For a geography of marginal areas. Critical considerations about classification of inner areas

Author/s Bruna Vendemmia, Paola Pucci, Paolo Beria
Publishing Year 2022 Issue 2022/133 Language Italian
Pages 27 P. 29-55 File size 368 KB
DOI 10.3280/ASUR2022-133002
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This paper provides an alternative geography of marginal territories in Italy, different from the one developed by the National Strategy for Inner Areas (2014). Thanks to a cluster analysis, based on demographic, socioeconomic and mobility variables, the work identifies 4 different conditions of marginality helpful to design policies for redressing territorial inequalities.

Keywords: accessibility; mobility; Inner Areas; Marginal Territories; Fragile Territories.

  1. Pucci P. and Vecchio G. (2019). Enabling mobilities. Planning tools for people and their mobilities, SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences.
  2. Pucci P., Vecchio G., Bocchimuzzi L. and Lanza G. (2019). Inequalities in job-related accessibility: testing an evaluative approach and its policy relevance in Buenos Aires. Applied Geography, 107: 1-11.
  3. Rodríguez-Pose A. (2017). The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(1): 189-209.
  4. Sen A. (2010). The idea of Justice. London: Penguin.
  5. DPS – Dipartimento per lo Sviluppo e la Coesione Economica. Le aree interne: di quale territori parliamo? Nota esplicativa sul metodo di classificazione delle aree. -- Testo disponibile al sito:, ultimo accesso 25/05/2021.
  6. Farber S., Morang M.Z. and Widener M.J. (2014). Temporal variability in transit-based accessibility to supermarkets. Applied Geography, 53: 149-159.
  7. FDD – Forum Disuguaglianze e Diversità (2021). Cosa pensiamo del piano inviato all’UE e “che fare ora”. -- Testo disponibile al sito:, ultimo accesso: 25/05/2021.
  8. Franklin R. (2019). The demographic burden of population loss in US cities, 2000-2010. Journal of Geographical Systems.
  9. Gatzweiler F.W. and Baumüller H. (2014). Marginality – A Framework for Analyzing Causal Complexities of Poverty. In: von Braun J. and Gatzweiler F., eds., Marginality. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7061-4_
  10. Gell N.M., Rosenberg D.E., Crlson J., Kerr J. and Belza B. (2015). Built environment attributes related to GPS measured active trips in mid-life and older adults with mobility disabilities. Disability and Health Journal, 8(2): 290-295.
  11. Geurs K.T. and Van Wee B. (2004). Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 12: 127-140.
  12. Grengs J. (2012). Nonwork Accessibility as a Social Equity Indicator. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 9: 1-14. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2012.71958
  13. Handy S.L. and Niemeier D.A. (1997). Measuring accessibility: an exploration of issues and alternatives. Environment and Planning A, 29(7): 1175-1194.
  14. Marucci A., Fiorini L., Di Dato C. and Zullo F. (2020). Marginality Assessment: Computational Applications on Italian Municipalities. Sustainability, 12: 3250.
  15. Materiali Uval (2014). Strategia Nazionale per le Aree Interne: definizione, obiettivi, strumenti e governance. Materiali Uval, n. 31.
  16. Ministero Infrastrutture e Trasporti (2014). Regolamento (UE) N. 1300/2014 della commissione del 18 novembre 2014 relativo alle specifiche tecniche di interoperabilità (STI) per l’accessibilità del sistema ferroviario dell’Unione per le persone con disabilità e le persone a mobilità ridotta. Piano Nazionale di Attuazione. Testo disponibile al sito:, ultimo accesso 25/05/2021.
  17. PNRR – Piano Nazionale di Ripresa e Resilienza. Next Generation Italia (2021). -- Testo disponibile al sito:, ultimo accesso: 25/05/2021.
  18. Pelc S. (2006). Geographical marginality in Slovenia from the point of demographical indicators. Revija za geografijo [online], 1(2): 121-131 [accessed 27 October 2020]. Cobiss_ID: 34461794. -- Testo disponibile al sito:, ultimo accesso 25/05/2021.
  19. Pereira R.H.M., Schwanen T. and Banister D. (2017). Distributive justice and equity in transportation. Transport Reviews, 37(2): 170-191. DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2016.125766
  20. Preston J. and Rajé F. (2007). Accessibility, mobility and transport-related social exclusion. Journal of Transport Geography, 15(3): 151-160.
  21. Pucci P. (2019). Dialogando sui movimenti. La mobilità come capitale spaziale. In: Perrone C. e Paba G. (a cura di), Confini, movimenti, luoghi. Politiche e progetti per città e territori in transizione. Roma: Donzelli.
  22. Servillo L., Russo A.P., Barbera F. and Carrosio G. (2016). Inner Peripheries: towards an EU place-based agenda on territorial peripherality. IJPP – Italian Journal of Planning Practice, VI(1): 42-75.
  23. Sheller M. and Urry J. (2006). The New Mobilities Paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38: 207-226.
  24. Stjernborg V., Melin Emilsson U. and Ståhla A. (2014). Changes in outdoor mobility when becoming alone in the household in old age. Journal of Transport & Health, 1(1): 9-16.
  25. Urso G. (2016). Polycentric development policies: a reflection on the Italian National Strategy for Inner Areas in Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 223. 2nd International Symposium “NEW METROPOLITAN PERSPECTIVES” – Strategic planning, spatial planning, economic programs and decision support tools, through the implementation of Horizon/Europe2020. ISTH2020, Reggio Calabria (Italy), 18-20 May 2016, 456-461.
  26. van Wee B. and Geurs K. (2011). Discussing equity and social exclusion in accessibility evaluations. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 11(4): 350-367.
  27. Vecchio G., Tiznado-Aitken I. and Hurtubia R. (2020). Transport and equity in Latin America: a critical review of socially oriented accessibility assessments. Transport reviews, 40(3): 354-381. DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2020.171182
  28. Veldhuisen J., Timmerman H. and Kapoen L. (2000). RAMBLAS: a regional planning model based on the microsimulation of daily activity travel patterns. Environment and Planning A, 32: 427-444.
  29. Vitale Bovarone E. and Cotella G. (2020) Improving Rural Accessibility: A Multilayer Approach. Sustainability, 12: 2876.
  30. Allen J. and Farber S. (2020). Planning transport for social inclusion: An accessibility-activity participation approach. Transportation Research Part D, 78: 102212.
  31. Andreoli M. (1994). Development and marginalization in Liguria region. In: Chang-Yi and D. Ch., eds., Marginality and development issues in marginal regions. Proceedings of Study Group on Development Issues in Marginal Regions. Taipei: IGU, 41-60.
  32. Ascher F. (2005). Introduction: Les sens du mouvement: modernités et mobilités. Allemand S., Ascher F. et Lévy J. (sous la direction de), Les sens du mouvement - Modernité et mobilités dans les sociétés urbaines contemporaines. Parigi: Belin, 21-34.
  33. Barca F. (2009). An Agenda for a reformed cohesion policy. A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Independent Report prepared at the request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy. -- Testo disponibile al sito:
  34. Barca F. (2013). Conclusioni del Forum Aree interne: nuove strategie per la programmazione 2014‐2020 della politica di coesione territoriale. Rieti, Auditorium Fondazione Varrone 11-12 marzo 2013. -- Testo disponibile al sito:, ultimo accesso 25/05/2021.
  35. Barca F. e Carrosio G. (2020). Un modello di policy place-based: la Strategia Nazionale per le Aree Interne. In: Osti G. e Jachia E., a cura di, Attivaree. Un disegno di rinascita delle aree interne. Bologna: il Mulino.
  36. Bock B.B. (2016). Rural Marginalisation and the Role of Social Innovation; A Turn Towards Nexogenous Development and Rural Reconnection. Sociologia Ruralis, 56(4): 552- 573.
  37. Boschmann E.E. and Brady S. (2013). Travel behaviors, sustainable mobility, and transit-oriented developments: a travel counts analysis of older adults in the Denver, Colorado metropolitan area. Journal of Transport Geography, 33: 1-11.
  38. Carrosio G. e Faccini A. (2018). Le mappe della cittadinanza nelle aree interne. In: De Rossi A., a cura di, Riabitare l’Italia: le aree interne tra abbandoni e riconquiste. Roma: Donzelli, 51-77.
  39. Crane R. and Melville M. (2008). People or Place? Revisiting the Who Versus the Where of Urban Development. Land Lines, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, July.
  40. Colucci M. (2018). Antichi percorsi, nuove mobilità: le migrazioni interne. In: De Rossi A., a cura di, Riabitare l’Italia. Le aree interne tra abbandoni e riconquiste. Roma: Donzelli, 317-332.
  41. Cotella G. e Vitale Brovarone E. (2020). La strategia nazionale per le aree interne: una svolta place-based per le politiche regionali in Italia. Archivio di Studi Urbani e Regionali, 129: 22-46. DOI: 10.3280/ASUR2020-12900
  42. Cresswell T. (2006). On the Move: Mobility in the Modern World. Abingdon: Routledge.
  43. Cullen B.T. and Pretes M. (2000). The meaning of marginality: interpretations and perceptions. Social Science, 37(2): 215-229.
  44. Dematteis G. (2015). L’Italia e le sue Regioni. Regioni come reti di sistemi urbani. -- Testo disponibile al sito:, ultimo accesso: 25/05/2021.
  45. Di Ciommo F. and Shiftan Y. (2017). Transport equity analysis. Transport Reviews, 37(2): 139-151. DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2017.127864
  46. Martens K. (2017). Transport Justice: Designing Fair Transportation Systems. New York-London: Routledge.
  47. Infussi F. (2019). Fragilità primer. Territorio, 91: 60-63. DOI: 10.3280/TR2019-09100
  48. IRPET (2018). Valutazioni per la Strategia Territoriale. Gli interventi per le Aree Interne. -- Testo disponibile al sito:, ultimo accesso: 25/05/2021.
  49. Jones P., Titheridge H., Wixey S. and Christodoulou G. (2006). ‘WALC’: Measuring pedestrian access to local bus and rail stations, taking into account traveller perceptions. Conference paper Session 4.1, The Expanding Sphere of Travel Behaviour Research, 11th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Kyoto, 16-20 agosto 2006.
  50. Kaufmann V. (2002). Rethinking mobility. Abingdon: Routledge.
  51. Leimgruber W. (2004). Between Global and Local. Marginality and Marginal Regions in the Context of Globalization and Deregulation. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/978135116272
  52. Lucas K. (2012). Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transport Policy, 20: 105-113.
  53. Lucas K., Bates J., Moore J. and Carrasco J.A. (2016). Modelling the relationship between travel behaviours and social disadvantage. Transportation Research Part A, 85: 157-173.
  54. Lucatelli S. (2016). Strategia Nazionale per le Aree Interne: un punto a due anni dal lancio della Strategia. Agriregionieuropa, 12(45): 4-10.
  55. Mackett R.L., Achuthan K. and Titheridge H. (2008). AMELIA: A tool to make transport policies more socially inclusive. Transport Policy, 15: 372-378.
  56. Máliková L., Farrell M. and McDonagh J. (2016). Perception of marginality and peripherality in an irish rural context. Quaestiones Geographicae, 35(4): 93-105.

  • LEADER local action groups and inner areas. An Italian case study Vincenzo Barone, Giuseppe Lucio Gaeta, Stefano Ghinoi, Francesco Silvestri, in Evaluation and Program Planning 102357/2023 pp.102357
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102357

Bruna Vendemmia, Paola Pucci, Paolo Beria, Per una geografia delle aree marginali in Italia. Una riflessione critica sulla classificazione delle aree interne in "ARCHIVIO DI STUDI URBANI E REGIONALI" 133/2022, pp 29-55, DOI: 10.3280/ASUR2022-133002