Un sistema di informazione geografica per l’analisi del programma di rigenerazione del quartiere Libertà di Bari

Journal title RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione
Author/s Gabriele Di Palma
Publishing Year 2022 Issue 2021/79 Language Italian
Pages 14 P. 60-73 File size 1754 KB
DOI 10.3280/RIV2021-079004
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page .

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

  1. Bugs G., Granell C., Fonts O., Huerta J. and Painho M. (2010). An assessment of public participation GIS and Web 2.0 technologies in urban planning practice in Canela, Brazil, Cities, 27(3): 172–181.
  2. Carver S., Evans A.J., Kingston R., Turton I. (2001). Public participation, GIS, and cyberdemocracy: evaluating on-line spatial decision support systems, Environment and Planning B-planning & Design, 28: 907-921.
  3. Castells M. (1983). The City and the Grassroots: A Cross-cultural Theory of Urban Social Movements. London: Edward Arnold.
  4. Chen H. (2012). Theory-driven evaluation: Conceptual framework, application and advancement. In: Strobl R., Lobermeier O., and Heitmeyer W., eds., Evaluation von Programmen und Projekten für eine demokratische Kultur. Wiesbaden: Springer.
  5. Corbett J., Rambaldi G. (2009). Geographic information technologies, local knowledge, and change. In: Cope M., Elwood S., eds., Qualitative GIS: A Mixed Methods Approach. London: SAGE Publications. DOI: 10.4135/9780857024541
  6. Davies R. (2018). Representing Theories of Change: A Technical Challenge with Evaluation Consequences, CEDIL Inception Paper, 15.
  7. Donolo C. (2017). Affari pubblici. Benessere individuale e felicità pubblica. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  8. Friedmann J. (1987). Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  9. Glaser B., Strauss A. (2006). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research. New Brunswick (U.S.A.)-London: Aldine Transaction, 1967.
  10. Ho S.Y. (1999). Evaluating urban regeneration programmes in Britain exploring the potential of the realist approach. Evaluation 5(4): 422–38.
  11. Jung J. (2017). Mapping Communities: Geographic and Interdisciplinary Community-Based Learning and Research, Professional Geographers, 70(2): 311-318. DOI: 10.1080/00330124.2017.1366787
  12. Lynch K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge (MA)-London: The MIT Press.
  13. Moro G. (2016). Miti e realtà di Bari città capitale. In: Amendola G., Carrera L., Moro G., Mortellaro D. e Romano O. (2016). Sociologia di Bari. Tra sogno e realtà. Bari-Roma: Laterza.
  14. Pavlovskaya M. (2009). Non-Quantitative GIS. In: Cope M., Elwood S., eds., Qualitative GIS: A Mixed Methods Approach. London: SAGE Publications. DOI: 10.4135/9780857024541
  15. Pawson R. (2006). Evidence-Based Policy A Realist Perspective. London: Sage Publications. DOI: 10.4135/9781849209120
  16. Pawson R., Tilley N. (1997). Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage Publications.
  17. Picone M. (2017). Il sostenibile ossimoro del GIS qualitativo, Semestrale di Studi e Ricerche di Geografia, 29(1): 125-136.
  18. Sidlar C.L., Rinner C. (2007). Analyzing the usability of an argumentation map as a Participatory Spatial Decision Support Tool, URISA Journal, 19(1): 47-55.
  19. Sieber R. (2006). Public Participation Geographic Information Systems: A Literature Review and Framework, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(3): 491-507.
  20. Van Reybrouck D. (2016). Against Elections: The Case for Democracy. London: Bodley Head.
  21. Weiss C.H. (1995). Nothing as Practical as Good Theory: Exploring Theory-Based Evaluation for Comprehensive Community Initiatives for Children and Families. In: Connell J.P., Kublsch A.C., Schorr L.B. and Weiss C.H., eds., New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives: Concepts, Methods, and Contexts. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
  22. Wilson A., Tewdwr-Jones M., Comber R. (2017). Urban planning, public participation and digital technology: App development as a method of generating citizen involvement in local planning processes, Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46: 286-302. DOI: 10.1177/2399808317712

Gabriele Di Palma, Un sistema di informazione geografica per l’analisi del programma di rigenerazione del quartiere Libertà di Bari in "RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione" 79/2021, pp 60-73, DOI: 10.3280/RIV2021-079004