Click here to download

Abuse of dominance by high technology enterprises: a comparison of u.s. and e.c. approaches
Author/s:  Frederic M. Scherer 
Year:  2011 Issue: Language: English 
Pages:  24 Pg. 39-62 FullText PDF:  392 KB
DOI:  10.3280/POLI2011-011002
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

This paper compares how the United States and the European Community dealt with competition policy challenges by two firms operating at the frontiers of technology: Microsoft and Intel. The U.S. Microsoft case was broadly targeted but largely unsuccessful in implementing remedies once violation was found. The European case was more narrowly focused, failing in its media player unbundling remedy but fighting hard to implement its interoperability information remedy. The European case on Intel was also tightly focused, leading to the highest fine in E.C. competition policy history and a mandate to avoid quantity-linked rebates. The newest U.S. settlement regarding Intel poses difficult monitoring problems with respect to its ambitious claim for remedies. The paper ends with critical comments on E.C. adjudication procedures.
Keywords: innovation, antitrust, dominant firms
Jel Code: L4

Frederic M. Scherer, in "ECONOMIA E POLITICA INDUSTRIALE " 1/2011, pp. 39-62, DOI:10.3280/POLI2011-011002


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content