Author/s Lawrence Friedman
Publishing Year 2009 Issue 2009/3 Language Italian
Pages 12 P. 301-312 File size 59 KB
DOI 10.3280/PU2009-003002
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Loewald - Psychoanalytic theory seems best suited to explain why psychoanalysis won’t work. As theory was taught when Hans Loewald wrote his early papers, practitioners were led to expect favorable responses that made no sense. He recognized that this was the result of neglecting the process aspect of Freud’s theory. Proposing that psychic structure is in continuous process within the mind and with the outside world, Loewald was able to bridge the gap between analyst and patient, past and present, old and new meaning, intrapsychic and interpersonal. He portrayed analytic process as working the same way as ordinary mental process. Although this was probably our most profound elaboration of Freud’s work, and one of the few plausible theories of therapeutic action, Freudian analysts felt threatened, and denounced Loewald as sentimentalizing treatment, infantilizing patients and betraying intrapsychic causality. Interpersonal analystis claimed him for their own. Despite his clarity and explicit caveats, many erroneous caricatures represent Loewald to this day.

KEY WORDS: Hans Loewald, psychoanalytic theory, therapeutic action, structural theory, interpersonal psychology

Lawrence Friedman, Loewald in "PSICOTERAPIA E SCIENZE UMANE" 3/2009, pp 301-312, DOI: 10.3280/PU2009-003002