Political Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility: Enhancing the Role of the Moral dimension

Titolo Rivista CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Autori/Curatori Cristiano Ciappei, Anna Marrucci, Giacomo Mininni, Marina Gallucci
Anno di pubblicazione 2022 Fascicolo 2021/2
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 20 P. 85-104 Dimensione file 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/cgrds2-2021oa12558
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Vedi l'articolo Scarica l'articolo open access

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Society is currently facing profound crises which threaten the stability, development, and individuals’ well-being. Specifically, health, environmental, and social crises have become topics of great interest among academics and scholars of Governance.  In this transformative environment, companies fulfill a vital role: they need to be responsible to the community by rethinking the maximization of interests. Indeed, businesses should operate by maximizing stakeholder interests and respecting social development. Failure to achieve these priority objectives can have major implications for society.  In achieving these ethical goals, Governance covers a crucial role. However, the debate on Governance and management has focused on purely control and administrative aspects. The present research offers a reinterpretation of Governance through a political lens. By examining Shareholder Theory and Stakeholder Theory, it emerges how in corporate management the political approach is superordinate to the ethical approach. This relationship between politics and ethics is analyzed in the context of Corporate Social Responsibility. Indeed, the research argues that Corporate social Responsibility is political and not ethical fact. The ethical roots of Corporate Social Responsibility can only be rediscovered through the enhancement of the moral dimension of management. In addition to Shareholder theory and Stakeholder Theory, the research explores Easton's model of political systems.  

Society is currently facing profound crises which threaten the stability, development, and individuals’ well-being. Specifically, health, environmental, and social crises have become topics of great interest among academics and scholars of Governance.  In this transformative environment, companies fulfill a vital role: they need to be responsible to the community by rethinking the maximization of interests. Indeed, businesses should operate by maximizing stakeholder interests and respecting social development. Failure to achieve these priority objectives can have major implications for society.  In achieving these ethical goals, Governance covers a crucial role. However, the debate on Governance and management has focused on purely control and administrative aspects. The present research offers a reinterpretation of Governance through a political lens. By examining Shareholder Theory and Stakeholder Theory, it emerges how in corporate management the political approach is superordinate to the ethical approach. This relationship between politics and ethics is analyzed in the context of Corporate Social Responsibility. Indeed, the research argues that Corporate social Responsibility is political and not ethical fact. The ethical roots of Corporate Social Responsibility can only be rediscovered through the enhancement of the moral dimension of management. In addition to Shareholder theory and Stakeholder Theory, the research explores Easton's model of political systems.  

Keywords:; Governance; Political System; Corporate social Responsibility; Ethics; Moral Dimension

  1. Aras G., Crowther D. (2008). Governance and sustainability: An investigation into the relationship between corporate governance and corporate sustainability. Management Decision, 46(3): 433-448. DOI: 10.1108/00251740810863870
  2. Barile S., Saviano M. (2011). Foundations of systems thinking: the structuresystem paradigm. Various Authors, Contributions to Theoretical and Practical Advances in Management. A Viable Systems Approach (VSA). ASVSA, Associazione per la Ricerca sui Sistemi Vitali. International Printing, 1-24.
  3. Barile S. (2009). Verso la qualificazione del concetto di complessità sistemica. Sinergie, 79(2): 47-76.
  4. Boaventura J.M.G., Bosse D.A., de Mascena K.M.C., Sarturi G. (2020). Value distribution to stakeholders: The influence of stakeholder power and strategic importance in public firms. Long Range Planning, 53(2): 101883. DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2019.05.003
  5. Berber N., Slavić A., Aleksić M. (2019). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and corporate governance. Ekonomika: 65(3): 1-12. DOI: 10.5937/ekonomika1903001B
  6. Bertland A. (2009). Virtue ethics in business and the capabilities approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(1): 25-32. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-008-9686-3
  7. Blattberg C. (2013). Welfare: Towards the patriotic corporation. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2250348. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2250348
  8. Brecher J. (2020). No Worker Left Behind: Protecting Workers and Communities in the Green New Deal. In: New Labor Forum, 29(2): 68-76. DOI: 10.1177/1095796020915177
  9. Brick I.E., Chidambaran N.K. (2010). Board meetings, committee structure, and firm value. Journal of corporate finance, 16(4): 533-553. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2010.06.003
  10. Boesso G., Kumar K., Michelon G. (2013). Descriptive, instrumental and strategic approaches to corporate social responsibility: Do they drive the financial performance of companies differently? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26 (3): 399-422. DOI: 10.1108/09513571311311874
  11. Carroll A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business & society, 38(3): 268-295. DOI: 10.1177/000765039903800303
  12. Carroll A.B. (2000), Ethical Challenges for Businessmen in the New Millennium: Corporate Social Responsibility and Models of Management Morality, Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(1): 33-42. DOI: 10.2307/3857692
  13. Carroll A.B. (2008), A History of Corporate Social Responsibility: Concepts and Practices, in AA. VV., The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 19-46.
  14. Castro-González S., Bande B., Fernández-Ferrín P., Kimura T. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and consumer advocacy behaviors: The importance of emotions and moral virtues. Journal of cleaner production, 231: 846-855. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.238
  15. Charreaux G., Desbrières P. (2001). Corporate governance: stakeholder value versus shareholder value. Journal of Management and Governance, 5(2): 107-128. DOI: 10.1023/A:1013060105433
  16. Ciappei C. (2002). Corporate government. Gli assetti istituzionali di governo dell’impresa. In: Ciappei C., Il corporate government e la governance, Florence: Firenze University Press, pp. 61-70.
  17. Ciappei C. (2003), La governance politica di impresa. Consenso, identità, interessi e potere nel governo imprenditoriale, Florence: Firenze University Press.
  18. Ciappei C. (2005), Il governo imprenditoriale. Vol 4.2: Strategia e valore d’impresa: saggezza e metodo dell’agire imprenditoriale, Florence: Firenze University Press.
  19. Ciappei C., Cinque M. (2014), Soft Skills per il governo dell’agire. Human Flourishing e saggezza pratica per lo sviluppo di competenze prassiche e pragmatiche, Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  20. Constantinescu M., Kaptein M. (2015). CSR standards and corporate ethical virtues: A normative inquiry into the way corporations integrate stakeholder expectations. In: Idowu S., Frederiksen C., Mermod A., Nielsen M. (eds). Corporate Social Responsibility and Governance. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-10909-1_8
  21. Cravens K.S., Oliver E.G. (2006). Employees: The key link to corporate reputation management. Business Horizons, 49(4): 293-302. DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2005.10.006
  22. Clementino E., Perkins R. (2021). How do companies respond to environmental, social and governance (ESG) ratings? Evidence from Italy. Journal of Business Ethics, 171(2): 379-397. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-020-04441-4
  23. D’Amato A., Henderson S., Florence S. (Eds) (2009). Corporate social responsibility and sustainable business. A Guide to Leadership tasks and functions, Greensboro, N.C.: CCL Press.
  24. Dahlsrud A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate social responsibility and environmental management, 15(1): 1-13. DOI: 10.1002/csr.132
  25. Dazzi C., Papa G.L. (2021). A new definition of soil to promote soil awareness, sustainability, security and governance. International Soil and Water Conservation Research.
  26. DesJardins J.R., McCall J.J. (2004), Contemporary Issues in Business Ethics, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  27. Dosi G., Faillo M., Marengo L. (2008). Organizational capabilities, patterns of knowledge accumulation and governance structures in business firms: an introduction. Organization Studies, 29(08&09): 1165-1185. DOI: 10.1177/0170840608094775
  28. Easton D. (1953), The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
  29. Easton D. (1957). An approach to the analysis of political systems. World politics, 9(3): 383-400. DOI: 10.2307/2008920
  30. Easton D. (1959). Political anthropology. Biennial review of anthropology, 1: 210-262. In: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2949205.
  31. Easton D. (1968). The theoretical relevance of political socialization. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique, 1(2): 125-146. DOI: 10.1017/S0008423900036477
  32. Farh J.L., Liang J., Chou L.F., Cheng B.S. (2008). Paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations: Research progress and future research directions. In: Leadership and management in China: Philosophies, theories, and practices (pp. 171-205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  33. Fassin Y., Werner A., Van Rossem A., Signori S., Garriga E., von Weltzien Hoivik H., Schlierer H.J. (2015). CSR and related terms in SME owner–managers’ mental models in six European countries: National context matters. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(2): 433-456. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-014-2098-7
  34. Freeman R.E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  35. Freeman R.E., Dmytriyev S. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder theory: Learning from each other. Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, 1: 7-15. DOI: 10.4468/2017.1.02freeman.dmytriyev
  36. Freeman R.E., Velamuri S.R. (2006). A new approach to CSR: Company stakeholder responsibility. In: A. Kakabadse A. et al. (eds.), Corporate social responsibility pp. 9-23. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  37. Freeman R.E. Reed D.L. (1983), Stockholders and Stakeholders: A New Perspective on Corporate Governance, California Management Review 25(3): 88-106. DOI: 10.2307/41165018
  38. Freeman R.E., Phillips R., Sisodia R. (2020). Tensions in stakeholder theory. Business & Society, 59(2): 213-231. DOI: 10.1177/0007650318773750
  39. Freudenreich B., Lüdeke-Freund F., Schaltegger S. (2020). A stakeholder theory perspective on business models: Value creation for sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 166(1): 3-18. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-019-04112-z
  40. Friedman M. (1970). A theoretical framework for monetary analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 78(2): 193-238. DOI: 10.1086/259623
  41. Ganson B., He T.L., Henisz, W.J. (2021). Business and Peace: The Impact of Firm-Stakeholder Relational Strategies on Conflict Risk. Academy of Management Review, (ja). DOI: 10.5465/amr.2019.0411
  42. Gilbert D.U., Rasche A. (2008). Opportunities and problems of standardized ethics initiatives-a stakeholder theory perspective. Journal of business ethics, 82(3), 755-773. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-007-9591-1
  43. Golinelli G.M., Barile S., Spohrer J., Bassano C. (2010). The evolving dynamics of service co-creation in a viable systems perspective. In: The 13th Toulon-Verona Conference, September (pp. 2-4).
  44. Gu Q., Tang T.L.P., Jiang W. (2015). Does moral leadership enhance employee creativity? Employee identification with leader and leader–member exchange (LMX) in the Chinese context. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(3): 513-529. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-013-1967-9
  45. Harvey B., Schaefer A. (2001). Managing relationships with environmental stakeholders: A study of UK water and electricity utilities. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(3): 243-260. DOI: 10.1023/A:1006356928957
  46. Heugens P.P., Kaptein M., Van Oosterhout J. (2008). Contracts to communities: A processual model of organizational virtue. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1): 100-121. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00738.x
  47. Hemingway C.A., Maclagan P.W. (2004). Managers’ personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of business ethics, 50(1): 33-44. DOI: 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000020964.80208.c9
  48. Hickman E., Petrin M. (2020). Trustworthy AI and Corporate Governance. The EU’s Ethics Guidelines For Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence from a Company Law Perspective. European Business Organization Law Review, 1-33. DOI: 10.1007/s40804-021-00224-0
  49. Jackson K.V. (2011). Towards a Stakeholder-Shareholder Theory of Corporate Governance: A Comparative Analysis. Hastings Business Law Journal, 7: 309.
  50. Kamal Y. (2021). Stakeholders expectations for CSR-related corporate governance disclosure: evidence from a developing country. Asian Review of Accounting, 29(2): 97-127. DOI: 10.1108/ARA-04-2020-0052
  51. Knox S., Maklan S. (2004). Corporate social responsibility: Moving beyond investment towards measuring outcomes. European Management Journal, 22(5): 508-516. DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2004.09.009
  52. Lyon T.P., Maxwell J.W. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and the environment: A theoretical perspective. Review of environmental economics and policy, 2(2): 240-260. DOI: 10.1093/reep/ren004
  53. Mackey A., Mackey T.B., Barney J.B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Academy of management review, 32(3): 817-835. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2007.25275676
  54. Mainardes E.W., Alves H., Raposo M. (2011). Stakeholder theory: issues to resolve. Management decision, 49(2): 226-252. DOI: 10.1108/00251741111109133
  55. McGhee M. (2002). Greeks, Galatians and Western Buddhists: Christianity, Buddhism and ‘Social Responsibility’, Contemporary Buddhism, 3(2): 99-109. DOI: 10.1080/14639940208573760
  56. Mergel I., Ganapati S., Whitford A.B. (2021). Agile: A new way of governing. Public Administration Review, 81(1): 161-165. DOI: 10.1111/puar.13202
  57. Michelon G., Parbonetti A. (2012). The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure. Journal of management & governance, 16(3): 477-509. DOI: 10.1007/s10997-010-9160-3
  58. Miles S. (2017). Stakeholder theory classification: A theoretical and empirical evaluation of definitions. Journal of Business Ethics, 142(3): 437-459. DOI: 0.1007/s10551-015-2741-y
  59. Mitchell R.K., Agle B.R., Wood D.J. (1997), Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts, Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 853-886. DOI: 10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105
  60. Pomeranz E.F., Stedman R.C. (2020). Measuring good governance: piloting an instrument for evaluating good governance principles. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(3): 428-440. DOI: 10.1080/1523908X.2020.1753181
  61. Porter M., Kramer M.R. (2011). Creare valore condiviso. Harvard Business Review Italia, 1(2): 68-84.
  62. Post J.E., Preston L.E., Sauter-Sachs S. (2002). Redefining the corporation: Stakeholder management and organizational wealth. Redwood City, California: Stanford University Press.
  63. Provan K.G., Kenis P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of public administration research and theory, 18(2): 229-252. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mum015
  64. Ruggiero P., Cupertino S. (2018). CSR strategic approach, financial resources and corporate social performance: The mediating effect of innovation. Sustainability, 10(10): 3611. DOI: 10.3390/su10103611
  65. Said R., Zainuddin Y.H., Haron H. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility disclosure and corporate governance characteristics in Malaysian public listed companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 5(2): 212-226. DOI: 10.1108/17471110910964496
  66. Sauser W.I. (2005). Ethics in business: Answering the call. Journal of Business Ethics, 58(4): 345-357. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-004-5715-z
  67. Sciarelli S. (2007), Etica e responsabilità sociale nell’impresa, Milano: Giuffrè.
  68. Sciarelli S., Sciarelli M. (2018), Il governo etico d’impresa, Vicenza: Wolters Kluwer.
  69. Sheng J., Zhou W., Zhu B. (2020). The coordination of stakeholder interests in environmental regulation: Lessons from China’s environmental regulation policies from the perspective of the evolutionary game theory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 249: 119385. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119385
  70. Spiess S.O., Mueller K., Lin-Hi N. (2013). Psychological foundations of corporate social responsibility: The importance of “avoiding bad”. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 6(4): 383-386. DOI: 10.1111/iops.12073
  71. Steurer R. (2006), Mapping Stakeholder Theory Anew: From the ‘Stakeholder Theory of the Firm’ to Three Perspectives on Business-Society Relations, Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(1): 55-69. DOI: 10.1002/bse.467
  72. Sundaram A.K., Inkpen A.C. (2004). The corporate objective revisited. Organization science,15(3): 350-363. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0068
  73. Tibiletti V., Marchini P.L., Furlotti K., Medioli A. (2021). Does corporate governance matter in corporate social responsibility disclosure? Evidence from Italy in the “era of sustainability”. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(2): 896-907. DOI: 10.1002/csr.2097
  74. Tse T. (2011). Shareholder and stakeholder theory: After the financial crisis. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 3(1): 51-63. DOI: 10.1108/17554171111124612
  75. Veríssimo J.M., Lacerda T.M. (2015). Does integrity matter for CSR practice in organizations? The mediating role of transformational leadership. Business Ethics: A European Review, 24(1): 34-51. DOI: 10.1111/beer.12065
  76. Werther Jr W.B., Chandler D. (2010). Strategic corporate social responsibility: Stakeholders in a global environment. New York: Sage Publications.
  77. Wittmer D., O’Brien K. (2014), The Virtue of “Virtue Ethics” in Business and Business Education, Journal of Business Ethics Education, 11: 1-18. DOI: 10.5840/jbee20141113
  78. Aras G., Crowther D. (2008). Governance and sustainability: An investigation into the relationship between corporate governance and corporate sustainability. Management Decision, 46(3): 433-448. DOI: 10.1108/00251740810863870.
  79. Barile S., Saviano M. (2011). Foundations of systems thinking: the structuresystem paradigm. Various Authors, Contributions to Theoretical and Practical Advances in Management. A Viable Systems Approach (VSA). ASVSA, Associazione per la Ricerca sui Sistemi Vitali. International Printing, 1-24.
  80. Barile S. (2009). Verso la qualificazione del concetto di complessità sistemica. Sinergie, 79(2): 47-76.
  81. Boaventura J.M.G., Bosse D.A., de Mascena K.M.C., Sarturi G. (2020). Value distribution to stakeholders: The influence of stakeholder power and strategic importance in public firms. Long Range Planning, 53(2): 101883. DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2019.05.003.
  82. Berber N., Slavić A., Aleksić M. (2019). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and corporate governance. Ekonomika: 65(3): 1-12. DOI: 10.5937/ekonomika1903001B.
  83. Bertland A. (2009). Virtue ethics in business and the capabilities approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(1): 25-32. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-008-9686-3.
  84. Blattberg C. (2013). Welfare: Towards the patriotic corporation. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2250348. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2250348.
  85. Brecher J. (2020). No Worker Left Behind: Protecting Workers and Communities in the Green New Deal. In: New Labor Forum, 29(2): 68-76. DOI: 10.1177/1095796020915177.
  86. Brick I.E., Chidambaran N.K. (2010). Board meetings, committee structure, and firm value. Journal of corporate finance, 16(4): 533-553. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2010.06.003.
  87. Boesso G., Kumar K., Michelon G. (2013). Descriptive, instrumental and strategic approaches to corporate social responsibility: Do they drive the financial performance of companies differently? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26 (3): 399-422. DOI: 10.1108/09513571311311874.
  88. Carroll A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business & society, 38(3): 268-295. DOI: 10.1177/000765039903800303.
  89. Carroll A.B. (2000), Ethical Challenges for Businessmen in the New Millennium: Corporate Social Responsibility and Models of Management Morality, Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(1): 33-42. DOI: 10.2307/3857692.
  90. Carroll A.B. (2008), A History of Corporate Social Responsibility: Concepts and Practices, in AA. VV., The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 19-46.
  91. Castro-González S., Bande B., Fernández-Ferrín P., Kimura T. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and consumer advocacy behaviors: The importance of emotions and moral virtues. Journal of cleaner production, 231: 846-855. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.238.
  92. Charreaux G., Desbrières P. (2001). Corporate governance: stakeholder value versus shareholder value. Journal of Management and Governance, 5(2): 107-128. DOI: 10.1023/A:1013060105433.
  93. Ciappei C. (2002). Corporate government. Gli assetti istituzionali di governo dell’impresa. In: Ciappei C., Il corporate government e la governance, Florence: Firenze University Press, pp. 61-70.
  94. Ciappei C. (2003), La governance politica di impresa. Consenso, identità, interessi e potere nel governo imprenditoriale, Florence: Firenze University Press.
  95. Ciappei C. (2005), Il governo imprenditoriale. Vol 4.2: Strategia e valore d’impresa: saggezza e metodo dell’agire imprenditoriale, Florence: Firenze University Press.
  96. Ciappei C., Cinque M. (2014), Soft Skills per il governo dell’agire. Human Flourishing e saggezza pratica per lo sviluppo di competenze prassiche e pragmatiche, Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  97. Constantinescu M., Kaptein M. (2015). CSR standards and corporate ethical virtues: A normative inquiry into the way corporations integrate stakeholder expectations. In: Idowu S., Frederiksen C., Mermod A., Nielsen M. (eds). Corporate Social Responsibility and Governance. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-10909-1_8.
  98. Cravens K.S., Oliver E.G. (2006). Employees: The key link to corporate reputation management. Business Horizons, 49(4): 293-302. DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2005.10.006.
  99. Clementino E., Perkins R. (2021). How do companies respond to environmental, social and governance (ESG) ratings? Evidence from Italy. Journal of Business Ethics, 171(2): 379-397. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-020-04441-4.
  100. D’Amato A., Henderson S., Florence S. (Eds) (2009). Corporate social responsibility and sustainable business. A Guide to Leadership tasks and functions, Greensboro, N.C.: CCL Press.
  101. Dahlsrud A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate social responsibility and environmental management, 15(1): 1-13. DOI: 10.1002/csr.132.
  102. Dazzi C., Papa G.L. (2021). A new definition of soil to promote soil awareness, sustainability, security and governance. International Soil and Water Conservation Research.
  103. DesJardins J.R., McCall J.J. (2004), Contemporary Issues in Business Ethics, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  104. Dosi G., Faillo M., Marengo L. (2008). Organizational capabilities, patterns of knowledge accumulation and governance structures in business firms: an introduction. Organization Studies, 29(08&09): 1165-1185. DOI: 10.1177/0170840608094775.
  105. Easton D. (1953), The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
  106. Easton D. (1957). An approach to the analysis of political systems. World politics, 9(3): 383-400. DOI: 10.2307/2008920.
  107. Easton D. (1959). Political anthropology. Biennial review of anthropology, 1: 210-262. In: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2949205.
  108. Easton D. (1968). The theoretical relevance of political socialization. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique, 1(2): 125-146. DOI: 10.1017/S0008423900036477.
  109. Farh J.L., Liang J., Chou L.F., Cheng B.S. (2008). Paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations: Research progress and future research directions. In: Leadership and management in China: Philosophies, theories, and practices (pp. 171-205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  110. Fassin Y., Werner A., Van Rossem A., Signori S., Garriga E., von Weltzien Hoivik H., Schlierer H.J. (2015). CSR and related terms in SME owner–managers’ mental models in six European countries: National context matters. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(2): 433-456. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-014-2098-7.
  111. Freeman R.E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  112. Freeman R.E., Dmytriyev S. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder theory: Learning from each other. Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, 1: 7-15. DOI: 10.4468/2017.1.02freeman.dmytriyev.
  113. Freeman R.E., Velamuri S.R. (2006). A new approach to CSR: Company stakeholder responsibility. In: A. Kakabadse A. et al. (eds.), Corporate social responsibility pp. 9-23. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  114. Freeman R.E. Reed D.L. (1983), Stockholders and Stakeholders: A New Perspective on Corporate Governance, California Management Review 25(3): 88-106. DOI: 10.2307/41165018.
  115. Freeman R.E., Phillips R., Sisodia R. (2020). Tensions in stakeholder theory. Business & Society, 59(2): 213-231. DOI: 10.1177/0007650318773750.
  116. Freudenreich B., Lüdeke-Freund F., Schaltegger S. (2020). A stakeholder theory perspective on business models: Value creation for sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 166(1): 3-18. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-019-04112-z.
  117. Friedman M. (1970). A theoretical framework for monetary analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 78(2): 193-238. DOI: 10.1086/259623.
  118. Ganson B., He T.L., Henisz, W.J. (2021). Business and Peace: The Impact of Firm-Stakeholder Relational Strategies on Conflict Risk. Academy of Management Review, (ja). DOI: 10.5465/amr.2019.0411.
  119. Gilbert D.U., Rasche A. (2008). Opportunities and problems of standardized ethics initiatives-a stakeholder theory perspective. Journal of business ethics, 82(3), 755-773. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-007-9591-1.
  120. Golinelli G.M., Barile S., Spohrer J., Bassano C. (2010). The evolving dynamics of service co-creation in a viable systems perspective. In: The 13th Toulon-Verona Conference, September (pp. 2-4).
  121. Gu Q., Tang T.L.P., Jiang W. (2015). Does moral leadership enhance employee creativity? Employee identification with leader and leader–member exchange (LMX) in the Chinese context. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(3): 513-529. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-013-1967-9.
  122. Harvey B., Schaefer A. (2001). Managing relationships with environmental stakeholders: A study of UK water and electricity utilities. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(3): 243-260. DOI: 10.1023/A:1006356928957.
  123. Heugens P.P., Kaptein M., Van Oosterhout J. (2008). Contracts to communities: A processual model of organizational virtue. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1): 100-121. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00738.x.
  124. Hemingway C.A., Maclagan P.W. (2004). Managers’ personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of business ethics, 50(1): 33-44. DOI: 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000020964.80208.c9.
  125. Sciarelli S. (2007), Etica e responsabilità sociale nell’impresa, Milano: Giuffrè.
  126. Sciarelli S., Sciarelli M. (2018), Il governo etico d’impresa, Vicenza: Wolters Kluwer.
  127. Hickman E., Petrin M. (2020). Trustworthy AI and Corporate Governance. The EU’s Ethics Guidelines For Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence from a Company Law Perspective. European Business Organization Law Review, 1-33. DOI: 10.1007/s40804-021-00224-0.
  128. Jackson K.V. (2011). Towards a Stakeholder-Shareholder Theory of Corporate Governance: A Comparative Analysis. Hastings Business Law Journal, 7: 309.
  129. Kamal Y. (2021). Stakeholders expectations for CSR-related corporate governance disclosure: evidence from a developing country. Asian Review of Accounting, 29(2): 97-127. DOI: 10.1108/ARA-04-2020-0052.
  130. Knox S., Maklan S. (2004). Corporate social responsibility: Moving beyond investment towards measuring outcomes. European Management Journal, 22(5): 508-516. DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2004.09.009.
  131. Lyon T.P., Maxwell J.W. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and the environment: A theoretical perspective. Review of environmental economics and policy, 2(2): 240-260. DOI: 10.1093/reep/ren004.
  132. Mackey A., Mackey T.B., Barney J.B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Academy of management review, 32(3): 817-835. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2007.25275676.
  133. Mainardes E.W., Alves H., Raposo M. (2011). Stakeholder theory: issues to resolve. Management decision, 49(2): 226-252. DOI: 10.1108/00251741111109133.
  134. McGhee M. (2002). Greeks, Galatians and Western Buddhists: Christianity, Buddhism and ‘Social Responsibility’, Contemporary Buddhism, 3(2): 99-109. DOI: 10.1080/14639940208573760.
  135. Mergel I., Ganapati S., Whitford A.B. (2021). Agile: A new way of governing. Public Administration Review, 81(1): 161-165. DOI: 10.1111/puar.13202.
  136. Michelon G., Parbonetti A. (2012). The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure. Journal of management & governance, 16(3): 477-509. DOI: 10.1007/s10997-010-9160-3.
  137. Miles S. (2017). Stakeholder theory classification: A theoretical and empirical evaluation of definitions. Journal of Business Ethics, 142(3): 437-459. DOI: 0.1007/s10551-015-2741-y.
  138. Mitchell R.K., Agle B.R., Wood D.J. (1997), Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts, Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 853-886. DOI: 10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105.
  139. Pomeranz E.F., Stedman R.C. (2020). Measuring good governance: piloting an instrument for evaluating good governance principles. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(3): 428-440. DOI: 10.1080/1523908X.2020.1753181.
  140. Porter M., Kramer M.R. (2011). Creare valore condiviso. Harvard Business Review Italia, 1(2): 68-84.
  141. Post J.E., Preston L.E., Sauter-Sachs S. (2002). Redefining the corporation: Stakeholder management and organizational wealth. Redwood City, California: Stanford University Press.
  142. Provan K.G., Kenis P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of public administration research and theory, 18(2): 229-252. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mum015.
  143. Ruggiero P., Cupertino S. (2018). CSR strategic approach, financial resources and corporate social performance: The mediating effect of innovation. Sustainability, 10(10): 3611. DOI: 10.3390/su10103611.
  144. Said R., Zainuddin Y.H., Haron H. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility disclosure and corporate governance characteristics in Malaysian public listed companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 5(2): 212-226. DOI: 10.1108/17471110910964496.
  145. Sauser W.I. (2005). Ethics in business: Answering the call. Journal of Business Ethics, 58(4): 345-357. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-004-5715-z.
  146. Sheng J., Zhou W., Zhu B. (2020). The coordination of stakeholder interests in environmental regulation: Lessons from China’s environmental regulation policies from the perspective of the evolutionary game theory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 249: 119385. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119385.
  147. Spiess S.O., Mueller K., Lin-Hi N. (2013). Psychological foundations of corporate social responsibility: The importance of “avoiding bad”. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 6(4): 383-386. DOI: 10.1111/iops.12073.
  148. Steurer R. (2006), Mapping Stakeholder Theory Anew: From the ‘Stakeholder Theory of the Firm’ to Three Perspectives on Business-Society Relations, Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(1): 55-69. DOI: 10.1002/bse.467.
  149. Sundaram A.K., Inkpen A.C. (2004). The corporate objective revisited. Organization science,15(3): 350-363. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0068.
  150. Tibiletti V., Marchini P.L., Furlotti K., Medioli A. (2021). Does corporate governance matter in corporate social responsibility disclosure? Evidence from Italy in the “era of sustainability”. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(2): 896-907. DOI: 10.1002/csr.2097.
  151. Tse T. (2011). Shareholder and stakeholder theory: After the financial crisis. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 3(1): 51-63. DOI: 10.1108/17554171111124612.
  152. Veríssimo J.M., Lacerda T.M. (2015). Does integrity matter for CSR practice in organizations? The mediating role of transformational leadership. Business Ethics: A European Review, 24(1): 34-51. DOI: 10.1111/beer.12065.
  153. Werther Jr W.B., Chandler D. (2010). Strategic corporate social responsibility: Stakeholders in a global environment. New York: Sage Publications.
  154. Wittmer D., O’Brien K. (2014), The Virtue of “Virtue Ethics” in Business and Business Education, Journal of Business Ethics Education, 11: 1-18. DOI: 10.5840/jbee20141113.

  • LEITURA DE IMAGEM INTERDISCIPLINAR NO CONTEXTO DA EDUCAÇÃO AMBIENTAL CRÍTICA POR MEIO DA FOTOGRAFIA Silvio Luiz Rutz da Silva, Daniele Francine Machado, Josie Agatha Parrilha da Silva, in Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental /2024 pp.e09543
    DOI: 10.24857/rgsa.v18n11-141

Cristiano Ciappei, Anna Marrucci, Giacomo Mininni, Marina Gallucci, Political Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility: Enhancing the Role of the Moral dimension in "CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT STUDIES" 2/2021, pp 85-104, DOI: 10.3280/cgrds2-2021oa12558