Disaffiliation and belonging: twitter and its agonistic publics

Journal title SOCIOLOGIA E POLITICHE SOCIALI
Author/s Michael Higgins, Angela Smith
Publishing Year 2014 Issue 2014/2
Language Italian Pages 13 P. 77-89 File size 168 KB
DOI 10.3280/SP2014-002005
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This article looks at forms of political and public engagement to emerge in Web 2.0. Focusing on the platform Twitter, the article looks at both antagonistic and agonistic types of political engagement. It discusses Twitter’s capacity for direct contact with main political party leaders as part of an antagonistic public discourse, geared towards creative expressions of individualised disaffiliation. However, in interventions around @EverydaySexism, the article finds collectivising practices more in keeping with an agonistic public discourse based upon involvement and the tactical use of irony and humour. While showing that the platform provides for new forms of antagonistic engagement with political elites, the article therefore offers support for the view that Web 2.0 gives rise to new and shifting formations of non-institutionally-aligned political public.

Keywords: Twitter; Disaffiliation; Agonistic Publics; Political Communication; Public Sphere.

  1. Kaye, B.K. & Johnson, T.J. 2004 A Web for all Reasons: Uses and Gratifications of Internet Components for Political Information, in «Telematics and Informatics», 21, 3, pp. 197-223.
  2. Kohly, K. 2013 Congress Vs. BJP: the Curious Case of Trolls and Politics, in «Times of India» --http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-10-11/india/42939774_1_social-media-trolls-congress-spokesperson-sanjay-jha (accessed 27 January, 1014)
  3. McCosker, A. 2013 Trolling as Provocation: YouTube’s Agonistic Publics, in «Convergence», --http://con.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/09/11/1354856513501413.full.pd f (accessed 23 January 2014)
  4. Mouffe, C. 2005 On the Political, London, Routledge.
  5. O’Neill, D. and Savigny, H. 2014 Female Politicians in the British Press: the Exception to the “Masculine” Norm?, in «Journalism Education», 3, 1, pp. 6-26.
  6. Parmelee, J. H. and Bichard, S. L. 2012 Politics and the Twitter Revolution, Plymouth, Lexington.
  7. Prynne, M. 2014 Twitter Trolls Admit abusing Feminist Campaigner Online, --http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/twitter/10556507/Twitter-trollsadmit-abusing-feminist-campaigner-online.html (accessed 24 January, 2014)
  8. Small, T. A. 2011 What the hashtag? A Content Analysis of Canadian Politics on Twitter, in «Information, Communication & Society», 14, 6, pp. 872-895.
  9. Scherer, M. 2009 Obama and Twitter: White House Social Networking, in «Time Magazine», --http://content.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1896482,00.html
  10. Street, J. 2004 Celebrity Politicians: Popular Culture and Political Representation, in «British Journal of Politics and International Relations», 6, pp. 435-452.
  11. Suhay, E. 2013 The Polarizing Effect of Incivility in the Political blog Commentsphere, in APSA 2013 Annual Meeting Paper; American Political Science Association 2013 Annual Meeting, --http://ssrn.com/abstract=2301157 (accessed 28 January 2014) Tepper, M. 1997 Usenet Communities and Cultural Politics of Information, in D. Porter (ed.) Internet Cultures, New York, Routledge, pp. 39-54.
  12. Warnick, B. and Heineman, D. S. 2012 Rhetoric Online: the Politics of New Media (2nd edition), New York, Peter Lang.
  13. Wilson, J. 2011 Playing With Politics: Political Fans and Twitter Faking in Post-broadcast Democracy, in «Convergence», 17, 4, pp. 445-461.
  14. Van Biezen, I, Mair, P. and Pogunkte, T. 2012 Going, Going, Gone? The decline of Party Membership in Contemporary Europe, in «European Journal of Political Research», 51, pp. 24-56.
  15. Yardi, S. and Boyd, D. 2010 Dynamic Debates: an Analysis of Group Polarization over Time on Twitter, in «Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society», 20, pp. S1–S8.
  16. Bates, L. 2014 Everyday Sexism, London, Simon & Schuster.
  17. Baxter, J. ed. 2006 Speaking Out: The Female Voice in Public Context, Basingstoke, Palgrave MacMillan.
  18. Beake, N. 2014 Pair Jailed over Abusive Tweets to Feminist Campaigners --http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-25886026#TWEET1022934 (accessed 27 January 2014)
  19. Berners-Lee, T. 2000 Weaving the Web, London, Texere.
  20. Bishop, J. 2014 Representations of “Trolls” in Mass Media Communication: a Review of Media-Texts and Moral Panics Relating to “Internet Trolling”, in «International Journal of Web Based Communities», 10, 1, pp. 7-24.
  21. Cammaerts, B. 2008 Critiques on the Participatory Potential of Web 2.0, in «Communication, Culture & Critique», 1, pp. 358-377.
  22. Cogburn, D. L. and Espinoza-Vasquez, F. K. 2011 From Networked Nominee to Networked Nation: Examining the Impact of Web 2.0 and Social Media on Political Participation and Civic Engagement in the 2008 Obama Campaign, in «Journal of Political Marketing», 10, 1-2, .pp. 189-213.
  23. Coleman, S. 2011 Representation and Mediated Politics, in K. Brants and K. Voltmer (eds.) Political Communication in Postmodern Democracy, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 39-56.
  24. Davis, A. 2010 New Media and Fat Democracy: the Paradox of Online Participation, in «New Media and Society», 12, 5, pp. 745-761.
  25. Dunleavy, P. 2005 Facing up to Multi-party Politics: how Partisan Dealignment and PR Voting Have Fundamentally Changed Britain’s Party Systems, in «Parliamentary Affairs», 58, 3, pp. 503-532.
  26. Enli, G. S. and Skogerbø, E. 2013 Personalized Campaigns in Party-centred Politics, in «Information, Communication & Society», 16, 5, pp. 757-774.
  27. Firstpost 2013 Why BJP’s Smart Social Media Policy Can’t Stem Trolling, in «Firstpost Politics» --http://www.firstpost.com/politics/why-bjps-smart-social-media-policy-cantstem-trolling-1137191.html
  28. (accessed 21 January 2014) Grant, W.J., Moon, B. and Grat, J.B. 2010 Digital Dialogue? Australian Politicians’ Use of the Social Network Tool Twitter, in «Australian Journal of Political Science», 45, 4, pp. 579-604.
  29. Hay, C. 2007 Why We Hate Politics, Cambridge, Polity.

  • Voices of Supporters (ISBN:9789027213884)
  • Crisis and the media Angela Smith, pp.231 (ISBN:9789027200341)
  • Fedrekvotepolitikkens dynamikk Anne Lise Ellingsæter, in Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning /2020 pp.323
    DOI: 10.18261/issn.1504-291X-2020-04-01
  • Emergent Twitter publics through political scandal Chamil Rathnayake, Angela Smith, Michael Higgins, in Journal of Language and Politics /2023 pp.458
    DOI: 10.1075/jlp.22028.rat
  • Mediated populism, culture and media form Michael Higgins, in Palgrave Communications 3/2017
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-017-0005-4
  • Mask communication: The development of the face covering as a semiotic resource through government public health posters in England and Wales Angela Smith, Michael Higgins, in Discourse, Context & Media 100651/2022 pp.100651
    DOI: 10.1016/j.dcm.2022.100651
  • Conflicting Policy Feedback: Enduring Tensions over Father Quotas in Norway Anne Lise Ellingsæter, in Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society /2022 pp.999
    DOI: 10.1093/sp/jxaa027
  • A Gossip Politic Michael Higgins, pp.27 (ISBN:978-3-031-15118-7)
  • Twenty-first Century Feminism Angela Smith, pp.1 (ISBN:978-1-349-50468-8)

Michael Higgins, Angela Smith, Disaffiliation and belonging: twitter and its agonistic publics in "SOCIOLOGIA E POLITICHE SOCIALI" 2/2014, pp 77-89, DOI: 10.3280/SP2014-002005