Youth engagement for social justice: the role of digital tools in civic organizations dealing with migration

Author/s Annalisa Cecconi, Antonella Guarino, Cinzia Albanesi
Publishing Year 2022 Issue 2022/2
Language English Pages 20 P. 99-118 File size 230 KB
DOI 10.3280/PSC2022-002006
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The present study aims to investigate the use of digital resources in the context of volun-tary/activist organizations dealing with migration. Twenty semi-structured interviews were conducted with young members of 13 organizations of the area of Bologna. The results from thematic analysis show that digital tools can improve youth social justice engagement and strengthen the community as a whole. These resources also allow better access for migrants to opportunities that could foster their empowerment and social inclusion, thus promoting social justice. However, the potential of these tools isn’t fully exploited, partly because of the difficulties in using them with migrants in a situation of vulnerability. Within a social justice pro-motion framework, the results suggest the necessity of supporting the digital literacy of the whole community.

Keywords: participation, young people, organizations, migrants, digital devices, social justice

  1. Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Ectj, 29(2), 75-91. DOI: 10.1007/BF02766777
  2. Alam, K., & Imran, S. (2015). The digital divide and social inclusion among refugee migrants: A case in regional Australia. Information Technology & People. 28(2), 344-365. DOI: 10.1108/ITP-04-2014-008
  3. Alencar, A., Kondova, K., & Ribbens, W. (2019). The smartphone as a lifeline: An exploration of refugees’ use of mobile communication technologies during their flight. Media, Culture & Society, 41(6), 828-844. DOI: 10.1177/016344371881348
  4. Banyard, V. L., & Miller, K. E. (1998). The powerful potential of qualitative research for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26(4), 485-505. DOI: 10.1023/A:102213682101
  5. Bloemraad, I., & Voss, K. (2020). Movement or moment? Lessons from the pro-immigrant movement in the United States and contemporary challenges. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(4), 683-704. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2018.155644
  6. Boulianne, S., & Theocharis, Y. (2020). Young people, digital media, and engagement: A meta-analysis of research. Social Science Computer Review, 38(2), 111-127. DOI: 10.1177/089443931881419
  7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
  8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37-44.
  9. Castaño-Muñoz, J., Colucci, E., & Smidt, H. (2018). Free digital learning for inclusion of migrants and refugees in Europe: A qualitative analysis of three types of learning purposes. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(2).
  10. Collins, C. R., Kohfeldt, D., & Kornbluh, M. (2020). Psychological and political liberation: Strategies to promote power, wellness, and liberation among anti‐racist activists. Journal of Community Psychology, 48(2), 369-386.
  11. Diehl, J. A., & Chan, I. S. L. (2021). Is it just apathy? Using the Theory of Planned Behaviour to understand young adults’ (18 to 35 years old) response to government efforts to increase planning participation in Singapore. Urban Governance, 1(2), 87-98.
  12. Douglas, P., Cetron, M., & Spiegel, P. (2019). Definitions matter: migrants, immigrants, asylum seekers and refugees. Journal of Travel Medicine, 26(2), taz005.
  13. Elliott, T., & Earl, J. (2018). Organizing the next generation: Youth engagement with activism inside and outside of organizations. Social Media + Society, 4(1), 2056305117750722. DOI: 10.1177/205630511775072
  14. Fernandes-Jesus, M., Brendon, B., & Diniz, R. F. (2020). Communities reclaiming power and social justice in the face of climate change. Community Psychology in Global Perspective, 6(2/2), 1-21.
  15. Gatti, F., & Procentese, F. (2021). Experiencing Urban Spaces and Social Meanings Through Social Media: Unravelling the Relationships between Instagram City-Related Use, Sense of Place, and Sense of Community. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 78, 101691.
  16. Ginwright, S., & Cammarota, J. (2007). Youth activism in the urban community: Learning critical civic praxis within community organizations. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(6), 693-710. DOI: 10.1080/0951839070163083
  17. Guerrero, M., Anderson, A. J., Catlett, B. S., Sánchez, B., & Liao, C. L. (2021). Emerging Adults’ Social Justice Engagement: Motivations, Barriers, and Social Identity. American Journal of Community Psychology, 68(1-2), 73-87.
  18. Hestres, L.E. (2014). Preaching to the choir: internet-mediated advocacy, issue public mobilization, and climate change. New Media & Society, 16(2), 323–339. DOI: 10.1177/146144481348036
  19. International Organization for Migration (IOM) (2019). Glossary On Migration. --
  20. Jenkins, H., Shresthova, S., Gamber-Thompson, L., Kligler-Vilenchik, N., & Zimmerman, A. (2016), By Any Media Necessary. NY: New York University Press.
  21. Jones, C., & Williamson, A. E. (2014). Volunteers working to support migrants in Glasgow: A qualitative study. International Journal of Migration, Health and Social Care, 10(4), 193 ‒ 206. DOI: 10.1108/IJMHSC-10-2013-003
  22. Kahne, J., Middaugh, E., & Evans, C. (2009). The civic potential of video games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  23. Kim, Y., Russo, S., & Amna, E. (2016). The longitudinal relation between online and offline political participation among youth at two different developmental stages. New Media & Society, 19(6), 899-917. DOI: 10.1177/146144481562418
  24. Maher, T. V., & Earl, J. (2019). Barrier or booster? Digital media, social networks, and youth micromobilization. Sociological Perspectives, 62(6), 865-883. DOI: 10.1177/073112141986769
  25. McInroy, L. B., & Beer, O. W. (2022). Wands up! Internet-mediated social advocacy organizations and youth-oriented connective action. New Media & Society, 24(3), 724-740. DOI: 10.1177/146144482096480
  26. McMullin, C. (2021). Migrant integration services and coping with the digital divide: challenges and opportunities of the COVID-19 pandemic. Voluntary Sector Review, 12(1), 129-136. DOI: 10.1332/204080520X1607617728791
  27. Montero, M., (2009). Community action and research as citizenship construction. American Journal of Community Psychology, 43(1-2), 149-161.
  28. Percy-Smith, B., McMahon, G., & Thomas, N. (2019). Recognition, inclusion and democracy: learning from action research with young people. Educational Action Research, 27(3), 347-361. DOI: 10.1080/09650792.2019.157714
  29. Prilleltensky, I. (2008). The role of power in wellness, oppression, and liberation: The promise of psychopolitical validity. Journal of Community Psychology, 36(2), 116-136.
  30. Raby, R., Caron, C., Théwissen-LeBlanc, S., et al. (2018). Vlogging on YouTube: the online, political engagement of young Canadians advocating for social change. Journal of Youth Studies 21(4), 495-512. DOI: 10.1080/13676261.2017.139499
  31. Riger, S., & Sigurvinsdottir, R. (2016). Thematic analysis. In L. Jason, & D. Glenwick (Eds.), Handbook of methodological approaches to community-based research: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods (pp. 33-41). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  32. Theocharis, Y., & Quintelier, E. (2016). Stimulating citizenship or expanding entertainment? The effect of Facebook on adolescent participation. New Media & Society, 18(5), 817-836. DOI: 10.1177/146144481454900
  33. Twenge, J. M. (2017). iGen: Why today’s super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy - And completely unprepared for adulthood. NY: Atria Books.
  34. UNHCR (2016). Connecting refugees. How Internet and Mobile Connectivity can Improve Refugee Well-Being and Transform Humanitarian Action. -- https://www.
  35. Van Laer, J. & Van Aelst, P. (2010). Internet and social movement action repertoires: opportunities and limitations. Information, Communication & Society 13(8), 1146-1171. DOI: 10.1080/1369118100362830
  36. Vissers, S., & Stolle, D. (2014). Spill-over effects between Facebook and on/offline political participation? Evidence from a two-wave panel study. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11(3), 259-275. DOI: 10.1080/19331681.2014.88838
  37. von Bülow, M., Vilaça, L., & Abelin, P.H. (2018). Varieties of digital activist practices: students and mobilization in Chile. Information, Communication & Society, 22(12), 1770-1788. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2018.145155
  38. Zajak, S., Stjepandić, S., & Steinhilper, E. (2021). Pro-migrant protest in times of COVID-19: intersectional boundary spanning and hybrid protest practices. European Societies, 23(sup1), S172-S183. DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2020.182107
  39. Zijlstra, J., & Liempt, I. V. (2017). Smart (phone) travelling: Understanding the use and impact of mobile technology on irregular migration journeys. International Journal of Migration and Border Studies, 3(2-3), 174-191. DOI: 10.1504/IJMBS.2017.08324

Annalisa Cecconi, Antonella Guarino, Cinzia Albanesi, Youth engagement for social justice: the role of digital tools in civic organizations dealing with migration in "PSICOLOGIA DI COMUNITA’" 2/2022, pp 99-118, DOI: 10.3280/PSC2022-002006