About planning standards. Issues and evaluations

Journal title TERRITORIO
Author/s Elena Marchigiani, Paola Savoldi
Publishing Year 2020 Issue 2019/90
Language Italian Pages 6 P. 21-26 File size 122 KB
DOI 10.3280/TR2019-090002
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Focusing on both methodological aspects and direct investigation of experiences, this collection of essays gathers reflections on ‘planning standards’ developed by researchers from different Italian universities. A varied selection of territories and practices gives a first sampling of situations where reinterpretations of the traditional categories introduced by the decree no. 1444/1968 highlight possible links with other urban spaces, tools and policies. Confirming the usefulness of the standards regulation, this picture helps trace perspectives for its evolution: from the construction of a national observatory about the achieved (quantitative and qualitative) equipment, to the overcoming of problems and reductions that have marked the spatial translation of standards over time.

Keywords: Planning standards; national observatory; urban policies

  1. Tosi M.C., 2019, ≪Progettare spazi concavi≫. In: Conte M., Laffi S., Prendiamoci un caffè. I luoghi del welfare nel Programma Welfare in Azione, Quaderni dell’Osservatorio, n. 32. Milano: Fondazione Cariplo. -- www.fondazionecariplo.it/static/upload/qua/0000/quad-32-welfarein-azione-web.pdf (ultimo accesso: 2019.12.13).
  2. Bricocoli M., Sabatinelli S., 2017, ≪Citta, welfare e servizi: temi e questioni per il progetto urbanistico e le politiche sociali≫. Territorio, 83: 106-110. DOI: 10.3280/TR2017-083015
  3. Bricocoli M., Savoldi P., 2019, ≪Standard≫. In: Bifulco L., Borghi V., Bricocoli M., Mauri D. (a cura di), Azione pubblica. Un glossario sui Generis. Milano: Mimesis.
  4. Caravaggi L., Imbroglini C., 2016, Paesaggi socialmente utili. Accoglienza e assistenza come dispostivi di progetto e trasformazione urbana. Macerata: Quodlibet.
  5. Gabellini P., 2018, Le mutazioni dell’urbanistica. Principi, tecniche, competenze. Roma: Carocci.
  6. Giaimo C., 2018, a cura di, Dopo 50 anni di standard urbanistici in Italia. Roma: inu Edizioni.
  7. Laboratorio Standard, 2020, a cura di, Diritti in città. Cinquant’anni di standard urbanistici in Italia. Roma: Donzelli.
  8. Renzoni C., 2018, a cura di, ≪Cinquant’anni di standard urbanistici (1968-2018). Radici≫. Territorio, 84: 21-76.
  9. Renzoni C., Savoldi P., 2018, ≪Gli standard, oggi≫. In: Urban@it, Mind the gap. Il distacco tra politiche e città. Terzo rapporto sulle città. Bologna: il Mulino.

  • Cultural Heritage Education in the Everyday Landscape Bertrando Bonfantini, pp.11 (ISBN:978-3-031-10394-0)

Elena Marchigiani, Paola Savoldi, Sugli standard. Questioni e bilanci in "TERRITORIO" 90/2019, pp 21-26, DOI: 10.3280/TR2019-090002