Llibertà contro vantaggi in Rousseau e Rawls

Titolo Rivista RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA
Autori/Curatori Gabriella Lamonica
Anno di pubblicazione 2015 Fascicolo 2015/1
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 13 P. 79-91 Dimensione file 557 KB
DOI 10.3280/SF2015-001007
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Both Rousseau and Rawls see extreme inequality as a condition which undermines political liberties. By looking into the relationship between bondage and inequality as it unfolds in Rousseau’s Discours sur l’Inégalité and in Rawls’s reply to Hart on liberty and its priority, a coextension between liberty and the individual can be found, in which liberty plays a normative role. This explains why both Rousseau and Rawls insist on ruling out trade-offs between liberty (or the basic liberties in Rawls’s first principle) and other advantages.;

Keywords:Rousseau, Rawls, liberty, advantages, equality, priority.

  1. - Barry1973: Brian Barry, John Rawls and the Priority of Liberty, in «Philosophy & Public Affairs», Vol. 2, No. 3 (1973), pp. 274-290.
  2. - Bertram 2010: Christopher Bertram, lemma Jean Jacques Rousseau, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL=<http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/rousseau/>.
  3. - Bertram 2004: Id., Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Rousseau and the Social Contract, Routledge, London 2004.
  4. - Cohen 2010: Joshua Cohen, Rousseau. A free Community of Equals, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010. - Daniels 1989: Norman Daniels, Equal Liberty and Unequal Worth of Liberty, in Id. (ed.), Reading Rawls, Stanford University Press, Stanford 1989, pp. 253-281.
  5. - Derathé 1950: Robert Derathé, J.-J.Rousseau et la science politique de son temps, Vrin, Paris 1950.
  6. - Hart 1989 (1973): Herbert Hart, Rawls on Liberty and its Priority, in Norman Daniels (ed.), Reading Rawls, Stanford University Press, Stanford 1989, pp. 230-252.
  7. - Lessnoff 1974: Michael Lessnoff , Barry on Rawls’ Priority of Liberty, in «Philosophy & Public Affairs», Vol. 4, No. 1 (Autumn, 1974), pp. 100-114.
  8. - Paul 1984: Jeffrey Paul, Rawls on Liberty, in John Gray e Zbigniew Pelczynski (eds.), Conceptions of Liberty in Political Philosophy, Athlone Press, London 1984, pp. 376-396.
  9. - Rawls 1993: John Rawls, Political Liberalism, Colombia University Press, New York 1993.
  10. - Rawls 2001: Id., Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA 2001.
  11. - Rawls 2007: John Rawls, Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (MA) 2007.
  12. - Rousseau 1964: Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Discours sur l’origine et les fondements de l’inégalité parmi les hommes (éd. Jean Starobinski) in OEuvres complètes, (éd. Bernard Gagnebin et Marcel Raymond), Gallimard, Paris 1964, Vol. III, pp. 109-223.
  13. - Spector 2011: Céline Spector, Au Prisme de Rousseau: usages politiques contemporaines, Voltaire Foundation, University of Oxford, Oxford 2011.

Gabriella Lamonica, Llibertà contro vantaggi in Rousseau e Rawls in "RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA" 1/2015, pp 79-91, DOI: 10.3280/SF2015-001007