Writing the case history of the Rat Man (1909):

Author/s Cesare Romano
Publishing Year 2021 Issue 2021/1
Language Italian Pages 42 P. 77-118 File size 521 KB
DOI 10.3280/PU2021-001008
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Through a re-reading of Freud’s Rat Man’s case of 1909, two theses are advanced. The first one asserts that, when drawing up this clinical case, Freud was influenced not only by Jung, according to Mannoni (1969), but also by claims Adler maintained in two lectures he read at the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society: in the first one he presented an ereutophobic patient whose childhood had many similarities with that of Freud’s patient; the second one concerned the aggressive drive in life and in neurosis. Some aspects of these lectures are surfacing in Freud’s writing. The second thesis argues that Freud was not able to keep the promise he had put forward in his Introduction to the clinical case to develop his first observations on the subject, published in 1896 (the paper Further Remarks on the Neuro-Psychoses of Defence), because in the meantime he had given up his traumatic theory that was the kernel of his sexual etiology of neuroses. Hence sexual trauma lost his relevance in the Rat Man’s neurosis, and childhood sexual experiences became irrelevant in the case history like the many sexual infantile experiences of Adler’s patient were meaningless for his neurosis.

Keywords: Rat Man; Jung and Adler; Infantile sexuality; Theory of trauma; Sadism in the neurosis

  1. Adler A. (1898-1909). The Collected Clinical Works of Alfred Adler. Vol. 2: Journal Articles 1898-1909. Bellingham, WA: Alfred Adler Institute of North-western Washington, 2002.
  2. Adler A. (1907). Studie über Minderwertigkeit von Organen. Wien: Urban & Schwarzeberg (trad. it.: Inferiorità e compenso psichico. Sesto San Giovanni [MI]: Mimesis, 2013).
  3. Adler A. (1908). Der Aggressionstrieb im Leben und in der Neurose. Fortschritte der Medizin, 19 (trad. inglese: The aggression drive in life and in the neurosis. In: Adler, 1898-1909, chapter XI, pp. 188-208 (trad. it.: La pulsione aggressiva nella vita e nella nevrosi. Rivista di Psicologia Individuale, 1999, 46: 5-14).
  4. Adler A. (1909a). Un cas de rougissement compulsionnel. Séance du 3 février 1909. In: Nunberg & Federn, 1908-10, pp. 128-146.
  5. Adler A. (1909b). L’unité des névroses. Séance du 2 juin 1909. In: Nunberg & Federn, 1908-10, pp. 256-270.
  6. Adler A. (1909c). Über Neurotische Disposition: zugleich ein Beitrag zur Ätiologie und zur Frage der Neurosenwahl. In: Adler A. & Furtmüller C., Heilen und Bilden. Ein Buch der Erziehungskunst für Ärzte und Pädagogen. München: Ernst Reinhardt, 1913 (trad. inglese: On the neurotic disposition. In: Adler, 1898-1909, chapter XVI).
  7. Adler A. (1911). La protestation masculine comme problème central de la névrose. Séance du 1er février 1911. In: Nunberg & Federn, 1910-11, pp. 146-156.
  8. Adler A. (1912). Über den Nervösen Charakter. Wien: Bergman (trad. it.: Il temperamento nervoso. Roma: Astrolabio 1950).
  9. Adler A. (1932). The structure of neurosis. International Journal of Individual Psychology, 1935, 1, 2: 3-12. Anche in: Carlson & Maniacci, 2012, pp. 218-228.
  10. Adler A. (1933). Was ist wirklich eine Neurose? Internationale Zeitschrift für Individual Psychologie, 11: 177-185 (trad. inglese: What is neurosis? International Journal of Individual Psychology, 1935, 1, 1: 9-17. Anche in: Carlson & Maniacci, 2012, pp. 198- 211).
  11. Adler A. (1937). Significance of early recollections. International Journal of Individual Psychology, 3, 4: 283-287. Anche in: Carlson & Maniacci, 2012, pp. 307-311.
  12. Ansbacher H.L. (1973). Adler’s interpretation of early recollections: Historical account. Journal of Individual Psychology, 29, 2: 135-145.
  13. Ansbacher H.L. & Ansbacher R.R., editors (1956). The Individual Psychology of Alfred Adler. A Systematic Presentation in Selections from His Writings. New York: Basic Books (trad. it: La Psicologia Individuale di Alfred Adler. Il pensiero di Alfred Adler attraverso una selezione dei suoi scritti. Firenze: Martinelli, 1998).
  14. Anthi P. (1989). Formal defensive aspects of cognition and modes of thinking exemplified by Freud’s case history of the Rat Man. Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 12, 1: 22-37. DOI: 10.1080/01062301.1989.10592529
  15. Beigler J.S. (1975). A commentary on Freud’s treatment of the Rat Man. Annual of Psychoanalysis, 3: 271-285.
  16. Carlson J. & Maniacci M.P. (2012). Alfred Adler revisited. London: Routledge.
  17. Eissler K. (2001). Freud and the Seduction Theory: A Brief Love Affair. Madison, CT: International University Press.
  18. Ferrigno G., Canzano C., Coppi P., Manzotti G. & Marasco E. (1999). Riflessioni conclusive alla relazione di Adler “La pulsione aggressiva nella vita e nella nevrosi”. Rivista di Psicologia Individuale, 46: 19-26.
  19. Ferrigno G., Berselli C., Canzano C., Coppi P., Di Ottavio G., Manzotti G., Marasco E.E., Tintori S. & Volpe C. (2006). Alfred Adler nei verbali della “Società Psicoanalitica di Vienna” (1906-1911). Quaderni della Rivista di Psicologia Individuale, 2006. Torino: SIPI (www.sipi-adler.it/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/073_CD_Ferrigno-2006.pdf).
  20. Fletcher J. (2013). Freud and the Scene of Trauma. New York: Fordham University Press.
  21. Freud A. (1936). Das Ich und die Abwehrmechanismen. Wien: Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag (trad. it.: L’io e i meccanismi di difesa. Firenze: Martinelli, 1967. Anche in: Scritti, Vol 1: 1922-1943. Torino: Boringhieri, 1978, pp. 149-265).
  22. Freud A. (1966). Obsessional neurosis: A summary of psychoanalytic views as presented at the Congress. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 47: 116-122.
  23. Freud A. (1968). Difficoltà della psicoanalisi: confronto fra punti di vista passati e presenti. Opere, Vol. 3, pp. 1039-1064. Torino: Boringhieri, 1979.
  24. Freud S. (1887-1904). The Complete Letters of Sigmund Freud to Wilhelm Fliess, 1887-1904 (Masson J.M., editor and translator). Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1985 (trad. it.: Lettere a Wilhelm Fliess, 1887-1904. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri, 1986). Ediz. tedesca: Briefe an Wilhelm Fliess, 1887-1904. Frankfurt a.M.: Fischer, 1999.
  25. Freud S. (1895 [1892-97]). Minute teoriche per Wilhelm Fliess. Minuta K: Le nevrosi da difesa (Favola di Natale). Opere, 2: 49-57. Torino: Boringhieri, 1968.
  26. Freud S. (1896). Nuove osservazioni sulle neuropsicosi da difesa. Opere, 2: 307-327. Torino: Boringhieri, 1968.
  27. Freud S. (1901 [1905]). Frammento di un’analisi di isteria (Caso clinico di Dora). Opere, 4: 301-402. Torino: Boringhieri, 1970.
  28. Freud S. (1908). Carattere ed erotismo anale. Opere, 5: 401-406. Torino: Boringhieri, 1972.
  29. Freud S. (1909). Osservazioni su un caso di nevrosi ossessiva (Caso clinico dell’Uomo dei topi). Opere, 6: 1-124. Torino: Boringhieri, 1974 (edizione inglese: Notes Upon a Case of Obsessional Neurosis. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume 10. London: Hogarth, 1955).
  30. Freud S. (1910 [1911]). Osservazioni psicoanalitiche su un caso di paranoia (dementia paranoides) descritto autobiograficamente (Caso clinico del presidente Schreber). Opere, 6: 335-406. Torino: Boringhieri, 1974.
  31. Freud S. (1913). La disposizione alla nevrosi ossessiva. Contributo al problema della scelta della nevrosi. Opere, 7: 235-244. Torino: Boringhieri, 1975.
  32. Freud S. (1920). Al di là del principio di piacere. Opere, 9: 189-249. Torino: Boringhieri, 1977.
  33. Freud S. (1921). Psicologia delle masse e analisi dell’Io. Opere, 9: 259-330. Torino: Boringhieri, 1977.
  34. Freud S. (1925 [1926]). Inibizione, sintomo e angoscia. Opere, 10: 231-317. Torino: Boringhieri, 1978.
  35. Freud S. (1929 [1930]). Il disagio della civiltà. Opere, 10: 555-630. Torino: Boringhieri, 1978.
  36. Freud S. & Jung C.G. (1906-13). Lettere tra Freud e Jung. Torino: Boringhieri, 1974.
  37. Glueck B. (1917). Adler’s conception of the neurotic constitution. Psychoanalytic Review, 4, 2: 217-225.
  38. Green A. (1993). L’analité primaire dans la relation anale. In: L’analité primaire. Monographies de la Revue Française de Psychanalyse. Paris: PUF, 1993, pp. 61-86 (trad. it.: L’analità primaria nella relazione anale. In: Mangini E., a cura di, Nevrosi ossessiva. Monografie della Rivista di Psicoanalisi. Roma: Borla, 2005, pp. 119-145).
  39. Grunberger B. (1966). Some reflections on the Rat Man. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 47: 160-168.
  40. Halprin L.S. (1996). On Freud’s “Notes Upon a Case of Obsessional Neurosis” (1909). Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 19, 1: 125-158.
  41. Hoffman L. (2017). Un Homme Manqué: Freud’s engagement with Alfred Adler’s masculine protest. Commentary on Balsam. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 65, 1: 99-108. DOI: 10.1177/0003065117690351.
  42. Künstlicher R. (1998). Horror at pleasure of his own of which he himself is not aware: The case of the Rat Man. In: Matthis I. & Szecsödy, editors, On Freud’s Couch. Seven New Interpretations of Freud’s Case Histories. Lanham, MD: Aronson, 1998, pp. 127-162.
  43. Künstlicher R. (2009). The conflicting forces of Freud’s clinical situation. Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 32, 2: 116-124. DOI: 10.1080/01062301.2009.10592654
  44. Laplanche J. & Pontalis J.-B. (1967). Vocabulaire de la psychanalyse. Paris: PUF (trad. it.: Enciclopedia della psicoanalisi. Bari: Laterza, 1968).
  45. Levitan H.L. (1976-77). Dynamic and structural features of a case of compulsive neurosis as revealed in dreams. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 27, 3/6: 125-132.
  46. Lipton S.D. (1977). The advanteges of Freud’s technique as shown in his analysis of the Rat Man. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 58: 255-273.
  47. Lipton S.D. (1979). An Addendum to “The advanteges of Freud’s technique as shown in his analysis of the Rat Man”. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 60: 215-216.
  48. Mahony P.J. (1986). Freud and the Rat Man. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press (trad. francese: Freud et l’Homme aux rats. Paris: PUF, 1991).
  49. Mannoni O. (1968). Freud. Paris: Seuil (trad. it: Freud. Bari: Laterza, 1970).
  50. Mannoni O. (1969). L’homme aux rats. In: Mannoni O., Clefs pour l’imaginaire ou l’autre scène. Paris: Editions du Seuil, 1969, pp. 131-149.
  51. May U. (2018). Freud at Work. On the History of Psychoanalytic Theory and Practice, with an Analysis of Freud’s Patient Record Books. London: Routledge.
  52. Nunberg H. & Federn E, editors (1906-08). Minutes of the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society. Vol. I: 1906-1908. New York: International Universities Press, 1962 (trad. it.: Dibattiti della Società Psicoanalitica di Vienna, 1906-1908. Torino: Boringhieri, 1973).
  53. Nunberg H. & Federn E., editors (1908-10). Les premiers psychanalystes. Minutes de la Société psychanalytique de Vienne. Vol. II: 1908-1910. Trad. dal tedesco di Nina Bakman. Paris: Gallimard, 1978 (ediz. inglese: Minutes of the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society. Vol. II: 1908-1910. New York: International Universities Press, 1967).
  54. Nunberg H. & Federn E, editors (1910-11). Les premiers psychanalystes. Minutes de la Societé psychanalytique de Vienne. Vol. III: 1910-1911. Paris: Gallimard, 1979 (ediz. inglese: Minutes of the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society. Vol. III: 1910-1911. New York: International Universities Press, 1974).
  55. Nunberg H. & Federn E, editors (1912-18). Minutes of the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society. Vol. IV: 1912-1918. New York: International Universities Press, 1975.
  56. Osman M.P. (2009). Freud’s Rat Man from the perspective of an early-life variant of the Oedipus complex. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 78, 3: 765-790.
  57. Ribeiro Hawelka E., a cura di (1974). L’Homme aux rats. Journal d’une analyse. Paris: PUF.
  58. Romano C. (2015). Freud and the Dora Case. A Promise Betrayed. London: Karnac.
  59. Schrecker P. (1973). Individual psychological significance of first childhood recollections. Journal of Individual Psychology, 29, 2: 140-156.
  60. Rogers R. (1991). Self and Other. Object Relations in Psychoanalysis and Literature. New York: New York University Press (si veda in particolare Part II, Ch. 3: Freud’s Cases Reread).
  61. Stepansky P.E. (1983). In Freud’s Shadow. Adler in Context. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
  62. Stroeken H.P.J. (2007). Note on the extraordinary similarity between the worlds of Freud and of the Ratman. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 16, 2: 100-102. DOI: 10.1080/08037060500545219
  63. Sulloway F.J. (1991). Reassessing Freud’s case histories: The social construction of psychoanalysis. Isis, 82, 2: 245-275 (trad. it: Rivalutando i casi clinici di Freud: la costruzione sociale della psicoanalisi. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, 1992, XXVI, 1: 7-37 [I parte] e 2: 5-39 [II parte]).
  64. Viderman S. (1977). Le céleste et le sublunaire. Paris: PUF.
  65. White K. (2010). Notes on “Bemächtigungstrieb” and Strachey’s translation as “instinct for mastery”. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 91, 4: 811-820.
  66. Zetzel E.R. (1965). 1965: Additional notes upon a case of obsessional neurosis: Freud 1909. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 1966, 47: 123-129.

Cesare Romano, La scrittura dell’Uomo dei topi (1909): Freud tra Jung e Adler in "PSICOTERAPIA E SCIENZE UMANE" 1/2021, pp 77-118, DOI: 10.3280/PU2021-001008