Integrazione della VAS nei processi di pianificazione: il PTCP di Benevento

Titolo Rivista SCIENZE REGIONALI
Autori/Curatori Maria Cerreta, Pasquale De Toro
Anno di pubblicazione 2013 Fascicolo 2013/2
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 31 P. 15-45 Dimensione file 1228 KB
DOI 10.3280/SCRE2013-002002
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Il paper intende esplorare, attraverso un caso studio selezionato, come la Valutazione Ambientale Strategica (VAS) possa essere uno strumento di dialogo e di interazione tra differenti saperi, in grado di supportare processi di apprendimento, di gestione della conoscenza e di costruzione di scelte condivise, avvalendosi di approcci e tecniche opportuni. In questa prospettiva, la VAS può rivelarsi utile per supportare i processi decisionali a differenti scale e livelli, in grado di far dialogare valutazioni tecniche e politiche, con riferimento a valori complessi, parte integrante di realtà in conflitto ed in continua evoluzione, dove è necessario intervenire in coerenza con i principi della sostenibilità.;

Keywords:VAS, pianificazione territoriale, processi decisionali strategici.

Jel codes:Q51

  1. ANSEA Team (2002), New Concepts in Strategic Environmental Assessment. Towards Better Decision-making. Madrid: TAU Consultora Ambiental
  2. Bina O. (2005), Strategic Environmental Assessment. Paper presented at the International Research Workshop: Innovation in Environmental Policy? Integrating the Environment for Sustainability. Held at Cambridge, October. Available at http:// www.uea.ac.uk/env/cserge/events/2005/epi/index.htm
  3. Bina O. (2007), A Critical Review of the Dominant Lines of Argumentation on the Need for Strategic Environmental Assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27, 7: 585-606. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2007.05.003
  4. Bina O., Jing W., Brown L., Partidário M. R. (2011), An Inquiry into the Concept of SEA Effectiveness: Towards Criteria for Chinese Practice. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 31, 6: 572-581. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2011.01.004
  5. Caratti P., Dalkmann H., Jiliberto R. (eds.) (2004), Analytical Strategic Environmental Assessment: Towards Better Decision-Making. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  6. Castells N., Munda G. (1999), International Environmental Issues: Towards a New Integrated Assessment Approach. In: O’Connor M., Spash C. (eds.), Valuation and the Environment. Theory, Method and Practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 309- 327.
  7. CEAA – Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (1996), A Reference Guide for the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act: Assessing Environmental Effects on Physical and Cultural Heritage Resources. Otawa: CEAA
  8. Costanza R., Funtowicz S. O., Ravetz J. R. (1992), Assessing and Communicating Data Quality in Policy-relevant Research. Environmental Management, 16, 1: 121-31. DOI: 10.1007/BF02393914
  9. De Mulder J. (2011), The Protocol on Strategic Environmental Assessment: A Matter of Good Governance, RECIEL. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 20, 3: 232-247. doi: DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9388.2012.00731.x
  10. EC – Directorate General for Energy and Transport (2005), The SEA Manual. A Sourcebook o Strategic Environmental Assessment of Transport Infrastructure Plans and programmes. Brussels: BEACon
  11. Fischer T. B. (2001), Practice of Environmental Assessment for Transport and Landuse Policies, Plans and Programmes. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 19, 1: 41-51.
  12. Fischer T. B. (2007), Theory and Practice of Strategic Environmental Assessment: Towards a More Systematic Approach. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.
  13. Fischer T. B., Kidd S., Jha-Thakur U., Gazzola P., Peel D. (2009), Learning through EC Directive based SEA in Spatial Planning? Evidence from the Brunswick Region in Germany. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 29, 6: 421-428. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2009.03.001
  14. Fusco Girard L., Cerreta M., De Toro P., Forte F. (2007), The Human Sustainable City: Values, Approaches and Evaluative Tools. In: Deakin M., Mitchell G., Nijkamp P., Vreeker R. (eds.), Sustainable Urban Development. The Environmental Assessment Methods, vol. 2. London: Routledge. 65-93
  15. Fusco Girard L., Nijkamp P. (1997), Le valutazioni per lo sviluppo sostenibile della città e del territorio. Milano: FrancoAngeli
  16. Gunn J., Noble B. F. (2011), Conceptual and Methodological Challenges to Integrating SEA and Cumulative Effects Assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 31, 2: 154-160. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2009.12.003
  17. João E. (2005a), Key Principles of SEA. In: Schmidt M., João E., Albrecht E. (eds.), Implementing Strategic Environmental Assessment. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 3-14. DOI: 10.1007/3-540-27134-1_1
  18. João E. (2005b), SEA Outlook. Future Challenges and Possibilities. In: Schmidt M., João E., Albrecht E. (eds.), Implementing Strategic Environmental Assessment. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 691-700. DOI: 10.1007/3-540-27134-1_47.
  19. João E. (2007), A Research Agenda for Data and Scale Issues in Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA). Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27, 5: 479-491. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2007.02.009
  20. Karstens S., Bots P., Slinger J. (2007), Spatial Boundary Choice and the Views of Different Actors. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27, 5: 386-407. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2007.02.002
  21. Kontić B., Kontić D. (2012), A Viewpoint on the Approval Context of Strategic Environmental Assessments. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 32, 1: 151-155. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2011.07.003
  22. Levitt S., Dubner S. (2005), Freakonomics: a Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything. New York: William Morrow/Harper Collins
  23. Nilsson M., Wiklund H., Finnveden G., Jonsson D. K., Lundberg K., Tyskeng S., Wallgren O. (2009), Analytical Framework and Tool Kit for SEA Follow-up. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 29, 3: 186-199. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2008.09.002
  24. Noble B. F. (2004), SEA Quality Assurance: Evaluating and Improving the Consistency of Judgments in Assessment Panels. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24, 1: 3-25. DOI: 10.1016/S0195-9255
  25. Noble B. F. (2009), Promise and Dismay: The State of Strategic Environmental Assessment Systems and Practices in Canada. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 29, 1: 66-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2008.05.004
  26. Noble B. F., Storey K. (2001), Towards a Structured Approach to Strategic Environmental Assessment. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 3, 4: 483-508.
  27. Partidário M. R. (2000), Elements of an SEA Framework. Improving the Added Value of SEA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20, 6: 647-63. DOI: 10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00069-X
  28. Partidário M. R. (2007), Scales and Associated Data. What is Enough for SEA Needs?, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27, 5: 460-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2007.02.004
  29. Partidário M. R., Arts J. (2005), Exploring the Concept of Strategic Environmental Assessment Follow-up. Impact Assessment Project Appraisal, 23, 3: 246-57. DOI: 10.3152/147154605781765481
  30. Runhaar H. (2009), Putting SEA in Context: A Discourse Perspective on How SEA Contributes to Decision-making. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 29, 3: 200-209. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2008.09.003
  31. Stinchcombe K., Gibson R. (2001), Strategic Environmental Assessment as a Means of Pursuing Sustainability: Ten Advantages and Ten Challenges. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 3, 3: 343-72. DOI: 10.1142/S1464333201000741
  32. Thérivel R. (2004), Strategic Environmental Assessment in Action. London: Earthscan
  33. Thérivel R., Partidario M. R. (eds.) (1996), The Practice of Strategic Environmental Assessment. London: Earthscan.
  34. Thérivel R., Ross B. (2007), Cumulative Effects Assessment: Does Scale Matter?. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27, 5: 365-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2007.02.001
  35. Thérivel R., Wilson E., Thompson S., Heany D., Pritchard D. (1992), Strategic Environmental Assessment. London: Earthscan
  36. Verheem R., Tonk J. (2000), Strategic Environmental Assessment: One Concept, Multiple Forms. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 19, 3: 177-82. DOI: 10.3152/147154600781767411
  37. Vicente G., Partidário M. R. (2006), SEA. Enhancing Communication for Better Environmental Decisions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26, 8: 696-706. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2006.06.005
  38. Wirutskulshai U., Sajor E., Coowanitwong N. (2011), Importance of Context in Adoption and Progress in Application of Strategic Environmental Assessment: Experience of Thailand. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 31, 3: 352-359. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2011.01.001
  39. Wright F. (2007), Consideration of the Baseline Environment in Examples of Voluntary SEAs from Scotland. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27, 5: 424-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2007.02.006

  • New Metropolitan Perspectives Alessio D’Auria, Irina Di Ruocco, pp.774 (ISBN:978-3-031-06824-9)

Maria Cerreta, Pasquale De Toro, Integrazione della VAS nei processi di pianificazione: il PTCP di Benevento in "SCIENZE REGIONALI " 2/2013, pp 15-45, DOI: 10.3280/SCRE2013-002002