Mechanical behaviour of three organic fertilisers to optimise spreading methods in the vineyard

Titolo Rivista RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'
Autori/Curatori Domenico Pessina, Davide Facchinetti, Javier Tardaguila, Isabella Ghiglieno, Leonardo Valenti
Anno di pubblicazione 2020 Fascicolo 2019/2 Suppl.
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 16 P. 375-390 Dimensione file 407 KB
DOI 10.3280/RISS2019-002-S1024
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Organic viticulture is attracting increasing interest worldwide. Fertilisation can be carried out with different products, such as manure, the solid fraction of digestate and compost. In order to optimise the distribution rate, it is very important to previously check the physical characteristics of these materials, which are typically subjected to progressive compression during the spreading procedure. In this context, the use of dedicated sensors and specialised software devoted to piloting the rotors and bulkhead speed of the spreader is highly recommended, taking into account also the different rheological characteristics of the different matrices. A series of laboratory tests to determine the load-deformation curve were arranged. The results showed that digestate and manure behaved in a similar way, but the former was more compact with the same load.

Keywords:Organic fertilisers, manure, solid digestate, compost, spreading, vineyard.

  1. Yadav G.D., Pawar M.S. (2015). Design and Development of Manure Spreader – A Review. iJERGS, Part-2, May-June, 3(3): 2091-2730.
  2. Zafari A., Kianmehr M.H. (2012). Livestock manure management and pelleting. Agricultural Engineering International CIGR Journal, 14: 3.
  3. Agnew J.M., Leonard J.J. (2003). The Physical Properties of Compost. COMPOST SCI UTIL, 11(3): 238-264.
  4. Amiri H., Akbar A., Mohamad H. (2012). Determination of some rheological properties of cow manure using a shear vane. Department of Agrotechnology, College of Abouraihan, University of Teheran, Iran. Egypt. Acad. J. Biolog. Sci., 4(1): 59-68.
  5. Björn A., Segura de La Monja P., Karlsson A., Ejlertsson J., Svensson B.H. (2012). Rheological Characterization, Biogas. In: Kumar S. (Ed.). InTech. – Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/biogas/rheological-characterization.
  6. Celik I., Gunal H., Budak M., Akpinar C. (2010). Effects of long-term organic and mineral fertilizers on bulk density and penetration resistance in semi-arid Mediterranean soil conditions. Geoderma, 160: 236-243. El-Mashad H.M., Van Loon W.K.P., Zeeman G., Bot G.P.A. (2004). Rheological properties of dairy cattle manure. Bioresource Technol, 96: 531-535.
  7. Haneklaus S., Schick J., Kratz S., Rückamp D., Schnug E. (2016). Variable rate application of manure – gain or pain?. Landbauforsch Appl Agric Forestry Res, 1(66): 11-20.
  8. Khater E.G. (2015). Some Physical and Chemical Properties of Compost. Int J Waste Resources, 5(172). DOI: 10.4172/2252-5211.1000172
  9. Landry H., Laguë C., Roberge M. (2004). Physical and rheological properties of manure products. Applied Engineering in Agriculture ASABE, 20(3): 277.
  10. Lecompte T., Le Duigou A. (2017). Mechanics of straw bales for building applications. J. Build. Eng, 9: 84-90.
  11. Mani S., Tabil L.G., Sokhansanj, S. (2003). An Overview of Compaction of Biomass Grinds. Powder Handling and Processing, 15(2).
  12. Mani S., Tabil L.G., Sokhansanj S. (2004). Evaluation of compaction equations applied to four biomass species. CSBE journal, 46(3): 55-3.61.
  13. Metzger B., Papworth L., Nelson V., Sexton K. (2010). Calculating the Application Rate of a Manure Applicator and Why. AgTech Centre, Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development. -- www.agriculture.alberta.ca (downloaded 19/1/2018).
  14. Miclet D., Piron E., Venel S., Villette S. (2010). Mass flow control for manure spreader. AGENG Conference 2011.
  15. Morlat R., Chaussod R. (2008). Long-Term Additions of Organic Amendments in a Loire Valley Vineyard on a Calcareous Sandy Soil. II. Effects on Root System, Growth, Grape Yield, and Foliar Nutrient Status of a Cabernetfranc. Am. J. Enol. Vitic., 59: 4.
  16. Romano E., Brambilla M., Bisaglia C., Pampuro N., Foppa Pedretti E., Cavallo E. (2014). Pelletization of composted swine manure solid fraction with different organic co-formulates: effect of pellet physical proprieties on rotating spreader distribution patterns. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agricult.
  17. Rückamp D., Schick J., Haneklaus S., Schnug E. (2013). Algorithms for variablerate application of manure. Julius Kühn-Institut, JKI, Institute for Crop and Soil Science.

Domenico Pessina, Davide Facchinetti, Javier Tardaguila, Isabella Ghiglieno, Leonardo Valenti, Mechanical behaviour of three organic fertilisers to optimise spreading methods in the vineyard in "RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'" 2 Suppl./2019, pp 375-390, DOI: 10.3280/RISS2019-002-S1024