The grammar of Montelupo: brief group interventions with offender psychiatric patient confined to a mental institute

Author/s Alessandro Ridolfi, Antonietta Lettieri, Franco Scarpa, Edi Marini, Daiana Tredici
Publishing Year 2014 Issue 2014/1
Language Italian Pages 14 P. 99-112 File size 787 KB
DOI 10.3280/PDS2014-001005
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This paper presents the experience with a brief group work involving patients confined to a mental institute for offenders. The authors discuss the theoretic clinical aspects relative to two cycles of eight group encounters analyzing the transcripts with the Social Cognition and Object Relational Scale (SCORS). The principal goal of the intervention is aimed at overcoming the condition of interpersonal solitude perceived and recognizing the analogies-differences in the experiences with others. The intervention was conducted with an "in the group" method, an Evolutivity-Affectivity- Intersubjectivity-Experience model (EAIE) in which the conductor of the group actively stimulates the participants to freely express thoughts and associations as well "solutions" for hypothetical situations related to the story read. The focus is on the single person and on the opportunities that the group provides because of the relational activating context in which it is possible to share and confront with others. The complete narrative of each encounter was written "in direct" on a screen visible to all participants. The text was analyzed using SCORS as a means to identify the quality of patients’ answers. Even with patients with severe psychopathology the group seemed to represent an occasion for exchange, knowledge, respect and growth which promotes the capacity to reflect, elaborate and construct a growing interpersonal awareness.

Keywords: Brief group interventions, group psychotherapy, Evolutivity - Affectivity - Intersubjectivity - Experience Model, Social Cognition and Object Relational Scale, mental institute for offenders

  1. Abbate L. e Massaro V. (2007). La valutazione delle relazioni oggettuali e delle rappresentazioni sociali con il TAT: La Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale di Drew Westen [TAT Evaluation of object relations and social representations: The Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale di Drew Westen]. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  2. Benni S. (2007). La grammatica di Dio [God’s grammar]. Milano: Feltrinelli.
  3. Burlingame G.M., Mackenzie R.K. and Strauss B. (2004). Small Group Treatment: evidence for effectiveness and mechanism of change” In M. Lambert (Ed.), Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behaviour Change, 5th ed. New York: John Wiley and sons, pp. 647-696.
  4. Cermolacce M., Naudin J. and Parnas J. (2007). The “minimal self” in psychopathology: Re-examinig the self-disorders in schizophrenia spectrum. Consciousness and Cognition, 16: 703-714. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.05.01
  5. Costantini A. (2000). Psicoterapia di gruppo a tempo limitato: Basi teoriche ed efficacia clinica [Time limited group psychoyherapy: theoretical basis and clinical effectiveness]. Milano: Mc Graw-Hill.
  6. Erskine R. (2010). Relational Group Psychotherapy: The Healing of Stress, Neglect and Trauma. International Journal of Integrative Psychotherapy, 1 (1): 1-10.
  7. Gendlin E.T. (1996). Focusing-oriented psychotherapy: A manual of the experiential method. New York: Guilford Press.
  8. Westen D., Lohr N., Silk K.R. and Kerber K. (1985). Social Cognition and Object Relational Scale (SCORS): Manual for coding TAT data. Inedito: University of Michigan.
  9. Gullo S., Lo Coco G., Prestano C., Giannone F. e Lo Verso G. (2010). La ricerca in psicoterapia di gruppo. Alcuni risultati e future direzioni di ricerca [Research on group psychotherapy: some results and future reserch directions]. Ricerca in Psicoterapia/Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 2 (13): 78-96. Retrieved from:
  10. Legrand D. (2007). Pre-reflective self-as-subject from experimental and empirical perspectives. Consciousness and Cognition, 16: 583-599. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.04.00
  11. Lo Coco G., Giannone F. e Lo Verso G. (2006). La ricerca in psicoterapia di gruppo [Research on group psychotherapy]. In N. Dazzi, V. Lingiardi e A. Colli, a cura di, La ricerca in psicoterapia: Modelli e strumenti [Psychotherapy Research: Models and instruments]. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  12. Lo Coco G., Prestano C. e Lo Verso G. (2009). L’efficacia clinica delle psicoterapie di gruppo [Clinical effectiveness of Group Psychotherapy]. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  13. Menoni E. e Iannelli K. (2009). Il modello integrativo E.A.I.E. (Evolutivo, Affettivo, Intersoggettivo, Esperienziale) [The integrative model E.A.I.E. (Evolutivity, Affectivity, Intersubjectivity, Experience)]. Relazione al convegno AIIP Processi di vita e psicoterapia: intersoggettività, sviluppo, riparazione e cambiamento. Firenze, 5 settembre 2009.
  14. Menoni E. e Iannelli K. (2010a). The Integrative model (EAIE) Evolution, Affect, Intesubjectivity, Experience. A proposal. Paper presentato alla XXVI Conference SEPI Firenze, 27-30 maggio 2010.
  15. Menoni E. e Iannelli K. (2010b). Un modello di psicoterapia integrativa: EAIE [An integrative psychotherapy model: EAIE]. Paper presentato al I° Congresso Internazionale. Il Neo-Funzionalismo. Napoli, 8-9 maggio, 2010.
  16. Menoni E. e Iannelli K. (2011). Modelli psicoterapeutici integrativi e neuroscienze [Integrative psychotherapies Models and neurosciences]. In P. Petrini e A. Zucconi, a cura di, Psicoterapie e neuroscienze [Psychotherapy and neuroscience]. Roma: Alpes.
  17. Panksepp J. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. New York: Oxford University Press.
  18. Schore A. (2003a). Affect regulation and the repair of the self. New York, MA: Norton.
  19. Schore A. (2003b). Affect dysregulation and disorders of the self. New York, MA: Norton.
  20. Siegel D.J. (1999). The developing mind: Toward a neurobiology of interpersonal experience. New York: Guilford Press (trad. it. La mente relazionale. Neurobiologia dell’esperienza relazionale. Milano: Cortina, 2001).
  21. Siegel D.J. (2003). An interpersonal neurobiology of psychotherapy: The developing mind and the resolution of trauma. In M.F. Solomon and D.J. Siegel, editors, Healing Trauma: Attachment, mind, body, and brain. New York: Norton.
  22. Siegel D.J. (2006). An interpersonal neurobiology approach to psychotherapy: awareness, mirror neurons, and well-being. Psychiatric Annals, 36: 248-256.
  23. Smith M.L., Glass G.V. and Miller T.I. (1980). The benefits of psychotherapy. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
  24. Stern D. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant: A view from psychoanalysis developmental psychology, New York: Basic Books (tr it. Il mondo interpersonale del bambino. Bollati Boringhieri: Torino, 2000).
  25. Watt D.B. (2007). Toward a neuroscience of empathy. Integrating cognitive and affective perspectives. Neuropsychoanalysis, 9: 119-140. DOI: 10.1080/15294145.2007.1077355
  26. Westen D., Lohr N., Silk K.R. and Kerber K. (1990). Social Cognition and Object Relational Scale (SCORS)”: Manual for coding TAT data. Inedito, University of Michigan.
  27. Yalom I. and Leszcz M. (2005). The Theory and practice of Group Psychotherapy, 5th ed. (trad. it. Teoria e pratica della psicoterapia di gruppo. Bollati Boringhieri: Torino, 2005).

Alessandro Ridolfi, Antonietta Lettieri, Franco Scarpa, Edi Marini, Daiana Tredici, La grammatica di Montelupo: interventi brevi con gruppi di pazienti in Ospedale Psichiatrico Giudiziario in "PSICOLOGIA DELLA SALUTE" 1/2014, pp 99-112, DOI: 10.3280/PDS2014-001005