Cultivated Spontaneity. Stories from the present of Amsterdam urbanism

Journal title TERRITORIO
Author/s Giuseppe Pepe
Publishing Year 2019 Issue 2019/88
Language Italian Pages 18 P. 7-24 File size 537 KB
DOI 10.3280/TR2019-088001
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The city of Amsterdam, in the years at the turn of the last financial crisis of 2008, was the protagonist of a series of experiences that showed lateral characteristics compared to a tradition of strongly organized and planned way of producing the city. It is a nebula of microstories that in recent years, as often happens in times of transition and crisis, tend to thicken and emerge as attempts to respond to the changed conditions of the context of action. Amsterdam, as a laboratory for reflection and experimentation, shows a great capacity for resilience in the ways of thinking, experimenting and building its own future. Going back today to reflect on current practices means questioning what lessons can still come from a city that has been the protagonist of the different seasons of European urbanism.

Keywords: Amsterdam; organic planning; urban project

  1. Abrahamse J.E., 2006, ed., Eastern Harbour District Amsterdam. Urbanism and Architecture. Rotterdam: nai Publisher.
  2. Andersson D.E., Moroni S., 2014, eds., Cities and Private Planning. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing. Astengo G., 1949, ≪La lezione urbanistica di Amsterdam≫. Urbanistica, 2: 27-42.
  3. Avidar P., Havik K., Wigger B., 2007, ≪Gentrification: Flows and Counter-Flows≫. oase, 93: 2-6.
  4. Baes-Cantillon N., Declerk J., Dehaene M., Levy S., 2012, eds., Changing Culture of Planning. Brussels: Architecture Workroom Brussels.
  5. Beck U., 2000, La società del rischio. Verso una seconda modernità. Roma: Carocci.
  6. Bergevoet T., Van Tuijl M., 2016, The Flexible City. Sustainable Solutions for a Europe in Transition. Rotterdam: nai010 publishers.
  7. Bertolini L., Wenban-Smith A., Robiglio M., Williams B., van der Kooij E., 2011, ≪Planning and the Recession≫. Planning Theory & Practice, 12, 3: 429-451. DOI: 10.1080/14649357.2011.617499
  8. Bianchetti C., 2016, Spazi che contano. Il progetto urbanistico in epoca neo-liberale. Roma: Donzelli.
  9. Bishop P., Lesley W., 2012, The Temporary City. London: Routledge.
  10. Bonomi A., Della Puppa F., Masiero R., 2016, La società circolare. Fordismo, capitalismo molecolare, sharing economy. Roma: DeriveApprodi. Bouman O., 2007, ≪Unsolicited, or: The new Autonomy of Architecture≫. Volume, 14: 138-139.
  11. Brugmans G., 2018, ed., iabr 2018+2020, The Missing Link. Rotterdam: iabr.
  12. Brugmans G., Strien J., 2014, eds., iabr 2014, Urban by Nature. Rotterdam iabr.
  13. Brugmans G., van Dinteren J., Hajer M., 2016, eds., iabr 2016, The Next Economy. Rotterdam: iabr.
  14. Brunetta G., Moroni S., 2011, a cura di, La città intraprendente. Roma: Carocci.
  15. Buchel P., Hogervorst B., 1997, The Turning Tide. The User’s Role in the Redevelopment of Harbour in the North-West Europe. Amsterdam: The ij Industrial Building Guild, De Appelbloesempers.
  16. Buitelaar E., 2010, ≪Window on the Netherlands: Cracks in the Myth: Challenges to Land Policy in the Netherlands≫. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 101: 349-356.
  17. Buitelaar E., Bregman A., 2016, ≪Dutch Development Institutions in the Face of Crisis: Trembling Pillars in the Planners’ Paradise≫. European Planning Studies, 24, 7: 1281-1294. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1168785
  18. Buitelaar E., Feenstra S., Galle M., Lekkerkerker J., Sorel N., Tennekes J., 2012, Vormgeven aan de Spontane Stad: Belemmeringen en Kansen voor Organische Stedelijke Herontwikkeling. The Hague: pbl Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Urhahn Urban Design.
  19. Buitelaar E., Galle M., Sorel N., 2014, ≪The public planning of private planning: an analysis of controlled spontaneity in the Netherlands≫.
  20. In: Andersson D.E., Moroni S. (eds.), Cities and Private Planning, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  21. Buurman M., Kloos M., 2005, eds., impact. Urban Planning in Amsterdam after 1986. Amsterdam: arcam/Architectura, Natura Press.
  22. Campli A., 2010, La ricostruzione del Crystal Palace. Macerata: Quodlibet.
  23. Chase J., Crawford M., Kaliski J., 1999, Everyday Urbanism. New York: Monacelli Press.
  24. Circle Economy, tno, fabric, 2016, Circular Amsterdam, a Vision and Action Agenda for the City and Metropolitan Area. Amsterdam: Gemeente Amsterdam. -- (ultimo accesso: 2018.03.20).
  25. Cozzolino S., 2014, ≪Il caso di Almere e la nuova sfida urbanistica olandese. Da un modello blueprint a do it by yourself≫. In: Marzo M., Fabian L. (a cura di), La ricerca che cambia. Atti del primo convegno nazionale dei dottorati italiani dell’architettura, della pianificazione e del design. Siracusa: LetteraVentidue.
  26. Cozzolino S., 2017, The City as Action. The Dialectic between Rules and Spontaneity, tesi di dottorato in Urban Planning Design and Policy. Milano: Politecnico di Milano. -- (ultimo accesso: 2019.04.03).
  27. De Klerk E., 2017, Make Your City. De Stad als Casco. The City as a Shell. ndsm-Werf Amsterdam. ndsm Shipyard Amsterdam. Haarlem-Amsterdam: Trancity Valiz.
  28. Delva Landscape Architects, Studioninedots, Metabolic, 2016, Circular City. Designing Post-Industrial Amsterdam. The case of Buiksloterham. Rotterdam, Amsterdam: Stimuleringsfonds Creatieve Industrie, Van Eesteren-Fluck & Van Lohuizen Fund.
  29. Dembski S., 2013, Case study Amsterdam Buiksloterham, the Netherlands: the challenge of planning organic transformation. context Report 2. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, aissr programme group Urban Planning.
  30. Djalali A., 2016, ≪The Political Economy of Architectural Research. Dutch Architecure, Architects and the City≫. In: De Maat S., Doyle M., Koseki
  31. S., Lanoix C., Mercuriali M., Negueruela del Castilllo D., Rockcastle S., Savic S., Thorer A. (eds.), Contour: Divergences in Architectural Research. Lousanne: Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lousanne.
  32. Faludi A., van der Valk A., 1994, Rule and Order. Dutch Planning Doctrine in the Twentieth Century. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
  33. Ferguson F., 2014, ed., Make_Shift City. Renegotiating the Urban Commons. Berlin: Jovis.
  34. Florida R., 2003, L’ascesa della nuova classe creativa. Milano: Mondadori.
  35. Gemeente Almere, Gemeente Zeewolde, 2013, Intergemeentelijke Structuurvisie Oosterwold. Almere, Zeewolde.
  36. Gemeente Amsterdam, 2013, Haven Atlas ndsm. Amsterdam.
  37. Gemeente Amsterdam, 2016, Koers 2025, Ruimte voor de stad. Amsterdam.
  38. Gemeente Amsterdam, 2017, Opgeleverd! Voorbeeldige zelfbouwprojecten in Amsterdam. Amsterdam. -- (ultimo accesso: 2018.12.2).
  39. Grafe C., Maaskant M., Stuhlmacher M., 2005, eds., After the Party, oase, 67. Rotterdam: nai010 publishers.
  40. Grulois G., Tosi M.C., Crosas C., 2018, eds., Designing Territorial Metabolism. Berlin: Jovis Verlag.
  41. Hajer M., 2011, The Energetic Society. In search of a governance philosophy for a clean economy. The Hague: pbl Netherlands Environment Assessment Agency.
  42. Harvey D., 2007, Breve storia del neoliberismo. Milano: il Saggiatore.
  43. Havik K., 2007, ≪Monotony and Diversity along the Banks of the ij≫.
  44. oase, 73: 129-137. Haydn F., Temel R., 2006, Temporary Urban Spaces: Concepts for the Use of City Spaces. Basel: Birkhauser.
  45. Hou J., 2010, Insurgent Public Space: Guerrilla Urbanism and the Remaking of Contemporary Cities. Oxford: Routledge.
  46. Hulsman B., Kramer L., 2013, Double Dutch. Architecture in the Netherlands since 1985. Rotterdam: nai010 publishers.
  47. Inti I., Cantaluppi G., Persichino M., 2014, Temporiuso. Manuale per il riuso temporaneo di spazi in abbandono, in Italia. Milano: Altra Economia.
  48. Iveson K., 2013, ≪Cities within the City: Do-It-Yourself Urbanism and the Right to the City≫. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37, 3: 941-956. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.12053
  49. Koolmees T., Majoor S., 2016, ≪Boom-Bust-Boom gebiedsontwikkeling in Amsterdam≫. Rooilijn, 49, 3: 160–169.
  50. Lydon M, Garcia A., 2015, Tactical Urbanism. Washington-Covelo-London: Island Press.
  51. Lloyd M.G., Peel D., Janssen-Jansen L.B., 2015, ≪Self-build in the uk and Netherlands: mainstreaming self-development to address housing shortages?≫. Urban Planning and Transport Research, 3, 1: 19-31. DOI: 10.1080/21650020.2014.987403
  52. Lootsma B., 2000, Superdutch. New Architecture in the Netherlands. London: Thames & Hudson.
  53. Masboungi A., 2016, dir., Le Génie d’Amsterdam. Opportunité, Agilité, Inventivité. Paris: Editions Parentheses.
  54. McDonough W., Braungart M., 2003, Dalla culla alla culla. Come conciliare tutela dell’ambiente, equità sociale e sviluppo. Novara: Blu edizioni.
  55. Metabolic, Delva Landscape Architects, Studioninedots, Alsema F., Dortwegt P., Muller S., 2014, Circular Buiksloterham. Amsterdam: De Alliantie, Waternet, Ontwikkelingsbedrijf Gemeente Amsterdam, oga.
  56. Miazzo F., Kee T., 2014, We Own The City. Haarlem-Amsterdam: Trancity Valiz. Moore T., 2015, ≪Screensaver Architecture≫. Volume, 43: 4-9.
  57. Needham B., 1997, ≪Land Policy in The Netherlands≫. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 88, 3: 291–296.
  58. Noordwaarts, 2007, Investeringsbesluit Buiksloterham: transformatie naar stedelijk wonen en werken. Amsterdam: Noordwaarts.
  59. Oosterman A, 2007, ed., Self-building City, Volume, 43. Amsterdam: Stichting Archis.
  60. Oosterman A., 2007, ≪Up on the Roof≫. Volume, 14: 130-131.
  61. Oosterman A, 2015, ed., Volume 43. Self-building City. Amsterdam: Stichting Archis.
  62. Oosterman A., Retegan A., 2015, ≪Building your Own≫. Volume, 43: 18-25.
  63. Oswalt P., Overmeyer K., Misselwitz P., 2013, eds., Urban Catalyst. The Power of Temporary Use. Berlin: Dom Publishers.
  64. Ovink H., Wierenga E., 2009, eds., Design and politics 01. Rotterdam: nai010 publishers.
  65. Pasquinelli M., 2009, ≪The Art of Ruins. The Factory of Culture through the Crisis≫. Open, 17: 64-69.
  66. Peck J., 2012, ≪Austerity urbanism: American cities under extreme economy≫. City, 16, 6: 626–655. DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2012.734071
  67. Pinilla C., 2007, ≪Emergent Urbanism≫. In: Maas W., Graafland A., Batstra B., Bilsen A., Pinella C. (eds.), Space Fighter: The Evolutionary City (Game). Barcellona: Actar D.
  68. raamm, 2012, Almere Oosterwold: Land-Goed voor Initiatieven. Almere: Gemeente Almere.
  69. Rauws W., De Roo G., 2016, ≪Adaptive planning: Generating conditions for urban adaptability. Lessons from Dutch organic development strategies≫. Enviroment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 43, 6: 1052-1074. DOI: 10.1177/0265813516658886
  70. Ring K., Eidner F., 2013, SelfMade City Berlin: Focus of the Analysis. Berlin: Jovis.
  71. Ritsema A., Kompier V., 2013, ≪Buagruppen as catalysts for new urban housing quality≫. dash Delft Architectural Studies on Housing, 8: 30-42.
  72. Salewski C., 2012, Dutch New Worlds. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers.
  73. Savini F., 2017a, ≪Planning, uncertainty and risk: the neoliberal logics of Amsterdam urbanism≫. Environment and Planning A, 49, 4: 857-875. DOI: 10.1177/0308518X16684520
  74. Savini F., 2017b, ≪Self-Organization and Urban Development: Disaggregating the City-Region, Deconstructing Urbanity in Amsterdam≫. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40, 6: 1152–1169. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.12469
  75. Savini F., Dembski S., 2016, ≪Manufacturing the creative city: Symbols and politics of Amsterdam North≫. Cities, 55: 139–147.
  76. Savini, F., Majoor S., Salet W., 2015, ≪Dilemmas of planning: intervention, regulations and investment≫. Planning Theory, 14, 3: 296–315. DOI: 10.1177/1473095214531430
  77. Savini F., Salet W., 2017, Planning Projects in Transition. Berlin: Jovis Verlag.
  78. Schaap T., 2008, Amsterdam. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers.
  79. Scheffer P., 2000, ≪Het multiculterele drama≫. nrc Handelsblad, 2000.01.29, -- (ultimo accesso: 2018.12.2).
  80. Schuster M., 2001, ≪Ephemera Temporary Urbanism and Imaging≫. In: Vale L.J., Warner Jr. S.B., (eds.), Imaging the City: Continuing Struggles and New Directions. New Brunswick, nj: cupr Books.
  81. Secchi B., 1986, ≪La lezione di urbanistica di Amsterdam≫. Urbanistica, 85: 4-5.
  82. Secchi B., 2013, La città dei ricchi e la città dei poveri. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  83. Secchi B., 2014, ≪La nuova questione urbana≫. In: Fabian L. (a cura di), New urban question. Ricerche sulla città contemporanea 2009-2014. Roma: Aracne.
  84. Sloterdijk P., 2006, Il mondo dentro il capitale. Roma: Meltemi.
  85. Staal G., 1994, ed., De Stad als Casco: Werken aan ‘t ij. Amsterdam: Woningbouwvereniging Het Oosten.
  86. Staal G., 1997, ed., De stad als casco: Podium Werken aan het ij. Amsterdam: Podium Werken aan het ij.
  87. Uitermark J., 2009, ≪An in memoriam for the just city of Amsterdam≫. City, 13, 2-3: 347-361. DOI: 10.1080/13604810902982813
  88. Urhahn Urban Design, 2010, The Spontaneous City. Amsterdam: bis publisher.
  89. van der Cammen H., de Klerk L., 2012, The Selfmade Land. Houten-Antwerpen: Spectrum.
  90. van Gameren D., van der Heuvel D., van Andel F., Klijn O., Kraaij A., Mooij H., van der Putt P., 2013, eds., DASH 8, Building Together. Delft: nai010 publishers.
  91. van ’t Klooster I., 2013, Reactivate! Innovators of Dutch Architecture. Haarlem-Amsterdam: Trancity Valiz.
  92. van Straalen F.M., Witte P., Buitelaar E., 2017, ≪Self-organization in Oosterwold, Almere: challenges with public goods and externalities≫.
  93. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 108, 4: 503-511.
  94. Vanstiphout W., 1998, ≪Naar Wild Plannen≫. In: Weeber C. (ed.), Het Wild Wonen. Rotterdam: 010 Uitgeverij.
  95. Venturini G., Venegoni C., 2016, Re-Act. Tools for Urban Re-Activation. Roma-Rezzato: Deleyva.
  96. Weeber C., 1997, ≪Het Wilde Wonen≫, nrc Handelsblad, 1997.04.04, -- (ultimo accesso: 2018.12.1).
  97. Weeber C., 1998, Het Wilde Wonen. Rotterdam: 010 Uitgeverij.
  98. Zizek S., 2017, Il coraggio della disperazione. Firenze: Ponte alle Grazie.
  99. Zukin S., 1982, Loft Living: Culture and Capital in Urban Change. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

Giuseppe Pepe, Spontaneità coltivata. Storie dal presente dell’urbanistica di Amsterdam in "TERRITORIO" 88/2019, pp 7-24, DOI: 10.3280/TR2019-088001