The Factory of the Future? The Contradictory Restructuring of an Assembly Line in France

Titolo Rivista SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO
Autori/Curatori Juan Sebastian Carbonell
Anno di pubblicazione 2020 Fascicolo 2020/158
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 19 P. 118-136 Dimensione file 254 KB
DOI 10.3280/SL2020-158006
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

This paper studies how the introduction of new technologies and a new organiza-tion of work transforms the labour process at an assembly line of the PSA group in France. The firm presents the new organization as an innovative modernization bringing forward the “Factory of the Future” through concepts directly inspired by Industrie 4.0 and Industrie du futur. At the same time, this modernization also re-sponds to the need for the plant to become more competitive in order to face the consequences of the economic crisis of 2008. Drawing from data obtained through fieldwork (interviews with workers, union representatives and internal documents), the author shows that behind the rhetoric of modernization and industrial excel-lence, the firm intensifies work in assembly operations and workers lose autono-my.

Questo contributo studia come l’introduzione di nuove tecnologie e una nuova organizzazione del lavoro abbiano trasformato il processo produttivo in una catena di montaggio del gruppo PSA in Francia. L’azienda presenta la nuova organizzazione come una modernizzazione innovativa che permette di portare avanti la “Fabbrica del futuro”, attraverso concetti direttamente ispirati a Industria 4.0 e Industrie du futur. Allo stesso tempo, questa modernizzazione risponde anche all’esigenza di una maggiore competitività dell’impianto per far fronte alle conseguenze della crisi economica del 2008. Attingendo ai dati ottenuti attraverso il lavoro sul campo (interviste con lavoratori e rappresentanti sindacali, analisi di documenti interni), l'autore mostra che, dietro la retorica della modernizzazione e dell’eccellenza industriale, l’azienda intensifica il lavoro nelle operazioni di assemblaggio minacciando l’autonomia degli operatori.

Keywords:Digital manufacturing, sindacati, industria automobilistica, Industria 4.0

  1. Alliance Industrie du Futur (2017). Étude filières Industrie du futur. Synthèse des impacts et des recommandations.
  2. Askenazy P. (2005). Sur les sources de l’intensification. Revue économique, 56, 2: 217-236.
  3. Autor D.H. (2015). Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29, 3: 3-30.
  4. Beaud S., Weber F. (2010). Guide de l’enquête de terrain. Paris: Éditions La Découverte.
  5. Beaud S., Weber F. (2012). Le raisonnement ethnographique. In: Paugam S, L’enquête sociologique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  6. Bidet-Mayer T. (2016). Tour d’horizon des politiques d’“Industrie du futur”. Annales des Mines - Réalités industrielles, 4: 47-50.
  7. Braverman H. (1974). Labor and Monopoly Capital: the Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. London: Monthly Review Press.
  8. Briken K., Chillas S., Krzywdzinski M., Marks A. (2017). Labour Process Theory and the New Digital Workplace. In: Briken K, Chillas S, Krzywdzinski M, Marks A (eds.), The New Digital Workplace How New Technologies Revolutionise Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  9. Butollo F., Jürgens U., Krzywdzinski M. (2018). From Lean Production to Industrie 4.0. More Autonomy for Employees?. Discussion Paper, WZB Berlin Social Science Center, October 2018.
  10. Byrnjolfsson E., McAfee A. (2014). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
  11. Coriat B. (1990). L’atelier et le robot. Essai sur le fordisme et la production de masse à l’âge de l’électronique. Paris: Christian Bourgois Editeur.
  12. Gaborieau D. (2012). Le nez dans le micro ». Répercussions du travail sous commande vocale dans les entrepôts de la grande distribution alimentaire. La nouvelle revue du travail [Online], 1.
  13. Gaudemar (de) J.-P. (1982). L’ordre et la production. Naissance et formes de la discipline à l’usine. Paris: Dunod.
  14. Goods C, Veen A, Barrat T (2019) “Is your gig any good?’ Analyzing job quality in the Australian platform-based food-delivery sector. Journal of Industrial Relations, 61, 4: 502-527. DOI: 10.1177/002218561881706
  15. Gorgeu A., Mathieu R. (2005). Les restructurations industrielles : une fatalité du marché ? Le cas de la filière automobile en France. La Revue de l’Ires, 47, 1: 37-58.
  16. Graham L. (1995). On the Line at Subaru-Isuzu. The Japanese Model and the American Worker. Ithaca, London: ILR Press.
  17. Groupe PSA (2015) Planète Mulhouse, Hors série « Plan de transformation » n° 4, spécial kitting, avril 2015
  18. Groupe PSA (2016a). Le pôle de Mulhouse. En route vers l’usine du futur, 14th of April, 2016.
  19. Groupe PSA (2016b). Health Committee of the assembly workshop, 24 of October, 2016.
  20. Hatzfeld N. (2004). L’intensification du travail en débat. Ethnographie et histoire aux chaînes de Peugeot-Sochaux. Sociologie du travail, 46, 3: 291-307.
  21. Jolly C. (2019). Collective Action and Bargaining In the Digital Era. In: Neufeind M, O’Reilly J, Ranft F (eds.), Work In the Digital Age. Challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. London, New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
  22. Knights D., Willmott H. (eds.) (1990). Labour Process Theory, London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
  23. Kohler D., Weisz J.-D. (2016). Industrie 4.0. Les défis de la transformation numérique du modèle industriel allemand. Paris: La Documentation française.
  24. Krzywdzinski M. (2017). Automation, skill requirements and labour-use strategies: high-wage and low-wage approaches to high-tech manufacturing in the automative industry. New Technology, Work and Employment, 32, 3: 247-267.
  25. Limère V. (2011). To Kit or Not to Kit: Optimizing Part Feeding in the Automotive Assembly Industry. Ghent: Ghent University, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture.
  26. Pardi T., Krzywdzinski M., Luethje B. (2020). Digital manufacturing revolutions as political projects and hypes: evidences from the auto sector. ILO Working Paper 3.
  27. Peña-Casas R., Ghailani D., Coster S. (2018). Transition digitale dans l’Union européenne : quels impacts sur la qualité de l’emploi? In: Vanhercke B, Ghailani D, Sabato Sebastiano (eds.), Bilan social de l’Union européenne 2018. Dix-neuvième rapport annuel, ETUI.
  28. Petropoulos G. (2019). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Employment. In: Neufeind M, O’Reilly J, Ranft F (eds.), Work In the Digital Age. Challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. London, New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
  29. Pfeiffer S. (2016). Robots, Industry 4.0 and Humans, or Why Assembly Work Is More than Routine Work. Societies, 6, 16: 1-26.
  30. Pfeiffer S. (2017). Industrie 4.0 in the Making – Discourse Patters and the Rise of Digital Despotism. In: Briken K, Chillas S, Krzywdzinski M, Marks A (eds.), The New Digital Workplace How New Technologies Revolutionise Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  31. Rot G. (2002). Fluidité industrielle, fragilité organisationnelle. Revue française de sociologie, 43, 3: 711-737. DOI: 10.2307/332288
  32. Sartorius E., Serris J. (2012). Rapport à Monsieur le Ministre du Redressement productif sur la situation de PSA Peugeot Citroën. 11 septembre 2012.
  33. Scholz T. (2017). Uberworked and Underpaid. How workers are disrupting the digital economy. Cambridge, Medford: Polity Press.
  34. Shimizu K. (1999). Le Toyotisme. Paris: La Découverte.
  35. Thomas R. J. (1994). What Machines Can’t Do. Politics and Technology in the Industrial Enterprise. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Berkeley.
  36. Thompson P. (1989). The Nature of Work. An Introduction to the Debates on the Labour Process. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd.
  37. Tubaro P., Casilli A. A. (2019). Micro-work, artificial intelligence and the automotive industry. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 46: 333-345.
  38. Valeyre A. (2004). Forms of Work Intensification and Economic Performance in French Manufacturing. Eastern Economic Journal, 30, 4: 643-658.
  39. Womack J.P., Jones D.T., Roos D. (1990). The Machine That Changed the World. New York: Rawson Associates.
  40. Woodcock J., Graham M. (2020). The Gig Economy. A Critical Introduction. Cambridge, Medford: Polity Press.
  41. Wright C., Lund J. (2006). Variations on a lean theme: work restructuring in retail distribution. New Technology, Work and Employment, 21, 1: 59-74.

  • Que sait‐on du travail ? pp.561 (ISBN:9782724641905)
  • Making digitalization work: unveiling digitalization's implications on psycho-social risks at work Rocco Palumbo, Elena Casprini, Raffaella Montera, in Total Quality Management & Business Excellence /2022 pp.1
    DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2022.2055458

Juan Sebastian Carbonell, The Factory of the Future? The Contradictory Restructuring of an Assembly Line in France in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO " 158/2020, pp 118-136, DOI: 10.3280/SL2020-158006