Progress in human systematics. A review

Titolo Rivista PARADIGMI
Autori/Curatori Colin Groves
Anno di pubblicazione 2017 Fascicolo 2017/2
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 16 P. 59-74 Dimensione file 198 KB
DOI 10.3280/PARA2017-002005
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

In this paper I briefly discuss what "species" are, and how they might be recognised in the fossil record, and support a time-dependent view of higher categories (genus, family). The genus Homo, according to the time-dependent model, contains Australopithecus and Paranthropus, and perhaps Kenyanthropus, as synonyms. I suggest 19 "definite species" in the genus Homo, with several other "potential species" and "possible species".

Nel saggio si ragiona brevemente su cosa siano le "specie" e su come esse possano essere individuate nella documentazione fossile, e si sostiene un’interpretazione delle categorie superiori (genere, famiglia) dipendente dal fattore tempo (modello temporale). In base al modello temporale, il genere Homo racchiude come sinonimi al suo interno Australopiteco e Parantropo, e forse Kenyantropo. Suggerisco di individuare all’interno del genere Homo 19 "specie definite" con incluse svariate ulteriori "specie potenziali" e "specie possibili".

Keywords:Famiglia, Genere, Homo, Modello temporale, Specie, Specie potenziali.

  1. Antón S.C. (2003). Natural History of Homo erectus. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 46, 126-170.
  2. Antón S.C., Potts R. and Aiello L.C. (2014). Evolution of Early Homo: An Integrated Biological Perspective. Science, 345, 1236828: 1-13,
  3. Antón S.C. et al. (2007). Defining Homo erectus: Size Considered. In: Henke W. and Tattersall I., eds., Handbook of Paleoanthropology, III: Phylogeny of Hominids. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer: 1655-1693, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-33761-4_54
  4. Argue D. (2016). Variation in the Early Pleistocene: the Phylogenetic Relationships of Ceprano, Bodo, Daka, Kabwe and Buia. In: Behie A.M. and ‎Oxenham M.F., eds., Taxonomic Tapestries: the Threads of Evolutionary, Behavioural and Conservation Research. Canberra: ANU Press: 215-243.
  5. Argue D. et al. (2017). The Affinities of Homo floresiensis Based on Phylogenetic Analyses of Cranial, Dental, and Postcranial Characters. Journal of Human Evolution, 103: 107-133,
  6. Arnold M.L. (2009). Reticulate Evolution and Humans. Oxford: Oxford UP.
  7. Arnold M.L. (2016). Divergence with Genetic Exchange. Oxford: Oxford UP.
  8. Berger L.R. et al. (48). (2015). Homo naledi: a New Species of the Genus Homo from the Dinaledi Chamber, South Africa. ELife 2015, 4: e0956,
  9. Clarke R.J. (2008). Latest Information on Sterkfontein’s Australopithecus Skeleton and a New Look at Australopithecus. South African Journal of Science, 104: 443-449,
  10. De Queiroz K. (2007). Species Concepts and Species Delimitation. Systematic Biology, 56: 879-886, DOI: 10.1080/10635150701701083
  11. Emonet E.-G. et al. (2014). Subocclusal Dental Morphology of Sahelanthropus tchadensis and the Evolution of Teeth in Hominins. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 153: 116-123,
  12. Ferguson W.W. (1995). A New Species of the Genus Homo (Primates: Hominidae) from the Plio/Pleistocene of Koobi Fora, in Kenya. Primates, 36: 69-89,
  13. Goodman M. et al. (1998). Toward a Phylogenetic Classification of Primates Based on DNA Evidence Complemented by Fossil Evidence. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 9: 585-598,
  14. Groves C.P. (1989). A Theory of Human and Primate Evolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  15. Groves C.P. (1999). Nomenclature of African Plio-Pleistocene Hominins. Journal of Human Evolution, 37: 869-872,
  16. Groves C.P. (2001). Primate Taxonomy. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.
  17. Groves C.P. (2012). Speciation in Hominin Evolution. In: Reynolds S.C. and Gallagher A., eds., African Genesis: Perspectives on Hominin Evolution: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 45-62,
  18. Groves C.P. (2017). The Evolution of Javan Homo erectus. In: Bellwood P., ed., First Islanders: Prehistory and Human Migration in Island Southeast Asia, Hoboken and Oxford: Wiley Blackwell: 46-53.
  19. Groves C.P. and Grubb P. (2011). Ungulate Taxonomy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP.
  20. Haile Selassie Y., Melillo S.M. and Su D.F. (2016). The Pliocene Hominin Diversity Conundrum: Do More Fossils Mean Less Clarity? PNAS, 113, no. 23. 1521266113,
  21. Harley E.H. et al. (2016). Comparison of Whole Mitochondrial Genome Sequences of Northern and Southern White Rhinoceroses (Ceratotherium simum): the Conservation Consequences of Species Definition. Conservation Genetics, 17: 1285-1291,
  22. Hennig W. (1966). Phylogenetic Systematics. Urbana-Chicago-London: University of Illinois Press.
  23. ICZN (International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature) (1999). International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, 4th edition. London: British Museum (Natural History) Trustees,
  24. Kimbel W.H. and Delezene L.K. (2009). “Lucy” Redux: a Review of Research on Australopithecus afarensis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 140, 49: 2-48,
  25. Kimbel W.H. and Rak Y. (1993). The Importance of Species in Paleoanthropology and an Argument for the Phylogenetic Concept of the Species Category. In: Kimbel W.H. and Martin L.B., eds., Species, Species Concepts, and Primate Evolution. New York: Plenum: 461-484, DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-3745-2_18
  26. Kimbel W.H. et al. (2006). Was Australopithecus anamensis Ancestral to A.afarensis? A Case of Anagenesis in the Hominin Fossil Record. Journal of Human Evolution, 51: 134-152,
  27. Masao F.T. et al. (2016). New Footprints from Laetoli (Tanzania) Provide Evidence for Marked Body Size Variation in Early Hominins. eLife, 5: e 19568,
  28. May R.M. (1990). Taxonomy as Destiny. Nature, 347: 129-130,
  29. Mayden R.L. (1997). A Hierarchy of Species Concepts: the Denouement in the Saga of the Species Problem. In: Claridge M.F., Dawah H.A. and Wilson M.R., eds., Species: The Units of Biodiversity. London: Chapman and Hall: 381-424.
  30. Mayr E. (1963). Animal Species and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  31. Moggi-Cecchi J., Grine F.E. and Tobias P.V. (2006). Early Hominid Dental Remains from Members 4 and 5 of the Sterkfontein Formation (1966-1996 Excavations): Catalogue, Individual Associations, Morphological Descriptions and Initial Metrical Analysis. Journal of Human Evolution, 50: 239-328,
  32. Plavcan J.M. and Cope D.A. (2001). Metric Variation and Species Recognition in the Fossil Record. Evolutionary Anthropology, 10: 204-222,
  33. Rak Y. and Been E. (2016). What Do We Really Know about the Origin of Hu-mans? Abstract for a Podium Presentation to the European Society for the Study of Human Evolution. Madrid.
  34. Simpson G.G., Roe A. and Lewontin R.C. (1960). Quantitative Zoology. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.
  35. Spoor F. et al. (2015). Reconstructed Homo habilis Type OH 7 Suggests Deep-rooted Species Diversity in Early Homo. Nature, 519: 83-86,
  36. Tattersall I. (2007). Homo ergaster and Its Contemporaries. In: Henke W. and Tattersall I., eds., Handbook of Paleoanthropology, III, Phylogeny of Hominids. Berli-Heidelberg-New York: Springer: 1633-1653, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-33761-4_53
  37. Wood B.A. (1985). Early Homo in Kenya, and its Systematic Relationships. In: Delson E., ed., Ancestors: the Hard Evidence. New York: Alan R. Liss: 206-214.
  38. Woodley M.A. (2010). Is Homo sapiens Polytypic? Humantaxonomic Diversity and Its Implications. Med. Hypotheses, 74: 195-220,
  39. Zachos F.E. et al. (2013). Species Inflation and Taxonomic Artefacts: A Critical Comment on Recent Trends in Mammalian Classification. Mamm. Biol., 78: 1-6,

Colin Groves, Progress in human systematics. A review in "PARADIGMI" 2/2017, pp 59-74, DOI: 10.3280/PARA2017-002005