Il censimento jugoslavo nel 1945 secondo il Cadastre National de l'Istrie

Journal title STORIA URBANA
Author/s Luciano Giuricin
Publishing Year 2004 Issue 2003/103 Language Italian
Pages 15 P. File size 57 KB
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The essay deals with the main events involving Venezia-Giulia, the Istrian peninsula and Fiume (Rijeka) in the aftermath of WW II. The study focuses on one specific event: the unofficial census of the Istrian population carried out in October 1945 to prove the Slav character of the peninsula and thus help to tip the balance, at the Paris Peace Conference, in favour of Yugoslavia in the border dispute with Italy. The study of this anomalous census from every viewpoint points out its several inconsistencies and irregularities, both during the counting operation - planned secretly and carried out by indirect means, i.e. through parish and municipal registers - and upon publication of the count results in the Cadastre national de l’Istrie, where out of a total of 337,408 inhabitants, 234,166 were reported to be of Slav origin (69.4%) and 92,788 of Italian origin (27.5%). The same proportion was found in the survey concerning the distribution of Slav vs. Italian surnames and toponyms. It should be noted that a comparison with previous censuses was made taking into account the official Austrian censuses of 1880, 1890, 1900 and 1910, whereas the Italian 1921 census was thoroughly ignored, as if it had never existed. Moreover, the Fiume municipality was excluded from the 1945 census. The inclusion of Fiume could have produced a significant shift in the regional ethnic balance in favour of the Italian community. As for Pola, then under Anglo-American rule, the count was made on the basis of estimates and projections from the Austrian 1910 census, which were also published in the Cadastre. One of its most outstanding flaws is the later correction to get round the problem of the so-called Indeterminates of the Buie area (approx. 30% of the overall population). The census of that area was repeated in February 1946, when the majority of indeterminates declared to be Croats. The manipulations become all the more visible by comparing the 1945 count with the first official Yugoslav survey of 1948, when many Istrian areas reported a significantly higher concentration of Italians in comparison to 1945 in spite of the substantial exodus that had occurred in the meantime.

Luciano Giuricin, Il censimento jugoslavo nel 1945 secondo il Cadastre National de l'Istrie in "STORIA URBANA " 103/2003, pp , DOI: