Prospettive di empowerment per la salute: alcune proposte teoriche

Titolo Rivista SALUTE E SOCIETÀ
Autori/Curatori Alberto Ardissone
Anno di pubblicazione 2017 Fascicolo 2017/1
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 17 P. 163-169 Dimensione file 704 KB
DOI 10.3280/SES2017-001012
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Since empowerment entered the healthcare world, no sufficiently shared conceptualization has been produced yet. This essay aims at building a theoretical bridge amongst the contributions proposed so far by numerous scholars, leaning on a vast international literature. In delivering a definition, that encompasses several aspects, not always considered jointly by other researchers, it stresses, in particular, one aspect which until now has found few room in the debate, namely the fluidity and fluctuatingness connected to the phenomenon. In the second part, the essay proposes a typology of possible outcomes, by crossing two dimensions concerning the individuals and the governmental social action, asserting that only when individual pro-activity matches with a present social policy, we can find empowerment really on, while in others possible menaces to equity and social justice might arise.;

Keywords:Empowerment; sanità; e-health; società digitale; disuguaglianze sociali; politiche sociali

  1. Altieri L. (2009). Valutazione e partecipazione. Metodologia per una ricerca interattiva e negoziale. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  2. Andreassen H.K. (2012). ICT and patient roles: contradictions in e-health policy. Health Policy and Technology, 1: 86-92.
  3. Ardissone A., Carletti R. (2013). Le teorie sulle disuguaglianze in sanità. In: Cipolla C., a cura di, Disuguaglianze sociali in Sanità. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  4. Ardissone A. (2015). La rivoluzione digitale in sanità: verso lo sviluppo della medicalizzazione o dell’autocura?. Salute e Società, 14(2): 179-190.
  5. Aujoulat I., Marcolongo R., Bonadiman L., Deccache A. (2008). Reconsidering patient empowerment in chronic illness: A critique of models of self-efficacy and bodily control. Social Science & Medicine, 66: 1228-1239.
  6. Beeker C., Guenther-Gery C., Raj A. (1998). Community empowerment paradigm drift and the primary prevention of HIV/AIDS. Social Science & Medicine, 46(7): 831-842.
  7. Bertin G., Campostrini S. (2013). Disuguaglianze di salute e sistemi di welfare, In: Cipolla C., a cura di, Disuguaglianze sociali in sanità, Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  8. Buccoliero L. (2010). E-Health 2.0. Tecnologie per il patient empowerment. Mondo digitale, 4: 3-17.
  9. Caracci G., Carzaniga S. (2010). I risultati della ricerca Agenas. Definizione, mo-dello di analisi, strumenti di rilevazione ed esperienze significative di empowerment in sanità. Monitor, 6° suppl. al n. 25: 10-18.
  10. Cervia S. (2014), La partecipazione dei cittadini in Sanità. Italia ed Europa a confronto, Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  11. Charles C., Gafni A., Whelan T. (1997). Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango). Social Science & Medicine, 44 (5): 681-692.
  12. Cipolla C. (1997). Epistemologia della tolleranza. V Voll. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  13. Cipolla C. (2013). Perché non possiamo non essere eclettici. Il sapere sociale nella web society. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  14. Coburn D. (2004). Beyond the income inequality hypothesis: class, nel-liberism, and health inequalities. Social Science & Medicine, 58: 41-56. DOI: 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00159-
  15. Coburn D. (2015). Income inequality, welfare, class and health: a comment on Pickett and Wilkinson. Social Science & Medicine, 146: 228-232.
  16. Colozzi I. (2009). Quale rete sviluppare per superare la crisi del welfare sanitario: la probabile risposta di Achille Ardigò. Salute e Società, suppl. al n. 2: 74-84. DOI: 10.3280/SES2009-SU200
  17. Conger J.A., Kanungo R.N. (1988). The empowerment process: integrating theory and practice. The Academy of Management Review, 13(3): 471-482.
  18. Crawshaw P. (2012). Governing at a distance: Social marketing and the (bio) politics of responsibility. Social Science & Medicine, 75: 200-207.
  19. Frank V.A., Bierge B. (2011). Empowerment in drug treatment: Dilemmas in implementing policy in welfare institutions. Social Science & Medicine, 73: 201-208.
  20. Fox N.J., Ward K.J., O’Rourke A.J. (2005). The “expert patient”: empowerment or medical dominance? The case of weight loss, pharmaceutical drugs and the Internet. Social Science & Medicine, 60: 1299-1309.
  21. Funnell M.M., Arnold M.S., Donnelly M., Taylor-Moon D. (1991). Empowerment: An Idea Whose Time Has Come in Diabets Education. The Diabets Educator, 17(1): 37-41.
  22. Henwood F., Wyatt S., Hart A., Smith J. (2003). ‘Ignorance is bliss sometimes’: constraints on the emergence of the ‘informed patient’ in the changing landscape of health information. Sociology of Health & Illness, 25(6): 589-607. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.0036
  23. Henwood F., Harris R., Spoel P. (2011). Informing health? Negotiating the logics of choice and care in everyday practices of “healthy living”. Social Science & Medicine, 72: 2026-2032.
  24. Herian M.N., Tay L., Hamm J.A., Diener E. (2014). Social capital, ideology, and health in the United States. Social Science & Medicine, 105: 30-37.
  25. Jutel A., Banister E. (2013). “I was pretty sure I had the ‘flu”: qualitative description of confirmed-influenza symptoms. Social Science & Medicine, 99: 49-55.
  26. Lupton D. (1997). Consumerism, reflexivity and the medical encounter. Social Science & Medicine, 45(3): 373-381.
  27. Lupton D. (2013a). Understanding the human machine. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine. DOI: 10.1109/MTS.2013.228643
  28. Lupton D. (2013b). Quantifying the body: monitoring and measuring health in the age of mHealth technologies. Critical Public Health, 23(4): 393-403. DOI: 10.1080/09581596.2013.79493
  29. Lupton D. (2014). The commodification of patient opinion: the digital patient experience economy in the age of big data. Sociology of Health & Illness, 36(6): 856-869. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.1210
  30. Lupton D., Jutel A. (2015). “It’s like having a physician in your pocket!” A critical analysis of self-diagnosis smartphone apps. Social Science & Medicine, 133: 128-135.
  31. Marzano M. (2013). L’impatto della crisi sui sistemi sanitari europei, Monitor, 32: 59-61.
  32. Maturo A., Conrad P., a cura di (2009). The medicalization of life, Salute e Società, 2.
  33. McKee M., Stuckler D., Martin-Moreno J. (2010). Protecting health in hard times: Europe’s health ministers exchange experiences on the impact of the economic crisis. British Medical Journal, 341(7775): 681-682.
  34. Nicoli M.A., Pellegrino V., a cura di (2011). L’empowerment nei servizi sanitari e sociali. Tra istanze individuali e necessità collettive. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  35. O’Cathain A., Goode J., Luft D., Strangleman T., Hanlon G., Greatbatch D. (2005). Does NHS Direct empower patients?. Social Science & Medicine, 61: 1761-1771.
  36. Oudshoorn N. (2008). Diagnosis at a distance: the invisible work of patients and healthcare professionals in cardiac telemonitoring technology. Sociology of Health & Illness, 30(2): 272-288.
  37. Parsons T. (1996). Il sistema sociale. Milano: Ed. Comunità.
  38. Population Council (2007). The World Health Organization on health inequality, inequity, and social determinants of health, Population and Development Review, 33(4): 839-843.
  39. Rappaport J. (1987). Terms of Empowerment/Exemplars of Prevention: Toward a Theory for Community Psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15(2): 121-148.
  40. Remuzzi G., Maturo A. (2013). Ci curano o ci curiamo?. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  41. Salmon P., Hall G.M. (2003). Patient empowerment and control: a psychological discourse in the service of medicine. Social Science & Medicine, 57: 1969-1980. DOI: 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00063-
  42. Schermer M. (2009). Telecare and self-management: opportunity to change the paradigm?. Journal of Medical Ethics, 35: 688-691.
  43. Sorell T. (1997). Morality, consumerism and the internal market in health care. Journal of Medical Ethics, 23(2): 71-76.
  44. Tang N., Eisenberg J.M., Meyer G.S. (2004). The roles of government in improving health care quality and safety. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 30(1): 47-55.
  45. Thomson S. et al., ed. (2014). Economic crisis, health systems and health in Europe: impact and implications for policy, Copenhagen, WHO – European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies.
  46. Wallerstein N. (2002). Empowerment to reduce health disparities. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 30(suppl. 59): 72-77. DOI: 10.1177/1403494802030003120
  47. Wallerstein N. (2006). What is the evidence on effectiveness of empowerment to improve health?. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
  48. Wensing M., Elwyn G. (2003). Improving the quality of health care: methods for incorporating patients’ views in health care. British Medical Journal, 326(7394): 877-879.
  49. Zimmerman M.A. (1990). Taking Aim on Empowerment Research: On the Distinction Between Individual and Psychological Conceptions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18(1): 169-177.
  50. Zimmerman M.A., Israel B.A., Schulz A., Checkoway B. (1992). Further explorations in empowerment theory: an empirical analysis of psychological empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 20(6): 707-727.

Alberto Ardissone, Prospettive di empowerment per la salute: alcune proposte teoriche in "SALUTE E SOCIETÀ" 1/2017, pp 163-169, DOI: 10.3280/SES2017-001012