in Intellectual Mapping, in T. Medvetz, J.J. Sallaz (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Pierre Bourdieu, New York, Oxford University Press.
  41. G. Sapiro, M. Bustamante (2009), «Translation as a Measure of International Consecration. Mapping the World Distribution of Bourdieu’s Books in Translation», Sociologica, 3, 2-3, pp. 1-45.
  42. S. Susen (2016), The Sociological Challenge of Reflexivity in Bourdieusian Thought, in D. Robbins (ed.), The Anthem Companion to Pierre Bourdieu, London, Anthem Press.
  43. L. Wacquant (1989), «For a Socio-Analysis of Intellectuals: On Homo Academicus», Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 34, pp. 1-29.
  44. J. Zavisca, J.J. Sallaz (2008), «From the Margins to the Mainstream. The Curious Convergence of Pierre Bourdieu and US Sociology», Sociologica, 2, 2, pp. 1-21.

Gerardo Ienna, Carmelo Lombardo, Lorenzo Sabetta, Marco Santoro, Sketch for a Sociology of Sociological Self-Analyses in "SOCIOLOGIA E RICERCA SOCIALE " 126/2021, pp 7-25, DOI: 10.3280/SR2021-126002