Sociology and Ethics in the Morphogenic Society: a Relational Interpretation of Their Links

Author/s Pierpaolo Donati
Publishing Year 2016 Issue 2016/1 Language Italian
Pages 29 P. 37-65 File size 239 KB
DOI 10.3280/SP2016-001003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Today the issue of the relations between sociology and ethics is emerging anew as a consequence of the crisis of neo-positivism and, in parallel, the sweeping changes of social morality in postmodern societies. Divisionist theories (going back to Hume’s guillotine) seem to become untenable for many reasons. Not only sociological researches reveal themselves necessarily related to moral values, but the question "knowledge for what?" places new requests on sociology to give practical orientations. The issue takes on a new face with the advent of the morphogenetic society. The Author claims that: (i) as a matter of fact, every sociological research is necessarily connected to moral choices; (ii) ethical references can be classified in four ideal-types; (iii) the moral values that the researcher necessarily adopts (either explicitly or implicitly) depend on a meta-theory of moral norms that supports the epistemic values of the researcher; (iv) meta-theories can be individualist, holist or relational. The paper argues that the individualist and holist paradigms do not explain the moral changes that emerge in a morphogenetic society. It becomes indispensable to appeal to the relational paradigm. In conclusion, the paper offers a "compass" useful to understand how sociological research is connected to different forms of ethics

Keywords: Sociological Research; Ethics; Morality; Relational Sociology; Social Morphogenesis

  1. Archer, M.S. 1997. La morfogenesi della società. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  2. — (ed.) 2013. Social Morphogenesis. New York: Springer.
  3. — (ed.) 2016. Morphogenesis and Normativity: Normogenetic Processes. New York: Springer.
  4. Beck, U. and Beck-Gernsheim, E. 2004. Families in a Runaway World. In J. Scott, Treas and M. Richards (eds.). The Blackwell Companion to the Sociology of Families. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 499-514.
  5. Beck, U., Bonss, W. and Lau, C.2003. The Theory of Reflexive Modernization. Problematic, Hypotheses and Research Program. Theory, Culture & Society, 20(2), pp. 1-33.
  6. Owen, D. 2014. Michel Foucault. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  7. Pestoff, V. 2015. Co-production as Social Innovation in Public Services. In P. Donati and L. Martignani (eds.). Towards a New Local Welfare. Best Practices and Networks of Social Inclusion. Bologna: Bononia University Press.
  8. Porpora, D., Nikolaev, A., Hagemann, J. and Jenkins, A. 2013. Post-Ethical Society The Iraq War, Abu Ghraib, and the Moral Failure of the Secular. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  9. Prandini, R. e Martignani, L. (a cura di) 2007. Cultura riflessiva e politiche sociali. Sociologia e Politiche Sociali, 10(3).
  10. Prodi, G. 1987. Alla radice del comportamento morale. Genova: Marietti.
  11. Rossi, G. e Boccacin, L. (a cura di) 2009. Forme di gestione associata nei servizi alla persona. Stili e pratiche di governance sussidiaria in Lombardia. Milano: Guerini e Associati.
  12. Sachs, J. 2015. The Age of Sustainable Development. New York: Columbia University Press.
  13. Silver, D. and Lee, M. 2012. Self-relations in Social Relations. Sociological Theory, 30(4), pp. 207–237.
  14. Terenzi, P. (a cura di) 2012. Percorsi di sociologia relazionale. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  15. Teubner, G. 2011. A Constitutional Moment. The Logics of ‘Hitting the Bottom’. In P. Kjaer, G. Teubner and A. Febbrajo (eds.). The Financial Crisis in Constitutional Perspective: The Dark Side of Functional Differentiation. Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart, pp. 3-42.
  16. Twitchell, J.B. 1999. Leas us into temptation. The triumph of American materialism. New York: Columbia University Press.
  17. Vidal, I. 2015. The Role of Third Sector in Local Welfare. In P. Donati and L. Martignani (eds.), Towards a New Local Welfare. Best Practices and Networks of Social Inclusion. Bologna: Bononia University Press.
  18. Weber, M. 2015. L’avalutatività nelle scienze sociologiche ed economiche [1922]. Milano-Udine: Mimesis.
  19. Zijderveld, A. 1986. The Ethos of the Welfare State. International Sociology, 1 (4), pp. 443-457.
  20. Marshall, T.H. 1950. Citizenship and Social Class: And Other Essays. Cambridge: CUP.
  21. Maccarini, A. and Prandini, R. 2010. Human Reflexivity in Social Realism: Beyond the Modern Debate. In M.S. Archer (ed.). Conversations About Reflexivity. London: Routledge, pp. 77-107.
  22. — 2008b. Are There Still Indispensable Norms in Our Society?. Soziale Systeme, 14(1), pp. 18-37.
  23. — 2008a. Die Moral der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
  24. Luhmann, N. 1993. The Code of the Moral. Cardozo Law Review, 14(3-4), pp. 995-1009.
  25. Lidz, V. 1981. Conceptions of Value-Relevance and the Theory of Action. Sociological Inquiry, 51(3-4), pp. 371-408.
  26. Leydesdorff, L. 2014. Advances in Science Visualization: Social Networks, Semantic Maps, and Discursive Knowledge. In B. Cronin and C. Sugimoto (eds.). Beyond Bibliometrics: Harnessing Multidimensional Indicators of Scholarly Impact. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  27. Lee, M. and Silver, D. 2012. Simmel’s Law of the Individual and the Ethics of the Relational Self. Theory, Culture and Society, 29(7/8), pp. 124-145.
  28. Hume, D. 2008, Trattato sulla natura umana [1739-40]. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  29. Höffding, H. 1905. On the Relation Between Sociology and Ethics. American Journal of Sociology, 10(5), pp. 672-685.
  30. Hartwig, M. (ed.) 2007. Dictionary of Critical Realism. London: Routledge.
  31. Giddens, A. 1998. The Third Way. The Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  32. Fløysand, A. and Jakobsen, S.E. 2011. The Complexity of Innovation: A Relational Turn. Progress in Human Geography, 35(3), pp. 328-344.
  33. Evers, A. 2015. Social Innovations on the Local Level. Approaches, Instruments and Different Ways of Dealing with them. In P. Donati and L. Martignani (eds.). Towards a New Local Welfare. Best Practices and Networks of Social Inclusion. Bologna: Bononia University Press.
  34. Donati. P. and Archer, M.S. 2015. The Relational Subject. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  35. — 2013b. Morphogenesis and Social Networks: Relational Steering not Mechanical Feedback. In M.S. Archer (ed.). Social Morphogenesis. New York: Springer, pp. 205-231.
  36. — 2013a. Sociologia della relazione Bologna: il Mulino.
  37. — 2008. Oltre il multiculturalismo. La ragione relazionale per un mondo comune. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  38. — 2006. L’analisi relazionale: regole, quadro metodologico, esempi. In P. Donati (a cura di). Sociologia. Una introduzione allo studio della società. Padova: Cedam, pp. 195-251.
  39. — 1991. Teoria relazionale della società. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  40. Donati, P. 1983. Introduzione alla sociologia relazionale. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  41. Colozzi, I. 2044. Sociologia della morale. Padova: Cedam.
  42. Burawoy, M. 2005. 2004 American Sociological Association Presidential address: For public sociology. The British Journal of Sociology, 56 (2), pp. 259-294.
  43. Belardinelli, S. 2002. La normalità e l’eccezione. Il ritorno della natura nella cultura contemporanea. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.

  • Researching sexuality and drug addiction Gabrilele Di Francesco, in Journal of the International Network for Sexual Ethics & Politics /2019 pp.80
    DOI: 10.3224/insep.v3i1.07

Pierpaolo Donati, Sociologia ed etica nella società morfogenetica: un’interpretazione relazionale delle loro connessioni in "SOCIOLOGIA E POLITICHE SOCIALI" 1/2016, pp 37-65, DOI: 10.3280/SP2016-001003