Social innovation and natural disasters: the "Casa Italia" Plan

Author/s Francesco Pagliacci, Margherita Russo, Laura Sartori
Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2017/113 Language English
Pages 16 P. 87-102 File size 643 KB
DOI 10.3280/SUR2017-113006
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This article critically reads the Plan "Casa Italia" in light of a Social Innovation approach combined with a socio-economic perspective, underlying the main challenges the Plan faces to be effectively implemented. It also discusses some policy implications. The Plan could serve as an efficient tool for social innovation only when it integrates a socio-economic perspective within its dominant engineering and technical matrix.

Keywords: Territorial resilience, process, social innovation, natural disasters, risk reduction, risk prevention.

  1. Barone G., Mocetti S. (2014). Natural Disasters, Growth and Institutions: A Tale of Two Earthquakes. Journal of Urban Economics, 84: 52-66.
  2. Barca F., Casavola P., Lucatelli S. (Eds). (2014). A strategy for inner areas in Italy: definition, objectives, tools and governance. Materiali Uval Series, 31.
  3. Battaglini E., Masiero N. (2015). Sviluppo locale e resilienza territoriale. Economia e società regionale, 3: 6-22.
  4. Bertolini P., Pagliacci F. (2016). Territorial unbalances in quality of life. A focus on Italian Inner and Rural Areas. DEMB Working Paper Series, 87.
  5. Chubb J. (2002). Three Earthquakes: Political Response, Reconstruction, and the Institutions. In Dickie J., Foot J., Snowden F.M. (Eds). Disastro!. New York: Palgrave.
  6. De Búrca G., Keohane R.O., Sabel C.F. (2014). Global Experimentalist Governance. British Journal of Political Science 44: 477-86. DOI: 10.1017/S0007123414000076
  7. Donolo C., Fichera F. (1988). Le vie dell’innovazione: forme e limiti della razionalità politica. Milano, Feltrinelli.
  8. duPont IV W., Noy I. (2015). What Happened To Kobe?. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 63: 777-812. DOI: 10.1086/681129
  9. Geipel R. (1991). Long-term consequences of disasters. New York: Springer.
  10. Hirschman A.O. (1967). Development projects observed. Washington D.C: Brookings Institution Press.
  11. Holling C.S. (1973). Resilience and Stability of Ecological System. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4: 1-23.
  12. Krummacker A. (2014). Community based disaster risk management (CBDRM). 22nd OSCE Economic and Environmental Forum. Vienna, 27-28 January.
  13. Lane D. (2014). Innovation dynamics, innovation society, social innovation, deliverable 2.3. Emergency by Design Project, Grant 284625, Funding Scheme ‘Collaborative project - FET-Open ICT, --
  14. Jenson J. (2015). Social innovation: redefining the welfare diamond. In Nicholls A., Simon J., Gabriel M. (Eds.). New frontiers in social innovation research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  15. Joseph J. (2013). Resilience as embedded neoliberalism: a governmentality approach. Resilience, 1: 38-52. DOI: 10.1080/21693293.2013.765741
  16. Martin R. (2012). Regional economic resilience, hysteresis and recessionary shocks. Journal of Economic Geography, 15: 1-42.
  17. McNeill D. (2006). The diffusion of ideas in development theory and policy. Global Social Policy, 6: 334-54. DOI: 10.1177/1468018106069204
  18. McGowan K., Westley F. (2015). At the root of change: the history of social innovation. In Nicholls A., Simon J. and Gabriel M. (Eds.). New frontiers in social innovation research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  19. Moulaert F., MacCallum D., Mehmood A., Hamdouch A. (Eds.). (2014). The international handbook on social innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  20. Mulgan G., Tucker S., Ali R., Sanders B. (2007). Social innovation: what it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. Oxford: Skoll centre for social entrepreneurship.
  21. Murray R., Caulier-Grice J., Mulgan G. (2010). The open book of social innovation. London: Young Foundation.
  22. Nicholls A., Murdock A. (Eds.). (2012). Social innovation: blurring boundaries to reconfigure markets. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  23. Nicholls A., Simon J., Gabriel M. (Eds.). (2015). New frontier of social innovation research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  24. OECD (2014). Guidelines for resilience systems analysis. OECD Publishing.
  25. Pagliacci F., Righi S., Russo M. (Eds). (2016). Enhancing the resilience of social infrastructures. DEMB Working Paper Series, 97.
  26. Pagliacci F., Russo M. (2017). Socio-economic effects of an earthquake: Does heterogeneity in spatial conditions matter? A counterfactual empirical analysis on the 2012 Emilia-Romagna earthquake. Regional Studies (under review).
  27. Phills J., Deiglmeier K., Miller D. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 4: 34-43.
  28. Pradel M., García, M., Eizaguirre S. (2013). Theorizing multi-level governance in social innovation dynamics. In F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood, A. Hamdouch (Eds.) The international handbook on social innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  29. Rittel H., Webber M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4: 155-69. DOI: 10.1007/BF01405730
  30. Rosenberg N. (1969). The direction of technological change: inducement mechanisms and focusing devices. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 18: 1-24. DOI: 10.1086/450399
  31. Russo M., Silvestri P. (Eds.). (2016). Innovation and development after the earthquake in Emilia. DEMB Working Paper Series, 81.
  32. Sabel C.F., Zeitlin J. (2011). Experimentalist governance. In Levi-Faur D. (Ed.). The Oxford handbook of governance. Oxford University Press.
  33. UNISDR (2005). Hyogo framework for action 2005-2015: building the resilience of Nations and Communities to disasters. Geneva: United Nations.
  34. UNISDR (2015), Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction, 2015-2030. Geneva: United Nations.
  35. Walker J., Cooper M. (2011). Genealogies of resilience: from systems ecology to the political economy of crisis adaptation. Security Dialogue, 42: 143-160. DOI: 10.1177/0967010611399616

  • Natural disasters as stress‐tests for housing systems. Vulnerability and local resistance to the 2012 earthquake in Italy Enrico Giovannetti, Francesco Pagliacci, in Regional Science Policy & Practice /2017 pp.231
    DOI: 10.1111/rsp3.12110
  • Agri-food activities in jeopardy—A territorial analysis of risks from natural hazards Francesco Pagliacci, in Land Use Policy 104041/2019 pp.104041
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104041
  • A novel composite environmental fragility index to analyse Italian ecoregions’ vulnerability Luigi Mastronardi, Aurora Cavallo, Luca Romagnoli, in Land Use Policy 106352/2022 pp.106352
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106352
  • Socioeconomic effects of an earthquake: does spatial heterogeneity matter? Francesco Pagliacci, Margherita Russo, in Regional Studies /2019 pp.490
    DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2018.1462483
  • The Good Entrepreneur Cristina Santini, pp.47 (ISBN:978-3-030-59331-5)
  • Theoretical and Practical Approaches to Social Innovation pp.211 (ISBN:9781799845881)

Francesco Pagliacci, Margherita Russo, Laura Sartori, Social innovation and natural disasters: the "Casa Italia" Plan in "SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE" 113/2017, pp 87-102, DOI: 10.3280/SUR2017-113006