Nature-based solutions (NBSs) for urban resilience. Introduction

Titolo Rivista ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Autori/Curatori Edoardo Croci, Benedetta Lucchitta
Anno di pubblicazione 2019 Fascicolo 2018/2
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 12 P. 31-42 Dimensione file 331 KB
DOI 10.3280/EFE2018-002002
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Ecosystem services are "the direct and indirect contributions of ecosystems to human wellbeing" and they can help to cope with the major challenges that cities are facing nowadays. In fact, healthy ecosystem are able to regulate city temperature reducing the heat island effect, reduce water run off, and improve human health and the overall resilience of urban areas. At the same time, urbanisation has increased the pressure on natural resources, generating several impacts on the ecosystems and on the services provided by them at local, regional, national and global scales. This phenomenon has been exacerbated by the impacts of climate change, increasing vulnerability to natural disaster risks. At international and national level several policies for the protection of ecosystems has been defined. Indeed regional and local authorities can improve integrated spatial planning and coordinated management between sectors to reduce the pressures on natural system. In order to do this it is fundamental to understand the value of the ecosystem to introduce regulatory and market instruments that are able to protect them.

Keywords:Ecosystem services, urbanization, nature-based solutions

Jel codes:Q56, Q57, Q58

  1. Baccini, M., Biggeri, A., Accetta, G., Kosatsky, T., atsouyanni, K., Analitis, A., Anderson, H.R., Bisanti, L., D’ Ippoliti, D., Danova, J., Forsberg, B., Medina, S., Paldy, A., Rabczenko, D., Schindler, C., Michelozzi, P. (2008). Heat Effects on Mortality in 15 European Cities. Epidemiology, 19(5): 711-719.
  2. Churkina, G., Kuik, F., Bonn, B, et al. (2017). Effect of VOC Emissions from Vegetation on Air Quality in Berlin during a Heatwave. Environmental Science & Technology, 51. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b06514.
  3. Cohen-Shacham, E., Walters, G., Janzen, C. and Maginnis, S. (eds.) (2016). Nature-based Solutions to address global societal challenges. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
  4. Conclusions from the OECD 5th GGSD Forum, 2016.
  5. Convention on biological diversity, 1992.
  6. Costanza, R., d’ Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’ Neill, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton, P., van den Belt, M. (1997). The Value of the World’ s Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital. Nature, 387.
  7. Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Sutton, P., van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S.J., Kubiszewski, I., Farber, S., Turner, R.K. (2014). Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 26.
  8. Daily, G.C., Polasky, S., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P.M., Mooney, H.A., Pejchar, L., Ricketts, T.H., Salzman, J., Shallenberger, R. (2009). Ecosystem Services in Decision Making: Time to Deliver. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7.
  9. De Groot, R.S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., Willemen, L. (2010). Challenges in Integrating the Concept of Ecosystem Services and Values in Landscape Planning, Management and Decision Making. Ecological Complexity, 7(3): 260-272.
  10. EEA (2015). Exploring nature-based solutions – The role of green infrastructure in mitigating the impacts of weather- and climate change-related natural hazards.
  11. Escobedo, F.J., Wagner, J.E., Nowak, D.J., et al. (2008). nalyzing the cost effectiveness of Santiago, Chile’ s policy of using urban forests to improve air quality. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(1): 148-157.
  12. European Commission (2015). Towards an EU Research and Innovation policy agenda for Nature-Based Solutions & Re-Naturing Cities.
  13. Fann, N., Brennan, T., Dolwick, P., Gamble, J.L., Ilacqua, V., Kolb, L., Nolte, C.G., Spero, T.L., Ziska, L. (2016). Ch. 3: Air Quality Impacts. The Impacts of Climate Change on Human Health in the United States: A Scientific Assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, 69-98. DOI: 10.7930/J0GQ6VP6
  14. Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., Holling, C.S. (2004). Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 35(1): 557-581.
  15. Gábor, P., Jombach, S. (2009). The Relation between the Biological Activity and the Land Surface Temperature in Budapest. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 7(3): 241-251.
  16. Gómez-Baggethun, E., de Groot, R. (2010). Natural capital and ecosystem services: The ecological foundation of human society. In R. E. Hester & R. M. Harrison (Eds.), Ecosystem services: Issues in environmental science and technology, 30. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.
  17. Gomez-Baggethun, E., Gren, Å., Barton, D.N., Langemeyer, J., McPherson, T., O’Farrell, P., Andersson, E., Hamsted, Z., et al. (2013). Urban ecosystem services. In: T Elmqvist, T. M. (ed.). Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities. A global assessment.
  18. Green, T.L., Kronenberg, J., Andersson, E. et al. Ecosystems (2016).
  19. Grimm, N.B., Faeth, S.H., Golubiewski, N.E., Redman, C.L., Wu, J., Bai, X., Briggs, J.M. (2008). Review Global change and the ecology of cities. Science, 319.
  20. Lovasi, G.S., Quinn, J.W., Neckerman, K.M., Perzanowski, M.S., Rundle, A.J. (2008). Children living in areas with more street trees have lower prevalence of asthma. Epidemiol Community Health.
  21. Maas J., Verheij R.A., Groenewegen P.P., de Vries S., Spreeuwenberg P.J. (2006). Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation? Epidemiol Community Health.
  22. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: the assessment series. Island Press, Washington DC.
  23. Mitchell R, Popham F. (2008). Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: an observational population study. Lancet, 372(9650): 1655-1660.
  24. Natural Capital Coalition (2012). Natural capital declaration.
  25. OECD (2006). Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment.
  26. Pitt, M. (2008). The Pitt Review: Learning Lessons from the 2007 Floods. Cabinet Office, London.
  27. Popkin, G. (2019). The forest question – Trees are supposed to slow global warming, but growing evidence suggests they might not always be climate saviours. Nature, 565.
  28. Sander, H., Polasky, S., Haight, R. G. (2010). The value of urban tree cover: A hedonic property price model in Ramsey and Dakota Counties, Minnesota, USA. Ecological Economics, 69(8): 1646-1656.
  29. Scalenghe, R., Marsan, F.A. (2009). The Anthropogenic Sealing of Soils in Urban Areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 90(1-2): 1-10.
  30. Schwarz, N., Lautenbach, S., Seppelt, R. (2011). Exploring indicators for quantifying surface urban heat islands of European cities with MODIS land surface temperatures. Remote Sensing of Environment.
  31. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2012). Cities and Biodiversity Outlook.
  32. Seto, K.C., Reenberg, A., Boone, C.G., et al. (2012). Urban land teleconnections and sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109.
  33. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) (2011). TEEB manual for cities: Ecosystem services in urban management.
  34. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) (2010). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations. London: Earthscan.
  35. The Nature conservancy (2014). Protect transform inspire – Annual report 2014.
  36. Tratalos, J., Fuller, R.A., Warren, P.H., Davies, R.G., Gaston, K.J. (2007). Urban Form, Biodiversity Potential and Ecosystem Services. Landscape and Urban Planning, 83.
  37. UN-Habitat (2016). Urbanization and development: emerging futures. World cities report.
  38. Van den Bosch, M., Ode Sang, A. (2017). Urban natural environments as nature-based solutions for improved public health – A systematic review of reviews. Environmental Research, 158: 373-384.
  39. Vitousek, P.M., Mooney, H.A., Lubchenco, J., Melillo, J.M. (1997). Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystems. Science, 277(5325): 494-499.
  40. Walker, B., Holling, C.S., Carpenter, S.R., Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social-ecological Systems. Ecology and society, 9(2).
  41. Wunder, S. (2015). Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 117: 234-243.
  42. --https://www.eea.europa.eu/themes/biodiversity/green-infrastructure/tools-to-support-greeninfrastructure.

  • Valuing Ecosystem Services at the Urban Level: A Critical Review Edoardo Croci, Benedetta Lucchitta, Tommaso Penati, in Sustainability /2021 pp.1129
    DOI: 10.3390/su13031129

Edoardo Croci, Benedetta Lucchitta, Nature-based solutions (NBSs) for urban resilience. Introduction in "ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT" 2/2018, pp 31-42, DOI: 10.3280/EFE2018-002002