Caso o necessità: Bayle interprete di Spinoza

Journal title PARADIGMI
Author/s Fiormichele Benigni
Publishing Year 2009 Issue 2009/2 Language Italian
Pages 15 P. 181-195 File size 98 KB
DOI 10.3280/PARA2009-002016
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Accident or Necessity: Bayle’s Critique of Spinoza - The convergence of Stratonism and Epicurism in Bayle’s thought made a consistent use of Epicure against Straton dysfunctional within the complex polemical grid of the "Spinoza" article in the Historical and Critical Dictionary. But Epicurean atomism was crucial for Bayle’s opposition to Spinoza. So, we may conclude that the aporetic structure of this text is proof of the limits of its general comparative strategy, while showing at the same time the originality of Bayle’s position with respect to the trends prevailing in the culture of the age.

Keywords: Stratonism, Epicurism, Spinozism, Accident, Necessity, Marxism.

Parole chiave: Stratonismo, Epicureismo, Spinozismo, Caso, Necessità, Marxismo

Fiormichele Benigni, Caso o necessità: Bayle interprete di Spinoza in "PARADIGMI" 2/2009, pp 181-195, DOI: 10.3280/PARA2009-002016