In difesa del naturalismo forte. Risposta a Pietro Perconti

Journal title PARADIGMI
Author/s Sandro Nannini
Publishing Year 2009 Issue 2009/1 Language Italian
Pages 5 P. 193-197 File size 49 KB
DOI 10.3280/PARA2009-001015
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

In defence of strong naturalism - In replying to Perconti’s objection that my strong naturalism implies an unjustifiable materialistic reductionism, I maintain firstly that my materialistic naturalism implies only ontological, not methodological reductionism. Secondly I think that materialism is compatible with the introduction in scientific language of concepts that refer to ficta, that is, to objects that do not exist: in such a way I can preserve the autonomy of mathematics while maintaining that numbers do not exist. Thirdly I suspect that Perconti’s "liberalized" naturalism is not compatible with a truly scientific view of the world. Keywords: Ficta, Materialism, Mind, Naturalism, Ontology, Reductionism.

Sandro Nannini, In difesa del naturalismo forte. Risposta a Pietro Perconti in "PARADIGMI" 1/2009, pp 193-197, DOI: 10.3280/PARA2009-001015