Il trasferimento tecnologico e la strategia di specializzazione intelligente

Titolo Rivista ECONOMIA E SOCIETÀ REGIONALE
Autori/Curatori Mariacarmela Passarelli, Francesco Ricotta, Alfio Cariola
Anno di pubblicazione 2019 Fascicolo 2019/2
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 31 P. 116-146 Dimensione file 559 KB
DOI 10.3280/ES2019-002011
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Il presente lavoro ha l’obiettivo di analizzare, in chiave evolutiva, le variabili strategiche e organizzative, che le strutture preposte al trasferimento tecnologico potrebbero adottare, nel perimetro della quadrupla elica e nell’attuazione della Strategia di Specializzazione Intelligente Regionale (S3). Ancora pochi contributi empirici (Carayannis et al., 2018) si sono focalizzati sui modelli di trasferimento tecnologico nel contesto della Quadrupla elica. E in tale filone di ricerca si posiziona il presente contributo. La metodologia utilizzata è il caso di studio multiplo che ha consentito di analizzare due strutture di trasferimento tecnologico che operano in Italia. L’approccio utilizzato è quello del design thinking. A livello strategico, i risultati dell’analisi suggeriscono che le strutture di trasferimento tecnologico evolvono nel perimetro della S3 sulla base di due concetti chiave: la densità dei legami tra gli attori dell’ecosistema innovativo e la consapevolezza degli stakeholders di operare nel contesto della S3.;

Keywords:Trasferimento tecnologico, valorizzazione della ricerca, Strategia di Specializzazione Intelligente, Design Thinking

  1. Asheim B.T. (2019). Smart Specialisation, Innovation Policy and Regional Innovation Systems: what about new Path Development in less Innovative Regions?. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 32(1): 8-25. DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2018.1491001
  2. Balderi C., Daniele C., Piccaluga A. (2012). Gli uffici di trasferimento tecnologico delle città italiane: numeri ma non solo numeri. Economia e Politica Industriale, 39(4): 135-159. DOI: 10.3280/POLI2012-004006
  3. Bianchi M., Chiaroni D., Chiesa V., Frattini F. (2011). Exploring the role of Human Resources in Technology Out-licensing: an Empirical Analysis of biotech Newtechnology-based Firms. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 23: 825-849. DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2011.604153
  4. Bianchi C.G., dos Santos A.B., Borini F.M. (2018). Open Innovation and Cocreation in the Development of New Products: the Role of Design Thinking. International Journal of Innovation, 6(2): 112-123.
  5. Carayannis E.G., Campbell D.F.J. (2009). “Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: Toward 21st Century Fractal Innovation Ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3/4): 201-234. DOI: 10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374
  6. Carayannis E.G., Grigoroudis E., Campbell D.F., Meissner D., Stamati D. (2018). The Ecosystem as Helix: An Exploratory Theory-building Study of Regional Co-opetitive Entrepreneurial Ecosystems as Quadruple/Quintuple Helix Innovation Models. R&D Management, 48(1): 148-162.
  7. Caseiro N., Santos D., Eds. (2018). Smart Specialization Strategies and the Role of Entrepreneurial Universities. Hershey PA Usa: IGI Global. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-6152-1
  8. Clarysse B., Tartari V.E., Salter A. (2011). The Impact of Entrepreneurial Capacity, Experience and Organizational Support on Academic Entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8): 1084-1093.
  9. Cunningham J., O’Reilly P., O’Kane C., Mangematin V. (2014). The Inhibiting Factors that Principal Investigators Experience in Leading Publicly Funded Research. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(1): 93-110.
  10. Cunningham J.A., Mangematin V., O’Kane C., O’Reilly P. (2016). At the Frontiers of Scientific Advancement: the factors that influence scientists to become or choose to become publicly funded principal investigators. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(4): 778-797.
  11. Cunningham J.A., Link A.N. (2016). Exploring the effectiveness of research and innovation policies among European Union countries. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(2): 415-425. 10.1007/s11365-016-0394-7.
  12. Cunningham J.A., Menter M., Young C. (2017). A Review of Qualitative Case Methods Trends and Themes Used in Technology Transfer Research. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(4): 923-956.
  13. Cunningham J.A., O’Reilly P. (2018). Macro, Meso and Micro Perspectives of Technology Transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(3): 545-557.
  14. Dettenhofer M., Doussineau M., Arregui-Pabollet E. (2019). An Analysis of University Governance Dimensions in Academic Research and S3 Innovation Performance. In: Caseiro N., Santos D., Eds. Smart Specialization Strategies and the Role of Entrepreneurial Universities.
  15. Di Minin A., Frattini F. (2016). L’impresa è un’opera aperta. Open innovation in Italia dal 2003 ad oggi. economia e società regionale, XXXIV(3): 19-37.
  16. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. (2000). The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2): 109-123. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
  17. EU (2018). European Innovation Scoreboard 2018 -- <https://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/innovation/facts-figures/scoreboards_en>.
  18. Flyvbjerg B. (2006). Five Misunderstandings about Case-study Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2): 219-245. DOI: 10.1177/1077800405284363
  19. Foray D., David P.A., Hall B. (2009). Smart Specialisation - The Concept, Knowledge Economists Policy Brief. European Commission.
  20. Foray D., David P.A., Hall B. (2011). Smart Specialization from Academic Idea to Political Instrument, the Surprising Career of a Concept and the Difficulties Involved in its Implementation. Mtei WP. Brussels: EC – Commission of the European Communities, Regional Policy Contributing to Smart Growth in Europe.
  21. Foray D., McCann P., Ortega-Argilés R. (2015). Smart Specialization and European Regional Development Policy. In: Audretsch D.B., Link A.N., Walshok M., Eds. Oxford Handbook of Local Competitiveness, 458-480.
  22. Gosetti G. (2018). Guardare “dentro” il lavoro. tecnologie, processi, tendenze di uno scenario che si consolida. Nota su Al posto tuo e Lavoretti. Economia e società regionale, XXXVI(1): 153-160.
  23. Höglund L., Linton G. (2018). Smart Specialization in Regional Innovation Systems: A Quadruple Helix Perspective. R&D Management, 48(1): 60-72.
  24. Lace N., Rumbinaite G. (2016). Successful University - Industry Collaboration as a Factor for Implementation of Smart Specialization Strategy: Evidence from Latvia and Lithuania. Proceedings of the 20th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (WMSCI) -- <http://www.iiis.org/CDs2016/CD2016Summer/papers/SA911XT.pdf>.
  25. Lew Y.K., Khan Z., Cozzio S. (2018). Gravitating toward the Quadruple Helix: International Connections for the Enhancement of a Regional Innovation System in Northeast Italy. R&D Management, 48(1): 44-59.
  26. Magro E., Navarro M., Zabala‐Iturriagagoitia J.M. (2014). Coordination‐mix: The hidden face of STI policy. Review of Policy Research, 31(5): 367-389.
  27. Miller K., Mcadam R., Mcadam M. (2018). A Systematic Literature Review of University Technology transfer from a Quadruple Helix Perspective: toward a Research Agenda. R&D Management, 48(1): 7-24.
  28. Morgan K. (2017). Nurturing Novelty: Regional Innovation Policy in the Age of Smart Specialisation. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(4): 569-583. 10.1177/0263774X16645106.
  29. Neffke F., Henning M., Boschma R. (2011). How do Regions Diversify over Time? Industry Relatedness and the Development of new Growth Paths in Regions. Economic Geography, 87(3): 237-265.
  30. Nepelski D., Piroli G. (2017). Organizational Diversity and Innovation Potential of EU-funded Research Projects. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(3): 615-639.
  31. Passarelli M., Cariola A., Vecellio P. (2018). Beyond Multidirectional Technology Transfer: The Case of a ‘Proof-of-concept Network. Industry and Higher Education, 32(5): 312-325. DOI: 10.1177/0950422218790538
  32. Passarelli M. (2017). Il management del trasferimento tecnologico: l’esperienza PoCN di Area Science Park. Milano: EGEA.
  33. Passarelli M., Costabile M. (2014). Un approccio manageriale al trasferimento tecnologico: un’analisi di benchmarking sui TTO universitari europei. Economia e Politica Industriale, 41(4): 265-297. DOI: 10.3280/POLI2014-004012
  34. Rehfeld D., Terstriep J. (2019). Regional Governance in North Rhine-Westphalia–lessons for Smart Specialisation Strategies?. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 32(1): 85-103. DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2018.1520629
  35. Rinaldi C., Cavicchi A., Spigarelli F., Lacchè L., Rubens A. (2018). Universities and Smart Specialisation Strategy: From Third Mission to Sustainable Development Co-creation. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 19(1):67-84. DOI: 10.1108/IJSHE-04-2016-0070
  36. Sanders E.B.N., Stappers P.J. (2008). Co-creation and the new Landscapes of Design. Co-design, 4(1): 5-18. DOI: 10.1080/15710880701875068
  37. Smith D., Feldman M., Anderson G. (2017). The Longer-term Effects of Federal Subsidies on firm Survival: Evidence from the Advanced Technology Program. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(3): 593-614.
  38. Teece D., Pisano G. (1994). The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: An Introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3): 537-556.
  39. Thomke S., von Hippel E. (2002). Customers as Innovators: A New Way to Create Value. Harvard Business Review, 80:74-85.
  40. Vallance P., Blažek J., Edwards J., Květoň V. (2018). Smart Specialisation in Regions with Less-developed Research and Innovation Systems: A Changing Role for Universities?. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(2): 219-238. DOI: 10.1177/2399654417705137
  41. von Hippel E. (1986). Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts. Management Science, 32(7): 791-805.
  42. Yigitcanlar T., Inkinen T. (2019). Place Dynamics for Innovation. In: Yigitcanlar T., Inkinen T. Geographies of Disruption. Place Making for Innovation in the Age of Knowledge Economy. Switzerland AG: Springer Nature. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-03207-4_3

Mariacarmela Passarelli, Francesco Ricotta, Alfio Cariola, Il trasferimento tecnologico e la strategia di specializzazione intelligente in "ECONOMIA E SOCIETÀ REGIONALE " 2/2019, pp 116-146, DOI: 10.3280/ES2019-002011