Capability approach and urban planning. Fertile urban capabilities and qual-ity of urban life of the most disadvantaged inhabitants

Author/s Ivan Blecic, Arnaldo Cecchini, Valentina Talu
Publishing Year 2018 Issue 2018/122 Language Italian
Pages 19 P. 34-52 File size 214 KB
DOI 10.3280/ASUR2018-122003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Starting from a reflection on the possibility to employ the capability approach as a methodological and operational framework for urban planning theory and practices, the authors introduce the concept of urban capability and illustrate how the concept may prove useful for the evaluation and for the design of enabling urban policies and projects which aim at guaranteeing and promoting the real freedom of each to live a quality urban life.

Keywords: Quality of urban life; capability approach; urban capabilities; disad-vantaged inhabitants.

  1. Accolla A. (2009). Design for All. Il progetto per l’individuo reale. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  2. Alkire S. (2005). Valuing freedoms: Sen’s capability approach and poverty reduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/0199245797.001.000
  3. Anand P. (2009). Capabilities and their measurement. E-Bulletin of the Human Development and Capability Association, 14.
  4. Basta C. (2015). From justice in planning toward planning for justice: A capability approach. Planning Theory. Epub ahead of print 13 February. DOI: 10.1177/1473095215571399
  5. Basta C. (2016). On Marx’s human significance, Harvey’s right to the city, and Nussbaum’s capability approach. Planning Theory. Epub ahead of print 6 April. DOI: 10.1177/1473095216641153
  6. Blečić I., Cecchini A. and Talu V. (2013). Capability approach in urban quality of life and urban policies. Towards a conceptual framework”. In: Maciocco G., Johansson M. and Serreli S. (eds.), City Project, Public Space, Berlin: Springer.
  7. Brighouse H. and Robeyns I., eds. (2011). Measuring justice. Primary goods and capabilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO978051181091
  8. Campbell H. (2006). Just planning. The art of situated ethical judgment. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(1): 92-106. DOI: 10.1177/0739456X0628809
  9. Campbell H. (2012). “Planning ethics” and rediscovering the idea of planning. Planning Theory, 11(4): 379-399. DOI: 10.1177/147309521244215
  10. Chiappero-Martinetti E. (2011). L’approccio delle capacità di Sen e la relazione contesto-individuo. In: Chiappero-Martinetti E., Moroni S. e Nuvolati G., a cura di, Gli spazi della povertà. Strumenti di indagine e politiche di intervento. Milano-Torino: Mondadori.
  11. Chiappero-Martinetti E. and Moroni S. (2007). An Analytical Framework for Conceptualizing Poverty and Re-examining the Capability Approach. Journal of Socio-Economics, 36: 360-375.
  12. Crocker D. (1992). Functioning and Capability: The Foundations of Sen’s and Nussbaum's Development Ethic. Political Theory, 20, pp. 584-612. DOI: 10.1177/009059179202000400
  13. Fainstein S.S. (2010). The just city. New York: Cornell University Press. DOI: 10.2747/0272-3638.32.5.75
  14. Frediani A.A. (2007). Amartya Sen, the World Bank, and the redress of urban poverty: A Brazilian case study. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 8(1): 133-152. DOI: 10.1080/1464988060110147
  15. Frediani A.A. (2010). Sen’s capability approach as a framework to the practice of development. Development in Practice, 20(2): 173-187. DOI: 10.1080/0961452090356418
  16. Frediani A.A., Boni A. and Gasper S. (2014). Approaching development projects from a human development and capability perspective. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 15(1): 1-12. DOI: 10.1080/19452829.2013.87901
  17. Harvey D. (2008). The right to the city. The New Left Review, 53.
  18. Harvey D. (2009). Social justice and the city. Georgia: University of Georgia Press.
  19. Harvey D. (2012). Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. London-New York: Verso Books.
  20. Khosla R. and Samuels J. (2005). Removing unfreedoms: citizens as agent of change in urban development. London: ITDG Publishing.
  21. Lefebvre H. (1968). Le droit à la ville. Paris: Éditions Anthropos.
  22. Lydon M. and Garcia T. (2015). Tactical Urbanism. Short-term Actions for Long-term Change. Washington DC: Island Press.
  23. Magni S.F. (2006). Etica delle capacità. La filosofia pratica di Sen e Nussbaum. Bologna: il Mulino.
  24. Moroni S. (2011). Livelli del discorso sulla povertà. In: Chiappero-Martinetti E., Moroni S. e Nuvolati G., a cura di, Gli spazi della povertà. Strumenti di indagine e politiche di intervento. Milano: Mondadori.
  25. Nussbaum M. (1999). Women and equality. The capability approach. International Labour Review, 138(3): 227-245.
  26. Nussbaum M. (2000). Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  27. Nussbaum M. (2002). Giustizia sociale e dignità umana. Da individui a persone. Bologna: il Mulino.
  28. Nussbaum M. (2006). Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species, Membership. Cambridge: Belknap Press.
  29. Nussbaum M. (2011). Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  30. Rawls J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Bellknap Press.
  31. Robeyns I. (2005). The capability approach: A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1): 94-114. DOI: 10.1080/14649880520003426
  32. Saith R. (2001). Capabilities: the concept and its operationalisation. Paper written for the project Alternative realities? An empirical investigation into alternative concept of poverty. Oxford: Department for International Development, University of Oxford.
  33. Sanyal B. (2002). Globalization, ethical compromise and planning theory. Planning Theory, 1(2): 116-123. DOI: 10.1177/14730952020010020
  34. Sen A.K. (1980). Equality of What?. In: The Tanner Lecture on Human Values, I: 197-220. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  35. Sen A.K. (1992). Inequality Reexamined. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  36. Sen A.K. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Knopf Press.
  37. Sen A.K. (2009). The Idea of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  38. Sen A.K. (2011). The place of capability in a theory of justice. In: Brighouse H. and Robeyns I., eds., Measuring justice. Primary goods and capabilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  39. Speak S. (2012). Planning for the needs of urban poor in the Global South: The value of a feminist approach. Planning Theory, 11(4): 343-360. DOI: 10.1177/147309521244042
  40. Talu V. (2013). Qualità della vita urbana e approccio delle capacità. Archivio di Studi Urbani e Regionali, 107: 52-73. DOI: 10.3280/ASUR2013-10700
  41. Talu V. (2014). Qualità della vita urbana e approccio delle capacità. Perché e come promuovere le capacità urbane degli abitanti più svantaggiati. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  42. Terzi L. (2011), What metric of justice for disabled people? Capability and disability. In: Brighouse H. and Robeyns I., eds., Measuring justice. Primary goods and capabilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  43. Wolff J. and De-Shalit A. (2007). Disadvantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2019 Ivan Blečić, Alessandra G. Santos, Ana Clara Moura, Giuseppe A. Trunfio, pp.612 (ISBN:978-3-030-24301-2)

Ivan Blecic, Arnaldo Cecchini, Valentina Talu, Approccio delle capacità e pianificazione urbana. Capacità urbane feconde e qualità della vita urbana degli abitanti più svantaggiati in "ARCHIVIO DI STUDI URBANI E REGIONALI" 122/2018, pp 34-52, DOI: 10.3280/ASUR2018-122003