Gli habitus e la personalizzazione dell’insegnamento

Titolo Rivista SOCIOLOGIA E POLITICHE SOCIALI
Autori/Curatori Concepciòn Naval, Dolores Conesa
Anno di pubblicazione 2016 Fascicolo 2016/2
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 16 P. 71-86 Dimensione file 225 KB
DOI 10.3280/SP2016-002005
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Not only should education professionals be expert in the subject(s) they teach; they should also strive to foster the aesthetic, ethical and civic capacities of students. In this regard, teaching is an ethical act which grounds a reciprocal relationship between individuals and whose purpose is to encourage the development of a set of habits among students as well as teachers. This chapter comprises a study of the idea of habit and its contribution to the development of an ethics of teaching. First, the Aristotelian view of habit as personal enrichment through the stable harmonization of spontaneity with the good is addressed. Then, the classical Aristotelian conception is further explored in light of the contemporary recovery of practical reason, read in relation to habit, freedom and personalization in the education process. Finally, the ways in which current perspectives outside the Aristotelian tradition, such as Dewey’s philosophy, may also encompass the concept of habit as a cornerstone of personal integration are also examined.;

Keywords:Personalized Teaching; Habit; Freedom; Moral Virtue; Authority.

  1. Altarejos, F. e Naval, C. 2004. Filosofía de la educación. Pamplona: EUNSA (2ª ed.). 2003. Filosofia dell’educazione. Brescia: La Scuola Editrice, Istituzioni di Pedagogia.
  2. Altarejos, F., Ibáñez-Martín, J.A., Jordán, J.A., Jover, G. 2003. Ética docente. Barcelona: Ariel.
  3. Aristotle, Nicomachean ethics, translation and historical introduction by Christopher Rowe, philosophical introduction and commentary by Sarah Broadie 2002. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. Aristotle The works of Aristotle, ed. W.D. Ross 1996. Rethorica, v. XI. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  5. Bárcena, F. y Jover, G. 1991. El carácter ético de la actividad educativa. Notas críticas para el replanteamiento de un problema. Bordón, 3, pp. 259-269.
  6. Cardona, C. 1990. Ética del quehacer educativo. Rialp: Madrid.
  7. Carr, D. 1991. Educating the virtues: an essay on the philosophical psychology of moral development and education. London: Routledge.
  8. Carr, D. 1999. Virtue ethics and moral education. London: Routledge.
  9. Carr, D. 2000. Professionalism and ethics in teaching. London: Routledge.
  10. Carr, D. 2005. El sentido de la educación: una introducción a la filosofía y a la teoría de la educación y de la enseñanza. Barcelona: Graó.
  11. Chevalier, J. 1940. L´habitude. Essai de métaphysique scientifique. Paris: Bovin et Cia.
  12. D’Agostini, F. 2000. Analíticos y Continentales, guía de la filosofía de los últimos treinta años. Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra.
  13. Davidson, T. 1971. The Education of the Greek People and Its Influence on Civilization (International Educational Series). Ams Pr Inc; [1st AMS ed.] edition.
  14. Day, C. 2004. A Passion for Teaching. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
  15. Defourny, M. 1920. Aristote et l’éducation. Annal de L’Instit. Super. de Philos. Louvain, IV.
  16. Dewey, J. 1957. Human Nature and Conduct. An Introduction to Social Psychology. New York: The Modern Library Inc.
  17. Dewey, J. 1969a. The Reflex Arc Concept in Psychology. In J.A. Boydston ed. The Early Works of John Dewey, 1882-1898, vol. 5, pp. 96-110. Carbondale & Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
  18. Dewey, J. 1969b. Soul and Body. In J.A. Boydston ed. The Early Works of John Dewey, 1882-1898, vol. 1, pp. 239-263. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
  19. Galino, M. A. 1973. Historia de la educación. Madrid: Gredos.
  20. García López, R., Jover, G., Escámez, J. 2010. Ética profesional docente. Madrid: Síntesis.
  21. Giroux, H.A. 1988. Teachers as intellectuals: toward a critical pedagogy of learning. New York: Bergin & Garvey.
  22. González, A. M. 2006. Claves de ley natural. Madrid: Rialp.
  23. Goodson, I.F. ed. 2004. Historias de vida del profesorado. Barcelona: Octaedro y EUB.
  24. Gusdorf, G. 1977. Pourquoi des professeurs?: pour une pédagogie de la pédagogie. Paris: Payot.
  25. Hargreaves, A. 1994. Changing Teachers, Changing Times. New York: Teachers College Press.
  26. Jackson, P. 1987. The Practice of Teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.
  27. Lewis, C. S. 1986. The Abolition of Man. New York: Collier Books, Macmillan Publishing Company.
  28. MacIntyre, A. 1988. Whose Justice? Which Rationality? South Bend, Indiana: Notre Dame University Press.
  29. Molinos, C. 2002. Teoría y práctica del currículo en John Dewey. Pamplona: Eunsa.
  30. Naval, C. 1992. Educación, retórica y poética. Tratado de la educación en Aristóteles. Pamplona: Eunsa.
  31. Naval, C. 2000. Educar ciudadanos. Pamplona: EUNSA (2ª ed.).
  32. Naval, C., González-Torres, M.C. Bernal, A. 2015. Character Education, International Perspectives. Pedagogia e Vita. Rivista di problema in educazione e formazione, 73. Annuario 2015, 155-184.
  33. Polo, L. 1996. Ética, hacia una versión moderna de los temas clásicos. Madrid: Unión Editorial.
  34. Polo, L. 1987. Tener y Dar, en Estudios sobre la Encíclica Laborem exercens, F. Fernández (dir.). Madrid: BAC.
  35. Ravaisson, H. 1955. El hábito. Aguilar: Buenos Aires.
  36. Rhonheimer, M. 1982. Sozialphilosophie und Familie. Gedanken zur humanen Grundfunktion der Familie. In B. Schnyder ed. Familie — Herausforderung der Zukunft, Freiburg.
  37. Rhonheimer, M. 2000. La perspectiva de la moral. Madrid: Rialp.
  38. Ross, W.D. 1995. Aristotle. London: Routledge.
  39. Riedel, M. (ed.), Rehabilitierung der praktischen Philosophie, Band I: Geschichte, Probleme 1972; Band II: Rezeption, Argumentation, Diskussion, Freiburg: Verlag Rombach Freiburg, 1974.
  40. Rodríguez Luño, A. 1988. La scelta etica. Il rapporto fra libertà e virtù. Milano: Ares.
  41. Rodríguez Luño, A. 2004. L’etica come educazione del Desiderio. in: http://www.eticaepolitica.net/eticafondamentale/arl_desiderio%5Bit%5D.htm
  42. Ryle, G. 1972. Can virtue be taught?. In R. F. Dearden, P. H. Hirst and R. S. Peters eds. Education and the development of reason. London and Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 434-447.
  43. Sabine, G. 1982. Historia de la Teoría Política. México: FCE.
  44. Taylor, C. 1992. The Ethics of Authenticity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Concepciòn Naval, Dolores Conesa, Gli habitus e la personalizzazione dell’insegnamento in "SOCIOLOGIA E POLITICHE SOCIALI" 2/2016, pp 71-86, DOI: 10.3280/SP2016-002005