Psychology and technology: are they really so distant in relation to the school learning?

Author/s Daniela Lucangeli
Publishing Year 2013 Issue 2013/1
Language Italian Pages 6 P. 159-164 File size 160 KB
DOI 10.3280/RIP2013-01011
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Domenico Parisi expresses in his article his concern about a science, the cognitive psychology, that is careless towards school learning and he emphasizes how little is dedicated to the implementation of new technologies. In my comment, I tried to express what, in my opinion, this science is doing to improve learning situations, trying to better understand how cognitive processes ensure or not the learning itself (for example in cases of specific learning disorders). In particular having worked for years on numerical cognition, I brought concrete and significant examples of how, in this context, psychology and technology are working together to enhance learning.

Keywords: Cognitive psychology, school learning, numerical cognition

  1. Battista, M.T. (2002). Learning Geometry in a Dynamic Computer Environment. Teaching Children Mathematics, 6, 333-339.
  2. Cornoldi, C. (Ed.) (2007). I disturbi dell’apprendimento. Bologna: il Mulino.
  3. Lucangeli, D., Bertolli, C., Molin, A., & Poli, S. (2010). L’intelligenza numerica, vol. 4 “Abilita cognitive e metacognitive nella costruzione della conoscenza numerica dagli 11 ai 14 anni”. Trento: Erickson.
  4. Lucangeli, D., De Candia, C., & Poli, S. (2003). Abilita cognitive e metacognitive nella costruzione della conoscenza numerica dagli 8 agli 11 anni. L’intelligenza numerica, 3. Trento: Erickson.
  5. Lucangeli, D., & Mammarella, I.C. (Eds.) (2010). Psicologia della Cognizione Numerica: Approcci Teorici, Valutazione ed Intervento. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  6. Lucangeli, D., Mammarella, I.C., Todeschini, M., Miele, G., & Cornoldi, C. (2009). Conoscere le forme geometriche: Valutazione delle competenze e schede di intervento per bambini dai 4 ai 6 anni. Firenze: Giunti.
  7. Lucangeli, D., Poli, S., & Molin, A. (2003a). Abilita cognitive e metacognitive nella costruzione della conoscenza numerica dai 3 ai 6 anni. L’intelligenza numerica, 1. Trento: Erickson.
  8. Lucangeli, D., Poli S., & Molin, A. (2003b). Abilita cognitive e meta cognitive nella costruzione della conoscenza numerica dai 6 agli 8 anni L’intelligenza numerica, 2. Trento: Erickson.
  9. Mammarella, N., Pazzaglia, C., & Cornoldi, C. (2005). Psicologia dell’apprendimento multimediale. E-learning e nuove tecnologie. Bologna: il Mulino.
  10. Mayer, R.E. (Ed.) (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511816819
  11. Moro, M., Menegatti, M., Sella, F., & Perona, M. (2011). Imparare con la robotica: Applicazioni di problem solving. Trento: Erickson.
  12. Sardone, N.B., & Devlin-Scherer, R. (2008). Teacher Candidates’ Views of a Multi-User Virtual Environment (MUVE). Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 17(1), 41-51. DOI: 10.1080/14759390701847484
  13. Vygotskij, L.S. (1974). Storia dello sviluppo delle funzioni psichiche superiori. Firenze: Giunti Barbera.
  14. Zuiker, S.J. (2010). Think Global/Design Glocal. Educational Technology, 50(5), 37-40.

  • The CrazySquare project for music learning in Italian school-age pre-adolescents: integrating technology into educational practice Sara Peretti, Federica Caruso, Maria Chiara Pino, Marco Giancola, Simonetta D’Amico, Tania Di Mascio, in Journal of Computers in Education /2024
    DOI: 10.1007/s40692-024-00320-3

Daniela Lucangeli, Psicologia e tecnologia: davvero così lontane nell’ambito apprendimento scolastico? in "RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA " 1/2013, pp 159-164, DOI: 10.3280/RIP2013-01011