Defending the "core"? Trade unions confronted with labour market dualisation

Author/s Lisa Dorigatti
Publishing Year 2015 Issue 2015/140
Language Italian Pages 14 P. 19-32 File size 97 KB
DOI 10.3280/SL2015-140002
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Over the last three decades, the issue of labour market segmentation has acquired a renewed significance in the political and scientific debate. Within this debate, a particularly discussed topic has been the role of trade unions in segmentation processes. According to the dualisation literature, trade unions have contributed to strengthen, rather than limiting, segmentation and the growth of inequalities on the labour market, since they are focused on the defense of their members, mainly concentrated in the most protected labor market segments. Through the analysis of the strategies adopted by German unions of the chemical and metalworking sectors towards outsourcing and nonstandard forms of employment, this study challenges this view. We will show that trade unions do not necessarily exclude outsiders. This is because the defense of their members is just one of the possible reasons that define trade unions’ strategies. In addition, we show how the same willingness to defend the interests of their members does not lead necessarily to the exclusion of more peripheral workers, since the growth of the latter often puts the former under strain. To represent more vulnerable workers becomes, therefore, a need for trade unions in order to defend also more stable workers.

Keywords: Segmentation, insider/outsider, trade union strategies, Germany

  1. AIChE (2011). Chemical Parks: Industry Landscaping a la Germany. CEP Magazine. 108(10): 44-47.
  2. Atkinson J. (1985). Flexibility, Uncertainty and Manpower Management. IMF Report n. 89. Institute of Manpower Studies.
  3. Benassi C., Dorigatti L. (2015). Straight to the Core – Explaining Union Responses to the Casualization of Work: The IG Metall Campaign for Agency Workers. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 53(3): 533-555. DOI: 10.1111/bjir.1207
  4. Benassi C., Vlandas T. (2015). Union inclusiveness and temporary agency workers: The role of power resources and union ideology. European Journal of Industrial Relations. DOI: 10.1177/095968011558948
  5. Cella G.P. (2003). La rappresentanza attraverso soggetti collettivi: rispecchiare o interpretare. Stato e mercato, 68(2): 217-240. DOI: 10.1425/955
  6. Davidsson J., Emmenegger P. (2013). Defending the organisation, not the members: Unions and the reform of job security legislation in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 52(3): 339-363. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2012.02073.
  7. Eichhorst W., Marx P. (2011). Reforming German Labour Market Institutions: A Dual Path to Flexibility. Journal of European Social Policy, 21(1): 73-87. DOI: 10.1177/095892871038573
  8. Emmenegger P., Haeusermann S., Palier B., Seeleib-Kaiser M. (2012). The Age of Dualization. The Changing Face of Inequality in Deindustrializing Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  9. Frege C., Kelly J. (2004). Varieties of Unionism: Strategies for Union Revitalization in a Globalizing Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  10. Greer I. (2008). Organized industrial relations in the information economy: The German automotive sector as a test case. New Technology, Work and Employment, 23(3): 181-196. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-005X.2008.00212.
  11. Haipeter T. (2011). “Unbound” employers’ associations and derogations: erosion and renewal of collective bargaining in the German metalworking industry. Industrial Relations Journal, 42(2): 174-194. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2338.2011.00615.
  12. Hassel A. (2007). The Curse of Institutional Security: The Erosion of German Trade Unionism. Industrielle Beziehungen, 14(2): 176-191.
  13. Hassel A. (2014). The Paradox of Liberalization - Understanding Dualism and the Recovery of the German Political Economy. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 52(1): 57-81. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8543.2012.00913.
  14. Hyman R. (1992). Trade Unions and the Disaggregation of the Working Class. In: Regini M., a cura di, The Future of Labour Movements. London: SAGE.
  15. IG BCE (2012). Zuschlaege fuer Leiharbeiter.
  16. IG Metall (2011). Viel Arbeit am Rand. Werkverträge und Outsourcing: Arbeitshilfe für Betriebsräte. Frankfurt: IG Metall Vorstand.
  17. Juergens U., Krzywdzinski M. (2006). Globalisierungsdruck und Beschaftigungssicherung - Standortsicherungsvereinbarungen in der deutschen Automobilindustrie zwischen 1993 und 2006. WZB Discussion Papers SP III.
  18. Kaedtler J. (2006). Sozialpartnerschaft im Umbruch. Industrielle Beziehungen unter den Bedingungen von Globalisierung und Finanzmarktkapitalismus. Hamburg: VSA Verlag.
  19. MacKenzie R. (2009). Union Responses to Restructuring and the Growth of Contingent Labour in the Irish Telecommunications Sector. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 30(4): 539-563. DOI: 10.1177/0143831X0934262
  20. Markovits A. (1985). The Politics of West-German Trade Unions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  21. Offe C., Wiesenthal H. (1980). Two Logics of Collective Action: Theoretical Notes on Social Class and Organizational Form. Political Power and Social Theory. 1: 67-115.
  22. Palier B., Thelen K. (2010). Institutionalizing Dualism: Complementarities and Change in France and Germany. Politics&Society, 38(1): 119-148. DOI: 10.1177/003232920935788
  23. Promberger M. (2012). Topographie der Leiharbeit. Flexibilitaet und Prekaritaet einer atypischen Beschaeftigungsform. Berlin: Edition Sigma.
  24. Pulignano V., Doerflinger N. (2013). A head with two tales: trade unions’ influence on temporary agency work in Belgian and German workplaces. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(22): 4149-4165. DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2013.84544
  25. Regalia I. (2009). Quale Rappresentanza? Dinamiche e prospettive del sindacato in Italia. Roma: Ediesse.
  26. Regini M. (1981). I dilemmi del sindacato: conflitto e partecipazione negli anni Settanta e Ottanta. Bologna: il Mulino.
  27. Rueda D. (2014). Dualization, crisis and the welfare state. Socio-Economic Review, 12(2): 381-407. DOI: 10.1093/ser/mwu01
  28. VDA (2008). Jahresbericht 2010. Frankfurt am Main: Verband der Deutschen Autoindustrie.
  29. Wetzel D., Weigand J., Niemann-Findeisen S., Lankau T. (2008). Organizing: die mitgliedorientierte Offensivstrategie für die IG Metall. Acht Thesen zur Erneuerung der Gewerkschaftsarbeit,

  • Diversity Management Policies for the Inclusion of LGBT People into the Labour Market: The Case of Naples Massimiliano Agovino, Fabio Corbisiero, in Papers in Applied Geography /2021 pp.50
    DOI: 10.1080/23754931.2020.1815236

Lisa Dorigatti, Difendere il "core"? I sindacati di fronte alla segmentazione del mercato del lavoro in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO " 140/2015, pp 19-32, DOI: 10.3280/SL2015-140002