Donne e rom. Segregazione razziale, oppressione di genere e resistenze

Titolo Rivista SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE
Autori/Curatori Claudia Mantovan, Gaja Maestri
Anno di pubblicazione 2021 Fascicolo 2021/125
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 18 P. 62-79 Dimensione file 309 KB
DOI 10.3280/SUR2021-125004
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Ispirandosi al recente filone di ricerca dei critical Romani studies, l’articolo si prefigge di connettere la letteratura intersezionale con quella sulla segregazione abitativa e razziale delle minoranze rom e sinte, con l’obiettivo di gettare luce sulle specificità di genere di questo fenomeno. L’analisi delle traiettorie abitative e sociali di tredici donne rom immigrate in Italia permette di evidenziare l’intreccio tra discriminazione razziale e oppressione di genere, ma anche le forme di resistenza e di "ordinary agency" attraverso cui le donne cercano di fronteggiare le proprie difficoltà e di migliorare la propria situazione.;

Keywords:donne, rom, segregazione abitativa e razziale, oppressione di genere, critical Romani Studies, resistenze.

  1. AA. VV. (2013). Donne Rom: condizione femminile, diritti umani e non discriminazione. Roma: Arti Grafiche Kolbe.
  2. Agamben G. (1998). Homo Sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford: Stanford Uni-versity Press.
  3. Agamben G. (2005). State of exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Alunni L. (2012). “After all, They are Nomads, Aren’t They?”: Roma Transnationalism and Health Issues. MMG Working Paper 12-20. Gottingen: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity.
  4. Armillei R. (2015), The ‘camps system’ in Italy: corruption, inefficiencies and practices of resistance. Romani Studies. -- Testo disponibile al sito: http://romanistudies.eu/the-camps-system-in-italy.
  5. Associazione 21 Luglio (2020). Asy(s)lum. Dalle “istituzioni totali” di Goffman ai “campi rom” della città di Roma. -- Testo disponibile al sito: https://www.21luglio.org/2018/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/asyslum-web.pdf.
  6. Bogdan M., Dunajeva J., Junghaus T., Kóczé A., Rostas I., Rövid M., Szilvasi M. (2018). Introducing the New Journal of Critical Romani Studies. Critical Romani Studies, 1(1): 2-7.
  7. Bourdieu P. (2015). Forme di capitale. Roma: Armando.
  8. Brooks E.C. (2012). The Possibilities of Romani Feminism. Signs, 38(1): 1-11. DOI: 10.1086/665947
  9. Ciniero A. (2016a). Life Trajectory of Dorina - 34 - Italy. Scientific report established in the ANR MARG-IN Project.
  10. Ciniero A. (2016b). Life Trajectory of Safia - 55 - Italy. Scientific report established in the ANR MARG-IN Project.
  11. Clavé-Mercier A., Olivera M. (2018). Inclusion and the ‘Arts of Resistance’. Intersections. East European Journal of Society and Politics, 4(2): 149-168.
  12. Clough Marinaro I. (2009). Between Surveillance and Exile: Biopolitics and the Roma in Italy. Bulletin of Italian Politics, 1(2): 265-287.
  13. Clough Marinaro I., Daniele U. (2014). A failed Roma revolution: Conflict, fragmentation and status quo maintenance in Rome. Ethnicities, 14(6): 775-792. DOI: 10.1177/1468796814542181
  14. Corradi L. (2018). Il femminismo delle zingare. Intersezionalità, alleanze, attivismo di genere e queer. Sesto San Giovanni: Mimesis.
  15. Crenshaw K.W. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Femi-nist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1: 139-167.
  16. Crenshaw K.W. (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6): 1241-1299. DOI: 10.2307/1229039
  17. Daniele U. (2011). ‘Nomads’ in the eternal city. Local policies and Roma participation in the ‘emergency’ era. Géocarrefour, 86(1): 15-24.
  18. Daniele U., Pasta S., Persico G. (2018). From Public Enemy to Urban Ghost. Roma Migrants and the Dismantling of the Nomad Camp Systems in Milan and Rome. Intersections. East Euro-pean Journal of Society and Politics, 4(3): 106-135.
  19. Daniele U. (2016a). Life Trajectory of Ana - 23 - Italy. Scientific report established in the ANR MARG-IN Project.
  20. Daniele U. (2016b). Life Trajectory of Aurelia - 20 - Italy. Scientific report established in the ANR MARG-IN Project.
  21. Daniele U. (2016c). Life Trajectory of Magdalena - 23 - Italy. Scientific report established in the ANR MARG-IN Project.
  22. De Certeau M. (1990). L’invention du quotidien. Tome 1, Arts de faire. Paris: Gallimard.
  23. Dell’Agnese E., Vitale T. (2007). Rom e sinti, una galassia di minoranze senza territorio. In Amiotti G., Rosina A. (a cura di). Identità ed integrazione. Passato e presente delle mi-noranze nell’Europa mediterranea. Milano: FrancoAngeli. Goffman E. (1961). Asylums. Essays on the social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. Doubleday: Anchor Books.
  24. Humphris R. (2019). Home-Land: Romanian Roma, Domestic Spaces and the State. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
  25. Isin E. (2002). Being Political: Genealogies of Citizenship. Minneapolis: University of Min-nesota Press.
  26. Katz I. (2015). From spaces of thanatopolitics to spaces of natality - A commentary on ‘Geogra-phies of the camp’. Political Geography, 49: 84-86.
  27. Kóczé A. (2009). The Limits of Rights-Based Discourse in Romani Women’s Activism: the Gender Dimension in Romani Politics. In Sigona N., Trehan N. (eds.). Romani Politics in Contemporary Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  28. Kóczé A. (2018). Transgressing Borders: Challenging Racist and Sexist Epistemology. In Beck S., Ivasiuc A. (eds.). Roma Activism. Reimagining Power and Knowledge. Oxford, NY: Berghahn Books.
  29. Ivasiuc A. (2018a). Introduction. Renewing Research and Romani Activism. In Beck S., Ivasiuc A. (eds.). Roma Activism. Reimagining Power and Knowledge. Oxford, NY: Berghahn Books.
  30. Ivasiuc A. (2018b). Alter-Narratives. Seeing Ordinary Agency. In Beck S., Ivasiuc A. (eds.). Roma Activism. Reimagining Power and Knowledge. Oxford, NY: Berghahn Books.
  31. Izsàk R. (2009). The European Romani Women’s Movement: The Struggle for Human Rights. Development, 52(2): 200-207.
  32. Maestri G. (2017). The Contentious Sovereignties of the Camp: Political Contention Among State and Non-state Actors in Italian Roma Camps. Political Geography, 60: 213-222.
  33. Maestri G. (2019). Temporary Camps, Enduring Segregation. The Contentious Politics of Roma and Migrant Housing. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  34. Maestri G., Vitale T. (2017). A Sociology of the Camps’ Persisting Architecture. Why Did Rome not Put an End to Expensive Ethnic Housing Policies? In Mendes M., Sá T., Ca-bral J. (eds.). Architecture and the Social Sciences. Cham: Springer.
  35. Mantovan C. (2018). Cultura giuridica e politiche locali per i rom e i sinti: il caso del Co-mune di Venezia. In Pennisi C., Prina F., Quiroz M., Reiteri M. (a cura di). Amministra-zione, cultura giuridica e ricerca empirica. Santarcangelo di Romagna: Maggioli.
  36. Martin D. (2015). From spaces of exception to “campscapes”: Palestinian refugee camps and informal settlements in Beirut. Political Geography, 44: 9-18.
  37. Mayall D. (2004). Gypsy Identies 1500-2000: From Egipcyans to Moon-men to the Ethnic Rom-any. London: Routledge.
  38. Miele C. (2016). Living through the camp: Roma segregation and border-crossing in the city of Naples. In Brambilla C., Laine J., Scott J.W., Bocchi G. (eds.). Borderscaping: Imaginations and practices of border making. Oxon: Routledge.
  39. Minca C. (2015). Geographies of the camp. Political Geography, 49: 74-83.
  40. Pagano S. (2019). „Nomadin-Sein“ im „Dorf der Solidarität“. Eine kritische Ethnografie zu Camps für Rom_nja in Rom. Göttingen: Institut für Kulturanthropologie/Europäische Ethnol-ogie, Universitätsverlag Göttingen.
  41. Pasta S. (2016). Life Trajectory of Liliana - 37 - Italy. Scientific report established in the ANR MARG-IN Project.
  42. Pasta S. (2017a). Life Trajectory of Simona - 41 - Italy. Scientific report established in the ANR MARG-IN Project. Pasta S. (2017b). Life Trajectory of Carmen - 30 - Italy. Scientific report established in the ANR MARG-IN Project.
  43. Pasta S. (2017c). Life Trajectory of Rosa - 43 - Italy. Scientific report established in the ANR MARG-IN Project.
  44. Pasta S. (2017d). Life Trajectory of Cireasa - 35 - Italy. Scientific report established in the ANR MARG-IN Project.
  45. Pasta S. (2019). I rom di via Rubattino a Milano: una storia interculturale di educazione alla citta-dinanza. Palaver, 8(1): 157-204.
  46. Persico G. (2017). Life Trajectory of Manuela - 31 - Italy. Scientific report established in the ANR MARG-IN Project.
  47. Persico G., Marcu O., Daniele U., Romano C.C., Santambrogio A. (2020). Youth on dis-crimination: a platform for self-expression through the photovoice. Studi di Sociologia, X: 1-27. DOI: 10.26350/000309_000081
  48. Piasere L. (2006). Che cos’è un campo nomadi? Achab, 8: 8-16.
  49. Picker G. (2017). Racial Cities: Governance and the Segregation of Romani People in Ur-ban Europe. Abingdon: Routledge.
  50. Picker G., Greenfields M., Smith D. (2015). Colonial refractions: the ‘gypsy camp’ as a spatio-racial political technology. City, 19(5): 741-752. DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2015.1071123
  51. Picker G., Pasquetti S. (2015). Durable Camps: The State, the Urban, the Everyday. City, 19(5): 681-688. DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2015.1071122
  52. Puggioni R. (2014). Against Camps’ Violence: Some Voices on Italian Holding Centres. Political Studies, 62(4): 945-960. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9248.12051
  53. Putnam R.D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  54. Ramadan A. (2013). Spatialising the refugee camp. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(1): 65-77.
  55. Redclift V. (2013). Abjects or Agents? Camps, Contests and the Creation of ‘Political Space’. Citizenship Studies, 17 (3-4): 308-321. DOI: 10.1080/13621025.2013.791534
  56. Ryder A.R. (2019). A Game of Thrones: Power Struggles and Contestation in Romani Stud-ies. International Journal of Roma Studies, 1(2): 120-143.
  57. Rygiel K. (2011). Bordering solidarities: Migrant activism and the politics of movement and camps at Calais. Citizenship Studies, 15(1): 1-19. DOI: 10.1080/13621025.2011.534911
  58. Saitta P. (2015). Resistenze. Pratiche e margini del conflitto nel quotidiano. Verona: Ombre Corte.
  59. Scott J.C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: everyday forms of peasant resistance. London: Yale University Press
  60. Scott J.C. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance: hidden transcripts. London: Yale University Press.
  61. Sigona N. (2011). The Governance of Romani People in Italy: Discourse, Policy and Practice. Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 16(5): 590-606.
  62. Sigona N. (2015). Campzenship: Reimagining the Camp as a Social and Political Space. Citizenship Studies, 19(1): 1-15. DOI: 10.1080/13621025.2014.937643
  63. Sigona N. (2016). Everyday Statelessness in Italy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39(2): 263-279. DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2016.1105995
  64. Stasolla C. (2012). Sulla pelle dei rom. Roma: Alegre.
  65. Stewart M. (2012) (ed.). The Gypsy “Menace”: Populism and the New Anti-Gypsy Politics. London: Hurst.
  66. Tremlett A. (2009). Bringing hybridity to heterogeneity in Romani Studies. Romani Studies, 19(2): 147-168.
  67. Turner S. (2016). What is a refugee camp? Explorations of the limits and effects of the camp. Journal of Refugee Studies, 29(2): 139-148.
  68. Vincze E. (2014). The Racialization of Roma in the “New” Europe and the Political Poten-tial of Romani Women. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 21(4): 435-442. DOI: 10.1177/1350506814548963
  69. Woolcock M.M. (2001). The place of social capital in understanding social and economic outcomes. Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2(1): 11-17.

  • Taking Vulnerabilities to Labour Exploitation Seriously Letizia Palumbo, pp.143 (ISBN:978-3-031-55423-0)
  • Roma women serving community sentences in Italy: an analysis through the lens of Critical Criminology and Critical Romani Studies Claudia Mantovan, in Ethnic and Racial Studies /2024 pp.1
    DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2024.2372037

Claudia Mantovan, Gaja Maestri, Donne e rom. Segregazione razziale, oppressione di genere e resistenze in "SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE" 125/2021, pp 62-79, DOI: 10.3280/SUR2021-125004