The use of management control system for managerial decisions in universities. Empirical evidence from an Assocontroller survey

Author/s Vincenzo Sforza, Pietro Marigonda, Bruno Bernardi, Alberto Domenicali
Publishing Year 2019 Issue 2019/3
Language Italian Pages 24 P. 99-122 File size 373 KB
DOI 10.3280/MACO2019-003006
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Literature investigating accounting systems innovation which emerged following public sector reforms has shown that changes adopt connotations that depend closely by the reference context, where public administrations often take on, under various pressures, homogeneous structures and procedures to comply with the demands of their environment (isomorphisms). This paper has taken into consideration the effects of changes in management control system of Italian universities introduced by Law 240/2010 and the results of a survey promoted by the Standing Conference of Managing Directors and Executives of Italian Universities (CODAU) are analysed. The findings highlight organizational aspects of the management control system, as well as features of the information and reporting systems. Using a quantitative methodology, the study demonstrates the heterogeneity of the administrative behaviour of universities and the absence of evidence of isomorphic behaviour in the implementation process.

Keywords: Universities, Management control, Accounting reforms, Institutional theory, Isomorphism.

  1. Agasisti T., Catalano G. (2013), Debate: innovation in the Italian public higher education system: introducing accrual accounting, Public Money & Management, 33(2), 92-94.
  2. Agasisti T., Catalano G., Di Carlo F., Erbacci A. (2015), Accrual accounting in Italian universities: a technical perspective, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28(6), 494-508.
  3. Agyemang G., Broadbent J. (2015), Management control systems and research management in universities: An empirical and conceptual exploration, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(7), 1018-1046.
  4. Allen D., Kern T., Havenhand M. (2002), ERP Critical Success Factors: an exploration of the contextual factors in public sector institutions, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3062-3071).
  5. Anessi‐Pessina E., Steccolini I. (2005), Evolutions and Limits of New Public Management – Inspired Budgeting Practices in Italian Local Governments, Public Budgeting & Finance, 25(2), 1-14.
  6. Anvur (2019), Linee Guida per la gestione integrata dei cicli della performance e del bilancio delle Università statali italiane, Gennaio.
  7. Arcari, A. (2003), Il controllo di gestione negli atenei, Milano, Egea.
  8. Arnaboldi M., Lapsley I., Steccolini I. (2015), Performance management in the public sector: The ultimate challenge, Financial Accountability & Management, 31(1), 1-22.
  9. Arnaboldi A., Schiavone M. (a cura di) (2017), Programmazione integrata e performance, Bologna, il Mulino.
  10. Baker R., Rennie M.D. (2006), Forces Leading to the Adoption of Accrual Accounting by the Canadian Federal Government: An Institutional Perspective, Canadian Accounting Perspectives, 5(1), 83-112.
  11. Biggeri L. (1999), La valutazione ed il finanziamento pubblico delle università, Sinergie, 17(48), 59-73.
  12. Biondi L., Francese U., Gulluscio C. (2015), Verso un sistema contabile economico-patrimoniale: prime evidenze empiriche nell’ambito delle università pubbliche italiane, Azienda Pubblica, 28(3), 247-267.
  13. Bonollo E., Lazzini S., Merli M.Z. (2016), Innovations in accounting information system in the public sector. Evidences from Italian public universities, in Mancini D., Dameri R.P., Bonollo E., Strengthening information and control systems, Cham, Springer, 199-216.
  14. Burns J. (2000), The dynamics of accounting change inter-play between new practices, routines, institutions, power and politics, Accounting, auditing & accountability journal, 13(5), 566-596.
  15. Burns J., Scapens R.W. (2000), Conceptualizing management accounting change: an institutional framework, Management Accounting Research, 11, 3-25.
  16. Cantele S., Martini M., Campedelli B. (2012), Gli atenei italiani e gli strumenti di pianificazione e controllo: a che punto siamo?, Management control, 1, 55-83.
  17. Cantele S., Martini M., Campedelli B. (2013), Factors affecting the development of management control systems in Universities, Economia Aziendale Online, 4(2), 167-183.
  18. Cassese S. (2015), Il diritto amministrativo e i suoi principi, in Cassese S. (a cura di), Istituzioni di diritto amministrativo, Milano, Giuffrè, V^ ed., 1-27.
  19. Catalano G., Silvestri P. (1993), Finanziamento e distribuzione delle risorse nel sistema universitario italiano, Economia Pubblica, 24(3), 93-106.
  20. Cavalluzzo K.S., Ittner C.D. (2004), Implementing performance measurement innovations: evidence from government, Accounting, organizations and society, 29(3-4), 243-267.
  21. Christensen M. (2005). The ‘Third Hand’: Private Sector Consultants in Public Sector Accounting Change, European Accounting Review, 14(3), 447-474.
  22. Christiaens J., Rommel J. (2008), Accrual accounting reforms: only for business like (parts of) governments, Financial Accountability & Management, 24(1), 59-75.
  23. Cinquini L. (2002), Il bilancio consuntivo delle Università verso una nuova informativa economico-finanziaria, Torino, Giappichelli.
  24. Cinquini L., Miolo Vitali P. (2000), Le informazioni economico-finanziarie nel nuovo contesto universitario italiano: i risultati di una ricerca sulla contabilità direzionale, Azienda Pubblica, 13(5), 563-583.
  25. Corte dei Conti (2017), Referto sul sistema universitario, novembre.
  26. Cugini A. (2007), La misurazione dei costi nelle unità amministrative delle facoltà: esperienze a confronto, in Cugini A. (a cura di), La misurazione della performance negli atenei, Milano, FrancoAngeli.
  27. Czarniawska B., Joerges B. (1996), Travel of ideas, in Czarniawska B. and Joerges B. (Eds.) Translating Organizational Change, 13-47, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  28. Dal Molin M., Turri M., Agasisti T. (2017), New Public Management Reforms in the Italian Universities: Managerial Tools, Accountability Mechanisms or Simply Compliance?, International Journal of Public Administration, 40(3), 256-69.
  29. DiMaggio P.J., Powell W.W. (1983), The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Connective Rationality in Organisational Fields’, American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
  30. Ellwood S., Newberry S. (2007), Public sector accrual accounting: institutionalizing neoliberal principles, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 20(4), 549- 573.
  31. Ernst & Young (2012), Overview and comparison of public accounting and auditing practices in the 27 EU Member States, 19 Dec.
  32. Ferreira A., Otley D. (2009), The design and use of performance management systems: an extended framework for analysis, Management Accounting Research, 20(4), 263-282.
  33. Fici L. (2001), Il controllo di gestione negli atenei. Dalla valutazione al governo aziendale, Milano, FrancoAngeli.
  34. Flamholtz E.G. (1996), Effective Management Control: Theory and Practice, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  35. Garlatti A. (1996), Bilancio e controllo economico nelle università degli studi, Milano, Egea.
  36. Giarda P., Petretto A., Catalano G., Silvestri P. (1996), La standardizzazione di costi nel sistema universitario italiano, Politica Economica, 12(1), 3-48.
  37. Gigli S., Tieghi M. (2017), La riforma del sistema informativo-contabile degli atenei italiani. Una proposta di analisi del nuovo modello di bilancio, Management Control, 1, 61-91.
  38. Giovanelli L., Rotondo F., Caffù S. (2016), Implementing accrual accounting in Italian universities: Critical aspects of an information system, in Mancini D., Dameri R.P., Bonollo E. (eds.), Strengthening Information and Control Systems, Cham, Springer, 185-198.
  39. Guthrie J. (1998), Application of accrual accounting in the Australian public sector–rhetoric or reality, Financial Accountability & Management, 14(1), 1-19.
  40. Guthrie J., Humphrey C. (1996), Public sector financial management developments in Australia and Britain: Trends and contradictions, Research in Governmental and Non-profit Accounting, 9, 283-302.
  41. Guthrie J., Humphrey C., Jones L.R., Olson O. (Eds.) (2005), International public financial management reform: progress, contradictions, and challenges. IAP.
  42. Hyndman N., Connolly C. (2011), Accruals accounting in the public sector: A road not always taken, Management Accounting Research, 22(1), 36-45.
  43. Hood C. (1991), A Public Management for all Seasons?, Public Administration, 75, 531-551.
  44. Hood C. (1995), The ‘New Public Management’ in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20 (2/3), 93-109.
  45. Lande E. (2006), Accrual Accounting in the public sector: Between institutional Competitiveness and the search for Legitimacy, in Lande E. and Scheid J. C. (eds), Accounting Reform in the Public Sector: Mimicry, Fad or Necessity, Paris, Experts Comptables Media, 19-30.
  46. Lapsley, I. (1999), Accounting and the new public management: instruments of substantive efficiency or a rationalising modernity?. Financial Accountability & Management, 15(3‐4), 201-207.
  47. Maingot M. (2006), The Evolution of the Standard Unqualified Auditor’s Report in Canada. Canadian Accounting Perspective, 5(1), 19-36.
  48. Maran L. (2009), Economia e management dell’università. La governance interna tra efficienza e legittimazione, Milano, FrancoAngeli.
  49. Marigonda P. (2007), Lo sviluppo del sistema di controllo di gestione nelle università pubbliche italiane, Cives, 6, 113-121.
  50. McSweeney B., Duncan S. (1998), Structure or agency? Discourse or meta-narrative? Explaining the emergence of the financial management initiative, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 11(3), 332-361.
  51. Metcalfe L. (1998), Accountability and effectiveness. Designing the rules of the accounting game, Keynotespeech, EIASM Conference in Venice “Accounting for the New Public Management”, September.
  52. Meyer J.W., Rowan B. (1977), Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony, The American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
  53. Meyer J.W., Rowan B. (1991), Insitutional Organizations: formal Strucutre as Myth and Ceremony, in Powell W.W., Di Maggio P.J. (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, The University of Chicago Press Books.
  54. Miolo Vitali P. (2001) (a cura di), I sistemi di misurazione economico-finanziaria nelle università italiane: problemi e prospettive, Padova, Cedam.
  55. Modell S. (2002), Institutional perspectives on cost allocations: integration and extension, European Accounting Review, 11(4), 653-679.
  56. Mussari R., D’Alessio L., Sostero U. (2015), Il nuovo sistema contabile delle università, Azienda pubblica, 28(3), pp. 227-246.
  57. Mussari R., Sostero U. (2014), Il processo di cambiamento del sistema contabile nelle università: aspettative, difficoltà e contraddizioni, Azienda Pubblica, 27(2), 125-147.
  58. OECD/IFAC (2017), Accrual Practices and Reform Experiences in OECD Countries, OECD Publishing, Paris.
  59. Olson O., Guthrie J., Humphrey C. (1998), International experiences with ‘new’ public financial management (NPFM) reforms: New world? Small world? Better world, in Olson O., Guthrie J., Humphrey C., Global warning: Debating international developments in new public financial management, Oslo, Capelen Akademisk Forlag, 17-48.
  60. Ongaro E., Rodolfi E. (1998), L’innovazione nella gestione delle università italiane: uno studio di casi di introduzione del controllo di gestione, Azienda pubblica, 11(1/2), 77-101.
  61. Otley D. (1994), Management control in contemporary organizations: towards a wider framework, Management Accounting Research, 5(3-4), 289-299.
  62. Otley D. (1999), Performance management: a framework for management control systems research, Management Accounting Research, 10(4), 363-382.
  63. Paletta A. (2002), Sistemi di finanziamento e governo delle Università. Il caso italiano comparativamente ad altri sistemi nazionali, in Matteuzzi Mazzoni L. (a cura di), Governo economico e sistemi di controllo nelle Università, Padova, Cedam.
  64. Paolini A., Soverchia M. (2013), Le università statali italiane verso la contabilità economico-patrimoniale ed il controllo di gestione, Management control, 3, 77-98.
  65. Paolini A., Soverchia M. (2014), Public Italian Universities Towards Accrual Accounting and Management Control, in Baglieri D., Metallo C., Rossignoli C., Pezzillo Iacono M. (eds.), Information Systems, Management, Organization and Control, Cham, Springer, 29-45.
  66. Parker L., Gould G. (1999), Changing public sector accountability: critiquing new directions, Accounting forum, 23(2), 109-135.
  67. Powell W.W., DiMaggio P.J. (eds.) (1991), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, The University of Chicago Press Books.
  68. PricewaterhouseCoopers (2014), Collection of information related to the potential impact, including costs, of implementing accrual accounting in the public sector and technical analysis of the suitability of individual IPSAS standards, Brussels: PricewaterhouseCoopers.
  69. PricewaterhouseCoopers (2018), Support for the development of harmonised European public sector accounting standards and analysis reports to support the implementation of EPSAS, November.
  70. Riccaboni A. (1999), La stima dei costi delle diverse attività istituzionali delle università. Rapporto finale del gruppo di ricerca MURST, Osservatorio per la valutazione del sistema universitario.
  71. Romano M., Cirillo A. (2015), La misurazione delle performance economico-finanziarie delle università pubbliche italiane. Logiche e strumenti nel nuovo sistema di contabilità, Azienda Pubblica, 28(4), 377-394.
  72. Santos J. (2013), M.EOS: How General Mangement Matters, MIT Sloan School of Management -- [].
  73. Scott W. R., Davis G.F. (2006), Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems Perspectives, (6th ed.) N.J., Prentice Hall.
  74. Sforza V., Stefanoni A. (2014), L’impiego dei costi standard nei processi di allocazione delle risorse agli atenei, in Busco C., Giovannoni E., Riccaboni A., Controllo di gestione. Metodi, strumenti ed esperienze. I fondamentali e le novità, Ipsoa.
  75. Sidrea (2011), Documento del Gruppo di lavoro Sidrea su “Sistemi contabili e di bilancio dell’Università”, Roma.
  76. Tieghi M., Gigli S. (2015), L’introduzione della Contabilità Economico-Patrimoniale negli Atenei: un commento su alcune opzioni esercitate e alcune possibili proposte di miglioramento, Azienda Pubblica, 28(1), 13-31.
  77. Tieghi M., Orelli R.L., Padovani E. (2018), Accounting Reform in Italian Universities. Internal Response to Accounting Change, Management Control, 1, 117-138.
  78. Trequattrini R., Nappo F., Lardo A. (2015), L’introduzione della contabilità-economico patrimoniale nelle università tra adeguamento alle norme e nuovi paradigmi emergenti: il caso Uniclam, Azienda Pubblica, 28(3), 269-285.
  79. Yigitbasioglu O.M., Velcu O. (2012), A review of dashboards in performance management: Implications for design and research, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 13(1), 41-59.
  80. Young D.W. (2014), Management accounting in health care organizations, 3^ ed, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.

  • Il risk management approach nelle Università italiane: prime riflessioni su vincoli e opportunità Manuela Lucchese, Giuseppe Sannino, Paolo Tartaglia Polcini, in MANAGEMENT CONTROL 1/2020 pp.111
    DOI: 10.3280/MACO2020-001006

Vincenzo Sforza, Pietro Marigonda, Bruno Bernardi, Alberto Domenicali, L’impiego del controllo di gestione negli atenei: i risultati di un’indagine AssoController in "MANAGEMENT CONTROL" 3/2019, pp 99-122, DOI: 10.3280/MACO2019-003006