Investigating teaching and learning methods in Italian universities and beyond. The quest to improve and share practices and strategies in the international higher education context

Titolo Rivista EDUCATIONAL REFLECTIVE PRACTICES
Autori/Curatori Monica Fedeli, Joellen E. Coryell
Anno di pubblicazione 2015 Fascicolo 2014/2
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 16 P. 35-50 Dimensione file 121 KB
DOI 10.3280/ERP2014-002003
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The present paper aims to describe the first phase (12 months) of an Italian research unit, which is part of a more extensive three year project that endeavored to: design innovative programs for higher education, to promote personalized learning, to build on job competencies, to value talents, to create new work opportunities, and to provide positive strategies in higher education to support young adults during their employment emergency as a response to the socio-economic crisis and as a citizenship action. In response, a consortium of universities and researchers, called Emp&Co (Employability and Competences) was created. The project involves six Italian Universities (Padova, Firenze, Siena, Napoli, Molise, Roma Sapienza), and Dr. Monica Fedeli from the University of Padova is the Principal Investigator. Dr. Fedeli’s research group is focusing on the innovation of teaching and learning methods and promotion of personalized programs in order to modernize university didactics, to encourage the university-business dialogue, and to promote employability. In the first phase of the project, a literature review was conducted and an analysis of student evaluation questionnaires on didactics, from 8 Italian, 3 American, 5 European, 1 Canadian, and 1 African University was completed to compare and learn from the different ways in which courses are evaluated by students in the different academic contexts. The goal at the end of the first year is the creation of a questionnaire template focused on teaching and learning methods, in order to gain a better understanding of student perspectives in our country. Additionally, we hope to implement strategies that will improve university didactics as requested by all European Union declarations. This paper introduces the overall study and the foregrounding work done with Dr. Joellen Coryell from Texas State University in the United States, who is a consultant to the University of Padova in the areas of adult and higher education teaching and learning.

  1. Anderson, G., Boud, D., & Sampson, J. (1996). Learning contracts. London: Kogan Page.
  2. Bart, D., & Fournet, M. (2010). Le projet professionnel et personnel des étudiants, assise de leur professionnalisation? Revue internationale de pédagogie de l’enseignement supérieur, 26(1), pp. 1-18.
  3. Bray, B. & Mc.Claskey, K. (2013). A step-by-step guide to personalized learning. Learning & Leading with Technology, 40(7), pp. 12-19.
  4. Brémaud, L., & Boisclair, M. (2012). Pédagogie universitaire et partenariat université-entreprise: Enjeux, écueils, perspectives. Revue internationale de pédagogie de l’enseignement supérieur, 28(1), pp. 1-17.
  5. Brockett, R.G., & Hiemstra, R. (1991). Self-direction in adult learning: Perspectives on theory, research, and practice. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
  6. Brookfield, S.D. (2004). Discussion. In M. Galbraith (Ed.), Adult learning methods: A guide for effective instruction (3rd ed.). Malabar, FL: Krieger.
  7. Brookfield, S.D. (2013). Powerful techniques for teaching adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  8. Brookfield, S.D. & Preskill, S. (2005). Discussion as a way of teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  9. Coryell, J.E. (2013). Collaborative comparative inquiry, and transformative crosscultural adult learning and teaching: A Western educator metanarrative and inspiring a global vision. Adult Education Quarterly, 63(4), pp. 299-320.
  10. Di Nubila R. (2008). Saper fare formazione: Manuale di metodologia per giovani formatori. Lecce: Pensa Multimedia.
  11. Di Nubila, R., & Fedeli, M. (2010). L’esperienza: quando diventa fattore di formazione e di sviluppo. Dall’opera di David A. Kolb alle attuali metodologie di Experiential Learning. Lecce: Pensa MultiMedia.
  12. Dirkx, J.M. (2005). “To develop a firm persuasion”: Workplace learning and the problem of meaning. In C. Elliott & S. Turnbill (Eds.). Critical thinking in human resource development (pp. 155-174). London: Routledge.
  13. Dirkx, J.M. (2008). The meaning and role of emotions in adult learning. In J. M.
  14. Dirkx (Ed.) Adult learning and the emotional self (pp. 7-18). New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, No. 120. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  15. Dirkx, J.M. (2011). Work-related learning in the United States: Past practices, paradigm shifts and policies of partnerships (pp. 293-306). In M. Malloch, L.
  16. Cairns, K. Evans, & B N. O’Conner (Eds.), The international handbook of workplace learning: Theory, research, practice and issues. London: Sage.
  17. European Commission (2006). Delivering on the modernisation agenda for universities: education, research and innovation.
  18. European Commission (2009). A new partnership for the modernisation of universities: The EU Forum for University Business Dialogue. Available from http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/recherche.cfm?C=it, [27.02.2014].
  19. European Commission (2011). Supporting growth and jobs – an agenda for the modernisation of Europe’s higher education systems.
  20. European Commission (2013). Report to the European Commission on improving the quality of teaching and learning in Europe’s higher education institutions. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  21. European Commission (2013a). 5th University-Business Forum. Strategic Partnerships for Innovation and Growth: From Dialogue to Partnerships.
  22. Fedeli, M., Giampaolo, M., & Coryell, J. (2013). The use of learning contracts in the Italian University System. Adult Learning, 24(3), pp. 104-111.
  23. Grow, G. O. (1991). Teaching learners to be self-directed. Adult Education Quarterly, 41(3), pp. 125-149.
  24. Guspini, M. (2008). Complex learning. Roma: Learning Community.
  25. Hudzik, J., & Briggs, P. (2012). Trends and institutional implications for international student enrollments in U.S. institutions. New York: NAFSA.
  26. Jenkins, J. M., & Keefe, J. W. (2002). Personalized instruction. Phi Delta Kappan, 83, pp. 440-448.
  27. Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. New York, NY: Cambridge Book Company.
  28. Knowles, M.S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge Books.
  29. Knowles, M.S. (1984). Introduction: The art and science of helping adults learn. In M.S. Knowles & Associates, (Eds.), Andragogy in action (pp. 1-21). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  30. Knowles, M.S. (1986). Using learning contracts. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
  31. Publishing.
  32. Leadbeater (2000). The weightless society. New York: Texere Publishing Ltd.
  33. Lieberman, D. (2005). Beyond faculty development: How centers for teaching and learning can be laboratories for learning. New Directions for Higher Education, 131, pp. 87-98.
  34. Mancuso, S. (2001). Adult-centered practices: Benchmarking study in higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 25(3), 165-181.
  35. Marsick, V.J. (2004). Cast study. In M. Galbraith (Ed.), Adult learning methods: A guide for effective instruction (3rd ed.). Malabar, FL: Krieger.
  36. Merriam, S.B., & Associates. (2007). Non-western perspectives on learning and knowing. Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing.
  37. Merriam, S.B. & Bierema, L.L. (2014). Adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
  38. Merriam, S.B., Caffarella, R.S., & Baumgartner, L.M. (2007). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide (3rd Ed). San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
  39. Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning to think like an adult. In J. Mezirow & Associates (Eds.) Learning as transformation (pp. 3-34). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  40. National Education Association (n.d.). Higher education best practices – Teaching & learning. Washington DC: National Education Association.
  41. Nicholson, B.L. (2004). Course portfolio. In M. Galbraith (Ed.), Adult learning methods: A guide for effective instruction (3rd ed.). Malabar, FL: Krieger.
  42. Pastré, P., Mayen, P., Vergnaud, G. (2006). La didactique professionnelle. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 154, pp. 144-198.
  43. Powell, W., & Kusuma-Powell, O. (2012). Planning for personalization. Educational Leadership, 69(5), pp. 52-55.
  44. Pentecouteau, H. (2012). L’alternance dans une formation professionnelle universitaire. De l’idéal épistémologique aux contradictions pédagogiques. Revue Internationale De Pédagogie De L’enseignement Supérieur, 28(1), pp. 1-12.
  45. Pratt, D.D. (2002). Good teaching: One size fits all? In J. Ross-Gordon (Ed.), Contemporary viewpoints on teaching adults effectively. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, No. 93, (pp 5 – 15). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  46. Richardson, W. (2012). Preparing students to learn without us. Educational Leadership, 69(5), pp. 22-26.
  47. Sisco, B.R. (2004). Form, panel, and symposium. In M. Galbraith (Ed.), Adult learning methods: A guide for effective instruction (3rd ed.). Malabar, FL: Krieger.
  48. Taylor, E. W. (2012). Transformative learning in practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  49. Tiberius, R. (2002). A brief history of educational development: Implications for teachers and developers. To Improve the Academy, 20, pp. 20-38.
  50. van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2007). Ten steps to complex learning: A systematic approach to four-component instructional design. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  51. Waldeck, J. H. (2006). What does “personalized education” mean for faculty, and how should it serve our students? Communication Education, 55(3), pp. 345-352.
  52. Waldeck, J. H. (2007). Answering the question: Student perceptions of personalized education and the construct’s relationship to learning outcomes. Communication Education, 56(4), pp. 409-432.
  53. White, B.A., & Bridwell, C. (2004). Distance learning techniques. In M. Galbraith (Ed.), Adult learning methods: A guide for effective instruction (3rd ed.). Malabar, FL: Krieger.
  54. Wittorski, R. (2012). La professionnalisation de l’offre de formation universitaire : quelques spécificités. Revue Internationale de Pédagogie de L’enseignement Supérieur, 28(1), pp. 1-11.
  55. Zaitseva, E., Milsom, C., & Stewart, M. (2013). Connecting the dots: Using concept maps for interpreting student satisfaction. Quality in Higher Education, 19(2), pp. 225-247.

  • Theory and Practice for Understanding Process and Outcomes of Transformative Learning Claudio Melacarne, Alessandra Romano, in EDUCATIONAL REFLECTIVE PRACTICES 2/2019 pp.214
    DOI: 10.3280/ERP2018-002014

Monica Fedeli, Joellen E. Coryell, Investigating teaching and learning methods in Italian universities and beyond. The quest to improve and share practices and strategies in the international higher education context in "EDUCATIONAL REFLECTIVE PRACTICES" 2/2014, pp 35-50, DOI: 10.3280/ERP2014-002003