Il terzo settore e i limiti del paradigma dei regimi di welfare

Titolo Rivista SOCIOLOGIA E POLITICHE SOCIALI
Autori/Curatori Luca Fazzi
Anno di pubblicazione 2013 Fascicolo 2013/1
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 18 P. 93-110 Dimensione file 226 KB
DOI 10.3280/SP2013-001006
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Esping-Andersen’s classification of welfare states seems by now inadequate to grasp the different directions taken by new ways to welfare, which cannot be fully appreciated at the national level of analysis. First of all, some experimental measures are emerging. These innovations are characterized by a reflexive orientation among the different stakeholders involved and inspired by distinctive processes observable in the local dimension of welfare. On the other side, we can examine the strengthening of a platform of activation policies and the new tools for the access to care services defined on a European basis. In this perspective, it can be noted that the distinctive territorial processes suggest that multiple welfare models are operating within specific nation States. Besides, international convergences are defining an agenda of priorities which radically modify the governance of national and local social policies. Territory and personalization are therefore emerging as principles which suggest a double direction assumed by processes of transformation of welfare systems. First, this article shows which distinctions allow a better understanding of some of the directions assumed by the new welfare. Second, it examines the rationale and presuppositions which inspire new relational configurations of local services.;

Keywords:Welfare, Territory, Personalization, Reflexivity, Social Policies

  1. Acemoğlu K. D., Robinson J. A. 2012 Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty, New York, Crown Publishers
  2. Alber J. 1995 A Framework for the Comparative Study of Social Services, in «Journal of European Social Policy», 1, 5, pp. 131-149.
  3. Arts,W., Gelissen J. 2002 Three worlds of welfare capitalism or more? A state of the art report, in «Journal of European Social Policy», 12, 2, pp. 137-58.
  4. Ascoli U., Ranci C. 2002 The context of new social policies in Europe, in U. Ascoli, C. Ranci, (eds.), Dilemmas of the welfare mix, New York, Kluwer
  5. Baldwin, P. 1997 State and Citizenship in the Age of Globalization. in P. Koslowski (ed.), Restructuring the Welfare State, Berlin, Springer, pp. 95-118
  6. Bache I., Flinders M. 2005 Multi-level Governance. Conclusions and Implications. in I. Bache, M. Flinders, (eds.), Multi-level Governance, Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 195-206.
  7. Bauman Z. 2005 Liquid Life, Cambridge, Polity; trad. it. Vita liquida, Roma-Bari, Laterza, 2006.
  8. Beveridge, W.H. 1948 Voluntary action, London, 1948; trad. it. L’azione volontaria, Milano, 1954
  9. Bode I. 2006 Disorganized welfare mixes: voluntary agencies and new governance regimes in Western Europe, in «Journal of European Social Policy», 16, pp. 346-359
  10. Borzaga C., Fazzi L. 2011 Processes of Institutionalization and Differentiation in the Italian Third Sector, in «Voluntas», 3, pp. 409-427.
  11. Borzaga C., Galera G. 2009 Social enterprise: An international overview of its conceptual evolution and legal implementation, in «Social Enterprise Journal», 5, 3, pp.210-228.
  12. Brandsen, T., Pestoff V. 2006 Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services: an introduction, in «Public Management Review», 8, 4, pp. 493-501.
  13. Colozzi I. 2006 Conclusioni. Valorizzare il Terzo settore e la famiglia per valorizzare il capitale sociale, in P. Donati, I Colozzi, (a cura di), Terzo settore e valorizzazione del capitale sociale in Italia: luoghi e attori, Milano, FrancoAngeli, 2006
  14. Defourny J., Nyssens M. 2008 Social Enterprise in Europe: Recent Trends and Developments, in «Social Enterprise Journal», 4, pp. 202-228.
  15. Defourny J., Nyssens M., 2010 Conceptions of Social Enterprise and Social Entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and Divergences, in «Journal of Social Entrepreneurship», 1, pp. 32-53.
  16. Dobrowolsky A., Saint-Martin D. 2002 Agency, Actors and Change in a Child-Focused Future: Problematizing Path Dependency’s Past and Statist Parameters. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, Toronto, May 29- June 1.
  17. Devereux G. 1973 Essais d’ethnopsychiatrie générale, Paris, Gallimard; trad. it. Saggi di etnopsichiatria generale, Roma, Armando, 1978
  18. Donati P. 1998 Che cos’è il terzo settore: cultura, normatività, organizzazione, ruolo societario, in P. Donati (a cura di), Sociologia del terzo settore, Roma, Carocci, 1° edizione, pp. 25-42
  19. 2010 Relational Sociology. A New Paradigm for the Social Sciences, London, Routledge.
  20. Enjolras B. 2009 A Governance-Structure Approach to Voluntary Organizations, in «Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly», 38, 5, pp. 761-783
  21. Esping-Andersen G. 1990 The Three Words of the Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge, Polity Press. 1996 Welfare State in Transition, National Adaptations in Global Economies, London, Sage; trad. it. I fondamenti sociali delle economie postindustriali, Bologna, il Mulino, 2000
  22. 2009 The Incomplete Revolution: Adapting to Women’s New Roles Cambridge, Polity Press; trad. it. La rivoluzione incompiuta. Donne, famiglie, welfare, Bologna, il Mulino, 2011
  23. Etzioni A. 1973 The Third Sector and Domestic Missions, in «Public Administration Review», 33, July/August, pp. 314-323
  24. Evers A. 1993 The Welfare Mix Approach: understanding and pluralism of welfare systems, in A. Evers, I. Svetlik, (eds.) Balancing Pluralism: new welfare mixes in care for the elderly. Aldershot, Avebury, pp.3-31.
  25. Evers A. 1993 The Welfare Mix Approach: understanding and pluralism of welfare systems, in A. Evers, I. Svetlik, (eds.) Balancing Pluralism: new welfare mixes in care for the elderly. Aldershot, Avebury, pp.3-31.
  26. Evers, A., J-L Laville 2004 Defining the Third Sector in Europe, in A. Evers, J-L Laville, (eds.), The Third Sector in Europe, Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, Edward Elgar, pp.11-42.
  27. Fazzi, L. 2008 Politica sociale e riferimenti paradigmatici: le sfide della ricerca, in «Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale », 86, 2, pp. 5-28. 2012 Social enterprises, models of governance, and the production of welfare services, in «Public Management Review», 14, 3, pp. 359-376. 2013 Terzo settore e nuovo welfare in Italia, Milano, FrancoAngeli
  28. Ferreira, S. 2006 The South European and the Nordic welfare and third sector regimes - how far are we from each other?, in Aila-Leena Matthies (ed.), Nordic civic society organisations and the future of welfare services. A model for Europe?, Copenhagen, Nordic Council of Ministers, pp. 301-326
  29. Ferrera, M. 2012 L’analisi delle politiche sociali e del welfare state, in M. Ferrera, Le politiche sociali, Bologna, il Mulino, pp. 11-51.
  30. Ferrera, M., Hemerijck A., Rhodes M. 2001 The Future of Social Europe: Recasting Work and Welfare in the New Economy, in A. Giddens (ed.), The Global Third Way Debate, Polity, pp. 114-133.
  31. Hinrichs, K. 2000 Elephants on the Move. Patterns of Public Pension Reform in OECD countries, in «European Review», 8, 3, pp. 353-378
  32. Hopkins, A. 2007 Delivering Public Services: Service Users Experiences of the Third Sector. A Report to the Office of the Third Sector by the National Consumer Council (London, National Consumer Council), April.
  33. Jaskyte, K. 2011 Predictors of Administrative and Technological Innovations in Nonprofit Organizations, in «Public Administration Review», 71, 1, pp. 77-86.
  34. Johnson, N. 1999 Mixed Economies of Welfare: a comparative perspective, London, Prentice Hall
  35. Kazepov, Y. 2010 Rescaling Social Policies towards Multilevel Governance in Europe: Some Reflections on Processes at Stake and Actors Involve, in Y. Kazepov, (ed.), Rescaling Social Policies: Towards Multilevel Governance in Europe, Ashgate Publishing, Famham, pp. 15-33
  36. Kendall, J. 2009 Terra Incognita: Third Sectors and European Policy Processes, in J. Kendall, (eds.), Handbook on Third Sector Policy in Europe, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 3-21.
  37. Kerlin, J. A. 2006 Social Enterprise in the United and Europe: Understanding and Learning from our Differences, in «Voluntas», 17, 3, pp. 247-263
  38. Leiter, J. 2005 Structural Isomorphism in Australian Nonprofit Organizations, in «Voluntas», 16, 1, pp. 1-3
  39. Lipset S. M., Rokkan S. 1967 Cleavage Structures, Party Systems and Voter Alignments. An Introduction, in S. M. Lipset, S. Rokkan, (eds.), Party Systems and Voter Alignments. Cross-National Perspectives, New York, Free Press, 1967, pp. 1–64
  40. Manow, P. 2004 'The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly’ – Esping-Andersen’s Regime Typology and the Religious Roots of the Western Welfare State, MPIfG Working Paper 04/3, September
  41. March, J. 1988 Decisions and Organizations, Oxford, Basil Blackwell
  42. Minas R., Øverbye E. 2010 The Territorial Organisation of Social Assistance Schemes in Europe, in Y. Kazepov, (ed.), Rescaling Social Policies: Towards Multilevel Governance in Europe, Ashgate Publishing, Famham, pp. 203-241
  43. Monzon, J. L., Chaves R., 2008 The European Social Economy: Concept and Dimensions of the Third Sector, in «Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics», 79, Issue 3-4, pp. 549-577.
  44. Osborne, S. 2008 The third sector in Europe: Prospects and Challenges, London, Routledge. 2010 The New Public Governance, London, Routledge
  45. Pavolini, E. 2002 Le nuove politiche sociali, Bologna, il Mulino
  46. Pierson, P. 2000 Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics, in «American Political Science Review» 94, 2, pp. 251-267.
  47. Pestoff, V. 2009 A Democratic Architecture for the Welfare State, London, Routledge.
  48. Rose Ackerman, S. 1996 Altruism, non-profits, and economic theory, in «Journal of Economic Literature», 34 (2), pp. 701-29.
  49. Salamon, L. M., Anheier, H. K. 1998 Social origins of civil society: explaining the nonprofit sector crossnationally, in «Voluntas», 9, 3, pp. 213-248.
  50. Shalev, M. 2007 Limits and Alternatives to Multiple Regression in Comparative Research, in «Comparative Social Research», 24, pp. 267-314
  51. Tenebruck, F. 1984 Die unbewältigten Sozialwissenschaften oder die Abschaffung des Menschen, Styria, Graz.
  52. Tilly, C. 2005 Identities, Boundaries and Social Ties, Paradigm Publishers, Boulder/London
  53. Venturi P., Zandonai, F. 2012 (a cura di), L’impresa sociale in Italia. Pluralità dei modelli e contributo alla ripresa, Rapporto Iris Network, Milano, Edizioni Altreconomia
  54. Wijkström, F., Einarsson, S., Larsson O. 2004 Staten och det civila samhället. détraditioner och tankemodeller i den statliga bidragsgivningen till ideella organisationer, Socialstyrelsen koch EFI, Ekonomiska Forskningsinstitutet, Stockholm
  55. Zetterbaum, M. 1967 Tocqueville and the problem of democracy, Stanford, Stanford University Press

  • Welfare occupazionale e sostegno ai working carer in europa: la difficile ricomposizione di un mosaico complesso Luca Pesenti, in SOCIOLOGIA E POLITICHE SOCIALI 3/2018 pp.23
    DOI: 10.3280/SP2017-003003

Luca Fazzi, Il terzo settore e i limiti del paradigma dei regimi di welfare in "SOCIOLOGIA E POLITICHE SOCIALI" 1/2013, pp 93-110, DOI: 10.3280/SP2013-001006