Corporate networks and we-relation: the italian experience

Author/s Simone D'Alessandro
Publishing Year 2015 Issue 2015/2 Language English
Pages 20 P. 152-171 File size 90 KB
DOI 10.3280/SP2015-002008
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

To be competitive today, it is essential to create corporate/business networks, especially for those small and medium companies that do not have the capacity to internationalize their product or invest in research and development. Starting from an analysis of Italian cases, the main idea supported in this research is that a simple network of actors/ companies involved in a system of relations, is not a sufficient condition to create the premises for economic growth, competitiveness and innovation. To create a successful corporate network, it is necessary a common aim sharing, oriented to the ‘We-relation’. We-Relation is the foundation of all effective communication (Ostrow 1990), it is possible only in the face to face situation (Schutz and Luckmann 1973) and enhance the Trust between human beings (Vaitkus 1991). The essential features of We-relation can be seen in reflection, after the concrete We relation has come to on end (Schutz 1976) and it is impossible to construct the same thing on the web (Bakardjieva 2005). The research has also tried to classify the types of corporate networks that currently exist (subdivided in vertical, horizontal, transversal, informal) as well as understand how to establish relationships capable of determining positive results in terms of effectiveness and sustainability.

Keywords: We-Relation; Corporate Network; Community; Innovation; Relational Theory

  1. Affuso, S., D’Alessandro, S. and Marini, G. 2012. The Next Global Scenarios. The Systemic Approach and the 21st Century Key Challenges. Roma: Aracne.
  2. Archer, M.S. 2003. Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation. Cambridge:
  3. Cambridge University Press. — 2007. Making our Way through the World: Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Bagnasco, A. 1997. Tre Italie: la problematica territoriale dello sviluppo italiano. Bologna: il Mulino.
  5. Bagnasco, A., Trigilia, C. 1988. La costruzione sociale del mercato. Bologna: il Mulino.
  6. Bakardjieva, M. 2005. Internet Society. London: Sage.
  7. Barbieri, P. 1997. Non c’è rete senza nodi. Il ruolo del capitale sociale nel mercato del lavoro. Stato e Mercato, 1, pp. 67-109.
  8. Barbieri, P. 1998. Regolazione industriale e redistribuzione dello stigma. Stato, mercato e reti sociali nei processi di avviamento al lavoro come fattori di esclusione sociale in Europa. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, 2, pp. 249-272.
  9. Becattini, G. 1989. Riflessioni sul distretto industriale marshalliano come concetto socio-economico. Stato e Mercato, 25, pp. 111-128.
  10. Beck, U., Giddens, A., and Lash, S., 1994. Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  11. Cianciullo, A., Realacci, E. 2005. Softeconomy. Milano: Rizzoli Bur.
  12. D’Alessandro, S. 2014. L’identità della Differenza. Ri-pensare la relazione nei sistemi sociali. Milano: Franco Angeli.
  13. — 2014. The Relationship in the System: a Comparison with Donati and Luhmann in G. Mancini and R. Angrisani eds. 2014. Mapping Systemic Knowledge. Saarbrücken: Lap Lambert Academic Publishing.
  14. D’Alessandro, S., Gagliardi M., 2013. The Relational Organisation: Business Networks and Business Communities. Pescara: Carsa Edizioni.
  15. Donati, P. 2013. Sociologia della relazione. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  16. — 2009. La società dell’umano. Genova: Marietti.
  17. — 2000. Dono e perdono nelle relazioni familiari e sociali. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.
  18. — 1991. Teoria relazionale della società. Milano: Franco Angeli.
  19. Donati, P., Solci, R. 2011. I beni relazionali. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
  20. Elder-Vass, D. 2007. Social Structures and Social Relations. Journal for the theory of social behaviour, 37 (4), pp. 463-477.
  21. Granovetter, M. 1973. The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78 (6), pp. 1360-1380.
  22. Ostrow, J. 1990. Social Sensitivity. A Study of Habit and Experience. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  23. Paci, M. 1989. Pubblico e privato nei moderni sistemi di Welfare. Napoli: Liguori.
  24. Piore, M., Sabel, C. 1987. Le due vie dello sviluppo industriale. Torino: Isedi.
  25. Prandini, R. 2010. Soggettività sociali riflessive: la costituzione di un “noi” riflessivo. Sociologia e Politiche Sociali, 1 (13), pp. 81-113.
  26. Putnam, R. D. 1993. La tradizione civica nelle regioni italiane. Milano: Mondadori.
  27. Ray, C. 1999. Endogenous development in the era of reflexive modernity. Journal of rural studies, 15 (3), pp. 257-267. Realacci, E. 2012. Green Economy. Milano: Chiare Lettere.
  28. Rullani, E. 2008. Il potere e le reti: rigenerare appartenenze e identità nel governo del territorio, Sociologia del Lavoro, 109, pp. 43-71.
  29. Rullani, E. 2001. New economy e regolazione: il capitalismo delle reti alla ricerca di nuove istituzioni. Foedus, 2, pp. 35-50.
  30. Schutz, A. 1970. On Phenomenology and Social Relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  31. — 1976. Collected Papers, II, Studies in Social Theory. The Hague (NL): Martinus Nihoff.
  32. Schutz, A., Luckmann, T. 1973. The structures of Life-Words, Vol. 1. Evanston: North Western University Press.
  33. Seligman, A. 2000. Modernity's Wager: Authority, the Self and Transcendence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  34. Vaitkus, S. 1991. How the Society is Possible? Dordrecht: Kluver Academic.
  35. Zamagni, S. 2006. L’economia come se la persona contasse. Verso una teoria economica relazionale in P.L. Sacco and S. Zamagni a cura di 2006. Teoria economica e relazioni interpersonali, pp. 17-51. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  36. Zanni, L., Bellavista, M. 2012. Reti d’impresa. Milano: Franco Angeli.
  37. Weber, L., Carte, A. 2003. The Social Construction of Trust. New York: Springer

  • Sociologia relazionale e rapporto medico-infermiere-paziente Simone D’Alessandro, in SALUTE E SOCIETÀ 1/2018 pp.159
    DOI: 10.3280/SES2018-001011

Simone D'Alessandro, Corporate networks and we-relation: the italian experience in "SOCIOLOGIA E POLITICHE SOCIALI" 2/2015, pp 152-171, DOI: 10.3280/SP2015-002008