Collective memory of rape: an analysis from an international law perspective

Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2016/3
Language English Pages 32 P. 101-132 File size 350 KB
DOI 10.3280/SD2016-003006
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This article argues first that the international community has elaborated a collective memory of rapes occurred during armed conflicts in the 20th century through the jurisprudence of international criminal tribunals and the activity of UN bodies; secondly, that memory of rapes is "gendered". To support this thesis, the article borrows the notion of "collective memory" introduced by the French sociologist Maurice Halbwachs and analyses it from an international law perspective. The article starts with a short legal history of wartime rape, before analysing the main judgments rendered by the following international criminal tribunals: the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals, the International Criminal Court for the Former Yugoslavia, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, and the International Criminal Court. A paragraph is devoted to the activity of the UN Special Representatives on Sexual Violence in Conflict and of the International Independent Commission of Inquiry for Syria. This contribution then uses the notion of collective memory to comment on the role of international bodies in the preservation of the memory of rapes occurred during armed conflicts.

Keywords: Rape - Women - Collective memory - International criminal courts

  1. Berkhof, Karel, 2012. Motherland in Danger: Soviet Propaganda During World War II. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
  2. Ambos, Kai & Ousman Njika, 2013. Charles Taylor’s Criminal Responsibility. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 11, 4: 789-812.
  3. Aroussi, Sahla, 2011. Women, Peace and Security: Addressing Accountability for Wartime Sexual Violence. International Feminist Journal, 14, 4: 576-593.
  4. Askin, Kelly D., 1997. War Crimes against Women. The Hague: Kluwer.
  5. 1999. Sexual Violence in Decisions and Indictments of the Yugoslav and Rwandan Tribunals: Current Status. American Journal of International Law, 93, 1: 97-123.
  6. Bensouda, Fatou, 2014. Gender Justice and the ICC. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 16, 4: 538-542.
  7. Bianchi, Bruna, 2012. Crimini di guerra e contro l’umanità. Le violenze ai civili sul fronte orientale (1914-1919). Milano: Unicopli.
  8. Bloch, Marc 2011. Mémoire collective, tradition et coutume: à propos d’un livre récent. Excerpt In Olick, Jeffrey K. Vered Vinitzky-Seroussi, & Daniel Levy (eds.), The Collective Memory Reader. Oxford: OUP.
  9. Block, Sharon, 2011. Rape in the American Revolution: Process, Reaction and Public Re-Creation. In D. Elizabeth Heineman (ed.), Sexual Violence in Conflict Zones. Philadelphia: University Press of Philadelphia
  10. Branche, Raphaëlle, & Fabrice Virgili 2012. Rape in Wartime. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  11. Brownmiller, Susan 1975. Against Our Will, Men, Women and Rape. New York: Fawcett Columbine Book.
  12. Butler, Judith, 2012. Sexual Consent: Some Thoughts on Psychoanalysis and Law. Columbia Journal Gender & Law, 21, 2: 3-27.
  13. Campbell, Sue, 2014. Memory, Reparation, and Relation. In Sue Campbell, Our Faithfulness to the Past. The Ethics and Politics of Memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, first published in Jocelyn Downie & Jennifer J. Llewellyn (eds.), 2012. Being Relational: Reflections on Relational Theory and Health Law. Vancouver: UBC Press.
  14. Caroli, Rosa, 2009. Comfort Women. Una lettura di genere. Deportate, esuli, profughe 10: 132-143.
  15. Charlesworth, Hilary, & Christine Chinkin, 2000. The Boundaries of International Law. A Feminist Analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  16. 1999. Feminist Methods in International Law. American Journal of International Law, 93, 2: 379-394.
  17. Christine Chinkin, & Shelley Wright, 1991. Feminist Approaches to International Law. American Journal of International Law, 85, 4: 613-645.
  18. Chinkin, Christine, 1994. Rape and Sexual Abuse of Women in International Law. European Journal of International Law, 5: 326-341.
  19. 2001. Women’s International Tribunal on Japanese Military Sexual Slavery. American Journal of International Law, 95, 2: 335-340.
  20. Cole, Alison, 2010. International Criminal Law and Sexual Violence. An Overview. In Clare McGlynn, Vanessa E. Munro (eds.), Rethinking Rape Law. Abingdon: Routledge.
  21. Connerton, Paul, 2006. How Societies Remember. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  22. Coomaraswamy, Radhika. 2005. Sexual Violence during Wartime. In Helen Durham & Tracey Gurd (eds.), Listening to the Silences: Women and the War. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
  23. Copelon, Rhonda, 2011. Toward Accountability for Violence Against Women in War: Progress and Challenges. In Elizabeth Heineman (ed.), Sexual Violence in Conflict Zones. Philadelphia: University Press of Philadelphia.
  24. De Brouwer, Anne-Marie, 2005. Supranational Criminal Prosecution of Sexual Violence. Cambridge, Intersentia.
  25. Dessingué, Alexandre, 2011. From Collectivity to Collectiveness: Reflections (with Halbwachs and Bakhtin) on the Concept of Collective Memory. In Siobhan Kattago (ed.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Memory Studies. Farnham: Ashgate.
  26. Dixon, Rosalind, 2002. Rape as a Crime in International Humanitarian Law: Where to from Here? European Journal of International Law, 13, 3: 697-719.
  27. Drumbl, Mark A., 2013. She Makes Me Ashamed to Be a Woman’: The Genocide Conviction of Pauline Nyiramasuhuko, 2011. Michigan Journal of International Law, 34, 3: 101-145.
  28. Eboe-Osuji, Chile, 2007. Rape as Genocide: Some Questions Arising. Journal of Genocide Research, 9, 2: 251-273.
  29. 2012. International Law and Sexual Violence in Armed Conflicts. Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.
  30. Fisher, Siobhan K., 1996. Occupation of the Womb: Forced Impregnation as Genocide. Duke Law Journal, 22: 91-133.
  31. Fricker, Miranda, 2006. Powerlessness and Social Interpretation. Episteme: Journal of Social Epistemology, 3: 96-108.
  32. Funkenstein, Amos, 1989. Collective Memory and Historical Consciousness. History & Memory, 1, 1:5-26.
  33. Gaca, Kathy L., 2011. Girls, Women, and the Meaning of Sexual Violence in Ancient Warfare. In Elizabeth Heineman (ed.), Sexual Violence in Conflict Zones. Philadelphia: University Press of Philadelphia.
  34. Grotius, Hugo, [1646]1995. De Jure Belli Ac Pacis, Libri Tres. English translation Francis W. Kelsey (ed.) Washington: Canergie Foundation .
  35. Gullace, Nicoletta F., 2011. War Crimes or Atrocity Stories? Anglo-American Narratives of Truth and Deception in the Aftermath of World War I. In Elizabeth Heineman (ed.), Sexual Violence in Conflict Zones. Philadelphia: University Press of Philadelphia.
  36. Hagay-Frey, Alona, 2011. Sex and Gender Crimes in the New International Law. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
  37. Halbwachs, Maurice [1950] 1996, 1980. La mémoire collective. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Italian Translation La memoria collettiva, ed. Paolo Jedlowski. Milano: Unicopli. English Translation, The Collective Memory. New York: Harper & Row Colophon Books.
  38. Halley, Janet, 2008. Rape in Berlin: Reconsidering the Criminalisation of Rape in the International Law of Armed Conflict. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 9: 78-124.
  39. Healey, Sharon A., 1995. Prosecuting Rape under the Statute of the War Crimes Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 21, 2: 327-383.
  40. Heineman, Elizabeth D., 2011. Introduction: The History of Sexual Violence in Conflict Zones. In D. Elizabeth Heineman (ed.), Sexual Violence in Conflict Zones. Philadelphia: University Press of Philadelphia.
  41. Henry, Nicola, 2011. War and Rape. Law, Memory and Justice. London: Routledge.
  42. Hicks, George L., 1995. The Comfort Women: Japan’s Brutal Regime of Enforced Prostitution in the Second World War. New York: W.W. Norton.
  43. Hirst, William, & Charles B. Stone, 2015. A Unified Approach to Collective Memory: Sociology, Psychology and the Extended Mind. In Siobhan Kattago (ed.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Memory Studies. Farnham: Ashgate.
  44. Human Rights Council (HRC), S-17/1, 22 August 2011.
  45. Human Rights Council, Report of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic, A/HRC/31/68, 11 February 2016 (HRC 2016a).
  46. Human Rights Council, “They Came to Destroy”: ISIS Crimes Against the Yazidis, 15 June 2016, A/HRC/32/CRP.2 (HRC 2016b).
  47. Jacobs, Janet, 2010. Memorializing the Holocaust. Gender, Genocide and Collective Memory. London: New York, I.B. Tauris.
  48. Karstedt, Susanne, 2009. Legal Institutions, Memories, and History. In Susanne Karstedt, Legal Institutions and Collective Memories. Oxford: Hart.
  49. Klinkner, Melanie, 2015. Is All Fair in Love and War Crimes Trials? Regulation 55 and the Katanga Case. International Criminal Law Review 15, 2: 396-410.
  50. Kuan, Steve, 2000. Alien Tort Claims Act – Classifying Peacetime Rape as an International Human Rights Violation. Houston Journal of International Law, 22, 3: 451-476.
  51. Lee, Sue R., 2003. Comforting the Comfort Women: Who Can Make Japan Pay. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 24: 509-547.
  52. Leydesdorff, Selma, Luisa Passerini, & Paul Thompson, 1996. International Yearbook of Oral History and Life Stories. Vol IV. Gender and Memory. Oxford: OUP.
  53. MacKinnon, Catherine A., 1993. Crimes of War, Crimes of Peace. UCLA Women’s Law Journal 4, 1: 59-86.
  54. Mariniello, Triestino, 2013. Prosecutor v Charles Ghankay Taylor Case Before the Special Court for Sierra Leone. American Journal of International Law 107,2: 424-430.
  55. Matsui, Yayori, 2003. Women’s International War Crimes Tribunal on Japan’s Military Sexual Slavery: Memory, Identity, and Society. In Peter Li (ed.), Japanese War Crimes: The Search for Justice. New Brunswick: Transaction publisher.
  56. Meron, Theodor, 1993a. Henry’s Wars and Shakespeare’s Laws. Perspectives on the Law of War in the Later Middle Ages. Oxford: OUP.
  57. 1993b. Rape as Crime under International Humanitarian Law. American Journal of International Law, 87, 3: 78-124.
  58. Moffet, Luke, 2014. Justice for Victims before the International Criminal Court. London: Routledge.
  59. Ní Aoláin, Fionnuala, 2012. Advancing Feminist Positioning in the Field of Transitional Justice. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 6: 1-24.
  60. 2014. Gendered Harms and their Interface with International Criminal Law. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 16, 4: 622-646.
  61. Dina F. Haynes, & Naomi Cahn, 2011. On the Frontlines. Gender, War, and the Post-Conflict Process. Oxford: OUP.
  62. O’Rourke, Catherine, 2013. Gender Politics in Transitional Justice. London: Routledge.
  63. Olick, Jeffrey K., 1997. Collective Memory: The Two Cultures. Sociological Theory, 17, 3: 333-348.
  64. 2011. Introduction. In Jeffrey K. Olick, Vared Vinitzky-Seroussi & Daniel Levy (eds.), The Collective Memory Reader. Oxford: OUP.
  65. Oosterveld, Valerie, 2011. The Gender Jurisprudence of the Special Court for Sierra Leone: Progress in the Revolutionary United Front Judgments. Cornell International Law Journal, 44: 49-74.
  66. 2014. Evaluating the Special Court for Sierra Leone’s Gender Jurisprudence. In Charles Chernor Jalloh (ed.), The Sierra Leone Special Court and its Legacy: The Impact for Africa and International Criminal Law. Cambrige: Cambridge University Press.
  67. Paletschek, Sylvia, & Sylvia Schraut, 2008. Introduction. In Sylvia Paletschek & Sylvia Schraut (eds.), Gender and Memory Culture in Europe in Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Europe. Frankfurt: Campus.
  68. Passerini, Luisa. 2011. Continuity and Innovation in the Art of Memory. In Siobhan Kattago (ed.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Memory Studies. Farnham: Ashgate.
  69. Perrin, Benjamin, 2015.Victim Participation at the ICC: Examining the Past Decade of Investigative and Pre-Trial Proceedings. International Criminal Law Review, 15, 2: 298-338.
  70. Reading, Anna, 2002. The Social Inheritance of the Holocaust. Gender, Culture and Memory. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  71. Short, Jonathan, 2003. Sexual Violence as Genocide: The Developing Law of the International Criminal Tribunals and the International Criminal Court. Michigan Journal of Race and Law, 8, 2: 503-528.
  72. Stahn, Carsten, 2014. Justice Delivered or Justice Denied? The Legacy of the Katanga Judgment. Journal of International Criminal Justice 12, 4: 809-834.
  73. Takai, Alexandra, 2011. Rape and Forced Pregnancy as Genocide before the Bangladesh Tribunal. Temple International and Comparative Law Journal Int’l, 25: 393-422.
  74. Totani, Yuma, 2011. Legal Responses to World War II Sexual Violence: The Japanese Experience. In Elizabeth Heineman (ed.), Sexual Violence in Conflict Zones. Philadelphia: University Press of Philadelphia.
  75. Trouille, Helen, 2013. How Far Has the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda Really Come since Akayesu in the Prosecution and Investigation of Sexual Offences Committed against Women? An Analysis of Ndindiliyimana et al. International Criminal Law Review, 13, 4: 747-788.
  76. Vojdik, K. Valorie 2014. Sexual Violence against Men and Women in War: A Masculinities Approach. Nevada Law Journal, 14, 3: 923-952.
  77. Yoshiaki, Yoshimi, 2000. Comfort Women. Sexual Slavery in the Japanese Military during World War II. New York: Columbia University Press.
  78. Zinsstag, Estelle, 2013. Sexual Violence against Women in Armed Conflicts and Restorative Justice: An Explanatory Analysis. In Martha A. Fineman & Estelle Zinsstag (eds.), Feminist Perspectives on Transitional Justice. Cambridge: Intersentia.

, Collective memory of rape: an analysis from an international law perspective in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO " 3/2016, pp 101-132, DOI: 10.3280/SD2016-003006