Cognizione-in-interazione, azione pratica e artefatti: il contributo della ricerca psicologica allo studio della relazione fra tecnologie e comunità lavorative

Author/s Francesca Alby
Publishing Year 2014 Issue 2014/1
Language Italian Pages 15 P. 163-177 File size 68 KB
DOI 10.3280/SO2014-001008
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The article describes the authors and theories that, in the domain of psychological research, helped to shape a conception of the mind as "technological", i.e. always mediated by artifacts, and of human cognition as culturally and historically situated, that is to be interpreted within a context always historically characterized and marked by the culture and its material and symbolic tools. Within this vision of psychological functioning, the article describes the conceptual tools, such as the constructs of "practice", "artifact", "knowledge-in-interaction", with which psychological research contributes to the interdisciplinary enterprise of analysing the relationship between technologies, socio-psychological phenomena and work communities.

Keywords: Technology, artifact, cultural psychology, work practices, cognition-ininteraction.

  1. Alby, F. (2007), Le tecnologie nella vita quotidiana, Roma, Carocci.
  2. Bobrow, D., Whalen, J. (2001), Community Knowledge Sharing in Practice: The Eureka Story, Xerox Parc paper.
  3. Bruni, A. (2005), Lo Studio Etnografico delle Organizzazioni, Roma, Carocci.
  4. Bruni, A., Gherardi, S. (2007), Studiare le Pratiche Lavorative, Bologna, Il Mulino.
  5. Bruni, A. (2012), “STS Italia”, Tecnoscienza, 3(2): 3-21.
  6. Cole, M. (1996), Psicologia culturale, Roma, Carlo Amore.
  7. Cole, M., Hood, L., McDermott, R.P. (1978), “Ecological niche picking: Ecological invalidity as an axiom of experimental cognitive psychology”, manoscritto non pubblicato, University of California and the Rockefeller
  8. University. Crabtree, A., Rodden, T., Benford, S. (2005), “Moving with the Times: IT Research and the Boundaries of CSCW”, Computer Supported Cooperative Work,14(3):217–251, DOI: 10.1007/S10606-005-3642-X
  9. Fleck, L. (1935), Genesi e sviluppo di un fatto scientifico, Bologna, Il Mulino.
  10. Gardner, H. (1985), The Mind’s New Science, New York: Basic Books.
  11. Goodwin, C. (1994), “Professional Vision”, American Anthropologist, 96 (3): 606-633, DOI: 10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100
  12. Heath, C., Luff, P. (2000), Technology in action, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  13. Hutchins, E. (2001), “Distributed Cognition”, Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, Amsterdam, Elsevier Science.
  14. Hutchins, E., Palen, L. (1997), “Constructing Meaning From Space, Gesture, and Talk”, in Resnick, C. Pontecorvo, R. Säljö, (Eds.) (1997), Discourse, tools and reasoning: Essays on Situated Cognition, New York, Springer Verlag.
  15. Hutchins, E. (1995), Cognition in the Wild, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
  16. Latour, B. (1986), “Visualization and Cognition. Thinking with Eyes and Hands”, Knowledge and Society, 6: 1-40.
  17. Latour, B. (2005), Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  18. Latour, B., Woolgar, S. (1986), Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts, Princeton, Princeton University.
  19. Lave, J. (1988), Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life, New York, Cambridge University Press.
  20. Leont'ev, A.N. (1981), “The problem of activity in psychology”, in Wertsch J.V.
  21. (Eds.) (1985), The concept of activity in Soviet Psychology, Armonk, N.Y., M.E Sharp: 37-71.
  22. Luff, P., Hindmarsh, J., Heath, C. (Eds.) (2000), Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing System Design, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  23. Lynch, M., Woolgar, M. (a cura di) (1988), Representation in Scientific Practice, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  24. Lynch, M. (a cura di) (2012), Science and Technology Studies, Critical Concepts in the Social Sciences, London and New York, Routledge.
  25. Mantovani, G. (1998), L’Elefante Invisibile - Alla Scoperta Della Dimensione Culturale, Firenze, Giunti.
  26. Mantovani, G. (2004), Intercultura, Bologna, Il Mulino.
  27. Mantovani, G. (Eds.) (2000), Ergonomia. Lavoro, Sicurezza e Nuove Tecnologie,
  28. Bologna, Il Mulino. Mead, G.H (1934), Mind, self and society, Chicago, Chicago University Press (trad. it. Mente, Se' e Società, Firenze, Giunti Barbera, 1972).
  29. Mecacci, L. (1999), Psicologia moderna e postmoderna, Bari, Laterza.
  30. Mecacci, L. (2000), “La mente umana e il suo mondo artificiale”, in Mantovani,
  31. G. (a cura di) (2003), Ergonomia, Bologna, Il Mulino.
  32. Neisser, U. (1978), “Memory: What are the Important Questions”, in Gruneberg, M., Morris, P., Sykes, R. (Eds.) (1978), Practical Aspects of Memory, London, Academic Press.
  33. Nicolini, D. (2013), Practice theory, work and organization, Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press.
  34. Orr, J. (1990), “Sharing knowledge, celebrating identity: war stories and community memory among service technicians”, in Middleton, D.S., Edwards, D. (Eds) (2001), Collective remembering: memory in society,
  35. London, Sage Pubblications: 169-189, (trad. it. “Condividere le conoscenze, celebrare l'identità. La memoria di comunità in un cultura di servizio”, in Zucchermaglio, C. (a cura di) (2013), Cognizione al lavoro, Milano, LED).
  36. Orr, J. (1996), Talking about machines: an ethnography of a modern job, Ithaca, N.Y., ILR Press.
  37. Parolin, L. (2008), “I Workplace Studies: tecnologia ed interazione sociale nei contesti di lavoro”, Studi Organizzativi, 1: 145-165.
  38. Resnick, L. B. (1987), “Learning in School and Out”, in Educational Researcher, 6 (9): 13-20 (trad. it. “Imparare dentro e fuori la scuola”, in Pontecorvo, C., Ajello, A.M, Zucchermaglio, C. (a cura di) (1995), I
  39. contesti sociali dell'apprendimento, Milano, LED).
  40. Riva, G. (2008), Psicologia dei Nuovi Media, Bologna, Il Mulino.
  41. Rogoff, B., Lave, J.(1984), Everyday Cognition, Cambridge Mass, Harvard University Press.
  42. Sapir, E. (1949), Culture, language and personality, Berkeley, University of California press (trad. it. Cultura, linguaggio e personalità, Torino, Einaudi, 1972).
  43. Schatzki, T.R., Cetina, K.K. von Savigny, E. (a cura di) (2001), The practice turn in contemporary theory, London, Routledge.
  44. Scribner, S., Cole, M. (1981), The Psychology of Literacy, Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press.
  45. Scribner, S. (1984), “Studying Working Intelligence”, in Rogoff, B., Lave, J., Everyday Cognition, Cambridge Mass, Harvard University Press (trad. it. “Lo studio dell'intelligenza al lavoro”, in Zucchermaglio, C. (a cura di) (2013), Cognizione al lavoro, Milano, LED). Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., LeBaron, C. (Eds.) (2011), Embodied Interaction. Language and Body in the Material World, New York, Cambridge University Press.
  46. Suchman, L. (2002), Replicants and Irreductions: Affective encounters at the interface, paper presented to EASST, York, UK, 2 August.
  47. Suchman, L. (2000), “Embodied practices of engineering work”, in Mind,culture and activity, 7 (1&2): 4-18.
  48. Suchman, L. (1987), Plans and situated actions: the problem of humanemachine communication, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  49. Suchman, L., Trigg, R. (1993), “Artificial Intelligence as Craftwork”, in Chaiklin, S., Lave, J. (Eds.), Understanding Practice, New York: Cambridge University Press: 144-178.
  50. Vygotskij, L.S., (1934), Pensiero e linguaggio, Roma- Bari, Laterza.
  51. Vygotskij, L.S. (1974), Storia dello sviluppo delle funzioni psichiche superiori, Firenze, Giunti.
  52. Zucchermaglio, C. (1995), “Studiare le organizzazioni. Apprendimento, pratiche di lavoro e tecnologie nei contesti organizzativi”, in Zucchermaglio C. (a cura di) (2013), Cognizione al lavoro, Milano: LED.
  53. Zucchermaglio, C. (2002), Psicologia culturale dei gruppi, Roma, Carocci.
  54. Zucchermaglio, C. (a cura di) (2013), Cognizione al lavoro. Interazione, pratiche, comunità, Milano, LED.
  55. Zucchermaglio, C., Alby, F. (2005), Gruppi e tecnologie al lavoro, Roma-Bari, Laterza.
  56. Zucchermaglio, C., Alby, F., Fatigante, M., Saglietti, M. (2013), Fare ricerca situata in psicologia sociale, Bologna, Il Mulino.

  • Where does it come from? Collaborative emergence in creative work practices Laura Lucia Parolin, Carmen Pellegrinelli, in New Ideas in Psychology 100800/2020 pp.100800
    DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2020.100800

Francesca Alby, Cognizione-in-interazione, azione pratica e artefatti: il contributo della ricerca psicologica allo studio della relazione fra tecnologie e comunità lavorative in "STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI " 1/2014, pp 163-177, DOI: 10.3280/SO2014-001008