Accessibility challenges in Italian Inner Areas: the case of Valle Arroscia

Journal title TERRITORIO
Author/s Elice Bacci, Giancarlo Cotella, Elisabetta Vitale Brovarone
Publishing Year 2021 Issue 2021/96
Language Italian Pages 9 P. 77-85 File size 844 KB
DOI 10.3280/TR2021-096007
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

In ‘inner’ rural and mountain areas, the reflection on accessibility implies a shift of perspective with respect to urban contexts. Improving accessibility in these territories means acting on several fronts, not only enhancing the transport offer, but also acting on the local territorial capital, bringing (or bringing back) services, knowledge and interaction. The National Strategy for Inner Areas (snai) points in this direction, promoting a place-based approach grounded, on the one hand, on the provision of the ‘prerequisites’ for territorial development (among which accessibility) and, on the other hand, on local development. Based on the case study of Valle Arroscia, that was analysed in the espon urruc project and is a selected project area of snai, this article explores accessibility issues and challenges for inner areas, and reflects on future directions for development.

Keywords: inner areas; accessibility; policies

  1. Vitale Brovarone E., 2021. «Accessibility and mobility in peripheral areas: a national place-based policy». European Planning Studies. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2021.1894098
  2. Geurs K.T., Patuelli R., Dentinho T., 2016, eds., Accessibility, equity and efficiency. Challenges for Transport and Public Services. Nectar Series on Transportation and Communications Network Research. Northampton: Edward Elgar.
  3. Gray D., Farrington J., Shaw J., Martin S., Roberts D., 2001, «Car dependence in rural Scotland: transport policy, devolution and the impact of the fuel duty escalator». Journal of Rural Studies, 17: 113-125. DOI: 10.1016/S0743-0167(00)00035-8
  4. Geurs K.T., van Wee B., 2004, «Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions». Journal of Transport Geography, 12: 127-140.
  5. Li X., Quadrifoglio L., 2010, «Feeder transit services: Choosing between fixed and demand responsive policy». Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Applications of Advanced Technologies in Transportation: Selected papers from the 10th AATT Conference, 18: 770-780.
  6. Lucatelli S., 2015, «La strategia nazionale, il riconoscimento delle aree interne». Territorio, 74: 80-86. DOI: 10.3280/TR2015-074014
  7. Malecki E.J., 2003, «Digital Development in Rural Areas: Potentials and Pitfalls». Journal of Rural Studies, 19, 2: 201–214. DOI: 10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00068-2
  8. Mattioli G., 2014, «Where Sustainable Transport and Social Exclusion Meet: Households Without Cars and Car Dependence in Great Britain ». Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 16: 379-400. DOI: 10.1080/1523908X.2013.858592
  9. Moroni S., 2010, «An evolutionary theory of institutions and a dynamic approach to reform». Planning Theory, 9: 275-297. DOI: 10.1177/1473095210368778
  10. Moseley M.J., 1979, Accessibility: the rural challenge. Londra: Methuen. Papa E., 2018, «Pianificare per l’accessibilità: misure, applicazioni e barriere» In: Tricarico L., Vecchio G. (a cura di), Mobilità è sviluppo. Strumenti e competenze per il futuro della mobilità. Milano: Fondazione Giangiacomo Feltrinelli.
  11. Philip L., Cottrill C., Farrington J., Williams F., Ashmore F., 2017, «The digital divide: Patterns, policy and scenarios for connecting the ‘final few’ in rural communities across Great Britain». Journal of Rural Studies, 54: 386-398.
  12. Philip L., Williams F., 2019, «Remote rural home based businesses and digital inequalities: Understanding needs and expectations in a digitally underserved community». Journal of Rural Studies, 68: 306-318.
  13. Regione Liguria, 2018, Strategia Nazionale per le Aree Interne, Area interna Valle Arroscia, Preliminare di Strategia. -- http://old2018.agenziacoesione.gov.it/opencms/export/sites/dps/it/documentazione/Aree_interne/STRATEGIE_DI_AREA/Preliminare_di_strategia/Preliminare_Valle_Arroscia_maggio_2018def.pdf (accesso: 2020.01.14).
  14. Schwanen T., Lucas K., Akyelken N., Cisternas Solsona D., Carrasco J.A., Neutens T., 2015, «Rethinking the Links between Social Exclusion and Transport Disadvantage through the Lens of Social Capital». Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 74: 123-35.
  15. Tantillo F., 2015, «La co-progettazione locale e la strategia d’area: il metodo di lavoro e le missioni di campo». Territorio, 74: 97-101. DOI: 10.3280/TR2015-074017
  16. Velaga N.R., Beecroft M., Nelson J.D., Corsar D., Edwards P., 2012, «Transport poverty meets the digital divide: accessibility and connectivity in rural communities». Journal of Transport Geography, Social Impacts and Equity Issues in Transport (special issue) 21: 102-112.
  17. Vitale Brovarone E., 2010, Città in movimento: relazioni e dipendenze tra i caratteri degli insediamenti e la domanda di mobilità. Potenza: Le Penseur.
  18. Vitale Brovarone E., Cotella G., Staricco L., 2019, «Enhancing urban-rural connectivity in non-metropolitan regions: a methodology in support to decision-making». In: Planning for transitions. Book of papers, aesop annual congress. Venice: Università Iuav.
  19. Vitale Brovarone E., Cotella G., Staricco L., 2021. Rural Accessibility in European Regions. London: Routledge.
  20. Bacci E., Basta M., 2016, «Governance nelle aree interne: un modello efficace di sviluppo partecipativo». In: La finanza territoriale – Rapporto 2016. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  21. Barca F., Casavola P., Lucatelli S., 2014, Strategia Nazionale per le Aree Interne: definizione, obiettivi, strumenti e governance. Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico, Dipartimento per lo Sviluppo e le Coesione Economica, Unità di valutazione degli investimenti pubblici. -- http://old2018.agenziacoesione.gov.it/it/arint/ (accesso: 2020.01.14).
  22. Bertolini L., 2017, Planning the Mobile Metropolis: Transport for People, Places and the Planet. Londra: Macmillan Education uk.
  23. Black N., Scott K., Shucksmith M., 2019, «Social inequalities in rural England: Impacts on young people post-2008». Journal of Rural Studies, 68: 264-275.
  24. Calvaresi C., 2015, «Una strategia nazionale per le aree interne: diritti di cittadinanza e sviluppo locale». Territorio, 74: 78-79. DOI: 10.3280/TR2015-074013
  25. Colleoni M., 2012, «Mobilità ed accessibilità urbana: definizioni e teorie di riferimento». In: Muoversi in città. Accessibilità e mobilità nella metropoli contemporanea. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  26. Cotella G., 2019, «The Urban Dimension of EU Cohesion Policy». In: Medeiros E. (ed.), Territorial Cohesion. The Urban Dimension. Cham: Switzerland.
  27. Cotella G., Janin Rivolin U., 2015, «Europeizzazione del governo del territorio: un modello analitico», Territorio, 73: 127-134. DOI: 10.3280/TR2015-073019
  28. Cotella G., Janin Rivolin U., Santangelo M., 2016, «Transferring good territorial governance in Europe: opportunities and barriers». In: Schmidt P., Van Well L. (eds.), Territorial governance across Europe: Pathways, practices and prospects. London: Routledge.
  29. Cotella G., Vitale Brovarone E., 2020a, «The Italian National Strategy for Inner Areas. A Place-Based Approach to Regional Development».
  30. In: Bański J. (ed.), Dilemmas of regional and local development. Londra: Routledge.
  31. Cotella G. Vitale Brovarone E., 2020b, «La Strategia Nazionale per le Aree Interne: una svolta place-based per le politiche regionali in Italia». Archivio di Studi Urbani e Regionali, 129, 3: 22-46.
  32. Davison L., Enoch M., Ryley T., Quddus M., Wang C., 2012, «Identifying potential market niches for Demand Responsive Transport». Research in Transportation Business & Management, Flexible Transport Services, 3: 50-61.
  33. Dematteis G., 2016, «La città ha bisogno della montagna. La montagna ha diritto alla città». Scienze del Territorio, 4: 10-17.
  34. espon, 2019a, espon urruc – Urban-Rural Connectivity in Non-Metropolitan Regions. Targeted Analysis. Final Report. Luxembourg: espon EGTC. -- www.espon.eu/urruc (accesso: 2020.01.14).
  35. espon, 2019b, espon urruc – Urban-Rural Connectivity in Non-Metropolitan Regions. Targeted Analysis. Annex 6 – Case study report. Province of Imperia- Valle Arroscia, Italy. Luxembourg: espon egtc. www.espon.eu/urruc (accesso: 2020.01.14).
  36. espon, 2019c, espon urruc – Urban-Rural Connectivity in Non-Metropolitan Regions. Targeted Analysis. Annex 8 – Policy Guidelines and Recommendations. Luxembourg: espon egtc. -- www.espon.eu/urruc.(accesso: 2020.01.14).
  37. espon, 2019d, espon urruc – Urban-Rural Connectivity in Non-Metropolitan Regions. Targeted Analysis. Annex 2 – Conceptualisation
  38. and Methodology. Luxembourg: espon egtc. -- www.espon.eu/urruc(accesso: 2020.01.14).
  39. Farrington J., Farrington C., 2005, «Rural accessibility, social inclusion and social justice: towards conceptualisation». Journal of Transport Geography, Sustainability and the Interaction Between External Effects of Transport (special Issue), 13: 1–12.
  40. Felice E., Lepore A., 2016, State intervention and economic growth in Southern Italy: the rise and fall of the Cassa per il Mezzogiorno (1950-1986). Munich Personal RePEc Archive - mpra Paper No. 69466. -- https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/69466/ (accesso: 2020.01.14).
  41. Ferreira L., Charles P., Tether C., 2007, «Evaluating Flexible Transport Solutions». Transportation Planning and Technology, 30: 249-269. DOI: 10.1080/03081060701395501
  42. Geurs K.T., van Wee B., 2004, «Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions». Journal of Transport Geography, 12: 127-140.
  43. Shergold I., Parkhurst G., 2010, «Operationalising ‘sustainable mobility’: the case of transport policy for older citizens in rural areas». Journal of Transport Geography, 18: 336–339.
  44. Shergold I., Parkhurst G., Musselwhite C., 2012, «Rural car dependence: an emerging barrier to community activity for older people ». Transportation Planning and Technology, 35: 69-85. DOI: 10.1080/03081060.2012.635417
  45. Silva C., Pinto N., Bertolini L., 2019, eds., Designing Accessibility Instruments: Lessons on Their Usability for Integrated Land Use and Transport Planning Practices. London: Routledge.

  • Improving Rural Accessibility: A Multilayer Approach Elisabetta Vitale Brovarone, Giancarlo Cotella, in Sustainability /2020 pp.2876
    DOI: 10.3390/su12072876
  • Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2023 Workshops Dino Molinaro, Valentina Santarsiero, Lucia Saganeiti, Beniamino Murgante, pp.468 (ISBN:978-3-031-37113-4)
  • Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2022 Valentina Santarsiero, Gabriele Nolè, Francesco Scorza, Beniamino Murgante, pp.344 (ISBN:978-3-031-10449-7)
  • Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2023 Workshops Diana Rolando, Alice Barreca, Manuela Rebaudengo, pp.249 (ISBN:978-3-031-37110-3)
  • Supporting Cities towards Carbon Neutral Transition through Territorial Acupuncture Federica Leone, Ala Hasan, Francesco Reda, Hassam ur Rehman, Fausto Carmelo Nigrelli, Francesco Nocera, Vincenzo Costanzo, in Sustainability /2023 pp.4046
    DOI: 10.3390/su15054046

Elice Bacci, Giancarlo Cotella, Elisabetta Vitale Brovarone, La sfida dell’accessibilità nelle aree interne: riflessioni a partire dalla Valle Arroscia in "TERRITORIO" 96/2021, pp 77-85, DOI: 10.3280/TR2021-096007