Social farming and the recent national regulation: An exploratory survey

Author/s Davide D’Angelo, Saverio Senni
Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2017/2
Language English Pages 14 P. 261-274 File size 117 KB
DOI 10.3280/ECAG2017-002005
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The second pillar of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) has been gradually broadening its objectives including, in the 2014-20 programming period, a specific concern for social inclusion. In this perspective social farming (SF) is emerging as an innovative activity within multifunctional agriculture, that provides new approaches to challenge social exclusion both in rural and urban areas. Italy is recognized as a country where SF has a long history and is developing rather rapidly. As well as being the culmination of a debate that took place in several regions, in the proceding years, regarding the social function of agricultural practices, the recent national law (No. 141/2015) on SF was also powerful factor for further increase of the sector. Yet, statistical knowledge on the topic is still fragmentary and uncomplete. The main scope of the article is to contribute to an understanding of the profiles of initiatives already underway, with a specific focus on its relations with the new legal framework that, for the first time, sets boundaries and definitions. The paper begins with a short overview of social farming in Italy, highlighting the main elements concerning the recent national regulation. Subsequently, it presents the main results from a national survey that took in farms, enterprises and other bodies currently involved in SF practices. Data from 123 respondents to an online questionnaire are presented in a descriptive way and processed through a multivariate method in order to aggregate them into homogeneous clusters. Specific attention is paid to the fitting of the respondents to the official definition of SF practices and actors established by Law No. 141/2015. The results reveal a wide variety of SF practices, together with a shared rather small productive, occupational and economic size. With reference to form a more reliable and complete picture the implementing multifunctional agriculture the national regulation, only 53% of the respondents fully fits with the law definition and requirements. To form a more reliable and complete picture the implementing decrees of the national law, not yet issued, should be considered as well as their transposition into the various regional legislations.

Keywords: Social farming, multifunctional agriculture, rural development, social inclusion, framework regulation

Jel codes: Q19, H75

  1. Adinolfi, F. & Capitanio, F. (2008). Rischio di impresa e accesso al credito. Agriregionieuropa, 4(15), 36-39. -- Retrieved from
  2. arm (2014). Agricoltura Bene Comune. Rome: Azienda Romana Mercati.
  3. Carbone, A., Gaito, M. & Senni, S. (2009). Consumer attitudes toward ethical food: evidence from social farming in Italy. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 15(3), 337-350. DOI: 10.1080/10454440902925831
  4. D’Angelo, D., Senni, S. & Ruivenkamp, G. (2015). Social farming fostered by microcredit: the case of Italy. In Book of proceedings (pp. 298-299). Agriculture in an urbanising society 2015, Conference. -- Retrieved from
  5. Di Iacovo, F. & Ciofani, D. (2005). Le funzioni sociali dell’agricoltura: analisi teorica ed evidenze empiriche. Rivista di Economia Agraria, 60(1), 78-103.
  6. Di Iacovo, F. (2008). Agricoltura sociale: quando le campagne coltivano valori. Milan: FrancoAngeli. -- Retrieved from
  7. Di Iacovo, F. (2013). Agricoltura sociale innovativa. In F. Giarè (Ed.), Coltivare Salute: Agricoltura Sociale e Nuove Ipotesi Di Welfare (pp. 21-40). Rome: INEA. -- Retrieved from
  8. Di Iacovo, F., Moruzzo, R. & Rossignoli, C. M. (2017). Collaboration, knowledge and innovation toward a welfare society: the case of the Board of Social Farming in Valdera (Tuscany), Italy. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 1-23.
  9. eesc (2012). Social farming: green care and social and health policies, Brussels: European Economic and Social Committee. -- Retrieved from
  10. Fonte, M. & Cucco, I. (2017). Cooperatives and alternative food networks in Italy. The long road towards a social economy in agriculture. Journal of Rural Studies, 1-12.
  11. Giarè, F. & Macrì, M.C. (2012). La valutazione delle azioni innovative di agricoltura sociale. Rome: inea. -- Retrieved from
  12. Hassink, J., Grin, J. & Hulsink, W. (2012). Multifunctional Agriculture Meets Health Care. Sociologia Ruralis, 53(2), 223-245.
  13. Haubenhofer, D.K., Elings, M., Hassink, J. & Hine, R.E. (2010). The Development of Green Care in Western European Countries. explore: The Journal of Science and Healing, 6, 106-111.
  14. Italian Parliament (2015). Law n. 141 - August 18, 2015. Disposizioni in materia di agricoltura sociale. Rome: O.J. General Series n. 208 – September 8, 2015. -- Retrieved from
  15. Lanfranchi, M., Giannetto, C., Abbate, T. & Dimitrova, V. (2015). Agriculture and the social farm: Expression of the multifunctional model of agriculture as a solution to the economic crisis in rural areas. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 21(4), 711-718. -- Retrieved from
  16. Mantino, F. (2013). La programmazione dello sviluppo rurale 2014-2020: il position paper e l’accordo di partenariato. Agriregionieuropa, 32. -- Retrieved from
  17. Mastrorilli, A., Petitta, L., Borgogni, L. & Steca, P. (2015). L’abc del programma spss. Come avviarsi alla pratica del pacchetto statistico. Milan: FrancoAngeli.
  18. mipaaf (2010). Strumenti finanziari a supporto della gestione delle politiche di sviluppo rurale. Una rassegna di buone prassi. Rome: Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Forestry Policies. -- Retrieved from
  19. Nazzaro, C. (2008). Sviluppo rurale, multifunzionalità e diversificazione in agricoltura. Nuovi percorsi di creazione di valore per le aziende agricole delle aree interne del Mezzogiorno d’Italia. Milan: FrancoAngeli. -- Retrieved from
  20. Renting, H., Rossing, W.A.H., Groot, J.C.J., Van der Ploeg, J.D., Laurent, C., Perraud, D., Stobbelaar, D.J. & Van Ittersum, M.K. (2009). Exploring multifunctional agriculture. A review of conceptual approaches and prospects for an integrative transitional framework. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, S112-S123.
  21. Scuderi, A., Timpanaro, G. & Cacciola, S. (2014). Development policies for social farming in the EU-2020 strategy. Calitatea, 15.S1, 76-82.
  22. Senni, S. (2010). Agricoltura e imprenditorialità sociale nell’esperienza italiana. Impresa Sociale, 79, 15-33.
  23. Senni, S. (2013). Uno sguardo europeo sull’agricoltura sociale. Agriregionieuropa, 9(32), 57-59. -- Retrieved from
  24. Visconti, G. (2015). L’impresa di agricoltura sociale introdotta dalla legge n. 141 del 2015. -- Retrieved from

  • The potential for developing educational farms: a SWOT analysis from a case study Maria Bonaventura Forleo, Nadia Palmieri, in The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension /2019 pp.431
    DOI: 10.1080/1389224X.2019.1643747

Davide D’Angelo, Saverio Senni, Social farming and the recent national regulation: An exploratory survey in "ECONOMIA AGRO-ALIMENTARE" 2/2017, pp 261-274, DOI: 10.3280/ECAG2017-002005