Social inequalities and gender-based violence during Covid-19: topicality of proposals from the Colao Plan

Journal title TERAPIA FAMILIARE
Author/s Elisabetta Camussi, Lidia Giuditta Visintini, Maria L. Sbarra, Cinzia Sassi
Publishing Year 2022 Issue 2022/129 Language Italian
Pages 22 P. 29-50 File size 735 KB
DOI 10.3280/TF2022-129003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page .

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The pandemic crisis had serious consequences on an individual, social and global level. Moreover, it has exacerbated the pre-existing socio-economic inequalities: people with limited resources and living in disadvantageous conditions have been hit the hardest by the effects of the crisis. This situation had, in fact, a strong impact on women’s lives for various reasons concerning, on the one hand, employment and economic aspects, on the other, the social role of women within the family and in society, up to the tragic increase in cases of domestic violence. Among the aspects addressed by the Colao Plan was the resolution of these issues, which presented some specific proposals for achieving gender equality based on the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development of the United Nations. In this pa- per, we present and analyze, from a psychosocial perspective, the fundamental themes to consider when developing effective change strategies.

Keywords: gender-based violence; domestic violence; Covid-19; Colao Plan; gender stereotypes; gender equality.

  1. Aloia S. (2022). Il PNRR per la parità di genere. La Repubblica.
  2. Amodio D.M. (2014). The neuroscience of prejudice and stereotyping. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 15(10): 670-682.
  3. Annovazzi C. & Camussi E. (2016). A proposito di (im)pari opportunità tra uomini e donne: la questione del “Gender Pay Gap”. In: Quadrio A. & Pajardi D., La so- cietà ri-pensata (pp. 41-60). Milano: EDRA.
  4. Antonicelli T., Capriati E., Laforgia A., Porcelli R., Sgaramella A. & Foschino Barbaro M. (2020). Emergenza COVID-19: aspetti psicosociali e buone prassi. Psicoterapeuti in Formazione, 40-55.
  5. Archer J. & Coyne S.M. (2005). An integrated review of indirect, relational, and social aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9: 212-230.
  6. Archer J. & Lloyd B. (2002). Sex and Gender, II ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139051910
  7. Baumeister R.F. (2012). Need-to-belong theory. In: Van Lange P.A.M, Kruglanski
  8. A.W. & Higgins E.T., eds., Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 121- 140). Sage Publications Ltd.
  9. Berke D., Reidy D., Gentile B. & Zeichner A. (2016). Masculine Discrepancy Stress, Emotion-Regulation Difficulties, and Intimate Partner Violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(6): 1-20. DOI: 10.1177/0886260516650967
  10. Bohner G. & Lampridis E. (2004). Expecting to meet a rape victim affects women’s self-esteem: The moderating role of rape myth acceptance. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 7(1): 77-87. DOI: 10.1177/1368430204039974
  11. Boniol M.M. et al. (2019). Gender equity in the health workforce: analysis of 104 countries. World Health Organization. -- Disponibile online: www.who.int/publications/i/item/gender-equity-in-the-health-workforce-analysis-of-104-countries
  12. Bonura M.L. (2016). Che genere di violenza. Conoscere e affrontare la violenza contro le donne. Trento: Erickson.
  13. Brewer G. & Forrest-Redfern A. (2022). Attachment Anxiety, Rape Myth Acceptance, and Sexual Compliance. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37: 4626-4639. DOI: 10.1177/0886260520948526
  14. Brown R. (2016). Honor bound: How a cultural ideal has shaped the American psy- che. New York: Oxford University Press.
  15. Brown R., Baughman K. & Carvallo M. (2018). Culture, Masculine Honor, and Violence Toward Women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(4): 538-549. DOI: 10.1177/0146167217744195
  16. Camussi E. & Leccardi C. (2005). Stereotypes of working women: the power of expectations. Social Science Information, 44(1): 113-140. DOI: 10.1177/0539018405050463
  17. Camussi E., Rella R., Grigis P., Sassi C. & Annovazzi C. (2021). Women and Covid19: How the Italian Government Task Force Fostered Gender Equity. Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 3.
  18. CENSIS (2020). Rapporto Annuale. CENSIS (2021). Italia sotto sforzo: Diario della transizione 2020/2021.
  19. Cowan G. (2000). Beliefs about the causes of four types of rape. Sex Roles, 42(9/10): 807-823. DOI: 10.1023/A:1007042215614
  20. Cuddy J.C, Fiske S.T. & Glick P. (2008). Warmth and Competence as Universal Dimensions of Social Perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Academic Press, 40: 61-149. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0
  21. DeKeseredy W. & Dragiewicz M. (2007). Understanding the Complexities of Feminist Perspectives on Woman Abuse: A Commentary on Donald G. Dutton’s Rethinking Domestic Violence. Violence Against Women, 13(8): 874-884. DOI: 10.1177/1077801207304806
  22. Downs J., Reif L., Hokororo A. & Fitzgerald D. (2014). Increasing Women in Leadership in Global Health. Academic Medicine, 89(8): 1103-1107. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000369
  23. Dryhurst S., Schneider C., Kerr J., Freeman A., Recchia G., Van Der Bles A.M., Spiegelhalter D. & Van Der Linder S. (2020). Risk perceptions of COVID-19 around the world. Journal of Risk Research, 994-1006. DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2020.1758193
  24. Eagly A., Wood W. & Diekman A. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and si- milarities: A current appraisal. In: Eckes T. & Trautner H., The Developmental so- cial psychology of gender (pp. 123-174). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. Endendijk J., Groeneveld M. & Mesman J. (2018). The Gendered Family Process Model: An Integrative Framework of Gender in the Family. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(7).
  25. European Parliament (2020). Tackling violence against women and domestic vio- lence in Europe. Disponibile online: www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ STUD/2020/658648/IPOL_STU(2020)658648_EN.pdf.
  26. Fabes R.A., Martin C.L. & Hanish L.D. (2003). Young children’s play qualities in the same-, other-, and mixed-sex peer groups. Child Development, 3: 921-932. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.00576
  27. Fiske S., Cuddy A., Glick P. & Xu J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82: 878-902. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
  28. FRA (2014). Violence against women: an EU-wide survey. -- Disponibile online: fra. europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra_uploads/fra-2014-vaw-survey-main-results- apr14_en.pdf.
  29. Gareffa F. (2010). Insicure da morire. Roma: Carocci.
  30. Glick P., Diebold J., Bailey-Werner B. & Zhu L. (1997). The Two Faces of Adam: AmbivalentSexismandPolarizedAttitudesTowardWomen.PersonalityandSocial Psychology Bulletin, 23(12): 1323-1334. DOI: 10.1177/01461672972312009
  31. Glick P., Lameiras M., Fiske S.T., Eckes T., Masser B., Volpato C., Manganelli A.M., Pek J.C.X., Huang L.-L., Sakalli-Uğurlu N., Castro Y.R., D’Avila Pereira M.L., Willemsen T.M., Brunner A., Six-Materna I. & Wells R. (2004). Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(5): 713-728. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.713
  32. Hales A.H., Ren D. & Williams K.D. (2017). Protect, correct, and eject: Ostracism as a social influence tool. In: Harkins S.G., Williams K.D. & Burger J.M., eds., The Oxford handbook of social influence (pp. 205-217). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  33. ISTAT (2020). Rapporto annuale 2020. La situazione del Paese. Roma: Istituto Nazionale di Statistica. -- Disponibile online: www.istat.it/storage/rapporto-annuale/2020/Rapportoannuale2020.pdf; www.istat.it/it/files/2021/07/Pillole_Rapporto_Annuale_2021.pdf.
  34. Maccoby E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Belknap Press/Harvard University Press.
  35. Marotta I. (2021). Incontro Fuori Luogo. Intervista con Elisabetta Camussi. Fuori Luogo. Rivista di Sociologia del Territorio, Turismo, Tecnologia, 8(2): 81-87.
  36. Martin C. & Fabes R. (2001). The stability and consequences of young children’s same-sex peer interactions. Developmental Psychology, 37(3): 431-446. DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.37.3.431
  37. Martin C. & Ruble D. (2004). Children’s search for gender cues: Cognitive perspec- tive on gender development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13: 60-70.
  38. Vaccaro S. (2016). Violenza di genere. Saperi contro. Milano: Mimesis.
  39. Ministero dell’Interno (2022). Dossier Viminale: Un anno di attività del Ministero dell’Interno. -- Disponibile online: www.interno.gov.it/sites/default/files/2022-08/dossier_ferragosto_2022.pdf.
  40. Nosek B.A., Smyth F.L., Hansen J.J., Devos T., Lindner N.M., Ranganath K.A., Smith C.T., Olson K.R., Chugh D., Greenwald A.G. & Banaji M.R. (2007). Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. European Review of Social Psychology, 18(1): 36-88. DOI: 10.1080/10463280701489053
  41. Nota L., Soresi S., Di Maggio I., Santilli S. & Ginevra M.C. (2020). Threats and Challenges of the XXI Century and the Role of Career Counseling and Vocational Designing (pp. 15-40). In: Sustainable Development, Career Counselling and Career Education. Sustainable Development Goals Series. Springer, Cham.
  42. OECD (2020). Womenatthecoreofthefightagainst COVID-19 crisis. -- Disponibile onli- ne: read.oecd-ilibrary.org/view/?ref=127_127000-awfnqj80me&title=Women- at-the-core-of-the-fight-against-COVID-19-crisis.
  43. Parrott D. & Zeichner A. (2003). Effects of hypermasculinity oh physical aggression against women. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 70-78. DOI: 10.1037/1524-9220.4.1.70
  44. Pleck J.H. (1995). The gender role strain paradigm: An update (pp. 11-32). In: Levant R.F. & Pollack W.S., eds., A new psychology of men. NY: Basic Books/ Hachette Book Group.
  45. Polis Lombardia (2020). Le invisibili: la violenza di genere in tempi di lockdown. -- Disponibile online: www.polis.lombardia.it/wps/wcm/connect/630d58b2-90f9- 4747-a1cc-8e07bb079109/La+violenza+di+genere+in+tempi+di+lockdown_ nota+di+ricerca_++NOV20201.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=ROOTWO RKSPACE-630d58b2-90f9-4747-a1cc-8e07bb079109-nnR.f-v.
  46. Reidy D., Berke D., Gentile B. & Zeichner A. (2014). Man enough? Masculine di- screpancy stress and intimate partner violence. Personality and Individual Differences, 68: 160-164.
  47. Reidy D., Shirk S., Solan C. & Zeichner A. (2009). Men who aggress against women: Effects of feminine gender role violation on physical aggression in hypermasculi- ne men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 10(1): 1-12. Gender and Society, 18(4): 429-451.
  48. Risman B.J. (2009). From doing to undoing: Gender as we know it. Gender and Society, 23(1): 81-84. DOI: 10.1177/0891243208326874
  49. Romito P., Beltramini L. & Escribà-Aguir V. (2013). Intimate Partner Violence and Mental Health Among Italian Adolescents: Gender Similarities and Differences. Violence Against Women, 19(1): 89-106. DOI: 10.1177/1077801212475339
  50. Romito P., De Marchi M. & Gerin D. (2008). Le conseguenze della violenza sul- la salute delle donne. Rivista SIMG, 3: 34-36. -- Disponibile online: www.simg.it/Riviste/rivista_simg/2008/03_2008/9.pdf.
  51. Rudman L.A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and be- nefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3): 629-645. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.629
  52. Rudman L.A. & Glick P. (2001). Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes and Backlash Toward Agentic Women. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4): 743-762. DOI: 10.1111/0022-4537.00239
  53. Rudman L.A. & Glick P. (2008). The social psychology of gender: how power and intimacy shape gender relations. New York: Guilford Press.
  54. Sidanius J. & Pratto F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hie- rarchy and oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  55. United Nations (2020). Policy Brief: The Impact of COVID-19 on Women. -- Disponibile online: www.unwomen.org/sites/default/files/Headquarters/Attachments/Sections/Library/Publications/2020/Policy-brief-The-impact-of-COVID-19-on-women-en.pdf.
  56. Vandello J.A., Bosson J.K., Cohen D., Burnaford R.M. & Weaver J.R. (2008). Precarious Manhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6): 1325- 1339.
  57. Vandello J. & Bosson J. (2013). Hard won and easily lost: A review and synthesis of theory and research on precarious manhood. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 14(2): 101-113.
  58. Vandello J. & Cohen D. (2003). Male honor and female fidelity: Implicit cultural scripts that perpetuate cultural violence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84: 997-1010. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.997
  59. Verga M. (2020). Smart Working, Lavoro Domestico, Violenze di Genere: Quando il Lavoro da casa può non essere un’Opportunità. Obiettivo Pari Opportunità. -- Disponibile online: uilcalombardia.it/wp-content/uploads/newsletter_po_nov 2020.pdf.
  60. WHO (2021). Violence against women. -- Disponibile online: www.who.int/news-ro- om/fact-sheets/detail/violence-against-women.

Elisabetta Camussi, Lidia Giuditta Visintini, Maria L. Sbarra, Cinzia Sassi, Disuguaglianze e violenza di genere ai tempi del Covid-19: attualità delle proposte dal Piano Colao in "TERAPIA FAMILIARE" 129/2022, pp 29-50, DOI: 10.3280/TF2022-129003