What is new in fake news? The disinhibition of dissent in a hyperconnected society

Titolo Rivista SOCIOLOGIA E POLITICHE SOCIALI
Autori/Curatori Alberto Cevolini
Anno di pubblicazione 2019 Fascicolo 2018/3
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 18 P. 75-92 Dimensione file 215 KB
DOI 10.3280/SP2018-003005
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Fake news entered quite impetuously in our daily lives, causing much concern. However, scientific research on this social issue is still rather lacking. This article offers a contribution to research starting from a strictly sociological approach. First of all, it is shown that the phenomenon of fake news is an old and new phenomenon at the same time, even if to understand this phenomenon we do not need a new concept of fake news but a new media theory. The issue of fake news is then detached from two very commonly held misunderstandings: that in order to defend oneself from this type of news it is necessary to distinguish the true from the false, and that the news can be manipulated. The core distinction should be, however, that between information and non-information rather than that between information and misinformation. Even misinformation is informative – not so much on what is reported, as on recipients’ reactions to misinformation. The main hypothesis is that fake news exploit this information to “stage dissent” in the mass media system. Fake news are therefore interpreted as events which trigger a second-order observation starting from a second reality, that produced by the mass media, which does not oblige consensus.

Keywords:Fake News; Mass Media System; Second-Order Observation; Misinformation; Public Opinion.

  1. Bloch, M. 2004. Riflessioni di uno storico sulle false notizie della guerra [1921]. In M. Bloch. La guerra e le false notizie, pp. 75-105. Roma: Donzelli.
  2. Bronner, G. 2016 La democrazia dei creduloni. Roma: Aracne.
  3. Cattaneo, M. 2016. Prefazione. Uscire dalla echo chamber. In W. Quattrociocchi and A. Vicini. Misinformation. Guida alla società dell’informazione e della credulità, pp. 9-14. Milano: Franco Angeli.
  4. Chartier, R. 2006. Inscrivere e cancellare. Cultura scritta e letteratura dall’XI al XVIII secolo. Roma/Bari: Laterza.
  5. Corsi, G. 2017. Legitimating Reason or Self-Created Uncertainty? Public Opinion as an Observer of Modern Politics. Thesis Eleven, 143(1), pp. 44-55.
  6. Del Vicario, M. et al. 2018. Polarization and Fake News: Early Warning of Potential Misinformation Targets. arXiv, pp. 1-18.
  7. Dentith, M. 2017. The Problem of Fake News. Public Reason, 8(1-2), pp. 65-79.
  8. Eco, U. 2015. Numero zero. Milano: Bompiani.
  9. Esposito, E. 2008. Abhängige Unabhängigkeit. Die Autonomie des Journalismus als Operationsmodus und Erfordernis. In B. Pörksen et al. Paradoxien des Journalismus. Theorie – Empirie – Praxis, pp. 327-340. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
  10. Gelfert, A. 2018. Fake News: A Definition. Informal Logic, 38(1), pp. 84-117.
  11. Hegelich, S. 2017. Social Bots, Trolle, Fake-News. Wie gefährlich sind sie für die Demokratie? Die Politische Meinung, 62(543), pp. 32-36.
  12. Hönn, G. P. 1721. Betrugslexikon, worinnen die meiste Betrügereyen in allen Ständen nebst denen darwider guten Theils dienenden Mitteln entdecket. Coburg: Paul Günther Pfotenhauer.
  13. Jonson, B. 1756. The Staple of News [Acted in the year 1625]. In The Works of Ben Jonson, pp. 125-248. London: Printed for D. Midwinter.
  14. Kleist, H. von 1993. Lehrbuch der französischen Journalistik [1809]. In H. von Kleist. Sämtliche Werke und Briefe, pp. 361-367. 2 voll. München: Carl Hanser Verlag.
  15. Lazer D. et al. 2018. The Science of Fake News. Science, 359(6380), pp. 1094-1096.
  16. Lewandowsky, S. et al. 2017. Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and Coping with the ‘Post-Truth’ Era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6, pp. 353-369.
  17. Lippmann, W. 1922. Public Opinion. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
  18. Luhmann, N. 1971. Öffentliche Meinung. In N. Luhmann. Politische Planung. Aufsätze zur Soziologie von Politik und Verwaltung, pp. 9-34. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
  19. — 1984. Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
  20. — 1992. Die Beobachtung der Beobachter im politischen System: Zur Theorie der öffentlichen Meinung. In J. Wilke, ed. Öffentliche Meinung: Theorie, Methode, Befunde, pp. 77-86. Freiburg: Alber Verlag.
  21. — 1994. Der “Radikale Konstruktivismus” als Theorie der Massenmedien? Bemerkungen zu einer irreführenden Debatte. Communicatio Socialis, 27(1), pp. 7-12.
  22. — 2009. Die Realität der Massenmedien. Opladen: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
  23. Ong, W. 1967. The Presence of the Word. New Haven: Yale University Press (Ital. trans. La presenza della parola. Bologna: Il Mulino, 1970).
  24. Quattrociocchi, W. 2016. L’era della (dis)informazione, Le Scienze, 570, pp. 32-39.
  25. — 2018. La babele di Internet. Le Scienze, 596, pp. 36-43.
  26. Quattrociocchi, W. and Vicini, A. 2016. Misinformation. Guida alla società dell’informazione e della credulità. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  27. Riva, G. 2018. Fake news. Vivere e sopravvivere in un mondo post-verità. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  28. Russ-Mohl, S. 2017. Die informierte Gesellschaft und ihre Feinde. Warum die Digitalisierung unsere Demokratie gefährdet. Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag.
  29. Salzano, D. et al. 2017. Molto rumore per nulla: post-verità, fake news e determinismo sociologico. Sociologia, 51(1), pp. 145-148.
  30. Simon, H. A. 1956. Rational Choice and the Structure of the Environment. Psychological Review, 63(2), pp. 129-138.
  31. — 1971. Designing Organizations for an Information-Rich World. In M. Greenberger, ed. Computers, Communication and the Public Interest, pp. 37-72. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University.
  32. — 1997. The Future of Information Systems. Annals of Operations Research, 71, pp. 3-14.
  33. Sunstein, C. 2002. The Law of Group Polarization. Journal of Political Philosophy, 10(2), pp. 175-195.
  34. Tuchman, G. 1973. Making News by Doing Work: Routinizing the Unexpected. American Journal of Sociology, 79(1), pp. 110-131.
  35. Vosoughi, S. et al. 2018. The Spread of True and False News Online. Science, 359(6380), pp. 1146-1151.
  36. Wolf, M. 2001. Teorie delle comunicazioni di massa. Milano: Bompiani.
  37. Zollo, F. et al. 2017. Debunking in a World of Tribes. PLoS One, 12(7), pp. 1-27.

Alberto Cevolini, What is new in fake news? The disinhibition of dissent in a hyperconnected society in "SOCIOLOGIA E POLITICHE SOCIALI" 3/2018, pp 75-92, DOI: 10.3280/SP2018-003005