Insurance as a business of imagination

Titolo Rivista SOCIOLOGIA E POLITICHE SOCIALI
Autori/Curatori Alberto Cevolini
Anno di pubblicazione 2019 Fascicolo 2019/2
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 21 P. 105-125 Dimensione file 231 KB
DOI 10.3280/SP2019-002007
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Despite the fact that insurance is a ubiquitous core institution of modern society, a sociological theory of insurance does not yet exist. This article aims at suggesting some hypotheses which can help filling the gap. Insurance has been pertinently defined as "the archetype of modernist governance of the future". Consequently, a sociological research on insurance institution should answer three preliminary questions: First, when we talk about the future, what are we actually talking about? Second, how is it possible to govern the future in the present? Finally, what is the modernity of this modernist governance of the future, and why does insurance represent its archetype? Moving from a comparison between prudence and providence, it is suggested that insurance turns uncertainty into possibilities. In this way, the decision-maker who takes out insurance can plan for the planningness of the future - that is, whatever happens, he relies on an open future. This article suggests, eventually, that the theory of evolution is conceptually well equipped to explain why an institution that at the beginning (that is, in the late Middle Ages) was regarded as a form of deviation has become normal over time.

Keywords: Decision; Insurance; Risk; Time; Uncertainty

  1. Arrow, K. 1971. Insurance, Risk, and Resource Allocation. In: K. Arrow, Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing. Amsterdam/London: North Holland, pp. 134-143.
  2. Bacon, F. [1597]1842. Meditationes sacrae. In: F. Bacon, The Works of Francis Bacon. Philadelphia: Carey and Hart.
  3. Baker, T. 2002. Risk, Insurance, and the Social Construction of Responsibility. In: T. Baker and J. Simon (Eds.), Embracing Risk. The Changing Culture of Insurance and Responsibility. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 33-51.
  4. Baker, T. and Simon, J. 2002. Embracing Risk. In: T. Baker and J. Simon (Eds.), Embracing Risk. The Changing Culture of Insurance and Responsibility. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 1-25.
  5. Beck, U. 1986. Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
  6. Beck, U. 1992. From Industrial Society to Risk Society. Theory, Culture and Society, 9, pp. 97-123.
  7. Beckert, J. 2011. Imagined Futures. Fictionality in Economic Action. MPIfG Discussion Paper 11/8.
  8. Bensa, E. 1884. Il contratto di assicurazione nel Medio Evo. Genova: Tipografia Marittima Editrice.
  9. Bonolis, G. 1901. Svolgimento storico dell’assicurazione in Italia. Firenze: Bernardo Seeber.
  10. Cevolini, A. 2010. Die Einrichtung der Versicherung als soziologisches Problem. Sociologia Internationalis, 48(1), pp. 65-89.
  11. Cevolini, A. 2016. Time Construction in Insurance Society. Journal of Historical Sociology, 29(2), pp. 160-181.
  12. Corsi, G. 2014. Die Ordnung der Zahlen und die Intransparenz der Öffentlichkeit. In: A. Cevolini (Ed.), Die Ordnung des Kontingenten. Beiträge zur zahlenmäßigen Selbstbeschreibung der modernen Gesellschaft. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 63-82.
  13. Corsi, G. 2005. Reform zwischen Gesellschaft und Organisation. In: G. Corsi and E. Esposito (Eds.), Reform und Innovation in einer unstabilen Gesellschaft. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius, pp. 79-92.
  14. Ericson, R. and Doyle, A. (Eds.) 2004. Uncertain Business. Risk, Insurance and the Limits of Knowledge. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  15. Ericson, R., Doyle, A. and Barry, D. (Eds.) 2003. Insurance as Governance. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  16. Esposito, E. 2010. Die Zukunft der Futures. Die Zeit des Geldes in Finanzwelt und Gesellschaft. Heidelberg: Carl-Auer Verlag.
  17. Esposito, E. 2013. Formen der Zirkularität in der Konstruktion der Zukunft. In: D. Weidner and S. Willer (Eds.), Prophetie und Prognostik. München: Wilhelm Fink, pp. 325-340.
  18. Ewald, F. 1986. L’état providence. Paris: Grasset.
  19. Ewald, F. 1989. Die Versicherungs-Gesellschaft. Kritische Justiz, 22, pp. 385-393.
  20. Ewald, F. 1991. Insurance and Risk. In: G. Burchell et al. (Eds.), The Foucault Effect. Studies in Governmentality. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp. 197-210.
  21. Girardin, É. de 1855. La politique universelle. Décrets de l’avenir. Paris: Librairie Nouvelle.
  22. Heimer, C. 1985. Reactive Risk and Rational Action. Managing Moral Hazard in Insurance Contracts. Berkeley et al.: University of California Press.
  23. Hobbes, T. 1651. Leviathan, or The Matter, Forme & Power of a Common-Wealth Ecclesiasticall and Civill. London: Printed for Andrew Crooke.
  24. La Torre, A. 2000. L’assicurazione nella storia delle idee. Milano: Giuffrè.
  25. La Torre, A. 2008. L’assicurazione fra storicità e sistema. In: Id., Cinquant’anni col diritto (Saggi). II. Diritto delle assicurazioni. Milano: Giuffrè, pp. 279-297.
  26. Leibniz, G.W. [1680]2000. Öffentliche Assekuranzen. In: Id., Hauptschriften zur Versicherungs- und Finanzmathematik. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, pp. 12-19.
  27. Lessio, L. 1653. De iustitia et iure. Lugduni: Sumptibus Hieronymi Delagarde.
  28. Luhmann, N. 1976. The Future Cannot Begin: Temporal Structures in Modern Society. Social Research, 43, pp. 130-152.
  29. Luhmann, N. 1984. Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
  30. Luhmann, N. 1988. Soziologische Aspekte des Entscheidungsverhaltens. In: Id., Die Wirtschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, pp. 272-301.
  31. Luhmann, N. 1991a. Soziologie des Risikos. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  32. Luhmann, N. 1991b. Verständigung über Risiken und Gefahren. Die politische Meinung, 36, pp. 86-95.
  33. Luhmann, N. 1996. Das Risiko der Versicherung gegen Gefahren. Soziale Welt, 3, pp. 273-283.
  34. Luhmann, N. 1997. Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
  35. Luhmann, N. 2000. Risiko auf alle Fälle. Schwierigkeiten bei der Beschreibung der Zukunft. In: Id., Short Cuts. Frankfurt a.M.: Zweitausendeins, pp. 91-98.
  36. Luhmann, N. 2005. Entscheidung in der Informationsgesellschaft. In: G. Corsi and E. Esposito (Eds.), Reform und Innovation in einer unstabilen Gesellschaft. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius, pp. 27-40.
  37. Major, J. 1519. In Quartum Sententiarum quaestiones utilissimae. Paris: Impress. Iodoco Badio.
  38. Moreau, J. 1969. Sénèque et le prix du temps. Bulletin Association G. Budé, 1, pp. 119-124.
  39. O’Malley, P. 2003. Governable Catastrophes: A Comment on Bougen. Economy and Society, 32, pp. 275-279.
  40. Pascal, B. 1954. Pensées. Paris: Bibliothèque de la Pléiade.
  41. Richelieu, A. 1738. Testament politique. Seconde partie. Amsterdam: Chez les Janssons à Waesberge.
  42. Scaccia, S. 1738. Tractatus de commerciis et cambio. 4th ed. Coloniae: Sumpt. Viduae Wilhelm Metternich & Filii.
  43. Seneca, L.A. 1925. Ad Lucilium Epistolae Morales. London/New York: William Heinemann and Putnam’s Sons.
  44. Shackle, G.L.S. 1954. The Complex Nature of Time as a Concept in Economics. Economia Internazionale, 7(4), pp. 743-753.
  45. Shackle, G.L.S. 1967. Time in Economics. Amsterdam: North Holland.
  46. Shackle, G.L.S. 1969. Decision, Order and Time in Human Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  47. Shackle, G.L.S. 1979. Imagination and the Nature of Choice. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  48. Shackle, G.L.S. 1990. Time Expectations and Uncertainty in Economics: Selected Essays. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
  49. Spencer Brown, G. 1979. Laws of Form. New York: E.P. Dutton.
  50. Tönnies, F. 1917. Das Versicherungswesen in soziologischer Betrachtung. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft, 17, pp. 603-624.
  51. Zelizer, V. 1983. Moral and Markets. The Development of Life Insurance in the United States. New Brunswick/London: Transaction

  • From pool to profile: Social consequences of algorithmic prediction in insurance Alberto Cevolini, Elena Esposito, in Big Data & Society 2053951720939228/2020
    DOI: 10.1177/2053951720939228
  • From Actuarial to Behavioural Valuation. The impact of telematics on motor insurance Alberto Cevolini, Elena Esposito, in Valuation Studies /2022 pp.109
    DOI: 10.3384/VS.2001-5992.2022.9.1.109-139

Alberto Cevolini, Insurance as a business of imagination in "SOCIOLOGIA E POLITICHE SOCIALI" 2/2019, pp 105-125, DOI: 10.3280/SP2019-002007